Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بیت‌گاید

Channel

بیت‌گاید

@SatoshiSchool

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,057subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001372274367
TypeChannel
Username@SatoshiSchool
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/SatoshiSchool

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@SatoshiSchool/3730 · this entry22 Jun 2026, 20:01 UTC@irancoin/13611 Jul 2026, 07:20 UTC1.008 days
@irancoin/13725 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC@SatoshiSchool/3750 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC1.0027 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@irancoin6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0018 hourseven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @SatoshiSchool — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,0576,0916,0746 August 2026 — 6,091 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,091 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,090 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,083 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,075 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,072 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,077 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,074 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,070 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,064 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,067 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,057 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 33 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,052–6,096 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 06:416,057-10
3 Sept 2026, 07:486,067+3
31 Aug 2026, 02:036,064-6
27 Aug 2026, 23:326,070-4
25 Aug 2026, 07:576,074-3
22 Aug 2026, 11:566,077+5
16 Aug 2026, 02:176,072-3
12 Aug 2026, 02:136,075-8
9 Aug 2026, 05:026,083-7
6 Aug 2026, 04:506,090-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:226,091no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:506,091first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 04s
Average length
1m 32s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

655 reactions across 24 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍29945.6%
16024.4%
💔263.97%
👎223.36%
😭223.36%
😱162.44%
🤣162.44%
🥱152.29%
😎131.98%
🤨131.98%
👌121.83%
🍌71.07%
💩50.763%
40.611%
🌚40.611%
🙏40.611%
🔥30.458%
😁30.458%
🤡30.458%
🤪30.458%
4 further kinds50.763%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 693 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC549 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بات @lnp2pbot طبق اعلامیه‌ای که چندی پیش منتشر کردند فعالیتش تا اطلاع ثانوی متوقف شد.

💔9👍32

Signed Mo Tahmasbi

9 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC≈1,080 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

چقدر شوکه کننده و غیر قابل انتظار. حدود ۹۹.۸۵٪ از هش‌پاور بیت‌کوین با بیت‌کوین موند. شاخه BIP-110 فقط دو بلاک استخراج کرده و الان بیش از ۸۰ بلاک عقبه.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ و پرونده‌ش عملا بسته شده.

17😱4🔥3👌2

Signed Snz

8 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC≈1,350 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

دوستان من اشتباه میکردم. اگر چین اسپلیت شد و سکه‌ی لوک-کوین واستون ایردراپ شد به هیچ عنوان به کسی نفروشیدش چون همون تراکنش رو شبکه اصلی هم معتبره و میتونه روی شبکه اصلی منتشر کنه و بیتکوین شما رو بگیره. در مورد replay attack تحقیق کنید. متاسفانه ازین BIP-110 آبی واسمون گرم نمیشه.

👍159

Signed Snz

8 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC≈1,170 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @GerdeAtash

بیپ-١١٠ موجب اسپلیت چین شد. بیپ-١١٠ بیپ پیشنهادی لوک برای سافت‌فورک و اعمال محدودیت روی قابلیت‌های کنونی گنجاندن داده در زنجیره‌ی بیت‌کوین بود. این ویدئو لحظه‌ایه که بیت‌کوین مکانیک و چند تا از افراد سرشناس حامی بیت‌-١١٠ فورک شدن دو زنجیره رو به صورت زنده می‌بینن. نکته‌ی اخلاقی: این که تصور کنیم سافت‌فورک خوبه و هارد فورک بد تصور اشتباهیه. یه سافت‌فورک هم در صورت نداشتن پشتیبانی موجب چین اسپلیت (دو شاخه شدن زنجیره

8👌1

Signed Mo Tahmasbi

7 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,450 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

یکی از باگ های مهمی که تو این کمپین پیدا شده مربوط به BTC Pay Server هستش که خود پروژه هم تاییدش کرده و میگه که همین الان داره ازین آسیب پذیری امنیتی سو استفاده میشه. اگه از این سرویس استفاده میکنین توصیه شده همین الان یا آپدیت کنید یا سرور رو خاموش کنید.

13👍1

Signed Snz

6 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,140 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ویدیوی توضیحی از موسسه Bitcoin Policy که به زبان ساده توضیح میده چرا کلمات ریکاوری ساخته شده با کیف پولهای سخت افزاری Coldcard اینقدر ضعیف بودن که منجر به دزدیده شدن بیت کوینهای داخل اونها شدن و چرا امکان تولید اعداد تصادفی واقعی اینقدر برای امنیت مهم و حیاتی هست. 🔎 bitcoinpolicy 📍 @TechTube

14

Signed Mo Tahmasbi

5 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC≈1,360 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @GerdeAtashPhoto

این سید ساینر ساده که روی یه کامپیوتر چندمنظوره (رزبری‌پای) ساخته شده، طی همه‌ی این سال‌هایی که nvk مشغول خریدن دامنه برای مسخره کردنش بوده، صد هیچ از کلد کارد جلو بوده! زمانی کلاً دیگه تحمل شنیدن صدای nvk رو از دست دادم که فهمیدم یه مشت دامنه‌ی seedsigner خریده بود و وقتی کاربر بازش می‌کرد، به یه صفحه‌ای هدایت می‌شد که سیدساینر رو مسخره کرده بود و به مردم نسبت به ساختن کامپیوتر air-gapped برای نگهداری بیت‌کوین هشدا

172

Signed Mo Tahmasbi

4 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC≈1,590 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

از زیبایی‌های این فضا:‌حالا که هوش مصنوعی داره باگ‌های خطرناکی پیدا میکنه چندین دولوپر با تجربه جمع شدن و با کمک مالی موسسات مختلف دارن هر پروژه اپن سورس بیتکوینی که میتونن رو بررسی امنیتی میکنن. فعلا که میگن کلی باگ پیدا شده تا اینجا. https://x.com/callebtc/status/2084561246305542617?s=20

12😭4👍1

Signed Snz

3 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,540 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @GerdeAtash

رودلفو (NVK) کلدکارد رو از روی کدِ متن‌باز Trezor ساخته بود. شرکت Foundation کد کلدکارد رو برای ساخت کیف پول سخت‌افزاری Passport فورک کرد. (این کار توی فضای متن‌باز کاملاً قانونی و عادیه.) رودلفو زورش گرفت و پروانه‌ی کلدکارد رو طوری عوض کرد که رقبا دیگه نتونن از کدش استفاده کنن. اما چون نمی‌تونست پروانه‌ی کد GPLی رو که از ترزور گرفته بود عوض کنه، مجبور بود اون کد رو حذف کنه و به جاش کد جدید بنویسه. توی همین فرآی

15👍5🙏3

Signed Mo Tahmasbi

3 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC≈1,690 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

جمعا برآوردها نشون میده ۱۰۰ میلیون دلار سرقت شد و دیگه سرقت‌ها خیلی کم تعداد شدن.

💔175😭1

Signed Snz

2 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC≈1,840 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

شانس آوردید کلد کارد گرونفروش بود و کریپتوهای دیگه رو ساپورت نمیکرد واسه همین ایران زیاد وارد نمیشد.

👍18🤣16🤪3😁2

Signed Snz

2 Aug 2026, 02:14 UTC≈2,210 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

اینکه چند وقته غر میزنم کارای مهمتری داریم که ول کردیم و چسبیدیم به اسپم یکیش همین موضوع ساده کردن و امن‌ کردن حضانت بیتکوین بود. ایده‌ای که میگه بیتکوین رو دیگه نباید آپگرید کرد بر این اساس استواره که همه چیز الان درست کار میکنه و اشخاص عادی میان سه تا والت سخت افزاری میخرند و بعد با تاس سید فریز درست میکنن و در سه جای مختلف ذخیره اش میکنن. اگه یکم با ادمای عادی صحبت کنن متوجه میشن که در توهم هستند و هرگز با این حجم

👍316👌2🥱1

Signed Snz

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @SatoshiSchool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

RadioDeev
@radiodeev · 55,873
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
آموزه های مالی رضا گلشاهیان
@rzgtrader · 72,529
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
Alireza.S
@cryptobyalireza · 37,302
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
Bplus
@podcastbplus · 97,257
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
ديدگاه بنيادى در بازارهاى مالى
@fundamental_View · 29,218
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Bitpin Academy | آکادمی بیت‌پین
@Bitpin_Academy · 37,500
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
⚜Xanastrology⚜
@xanastrology · 45,244
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
محمد حسین ادیب
@adibmh · 69,295
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
سفیران تپسی - TAPSI
@tapsi_safiran · 38,952
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 31 August 2026
اکوایران
@ecoiran_webtv · 66,063
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
فراچارت
@farachart · 43,031
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
TechTube 𝕏 تک توب
@TechTube · 75,666
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
Daraei360 تحلیل اقتصاد
@doctordaraei · 35,944
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
HOLDERS|اخبارفوری ارزدیجیتال
@Holders_News · 27,262
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
Battle Trading
@battle_trading · 71,451
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
تترلند | Tether Land
@TetherLand · 72,326
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
|قدرِ مطلق| (اقتصاد کلان)
@ghadremotlagh · 82,356
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
شاگرد بازار
@omidi_marketstudent · 31,855
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
تدریس رایگان کیفری - احمد غفوری
@keyfarighafoori · 38,837
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
گنگ خواب دیده
@mortezaebad · 50,655
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
سیامک قاسمی
@siamak_ghassemi · 99,556
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
UtoFX | مرجع فاندامنتال فارکس و انس طلا
@UtoFx · 49,840
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Wallex | صفحه رسمی والکس
@wallexchange · 137,117
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
کانال فرمانده کریپتو
@crypto0commander · 31,111
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 61 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بیت‌گاید” (@SatoshiSchool), 6,057 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SatoshiSchool.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.