Channel
@kafiha
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
693,523subscribers
-12,909 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001003587533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @kaaaf @kafiha |
| Description | مجله کاف، همه چیز از همه جا سفارش تبلیغات: @adskafiha اینستاگرام: instagram.com/mykafiha https://ble.ir/kafihaofficial بله ارسال مطالب: @kafiha_content_bot 🔴کاف وابسته به هیچ گروه، دسته و حزب سیاسی نیست. ❌️کاف فعالیتی در ایتا، روبیکا و توییتر ندارد |
| Created | 1 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kafiha |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 693,523 | -42 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 693,565 | -804 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 694,369 | -205 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 694,574 | -611 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 695,185 | -30 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 695,215 | -566 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 695,781 | -72 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 695,853 | -571 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 696,424 | -231 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 696,655 | -607 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 697,262 | -281 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 697,543 | -795 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 698,338 | -277 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 698,615 | -954 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 699,569 | -251 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 699,820 | -483 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 700,303 | -187 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 700,490 | -684 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 701,174 | -84 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 701,258 | first reading |
665 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 665 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 665 (5 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,488,813 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 149 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kafiha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 665 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
تصاویر ربایندگان نوزاد تهرانی 🔹این ۲ زن متهمان پروندهٔ ربایش نوزاد ۲ ماههٔ تهرانی هستند که یکی از آنها نوزاد را دزدیده و دیگری او را تحویل گرفته و نگهداری کرده است. اظهارات عجیب متهم دزدی نوزاد دو ماهه در تهران؛ علت اینکه بچه را به خانواده دیگری دادم، اختلاف پدر و مادرش بود @Kafiha
رگبار باران در نیمه شمالی و ارتفاعات تهران اداره کل هواشناسی استان تهران: تا دوشنبه (۲ شهریور) با عبور موج ناپایداری از فراز منطقه در برخی ساعتها افزایش ابر و افزایش باد گاهی وزش باد شدید و در پارهای از مناطق بهویژه در نیمه شمالی و ارتفاعات بارش رگباری با احتمال رعد و برق و در بعضی مناطق رخداد مه دور از انتظار نیست. @Kafiha
ماشینم یه صدایی میده که قبلاً نمیداد. لپتاپم یه صدایی میده که قبلاً نمیداد. یخچالم، لباسشوییم، هواپزم، همه زندگیم یه صداهایی میدن که دوست ندارم بشنومشون. 💬 inward_flighter Silverfox @Kafiha
Girl to Girl: مرد درست تورو لوستر میکنه نه شکاکتر 💬 paniz Silverfox @Kafiha
هر ماه باید یه وام بگیرم تا باهاش قسط وام قبلی رو بدم. دارم وارد یه چرخهی اقتصادی بینهایت میشم. 💬 Jeneral Silverfox @Kafiha
هیچ کس اونقدر که خودش فکر میکنه منصف نیست...! در بهترین حالت ما فقط در روایت خودمون آدمهای خوبی هستیم... 💬 paiizaaaan Silverfox @Kafiha
درخشش طلا رو با گوهر تجربه کن طلا همیشه یکی از محبوبترین داراییها برای حفظ ارزش پول بوده؛ اما در دو سال اخیر، درخشش اون بیشتر از قبل شده. افزایش قیمت این فلز ارزشمند هم در بازارهای جهانی و هم در داخل کشور، باعث شده طلا توجه خیلی از سرمایهگذاران رو به خودش جلب کنه. ✅ بازدهی دوساله : ۴۰۷ درصد ✅ بازدهی یکساله : ۱۵۱ درصد اگر شما هم میخواید از این بازدهی بهرهمند بشید، صندوق طلای گوهر کیان یک انتخاب هوشمندانهست که…
این روزا دارم عبارت losing spark رو با پوست و استخونم درک میکنم، هر چی میکاپ کنم، لباسای خوب بپوشم، غذای خوب بخورم، ورزش کنم، بزنم به درِ شوخی و خنده، بازم از قیافم مشخصه چه مرگمه، جدی آدم چجوری میتونه برق چشماشو برگردونه؟ برمیگرده اصلاً؟! 💬 pishimaows Silverfox @Kafiha
آره عزیزم حساسم، درست رفتار کن. 💬 Cherryberry Silverfox @Kafiha
داشتم فکر میکردم کنار قیمه چی میچسبه، سبزی، سالاد یا ماست. به بچهم گفتم تصور کن یه بشقاب پلو و قیمه جلوته دوست داری کنارش چی باشه؟ گفت پیتزا. 💬 bastanidastgahi Silverfox @Kafiha
امروز یه نینی کوچولو درحالی که یه فیله سوخاری دستش بود و تند تند یه جمله نامفهوم رو تکرار میکرد و باباش اهمیتی نمیداد٫ مامانش برگشت گفت داره میگه سس بریز :))))) بامزه ترین چیزی که در ۳ ماه اخیر دیدم 💬 thniki Silverfox @Kafiha
چندوقت پیشم تو یه جمع خونوادگی نشسته بودیم و من مشغول بازی با بچههای کوچیک بودم، خالم گفت چقدر بچهها باهات خوبن همگی مامانم گفت اره خیلی، سحر بچهبازه 💬 maybegollum Silverfox @Kafiha
Showing the 12 most recent of 665 posts we hold for @kafiha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 2,575 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 184 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 284 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کاف” (@kafiha), 693,523 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kafiha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.