28 measurements spanning 31 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,187–25,340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 20:58
25,322
+11
3 Sept 2026, 22:16
25,311
+23
2 Sept 2026, 14:23
25,288
+1
1 Sept 2026, 16:35
25,287
-2
31 Aug 2026, 15:25
25,289
+23
30 Aug 2026, 15:08
25,266
+16
29 Aug 2026, 17:25
25,250
+27
28 Aug 2026, 14:12
25,223
+13
27 Aug 2026, 11:54
25,210
-10
26 Aug 2026, 09:57
25,220
+4
25 Aug 2026, 08:25
25,216
+11
24 Aug 2026, 06:44
25,205
-8
22 Aug 2026, 16:44
25,213
-22
21 Aug 2026, 09:14
25,235
+6
20 Aug 2026, 12:06
25,229
-1
19 Aug 2026, 11:12
25,230
-8
18 Aug 2026, 11:06
25,238
-6
17 Aug 2026, 10:55
25,244
-15
15 Aug 2026, 19:56
25,259
-14
14 Aug 2026, 08:37
25,273
first reading
Engagement
76 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.1%
avg views ÷ 25,322 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,850
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.499%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 76 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
76 (25 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
316,140
Reactions total
1,579
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 57m
Average length
2m 16s
Measured directly from 52 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,459 reactions across 74 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,033
42.0%
👍
1,022
41.6%
👎
404
16.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,472 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 75 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @choraz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 76 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔸 چرا امکان معامله سهمیه بنزین را نداریم؟
🔹 از مفاهیم اولیه اقتصاد است که فراهم کردن امکان مبادله، رفاه را افزایش میدهد. مثلا اگر کسی سهمیه بنزین اضافه دارد و فرد دیگری سهمیه کم دارد، یکی از فروش سهمیهاش درآمد کسب میکند و دیگری بنزین موردنیازش را با قیمت پایینتری به دست میآورد؛ معامله ای که برای هر دو طرف منفعت دارد.
اما چگونه تفکر دولتی با کارت حقوق مکتبسه، مانع ایجاد امکان مبادله سهمیه بنزین میشود؟
مهمان گ…
🔸 آیا کسری نفت تنگه هرمز جبران شده است؟
🔹 پیش از جنگ، روزانه حدود ۱۹ میلیون بشکه نفت از تنگه هرمز عبور میکرد. با اختلال در این مسیر، سؤال اصلی این است که بازار جهانی تا چه اندازه توانسته این کسری را از مسیرهای جایگزین جبران کند؟
حدود ۶ میلیون بشکه از طریق خطوط لوله عربستان و امارات منتقل میشود، چین حدود ۵ میلیون بشکه از تقاضای نفت خود کاهش داده، نزدیک به ۲ میلیون بشکه در روز از ذخایر استراتژیک آزاد میشود و حدود …
🔸 بحران انرژی چگونه صنعت فولاد را زمینگیر کرده؟
🔹 درست است که فولاد مبارکه در جنگ با بمباران دشمن آسیب دید، اما ناترازی انرژی از مدتها قبل این صنعت را وارد یک فرسایش جدی کرده بود؛ بهطوریکه فقط در چهار سال گذشته، بیش از ۱۴ میلیارد دلار از ارزش تولید فولاد ایران بهدلیل ناترازی انرژی دود شد.
چطور با وجود ساخت نیروگاه توسط خود شرکت، قطعی برق و گاز همچنان تولید فولاد را تهدید میکند؟
مستند "لبه خاموشی" را در کانال…
🔸 وقتی هزینه بهره آمریکا به بودجه دفاعی نزدیک میشود
🔹 افزایش بدهی دولت آمریکا باعث شده هزینه پرداخت بهره بدهی به یکی از بزرگترین هزینههای دولت تبدیل شود؛ تا جایی که با بودجه دفاعی این کشور رقابت میکند.
این موضوع در بحث افول قدرتهای بزرگ اهمیت دارد، چون بخشی از منابع دولت به جای سرمایهگذاری در فناوری، زیرساخت و قدرت نظامی، صرف پرداخت بدهیهای گذشته میشود.
همزمان، چین با سرعت در حال افزایش بودجه دفاعی خود و …
🔸 چرا با این همه گاز، باز هم ناترازی داریم؟
🔹 ایران بعد از آمریکا و روسیه، سومین تولیدکننده گاز جهان و چهارمین مصرفکننده گاز دنیاست؛ اما نه سومین جمعیت جهان را دارد و نه سومین اقتصاد صنعتی دنیا را.
مسئله فقط مقدار مصرف نیست؛ شدت انرژی نشان میدهد ما برای تولید هر واحد کالا و خدمات، ۵ برابر بیشتر از میانگین جهان انرژی مصرف میکنیم.
این همه انرژی دقیقا کجا میرود؟
مستند "لبه خاموشی" را در کانال یوتوب چراز ببینید.
@…
🔸 بنزین، تورم و ناترازی؛ ایران چه راهی پیشرو دارد؟
🔹 آیا واقعا بنزین در ایران ارزان است یا هزینهاش را جای دیگری میپردازیم؟
مسئله ناترازی بنزین از داغترین چالشهای امروز ایران است. اما چرا با وجود سالها بحث کارشناسی، دولتها تصمیمی برای حل آن نگرفتهاند؟
در این پنل تحلیلی که در ادامه اکران مستند «لبه خاموشی» برگزار شد، به بررسی ریشه ناترازی، چالشهای تصمیمگیری دولت و نقد راهحلهای پیشنهادی موجود پرداختهایم.…
🔸 ری دالیو درباره افول آمریکا و حباب هوش مصنوعی چه میگوید؟
🔹 ری دالیو، بنیانگذار بریجواتر، معتقد است آمریکا با چالشهایی مثل افزایش بدهی دولت، کسری بودجه، شکافهای اجتماعی و رقابت با قدرتهای بزرگ روبهرو است؛ عواملی که میتوانند در بلندمدت جایگاه آمریکا در اقتصاد جهانی را تحت تأثیر قرار دهند.
او همچنین درباره رشد شدید سهام مرتبط با هوش مصنوعی هشدار داده و معتقد است بخشی از بازار ممکن است با انتظارات بسیار بالا …
🔸 تفاوت نرخ اوراق و بازده اوراق قرضه چیست؟
🔹 در بازار بدهی، دو مفهوم مهم وجود دارد: نرخ اسمی اوراق و بازده اوراق.
نرخ اسمی، سودی است که در زمان انتشار اوراق مشخص میشود؛ اما بازده اوراق، بازدهی واقعی سرمایهگذار براساس قیمت خرید اوراق در بازار است.
وقتی تقاضا برای خرید اوراق افزایش پیدا میکند، قیمت اوراق بالا میرود و چون سود پرداختی ثابت است، بازده اوراق کاهش پیدا میکند. در مقابل، کاهش تقاضا باعث افت قیمت اوراق…
مستند «لبه خاموشی» رو دیدم و واقعاً حیفم اومد دربارهش چیزی نگم.
ساختن چنین مستندی در ایران، اون هم درباره مسئله پیچیده و مهمی مثل بحران انرژی، فقط به دوربین و تدوین خوب احتیاج نداره؛ ماهها تحقیق، گفتوگو با آدمهای متخصص، کنار هم گذاشتن روایتهای مختلف و مهمتر از همه، مقدار زیادی دلسوزی و سماجت میخواد.
نتیجه، مستندی شده که فقط نمیگه «برق و گاز کم داریم»؛ کمک میکنه بفهمیم چطور کشوری با این حجم از منابع، به چنی…
🔸 ذخایر استراتژیک نفت آمریکا چقدر حاشیه امن دارد؟
🔹 ذخایر استراتژیک نفت آمریکا در حال حاضر حدود ۲۸۹ میلیون بشکه است. اهمیت این عدد زمانی مشخص میشود که آن را با سطوح مختلف ریسک مقایسه کنیم.
در چارچوبی که بررسی کردیم، محدوده ۲۵۰ میلیون بشکه سطح بحران، ۱۸۰ میلیون بشکه سطح اضطرار و حدود ۷۰ میلیون بشکه کف عملیاتی ذخایر در نظر گرفته میشود.
یعنی آمریکا هنوز بالاتر از سطوح بحرانی قرار دارد، اما نسبت به دورههایی که ذخای…
🎬 «لبه خاموشی» روایتی تکاندهنده از بحران انرژی و آینده ایران است؛ تلاشی برای کنار هم گذاشتن قطعات پازلی که توضیح میدهد چطور به وضعیت امروز رسیدیم و ادامه این مسیر ما را به کجا میرساند.
🎥 تماشای رایگان مستند «لبه خاموشی» در یوتیوب:
https://youtu.be/3BXCkvJrRVM
🎟 در صورت تمایل و رضایت از این اثر، میتوانید با خرید «بلیت اختیاری» از طریق نشانی زیر، از تداوم مستندسازی مستقل حمایت کنید:
revayatmostaghel.ir
@chorazme
🔸 توافق مکه؛ شکلگیری یک مثلث قدرت جدید در منطقه؟
🔹 یکی از مهمترین تحولات پس از جنگ ایران و آمریکا، تلاش برخی کشورهای منطقه برای بازتعریف موازنه قدرت در خاورمیانه است. «توافق مکه» را میتوان در همین چارچوب دید؛ نزدیکشدن سه ظرفیت متفاوت: قدرت مالی عربستان سعودی، توان تکنولوژیک و صنعتی ترکیه و بازدارندگی هستهای پاکستان.
این همکاری را میتوان نوعی بهرهبرداری راهبردی از ناامنی ایجادشده در منطقه دانست. جنگ ایران و آ…
👍11👎6❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @choraz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@choraz edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@choraz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@chorazinvestadmin named in 86 posts, 8 August 2026 – 4 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
موزیک آهنگ بی کلام لایت بیکلام @bi_lp · 47,474 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“چُراز” (@choraz), 25,322 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/choraz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.