کاش منشی یه پزشک سرشلوغ بودم؛ وقتی مریض ازم میپرسید "کی نوبت من میشه؟" جواب میدادم: ناگهان! #شانتاژگر @shaantaazhgar

Channel
۞ شانتاژگر ۞
@shaantaazhgar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,869subscribers
-534 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001024783784 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shaantaazhgar |
| Description | زینهار اَز قَرینِ بَد، زِنهار وَقِنا رَبَنا عَذابَ النار [جنگ، عدالت است ∞) توئیتر شانتاژگر: twitter.com/mimk4f اینستاگرام شانتاژگر: Instagram.com/shaantaazhgar |
| Created | 3 January 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shaantaazhgar |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 42,869 | -17 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 42,886 | -16 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 42,902 | -53 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 42,955 | -24 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 42,979 | -38 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 43,017 | -49 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 43,066 | -15 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 43,081 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 43,088 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:25 | 43,095 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 43,096 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 43,102 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 43,116 | -20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 43,136 | -31 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 43,167 | -35 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 43,202 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 43,213 | -16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 43,229 | -32 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 43,261 | -36 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 43,297 | first reading |
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 56.0%
- avg views ÷ 42,869 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 24,000
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (19 July 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 192,200 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,820
- Videos
- ≈440
- Links
- ≈501
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
۷۲ ساعت پایانی برای ثبت نام در دورهی تقویت نویسندگی شانتاژگر اطلاعات تکمیلی
عشق تو خوابی بود و بس، نقش سرابی بود و بس #شانتاژگر @shaantaazhgar
+ زیردریاییهارو هم باید درک کرد. باید اونارو شنید #شانتاژگر @shaantaazhgar
ترامپ در تروث سوشال: به امیرپارسا نشاط هشدار میدهیم همین حالا تعرفه استوریهایش را کاهش دهد. در غیر اینصورت ناگهان نوبت او خواهد شد و خواهیم دید چه خواهد شد @interpashmam_newss
به قول امیرمانوک نشاط بخشیان "و ناگهان نوبت تاسهای ترامپ میشود" #شانتاژگر @shaantaazhgar
از مرغ دریایی تریپلف تا کباب غازِ جمالزاده! نوشتهی خودم
مانوک خدابخشیان پیشبینی کرده بود که اول پمپ بنزینها شلوغ میشه بعدش ترامپ با ۳ تاس با قالیباف بازی میکنه اما هردوشون بخاطر آه مردم حذف میشن #شانتاژگر @shaantaazhgar
شاید یه روزی من دوباره ۲۰ سالم بشه ولی دلار دیگه ۲۰ تومن نمیشه #شانتاژگر @shaantaazhgar
دوستان مهلت ثبت نام بزودی تموم میشه (به محض اینکه تعداد اعضای دوره به حد نصاب برسه) اگه تمایل به شرکت دارید به اکانت ارتباطی پیام بدید.
▪️ دورهی مجازی تقویت خیالپردازی و مهارت نویسندگی [شانتاژگر] / یک سفر دستهجمعی ۱۶ هفتهای اگر همیشه دوست داشتید ذهن پر از ایدهتان را روی کاغذ بیاورید اما نمیدانستید از کجا شروع کنید، این دوره برای شماست. 🔸 در یک دورهی ۱۶ هفتهای در بستر تلگرام، الگوریتمی عملی و ساده یاد خواهید گرفت که به شما کمک میکند جهان ذهنیتان را شفاف، دقیق و خلاقانه روی کاغذ پیاده کنید. 🔸 طی این مسیر، با هم فیلم میبینیم و آن را نقد می…
تضارب آراء دربارهی بندهی حقیر کانال دوم منو داشته باشید، لینک گروه هم توی بیوشه @ord38
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @shaantaazhgar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@zhazhkha · 31,484
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@jannatkhah · 107,070
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
@CinemaGoznight · 21,596
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 September 2026
@mamlekate · 566,935
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 August 2026
@NimehShaab · 22,943
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 September 2026
@aqvalanam · 39,803
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
@Fotafanmis · 32,344
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 September 2026
@TrendsGoogle · 22,213
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
@adhdbefarsi · 23,035
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
@RADIO_act · 27,763
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
@factnameh · 111,320
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
@MohsenTelegramChannel · 37,714
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
@F_karamizand · 35,515
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
@Saate_13 · 59,826
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
@kxhyar · 49,224
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@official_codine · 24,977
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
@Rakoobofficial · 55,803
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
@OfficialCinama · 57,538
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
@OfficialBook · 76,931
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
@mohsenchavoshi · 239,925
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@officialpersiatwiter · 567,891
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 August 2026
@Cinemaee_ir · 22,983
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 19 September 2026
@youtwitte · 23,038
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
@reaalissm · 25,923
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 72 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“۞ شانتاژگر ۞” (@shaantaazhgar), 42,869 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shaantaazhgar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.