Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tahlilak

Channel

Tahlilak

@tahlilak

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,282subscribers

+460 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001048751169
TypeChannel
Username@tahlilak
Created6 March 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tahlilak

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

7,040 average views per post against 13,282 subscribers — an engagement rate of 53.0%. Across the 6,303 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.86% and 13.4%, with a median of 6.66%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (24 August 2026 23 September 2026)
Posts measured28 of 28 published in the window (0 exact, 28 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled197,240
Mature posts only54.0% over 26 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,282 measured 19 September 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 6,303 channels · p10 1.19% · p25 2.86% · p50 6.66% · p75 13.4% · p90 22.2%
Position in cohort99.175th percentile · 8.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.218% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 96.2% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,81613,28713,051.55 August 2026 — 12,822 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,822 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,820 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,816 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,918 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,931 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,929 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,922 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,917 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,913 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,995 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,103 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,108 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,124 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,142 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,148 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,150 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,157 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,159 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,154 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,163 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,161 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,175 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,190 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,195 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,261 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,281 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,287 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,278 subscribers9 September 2026 — 13,274 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,267 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,260 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,261 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,278 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,282 subscribers13,2825 August 202619 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 45 days, net +460. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,745–13,358 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:0113,282+4
17 Sept 2026, 04:2013,278+17
15 Sept 2026, 06:3913,261+1
13 Sept 2026, 15:5513,260-7
11 Sept 2026, 20:1513,267-7
9 Sept 2026, 09:1613,274-4
6 Sept 2026, 01:3613,278-9
3 Sept 2026, 20:5513,287+6
2 Sept 2026, 09:2313,281+20
1 Sept 2026, 11:5413,261+66
31 Aug 2026, 14:1213,195+5
30 Aug 2026, 17:3413,190+15
29 Aug 2026, 16:5813,175+14
28 Aug 2026, 14:0413,161-2
27 Aug 2026, 12:1413,163+9
26 Aug 2026, 12:2513,154-5
25 Aug 2026, 13:5613,159+2
24 Aug 2026, 16:5813,157+7
22 Aug 2026, 23:5813,150+2
21 Aug 2026, 15:4613,148first reading

Engagement

95 posts held, back to 12 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.0%
avg views ÷ 13,282 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,040
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 95 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held95 (12 February 20262 September 2026)
Views total197,240
Reactions total4,752
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 44s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16,431 reactions across 93 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12,37075.3%
👎3,41720.8%
👏6443.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,431 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 09:56 UTC≈6,350 views218 reactionsread 2 September 2026

سلام جنگ در حال عادی شدن است. همانطور که آلودگی هوا و بی‌برقی و تورم شد. @tahlilak

👍182👎36

2 Sept 2026, 07:15 UTC≈4,250 views126 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

اعلام وضعیت بازار @tahlilak

👍115👎11

1 Sept 2026, 07:38 UTC≈5,520 views303 reactionsread 2 September 2026

سلام هی من میگم الان مثل سال ۹۹ هست،شما باور نمی‌کنی! اون سال هم هسته همش خراب بود ،جوری که معاملات نمادهای پلایشی رو انداخته بودند بعد ازظهر! باید امسال هم همین کارو کنن تا شما باورت بشه،بازار امسال مثل بازار ۹۹ هستش؟! @tahlilak

👍185👎118

1 Sept 2026, 06:53 UTC≈13,600 views263 reactionsread 2 September 2026

سلام یه زمانی یه سهمی‌رو میفروشن به امید این که پایین همون سهم رو بخرن بذارن سرجاش! یه زمانی یه سهمی رو میفروشن به امید این که یه سهم بهتر رو جایگزینش کنن. یه زمانی یه سهمی‌رو میفروشن که با پولش توی بازارهای دیگه مثل مسکن یا خودرو سرمایه‌گذاری کنن. یه وقتی یه سهمی‌رو میفروشن تا دست و دلشون بسوزه تا بعدها برای بقیه تعریف کنن منم داشتم،فروختم،از اونجایی که من فروختم دو برابر شد.این روزهای بازار از اون روزهاست! @ta

👍231👎32

1 Sept 2026, 05:43 UTC≈5,450 views102 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

دوستاني كه ديروز نقد كردن! @tahlilak

👍89👎13

31 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC≈6,210 views184 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

دوستانی که امروز فروختند وقتی فردا می‌خوان بخرن! @tahlilak

👍131👎53

31 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈9,570 views284 reactionsread 2 September 2026

سلام سال ۹۸،کرونا در اوج خودش بود و رکود و تورم و بورس نیز در حال اوج. بازارها در اوج کسادی،خیابان‌ها خلوت،بیمارستان‌ها شلوغ. در بورس اما هر کس هر چیز می‌خرید از فردایش در سود بود. سود بود و پول بود و ماسک‌های دو و سه لایه! این روزها نیز مثل آن روزهاست فقط تورمش بیشتر است و ترامپش کله‌خرتر و پول سرگردانش بیشتر! خر مفت است،سواری بگیر و چند سال بعد اگر بودی و دلار دوباره پرید برای بقیه تعریف کن که سال ۱۴۰۵ بود،

👍234👎50

31 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈5,310 views51 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

«تجزیه و تحلیل کسب‌وکار شرکت‌های بورسی با استفاده از هوش مصنوعی» 🔻 پیش‌ثبت‌نام دوره آغاز شد 🔹 در مرحله پیش‌ثبت‌نام هیچ شهریه‌ای دریافت نمی‌شود. 🔹 ثبت‌نام اولیه به‌منظور اعلام آمادگی و اولویت‌بندی متقاضیان است. 🔹 ⚠️ ظرفیت دوره محدود است. 👇 برای پیش‌ثبت‌نام از لینک زیر اقدام کنید: 🔗 https://vihanskillschool.ir/?p=3990

👎28👍23

31 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC≈5,420 views130 reactionsread 2 September 2026

سلام بانک تجارت مچ بشه،بانک ملت هم صف میشه! @tahlilak

👍90👎40

30 Aug 2026, 23:35 UTC≈5,520 views99 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍63👎36

30 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC≈5,610 views102 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

ممنون از عزيزاني كه كمك كردند. زندگیتون،کسب و کارتون،بازارتون تا قیامت سبز! @tahlilak

👍100👎2

30 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC≈5,770 views161 reactionsread 2 September 2026

سلام هزینه‌های تولید غلات به دلیل افزایش قیمت کود شیمیایی بالا رفته! از طرفی به خاطر جنگ روسیه و اوکراین حمل و بارگیری غلات از اوکراین به عنوان بزرگترین تولید کننده این محصولات به مشکل خورده! به نظر میرسه یه افزایش قیمت قابل توجه در محصولات پایه غله در راه باشه! #آردینه #نان #ذرت #غگل #غمایه #غزر از مواردی هستند که قابل بررسی هستند. @tahlilak

👍136👎25

Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @tahlilak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@tahlilak edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بورس ایران با دکتر وحید کشمیری پور
@vahidkeshmirypour · 25,879
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
آرش مهراز - صندوق
@InvestmentMind · 25,086
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
سالار صفائی
@salarsafaie · 46,017
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
Capital DNA
@Capital_DNA · 27,300
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
گنگ خواب دیده
@mortezaebad · 50,700
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
"یادداشتهای مهدی رباطی"
@m_robatii · 22,275
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
تحلیل کاربردی " هلالات "
@validhelalat · 67,555
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
فردانامه _حسن کاظم‌زاده
@fardaname · 24,443
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
شناسایی تحرکات
@Identify_Movements · 35,719
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
فاند پلاس
@fundplus1 · 28,028
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
مجید مؤیدی -شاخص سبز-
@shakhesesabz · 32,256
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
توپولی
@topoli · 29,983
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
مهدی میرزایی (انستیتو امواج الیوت)
@mahdy_mirzaiie · 27,362
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
|قدرِ مطلق| (اقتصاد کلان)
@ghadremotlagh · 81,490
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
سید مهدی طباطبایی / حجم سبز
@hajme_sabzzz · 37,495
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
ترید فاند
@trade_fundd · 24,454
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
پارسیس تحلیل
@parsistahlil · 50,306
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
ETF Plus صندوق اهرمی/طلا
@etfplus · 29,169
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tahlilak” (@tahlilak), 13,282 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tahlilak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.