فووووری چین اوراق آمریکا رو سنگین فروخته @Satoshi_GOLD_BTC

Channel
اخبار جنگ / TIME GOLD
@GOLDVSBTC1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,316subscribers
-1,560 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001223659995 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GOLDVSBTC1 |
| Description | به نام خدا تحلیل طلا ، دلار ، بیتکوین |
| Created | 27 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GOLDVSBTC1 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:06 | 43,316 | -26 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 19:56 | 43,342 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:57 | 43,355 | -14 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 43,369 | -15 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:15 | 43,384 | -36 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:51 | 43,420 | -19 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 43,439 | -11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:58 | 43,450 | -16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 43,466 | -13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:41 | 43,479 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:41 | 43,487 | -13 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:36 | 43,500 | -12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:21 | 43,512 | -31 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 43,543 | -40 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 43,583 | -33 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 43,616 | -17 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:44 | 43,633 | -24 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 43,657 | -13 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 43,670 | -30 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 23:26 | 43,700 | first reading |
Engagement
787 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 183 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.3%
- avg views ÷ 43,316 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,190
- 279 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 279
- of 787 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 787 (24 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,726,860 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 02:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈19,400
- Videos
- ≈1,360
- Links
- ≈2,550
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 279 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
فوری العربی مدعی شده که آمریکا با پیشنویس یادداشت تفاهم ایران موافقت کرده
فوووووووووری نفت به نفت رسید
در سال ۲۰۱۸ بیتکوین پس از انتخابات میاندورهای ۵۱- درصد سقوط کرد در سال ۲۰۲۲، بیتکوین پس از انتخابات میاندورهای ۲۵- درصد سقوط کرد آیا BTC دوباره سقوط خواهد کرد، یا این بار فرق دارد؟ " TED " @Satoshi_GOLD_BTC
در سال ۲۰۱۸ بیتکوین پس از انتخابات میاندورهای ۵۱- درصد سقوط کرد در سال ۲۰۲۲، بیتکوین پس از انتخابات میاندورهای ۲۵- درصد سقوط کرد آیا BTC دوباره سقوط خواهد کرد، یا این بار فرق دارد؟ " TED " @Satoshi_GOLD_BTC
چه داستانی داریم وقتی نفت پامپ میشه بیتکوین دامپ میشه وقتی نفت دامپ میشه بیتکوین دامپ میشه @Satoshi_GOLD_BTC
وقتی پدربزرگم ازدواج کرد، نقره پایین ۵۰ دلار بود. وقتی پدرم ازدواج کرد، نقره پایین ۵۰ دلار بود. حالا من ازدواج کردم و بچه دارم، و نقره هنوز پایین ۵۰ دلاره @Satoshi_GOLD_BTC
نفت که میاد پایین تهدید هاشون شروع میشه ایران باید نفت و تا بالای۱۳۰ دلار پامپ کنه تا ترامپ جرات فکر کردن به حمله نظامی هم نیوفته @Satoshi_GOLD_BTC
غیررسمی : برخی رسانه ها مدعی شدن زلنسکی تا ۷۲ ساعت آینده یا برکنار میشه یا فرار میکنه @Satoshi_GOLD_BTC
سی ان ان : ایران تنها ۲۴ساعت فرصت دارد @Satoshi_GOLD_BTC
فووووووری اعتراضات به اوکراین رسیده مثل اینکه ارتش زلنسکی تو یه چاهی مردم رو شکنجه میداده که محلی ها این چاه و کشف کردن و ۴۰ جوان اونجا بودن حالا اوکراینی ها ریختن بیرون @Satoshi_GOLD_BTC
همچنان در انتظار فصل آلتکوین ها @Satoshi_GOLD_BTC
Showing the 12 most recent of 787 posts we hold for @GOLDVSBTC1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 21 posts on @GOLDVSBTC1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 11 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 26 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 34 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 9
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Satoshi_GOLD_BTC · 82,354#1
@crypto_shekar · 13,369#2
@CryptoMarket_BitBoy · 22,144#3
@cryptoplusers · 437,044#4
@bitfa · 229,986#5
@TROON · 1,420,666#6
@farhad1356 · 70,975#7
@Cryptofa_official · 44,700#8
@KINGCRYPTO1 · 103,277#9
@Nobitexmag · 147,059#10
@Cryptoo_neews · 21,442#11
@AmirCrypttoo · 11,314#12
@irmemecoin · 19,112#13
@Caspian_Crypto · 84,028#14
@Real_Ayhan · 109,777#15
@khancryptoir · 360,053#16
@SirBitMiner · 743,093#17
@ucn_ir · 153,566#18
@Signal_Alpha · 164,553#19
@lordcryptovip · 762,867#20
@tatcoinn · 38,913#21
@arz_jo · 16,606#22
@arzdigitalb · 54,441#23
@Mr_Haji_Bit · 6,169#24
@RstCrypto · 384,608#25
@CryptoPlus_company · 18,020#26
@Radcryptosignal · 95,114#27
@ccoineres · 20,859#28
@amirsambtc · 119,422 (as read 28 August 2026)#29
@doctormemecoin · 3,444#30
@arzdigital · 107,242#31
@cloobmali · 106,545#32
@plus_sarmayeh · 2,240#33
@alirezamehrabi_com · 114,621#34
@amir_ramzali · 119,207#35
@bsignal · 420,441#36
@crypto_gorg · 3,920#37
@naghdexx · 70,744#38
@CryptoHaj · 343,165#39
@YKCRYPTOchanle · 20,389#40
@mini_whales1 · 3,364#41
@lordcryptovipbot · 25,417#42
@trade_hadi · 1,236,404#43
@ali_cryptoc · 11,973#44
@Crypto_Azarmi · 55,691#45
@CryptoT248 · 52,406#46
@telonews_fa · 83,936#47
@shitcoink · 348,957#48
@ch_amozshe_sirvan · 6,123#49
@mahdiazimi_classic_patterns · 73,550#50
@Ar3yBiT · 721,009#51
@khabarfouri_arzedigital · 29,121#52
@Airdrops_univers · 107,888#53
@altin_data · 2,687#54
@analysis_bitcoin · 30,632#55
@hajicryptooo · 7,271#56
@IranMuskNews_VPN · 21,083#57
@mrkia7 · 53,939#58
@traderpasha · 107,899 (as read 28 August 2026)#59
@varzesh3 · 1,302,857#60
@nobitexmarket · 316,004#61
@futballbadtv · 318,876#62
@signallbinance · 13,274#63
@cryptobyalireza · 36,727#64
@CottageOrg · 749,124#65
@iMTProto · 7,716,661#66
@arash_timess · 427,259#67
@iRoProxy · 7,980,159#68
@rapking · 314,179#69
@khabar_fouri · 1,151,991#70
@FutballBadBoys · 107,802#71
@Dashaghnews · 111,847#72
@akhbarefori · 4,300,483#73
@officialpersiatwiter · 569,105#74
@akharinkhabar · 1,975,136#75
@kafiha · 663,250#76
@Dailycrrypto · 7,313#77
@dollar_tehran3bze · 643,455#78
@nobitexprices · 59,881#79
@alonews · 1,021,819#80
@SportBaadNews · 849,541#81
@roidbest · 1,621,791#82
@akhbare_fouri · 1,164,528#83
@drtel · 783,469#84
@proxydaemi · 1,741,354#85
@mamlekate · 561,556#86
@MawtinCrypto_vip · 3,135,641#87
@dogs · 6,506,149#88
@notcoin · 7,937,335#89
@proxymtproto · 11,864,145#90
@whale_alert_io · 296,315#91
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@trading1room · 22,740
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 September 2026
@Satoshi_GOLD_BTC · 82,354
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
@whalesview · 25,708
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
@IranMuskNews_VPN · 21,083
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 September 2026
@arzedegiral · 22,233
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
@CryptoT248 · 52,406
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
@ChanelVIP20 · 52,087
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
@short_cryptoo · 879,286
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
@CryptoMarket_BitBoy · 22,144
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 September 2026
@crocodile_trade · 206,604
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
@TROON · 1,420,666
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
@cryptouniversity0 · 18,636
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 October 2026
@navasanghirivipm · 22,031
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
@tatcoinn · 38,913
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
@toolou021 · 37,395
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 13 here — alongside 12 others — read 5 October 2026
@crrypto_navasan · 24,791
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 2 October 2026
@bourse14200 · 22,389
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@academy_khalife_Dex · 18,625
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 October 2026
@YKCRYPTOchanle · 20,389
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 September 2026
@Moderyatsarmae · 1
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 September 2026
@Amirreza_shahbaziy · 79,809
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
@KINGCRYPTO1 · 103,277
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@bitfa · 229,986
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
@cryptoplusers · 437,044
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 279 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار جنگ / TIME GOLD” (@GOLDVSBTC1), 43,316 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GOLDVSBTC1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.