Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net +914. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,575–8,763 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 13:38
8,626
+11
1 Nov 2026, 23:19
8,615
+22
30 Oct 2026, 06:39
8,593
+11
26 Oct 2026, 23:29
8,582
+12
23 Oct 2026, 13:41
8,570
+20
20 Oct 2026, 23:16
8,550
+7
18 Oct 2026, 02:28
8,543
+10
14 Oct 2026, 16:08
8,533
+37
11 Oct 2026, 14:20
8,496
+81
5 Oct 2026, 09:35
8,415
+141
27 Sept 2026, 08:38
8,274
+130
18 Sept 2026, 08:39
8,144
+54
14 Sept 2026, 09:41
8,090
+27
10 Sept 2026, 20:19
8,063
+36
5 Sept 2026, 22:00
8,027
+39
1 Sept 2026, 14:53
7,988
+40
29 Aug 2026, 23:17
7,948
+47
27 Aug 2026, 08:14
7,901
+37
23 Aug 2026, 22:47
7,864
+19
20 Aug 2026, 11:07
7,845
first reading
Engagement
69 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.7%
avg views ÷ 8,626 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,850
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 69 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
69 (2 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
84,770
Reactions total
2,061
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 23:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,620
Videos
≈273
Links
≈149
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 39s
Average length
5m 50s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,282 reactions across 67 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,161
29.7%
🤣
1,563
21.5%
👏
828
11.4%
👍
530
7.28%
🙏
397
5.45%
😁
344
4.72%
👌
312
4.28%
❤🔥
293
4.02%
👎
242
3.32%
😍
96
1.32%
😭
69
0.948%
💔
66
0.906%
🔥
46
0.632%
🤔
46
0.632%
🤷♀
45
0.618%
🥴
45
0.618%
🤓
29
0.398%
🤬
28
0.385%
😢
27
0.371%
🎉
19
0.261%
13 further kinds
96
1.32%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,282 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
60
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 67 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @donyaye_option. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 69 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (17.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
اگر شیش هفت سال پیش کسی رو داشتم که این نکات رو بهم میگفت، نمیگم الان پولم از پارو بالا زده بود، ولی احتمالا قطر این گردن نحیف چند میلیمتری ضخیمتر بود
کسایی که الان سرعت سفارشگذاری و مدیریت اردر رحمتی درچندجبهه رو میبینن، یه واااو نسبتا ریز میگن.
اما نمیدونن که رحمتی برای رسیدن به این سرعت، چنان شهریهای به بازار پرداخت کرده که اگه فاکتورش رو ببینن، اون واااو نسبتا ریز بلافاصله تبدیل میشه به یه یا ابوالفضل …
توصیه های دیگه :
سعی کنید تا حد امکان، بجز درمواقع اضطرار از ویرایش گروهی سفارشات استفاده نکنید.ویرایش گروهی دقیقا حکم یک اسلحه پر رو داره و کوچکترین غفلتی ازش میتونه فاجعه درست کنه.
ضمن اینکه شما هرچقدر هم دقیق باشید، گاهی مواقع سامانه میتونه نادقیق باشه.
تعداد خطاهای معاملاتی این بخش بسیار زیاده،
در یک نمونش مورد داشتیم قرارداد۸۰۰تومنی رو بخاطر ویرایش گروهی اشتباها ۶ریال ویرایش کردنو معامله انجام شدو دست آخر باطل…
این دوستمون یه معامله وحشتناک اشتباه انجام داد، که خداروشکر ابطال شد.
اما همیشه اینطور ختم بخیر نمیشه.
چند توصیه بسیار ضروری از رحمتی که باید هنگام فعالیت روی قراردادهای کم حجم(چه در آپشن سهام و چه کالا) رعایت کنید:
▪️توصیه اول اینکه همیشه اولین اردرتون رو با حجم ۱ ثبت کنید، که اگر به هر دلیلی اشتباه شد ، بدون زیان سنگین، متوجه خطای کارتون بشید.
▪️دوم اینکه در مورد سفارشات مهم و پرحجم مطلقا تنها به اطلاعات نمایش …
سلام دوستان وقتتون بخیر.
نمیگم توافق میشه یا جنگ میشه یا بلاتکلیفی ادامه دار میمونه.
نمیگم هم موقعیت صعودی بگیرید یا نزولی یا موقعیتی اخذ نکنید.
تنها چیزی که میخوام خدمتتون عرض کنم و تاکیدمم موکده،اینه که به هیچ وجه تااطلاع ثانوی سمت فروشِ غیر روزانه نَایستید.
چون شرایط طوری نیست که بشه هیچ رخدادی رو نامحتمل دونست.و هر اتفافی(فارغ از اینکه درصد احتمال وقوعش چقدره) میتونه رخ بده.
اگه نگاهتون صعودیه یمقدار کال بگیرید…
دوستان برای استفاده از ابزار کاربردی اختیار معامله
شما هیچ نیازی به خرید اشتراک ماهانه ندارید
ما کار رو براتون راحت کردیم
فقط یک برنامه نصب میکنید و در قالب مرورگرتون به هر اطلاعات ،نمودار،فیلتر و...
میخواهید دسترسی دارید
یک ماه استفاده از اون هم رایگان هست
بعد از یک ماه هم فقط شما یک بار این نرمافزار را تهیه میکنید
الان هم که با تخفیف ۵۰ درصدی قیمت گذاری شده
کار با برنامه فوق العاده راحته
چه نوسانگیر باشید چه ا…
احمقانهترین تصمیمی که میشد گرفت این بود که بااین وضعیت سامانه ها و این وضعیت اینترنت،بیاری لات خودروی۶۰میلیونی و لات اهرم۷میلیاردی رو هردوتاشو ۴۰۰۰درنظر بگیری. اما مسئولین امر این تصمیم رو گرفتن.و امکان تقسیم سفارشو هم فعال کردن.
چون نه درکی از واقعیت بازار آپشن دارن، و نه به فکر سرمایهی فعالای این بازار هستن.
اگه تا حالا سفارش اشتباه نداشتید، ایشالا که هیچوقت براتون رخ نده، ولی اینطور بهتون بگم که یک خطای خیلی خ…
اگر ازم بپرسن بزرگترین ریسکی که توی بازار تهدیدت میکنه چیه، قطع به یقین و بااختلاف بسیار زیاد میگم انجام معاملات باحجموقیمتهای ناخواسته.
حالا این معاملهی ناخواسته ممکنه از اشتباه صریح در قرار دادن اعداد باشه ، ممکنه بخاطر خطاهای سامانه کارگزاری و هسته باشه.
این ریسک هنوز جدی گرفته نشده، اماریسکیه که بطور اساسی معاملهگر رو به شدت تهدید میکنه.
شما فرض کنید احتمال ارسال یک سفارش اشتباه یک صدم درصد باشه، میشه بطور میا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @donyaye_option. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
آپشن باز - اختیار معامله @OptionBaaz · 19,202 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 October 2026
بورس اصفهان | Bourse Esf @BoursEsf13 · 22,864 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
فردین سلطانی (محافظ) @boursivared · 2,227 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
نقاش(Rtb) @Naghash69_Rtb · 21,382 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
ترید فاند @trade_fundd · 25,049 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
جواد نصر | سلام بورس @salam_bourse · 36,496 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
محسن تحلیل | Mohsen Tahlil @mohsen_tahlil · 39,150 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
ETF Plus صندوق اهرمی/طلا @etfplus · 29,580 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
طلا از نگاه فاندبیس @Fundbase_Gold · 38,065 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
لینک ورود به آرشیو چارت @archivecharts · 23 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
شرکت سبدگردان زاگرس @zagrosassetmanagement · 16,287 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دنیای آپشن _ علی رحمتی _ اختیار معامله” (@donyaye_option), 8,626 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/donyaye_option.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.