Channel
@rzgtrader
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
72,410subscribers
-862 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001001925855 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rzgtrader |
| Description | Financial advisor - Canadian securities institute هشدار ریسک: بازارهای مالی دارای ریسک هستند مطالب اینکانال پیشنهاد سرمایه گذاری نیست ادمین مسئولیتی در قبال استفاده از مطالب برای سرمایه گذاری ندارد. www.youtube.com/rzgtrader www.instagram.com/rzgtrader |
| Created | 24 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rzgtrader |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 72,410 | -65 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 72,475 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 72,478 | -31 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 72,509 | -20 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 72,529 | -29 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 72,558 | -105 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 72,663 | -63 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 72,726 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:52 | 72,746 | -16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 72,762 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 72,778 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:39 | 72,789 | +6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 72,783 | -20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 72,803 | -22 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 72,825 | -43 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 72,868 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 72,877 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 72,882 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 72,893 | -23 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 72,916 | first reading |
61 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 61 (15 July 2026 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 602,430 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Sept 2026, 00:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
✍️ گزارش هفتگی بازارهای جهانی | ۲۳ تا ۲۷ شهریور ۱۴۰۵ 📌 این هفته یکی از آن هفتههایی بود که همهچیز به نفت گره خورده بود. 🟠 اول هفته با نگرانی از خط لوله عربستان و مسیر دریای سرخ، وست تگزاس تا حوالی ۱۰۷ دلار بالا رفت. بازار خیلی سریع حساب کرد که نفت گران یعنی تورم چسبنده، و تورم چسبنده یعنی فدرالرزرو دستبسته نیست. 🟠 چهارشنبه تاثیرش معلوم شد: فدرالرزرو برای نخستین بار در سه سال نرخ بهره را ربعدرصد بالا برد و دا…
✍️ میدونید تفاوت ترید با شغلهای دیگه چیه؟ جدای از صدها تفاوت بسیار زیاد از نظر ساختار یک نکته بسیار مهمی داره که سالها خیلی از ما تجربه کردیم. تریدر پولش رو ریسک میکنه تا آزادیش رو حفظ کنه در اکثر شغلهای دیگه آزادیت رو قربانی میکنی و دیگه زمان و مکانت مال خودت نیست. ۲۰ ساله هر جای دنیا و هر زمان دوست داشته باشم میرم بدون اینکه به کسی پاسخگو باشم. بجز این چند سالی که کامبت رو شروع کردم و مشغله ام چند برابر شده ول…
موزیک تایم @rzgtrader
پرده ۱۶ «بازیای که نفهمیدم» 📌 در روایت پیشین گفتم: قانونها رو عوض کردیم، برای کمک به پراپی رفتیم سراغ مدیرش، نتیجهای نداد و کارمون رو ادامه دادیم. همون روزها بچههای تیم خبر آوردن که توی گروه پراپچک دوباره افتادن به جون کامبت. این بار خود ادمینهای اصلی. نشستم و نوشتهها رو یکییکی خوندم و ویسها رو گوش دادم. 🔻 ادمین اصلی گروه نوشته بود گلشاهیان «اصلاً بازی پراپفرم رو درست متوجه نشده» و هر از چند گاهی کارهای…
پرده ۱۶ بازی که نفهمیدم #روایت_کامبت #پراپ_تریدینگ 👇
📌 گزارش هفتگی بازارهای جهانی | ۲۲ شهریور ۱۴۰۵ ✍️ هفتهای که گذشت، دوباره نفت فرمان بازار را در دست گرفت. 🟠 آنچه این هفته روی چارت دیدیم: داوجونز با ۱٫۶٪ افت روی ۵۲٬۵۷۳، اساندپی با ۰٫۸٪ افت روی ۷٬۶۵۷ و نزدک صد با حدود ۰٫۷٪ افت نزدیک ۲۹٬۳۷۰ هفته را بستند. جمعه یک رالی تسکینی داشتیم، ولی جمع هفته منفی بود. ❓ دلیل اصلی از فاندامنتال و از خلیج فارس شروع میشه. سهشنبه حوثیها با موج گستردهای از پهپاد و موشک تأسیسات…
Photo, posted without a caption
موسیقی زیبا برای تمرکز کار ترید و ورزش تقدیم به دوستداران موسیقی و تمرکز و دنیای درون @rzgtrader
✍️ پرده ۱۵ کاش اشتباه کرده بودم 📌 بعد از اجرای قوانین جدید، تصمیم گرفتم داده هایی که به دست آورده بودیم رو با یک رقیب در میان بذارم. یک شرکت. فقط یکی. ❓اما چرا اون یکی؟ برای اینکه جوابش رو بدم، باید از یک عدد شروع کنم. 🟠 اون روزها تو گروه ها، یکی از معیارهای اصلی اعتبار یک شرکت شده بود عدد سود پرداختی. هر کی عدد بزرگ تری اعلام می کرد، معتبرتر به نظر می رسید. و مشکل اینجا بود که هیچ مرجعی برای راستی آزمایی این …
✍️ پرده ۱۵ کاش اشتباه کرده بودم 👇 #روایت_کامبت #پراپ_تریدینگ
📊 چرا سهام تکون نخورد ولی نفت ده درصد رشد کرد؟ 🟠 جمعبندی هفتهی ۹ تا ۱۳ شهریور ۱۴۰۵ 🟠 اگر فقط به تابلوی شاخصها نگاه کنید، این هفته انگار هیچ اتفاقی نیفتاده. نزدک حدود سهدهم درصد رشد کرد، اساندپی ۵۰۰ یکدهم درصد، داوجونز هم سهدهم درصد افت. کرد یعنی عملا بیحرکت. ولی زیر همین سطح آروم، دو نیروی بزرگ داشتن بازار رو از دو طرف میکشیدن. 🔎 نیروی اول: نفت. وست تگزاس این هفته نزدیک ده درصد بالا رفت و رسید به حدود ۹۱…
✍️ پرده ۱۴ تصمیم سخت میلیونها دلاری 📌 اوایل ۲۰۲۴، یک مدل آماری روی میز ما یک جمله گفت که خواب رو از چشمم گرفت: احتمال ورشکستگی شرکتهای پراپ در ایران ۹۰ درصد هست. اون موقع، هیچکس ورشکست نشده بود. پراپی بود تأمین سرمایه بود، خیلی ها هم که بعدا اسکم شدن هنوز وارد بازار نشده بودن، این تحلیل زمانی به دستم رسید که چند ماهی بود شروع کرده بودیم امروز، دو و نیم سال بعد، اکثر اون شرکتهایی که بودن یا بعدا اومدن دیگ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @rzgtrader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@rzgtrader edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزه های مالی رضا گلشاهیان” (@rzgtrader), 72,410 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rzgtrader.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.