برق هم بره، خیالت از قرابت معنایی کنکور جمع باشه! 😂⚡️💡 حتی وسط ضبط ویدیو و قطعی برق، حرف استاد امیر نجاتشجاعی کاملاً واضحه: هیچ کتابی در بازار معادل کتاب آنلاین قرابت معنایی «مُنیاز» نیست! 👇 مشاهده نمونههای رایگان و تهیه کتاب آنلاین قرابت معنایی: 🔗 ورود به کتاب آنلاین قرابت معنایی استاد نجاتشجاعی @MONIAZ سوالی داشتی هستیم : 💬 @moniaz_admin

Channel
مُنیاز | Moniaz
@moniaz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,051subscribers
-65 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001252165279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moniaz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moniaz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 9,051 | -19 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 9,070 | -22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 9,092 | -25 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 9,117 | -41 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 9,158 | -156 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 9,314 | +91 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 9,223 | +75 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 9,148 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 9,139 | +22 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:10 | 9,117 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 9,116 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 9,116 | first reading |
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 50.4%
- avg views ÷ 9,051 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,570
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (14 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 63,916 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 52m 48s
- Average length
- 2m 07s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
اگر میخوای وسطش جا نزنی هر کاری رو باید اصولی شروع کنی! شروع تستزنی زیستشناسی قلق داره؛ اگه اول راه بری سراغ تستهای سنگین و ترکیبی، فقط سردرگم و ناامید میشی. با «گام اول زیستشناسی مُنیاز» دستت رو میگیریم و مرحلهبهمرحله کنارتیم تا مطمئن بشیم پایهات برای این مسیر پر پیچوخم بتنی شده! 🎯 🔒 خبر خوب: امسال به هیچ کتاب تست دیگهای توی درس زیستشناسی نیاز نداری؛ چون با یک پکیج از کتابهای آنلاین زیست شناسی، همه جور…
توصیه و تجربه سه تا از دانشجویان پزشکی کنکور ١۴٠۴ در مورد منبع تستی درس زیست شناسی! 🧬📚 @MONIAZ
امسال با مُنیاز نگران درس ریاضی و آمارتون نباشید. با کتابهای تست و تشریحی مُنیاز؛ به هیچ کتاب دیگه ای نیاز نخواهید داشت. برای مشاهده و دریافت نمونه رایگان روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید : ریاضی انسانی مُنیاز @MONIAZ 💬 پشتیبانی: @moniaz_admin
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
🧪امسال چطوری باید شیمی بخونیم؟ چه کتابی بخریم؟ ویدئو معرفی پکیج کتاب های آنلاین شیمی مُنیاز در پکیج کتابهای آنلاین شیمی مُنیاز چه خبره؟ 🔹 با من بخوان شیمی: تحلیل خطبهخط کتاب درسی شیمی دهم، یازدهم و دوازدهم همراه با امید مصلایی 🔹 گام اول شیمی: شروع پرقدرت حل تست با تستهای پایه و مفهومی 🔹 کتاب تست شیمی: بانک تست جامع با تحلیل ۱۰۰٪ ویدیویی 🔹 گام آخر شیمی: تحلیل کامل تمامی تستهای کنکور تجربی و ریاضی از سال ۹۸ …
🌍📄 تحلیل ویدیویی کنکور خارج از کشور آمادهست! 🎥✨ امروز میریم سراغ سؤالهای کنکور خارج از کشور و با تحلیل استاد، ریزترین نکتهها و ایدههای طراح رو بررسی میکنیم. 🔍 🌱 فقط جواب سؤالها مهم نیست؛ ببینین طراح چطور فکر کرده و چطور باید به سؤالها نگاه کرد. 📚 🎬 فایل و تحلیل ویدیویی رو از اینجا ببینین👇 ⚡️[تحلیل کنکور خارج ۱۴۰۴] ⚡️ ✨ @fizik_channel1
۱۵ تا تست اقتصاد کنکور توی همه کتابهای کمک آموزشی بازار هست! 🤔 پس چرا درصد بچهها توی کنکور انقدر پایینه؟ مشکل جای دیگه است...! 🧐 مشاهده کتاب تست آنلاین اقتصاد مُنیاز 📘 استاد فیروز کریمی 👨🏫: کلیک کنید @MONIAZ 💬
به یه نیشابوری میگن با «منیاز» جمله بساز. میگه: مونیازم تو رو هر روز دیدنه! 🙃 فرق کتابهای آنلاین «مُنیاز» با بقیه کتابها اینه که زنده هستند و زندگی در اونها جاریه! 🌱 با شما همراه هستند و از طریق اونها دبیرها کمکتون میکنن در مسیر کنکور تنها نباشید. مهمترین ویژگی اونها آپدیت روزانه و هفتگی منطبق با سرفصل آزمونهای آزمایشی است. یعنی اولین کتابهایی هستند که با سبک کنکور بهروز میشن. امسال با حضور استاد بدیع دیگه ن…
هندسه رو غول نکن! 😈📐 بچهها، هندسه درس سختی نیست، اگه راهشو یاد بگیری. 🛑🚫 خیلیا فکر میکنن برای حل کردن یه تست، باید همه فرمولها رو حفظ باشن؛ ولی این کار فقط شما رو گیج میکنه. مثل یه مکانیک حرفهای، باید یاد بگیری برای هر پیچی، چه آچاری استفاده کنی. 🔧👨🔧 توی کتاب تست آنلاین هندسه مُنیاز، ما دقیقا همین راهو بهت یاد میدیم: چطور آچار مناسب رو برای هر مسئله پیدا کنی و مرحله به مرحله بری جلو. میخوای با تخفیف ویژه، …
🧬 آموزش بیمحدودیت، ۲۴ ساعته همراه تو! ارزشی که ما در مُنیاز برای آموزش میبینیم اینه که هیچ محدودیتی برای آموزش نباید وجود داشته باشه. مهم نیست کجایی، مهم اینه که با کتابهای آنلاین مُنیاز، قویترین منبع تستی و تشریحی کنکور و نهایی همیشه در دسترس شماست. 🎯 وقتش رسیده هوشمندانهتر درس بخونی و استرس رو بذاری کنار! 👇 برای دریافت لینک کتابها و نمونههای رایگان: همین جا کلیک کنید. @MONIAZ
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @moniaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@vaezimohammad · 5,85616 postsزیست برگر|استاد امید غلامی
@zistshenasi_gholami · 38,9537 postsBahraminasab Arabi
@bahraminasabarabi · 2073 postsوحید اسماعیلی | شیمی کنکور
@chemmind · 6673 postsعربی نهایی و کنکور دکتر مهران ترکمان
@araabiensani · 4,3161 postدين وزندگي دوازدهم/ محسنی كبیر
@mmk110 · 24,6841 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@bioHamedani · 31,384
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
@riazikarami1404 · 43,963
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
@English_MiladGhoreishi · 32,233
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
@mahdiazizi_math · 56,869
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
@alaa_sanatisharif · 47,207
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
@bioammarlou · 32,126
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
@alighayoomi_teacher · 97,498
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
@math_ehsan_ghiassi · 34,568
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مُنیاز | Moniaz” (@moniaz), 9,051 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moniaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.