Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mr_Analyzzer

Channel

Mr_Analyzzer

@MR_Analyzerr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,652subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001675412680
TypeChannel
Username@MR_Analyzerr
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MR_Analyzerr

Growth

1,6361,6521,64419 August 2026 — 1,636 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,638 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,637 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,645 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,652 subscribers19 August 20264 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,634–1,654 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 10:571,652+7
29 Aug 2026, 11:591,645+8
26 Aug 2026, 21:281,637-1
20 Aug 2026, 12:351,638+2
19 Aug 2026, 23:151,636first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

162 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7445.7%
😁4225.9%
😱159.26%
👏148.64%
👍95.56%
🔥31.85%
🤩21.23%
🤬21.23%
👎10.617%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC572 views3 reactionsread 19 August 2026

مثلا چند ثانیه تاخیر میتونه رو ورود یک دقیقه تاثیر داشته باشه ولی برای ۱۵ دقیقه واقعا مهم نیست.

3

3 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC562 views3 reactionsread 19 August 2026

این نتایج اسلیپیج‌های غیرعادی را محاسبه نکرده است؛ این موارد لحظه‌ای رخ می‌دهند و قابل پیش‌بینی نیستند. تاخیر در اجرای معاملات نیز وجود دارد که در بازه یک دقیقه‌ای بسیار مؤثر است ⏱️، اما بازه ۱۵ دقیقه‌ای اهمیتی ندارد 📉.

3

3 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC566 views9 reactionsread 19 August 2026

بالاخره بعد حدود ۲ ماه بک تست تموم شد حالا باید برم سراغ لایو با این AI AGENT . ابتدا دمو

9

3 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC566 views17 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

نتیجه نهایی برای ستاپ با حدود ۹۵۰۰۰ ترید.

12👏5

3 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC530 views6 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😁6

3 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC516 views5 reactionsread 19 August 2026
File

نتیجه. حالا بریم سراغ دیتای طلا.

5

3 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC534 views8 reactionsread 19 August 2026
File

وضعیت ((: تایم یک دقیقه دائوجونز از ۲۰۱۷

5👎1🔥1😁1

2 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC582 views13 reactionsread 19 August 2026

وقتی بهینه ترش کنم حساب دمو میسازم اونجا میزارمش ترید هاش رو ببینید.

11👍2

2 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC585 views17 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

تحلیل وضعیت وین (Win) 🎲 📊 و دراودان (Drawdown) 📉 پس از یک ماه فعالیت بر روی کد ستاپ شخصی، بر اساس داده‌های ۲۷ ساله طلا و ۱۴ ساله یورو به شرح زیر است: 📈 وین ریت یورو: ۷۶ تا ۷۹.۵ درصد 📈 وین ریت طلا: ۷۱ تا ۷۴.۵ درصد با در نظر گرفتن ضریب خطای ۱/۲ درصد، این آمار بر اساس ۱۶۰۰۰ ترید محاسبه شده است. میزان دراودان نیز بر اساس درصد ریسک، در بازه ۲.۵ تا ۷ درصد قرار دارد. 📉💰

12👏5

23 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC≈1,020 views4 reactionsread 19 August 2026

اگر نفت سقفشو بزنه این تحلیل کنسل هست.

👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @MR_Analyzerr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

⚜Xanastrology⚜
@xanastrology · 45,211
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
آموزه های مالی رضا گلشاهیان
@rzgtrader · 72,558
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
DJ AMB
@djambmusic2 · 67,524
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mr_Analyzzer” (@MR_Analyzerr), 1,652 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MR_Analyzerr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.