Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for یادداشتهای تحلیلی هاشم ذوالفقاری

Channel

یادداشتهای تحلیلی هاشم ذوالفقاری

@hashemzolfaghari

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,193subscribers

+538 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001005556543
TypeChannel
Username@hashemzolfaghari
Descriptionاین کانال صرفا جهت بررسی است و هیچگونه مسولیتی برای خرید یا فروش ندارد
Created30 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hashemzolfaghari

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,65215,27014,9615 August 2026 — 14,655 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,655 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,652 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,845 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,902 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,909 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,904 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,901 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,904 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,894 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,890 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,885 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,880 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,883 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,880 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,892 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,904 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,905 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,909 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,898 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,903 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,904 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,907 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,915 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,908 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,906 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,901 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,935 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,944 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,948 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,938 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,930 subscribers28 September 2026 — 15,102 subscribers5 October 2026 — 15,094 subscribers9 October 2026 — 15,087 subscribers13 October 2026 — 15,259 subscribers14 October 2026 — 15,266 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,264 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,263 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,260 subscribers20 October 2026 — 15,270 subscribers21 October 2026 — 15,262 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,254 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,253 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,247 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,244 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,239 subscribers28 October 2026 — 15,236 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,229 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,219 subscribers31 October 2026 — 15,210 subscribers1 November 2026 — 15,204 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,201 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,203 subscribers4 November 2026 — 15,200 subscribers5 November 2026 — 15,194 subscribers6 November 2026 — 15,193 subscribers15,1935 August 20266 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 92 days, net +538. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,559–15,363 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 02:5915,193-1
5 Nov 2026, 05:0015,194-6
4 Nov 2026, 04:4815,200-3
3 Nov 2026, 05:3015,203+2
2 Nov 2026, 07:3615,201-3
1 Nov 2026, 08:4615,204-6
31 Oct 2026, 10:2815,210-9
30 Oct 2026, 09:4815,219-10
29 Oct 2026, 11:5515,229-7
28 Oct 2026, 08:1415,236-3
27 Oct 2026, 06:4615,239-5
26 Oct 2026, 04:1715,244-3
25 Oct 2026, 06:5415,247-6
24 Oct 2026, 09:3115,253-1
22 Oct 2026, 14:1815,254-8
21 Oct 2026, 06:3915,262-8
20 Oct 2026, 02:2815,270+10
18 Oct 2026, 23:4415,260-3
18 Oct 2026, 02:5615,263-1
16 Oct 2026, 23:5515,264first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.9%
avg views ÷ 15,193 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,000
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.853%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held73 (10 July 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total90,020
Reactions total768
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 05:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈10,300
Videos
≈555
Links
≈717

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 02s
Average length
7m 02s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,233 reactions across 69 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,58349.0%
❤94129.1%
😭37311.5%
👎33610.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,302 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 72 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hashemzolfaghari. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 73 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 1 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

1 Nov 2026, 08:11 UTC≈2,200 views28 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

#وپارس قابل بررسی در نقاط حمایتی مهم

👍20❤4👎4

Signed hashem zolfaghari

1 Nov 2026, 06:23 UTC≈2,730 views61 reactionsread 6 November 2026

قسمت جالب و عجیب ماجرا رها کردن بازار توسط صندوقهای حمایتی است صندوقهایی که با پول کارمزد من و شما به این ابعاد اثر گذاری رسیدند تا در روزهای اینچنینی حامی من سهامدار باشند !

👍46❤6😭5👎4

Signed hashem zolfaghari

31 Oct 2026, 07:58 UTC≈4,200 views82 reactionsread 6 November 2026

حتاید و حسینا و حکشتی میگن توافق میشه بقیه بازار میگن چیزی نخور نمیشه😁

👍73❤7👎2

Signed hashem zolfaghari

29 Oct 2026, 19:19 UTC≈4,130 views98 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Happy Halloween!

😭52👎20❤15👍11

Signed hashem zolfaghari

28 Oct 2026, 13:48 UTC≈4,390 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

Siavash Ghomayshi - Ghoroub.mp3

❤23👎1

Signed hashem zolfaghari

28 Oct 2026, 13:47 UTC≈4,240 views32 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤32

Signed hashem zolfaghari

27 Oct 2026, 06:55 UTC≈4,960 views50 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

نمودار جالب نوری

👍34❤8👎8

Signed hashem zolfaghari

27 Oct 2026, 06:18 UTC≈4,550 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍8

Signed hashem zolfaghari

25 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC≈6,250 views114 reactionsread 6 November 2026

در هر ساختاری برای هر بخشی یک وظیفه معین شده و تا زمانی که آن بخش مشغول انجام وظایفش باشد چه باب میل بقیه باشد چه نباشد در جای خودش استوار و محکم است در بازار سرمایه وظیفه خراب کردن روند بازار و خرد کردن اعصاب بقیه به عهده خودرو سایپا بانک ملت ذوب و چند سهم از این دست است

👍104😭5👎3❤2

Signed hashem zolfaghari

24 Oct 2026, 04:25 UTC≈5,350 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026

نرخ دلار #حواله 1,849,361 ریال شنبه ۲ آبان ماه ۱۴۰۵

👍16😭9👎2

Signed hashem zolfaghari

21 Oct 2026, 17:31 UTC≈6,120 views13 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

گزارش درآمد عملیاتی فصلی 🔷 نماد: #کیمازی 🔶 درآمد عملیاتی تابستان 1405: 466.6 🔹 درآمد عملیاتی دوره قبل: 257.9 🔹 درآمد عملیاتی مدت مشابه سال قبل: 204.4 🔸 رشد نسبت به دوره قبل: 80.9 % 🔸 رشد نسبت به مدّت مشابه سال قبل: 128.2 % 🔹 سال مالی منتهی به: 1405/12/29 کلیه مبالغ میلیارد تومان می باشد. ──── ⚡ معامله آنلاین #کیمازی در کمان دار 🤖 @Codal724_bot 🆔️ @C0dal724 🌐 kamandar.ir

❤10👍3

Signed hashem zolfaghari

21 Oct 2026, 06:29 UTC≈4,440 views36 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

حباب منفی صندوقهای اهرمی به سطوح قابل توجهی رسیده و احتمال کاهش این سطح وجود دارد

👍22👎10❤4

Signed hashem zolfaghari

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @hashemzolfaghari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @hashemzolfaghari as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
31 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شناسایی تحرکات
@Identify_Movements · 33,660
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
مهدی میرزایی (انستیتو امواج الیوت)
@mahdy_mirzaiie · 27,416
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Capital DNA
@Capital_DNA · 27,447
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
بورس ایران با دکتر وحید کشمیری پور
@vahidkeshmirypour · 26,706
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
خلاصه بازار
@MarketSummary · 21,180
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
تحلیل کاربردی " هلالات "
@validhelalat · 68,341
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
NAV STOCK
@NAVSTOCK · 32,896
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
فردانامه _حسن کاظم‌زاده
@fardaname · 24,952
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
سالار صفائی
@salarsafaie · 44,151
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
آرش مهراز - صندوق
@InvestmentMind · 24,693
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
گنگ خواب دیده
@mortezaebad · 50,764
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
فاند پلاس
@fundplus1 · 31,913
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
"یادداشتهای مهدی رباطی"
@m_robatii · 25,872
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
آپشن باز - اختیار معامله
@OptionBaaz · 19,202
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 October 2026
ترید فاند
@trade_fundd · 25,043
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
آرشیو چارت
@archivecharts · 25,729
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
سینا رهبرشهلان
@sinarahbarshahlan · 26,202
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
پارسیس تحلیل
@parsistahlil · 51,222
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
اقتصاد امروز « بازار سرمایه »
@Eghtesad_Emroz · 35,886
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
ETF Plus صندوق اهرمی/طلا
@etfplus · 29,582
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
stock & options
@sstock_options · 24,039
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
فردین سلطانی (محافظ)
@boursivared · 2,227
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
استخدام در نهادهای مالی - کانون کارگزاران
@SEBAemployment · 26,765
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
بتا سهم
@betasahm1 · 127,737
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“یادداشتهای تحلیلی هاشم ذوالفقاری” (@hashemzolfaghari), 15,193 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hashemzolfaghari.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.