Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 50 days, net -1,477. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106,619–108,741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 06:18
106,864
-206
18 Sept 2026, 21:38
107,070
-99
16 Sept 2026, 14:39
107,169
-81
14 Sept 2026, 18:40
107,250
-78
13 Sept 2026, 07:16
107,328
-68
11 Sept 2026, 07:36
107,396
-102
8 Sept 2026, 11:56
107,498
-127
5 Sept 2026, 05:59
107,625
-65
3 Sept 2026, 10:47
107,690
-37
2 Sept 2026, 07:45
107,727
-28
1 Sept 2026, 09:03
107,755
-35
31 Aug 2026, 12:28
107,790
-49
30 Aug 2026, 14:05
107,839
-50
29 Aug 2026, 12:43
107,889
-51
28 Aug 2026, 13:33
107,940
-28
27 Aug 2026, 16:28
107,968
-51
26 Aug 2026, 18:32
108,019
-50
25 Aug 2026, 16:25
108,069
-48
24 Aug 2026, 16:18
108,117
-72
23 Aug 2026, 00:44
108,189
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
2m 24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
49,935 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
20,622
41.3%
😁
9,939
19.9%
❤
9,028
18.1%
custom 4911490704376596665
6,515
13.0%
❤🔥
1,510
3.02%
👌
526
1.05%
👏
497
0.995%
💔
242
0.485%
🔥
222
0.445%
😢
191
0.382%
🥴
140
0.28%
💅
81
0.162%
🆒
71
0.142%
✍
68
0.136%
😭
58
0.116%
💘
50
0.1%
🥰
41
0.082%
👻
40
0.08%
😘
37
0.074%
🤷♀
36
0.072%
1 further kind
21
0.042%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49,935 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
63
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 18 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jannatkhah. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
حالا که سایت و اپ فردوسی پور رو بستن خوبه بدونیم که حتی بعد از دی ۹۶ و آبان ۹۸، گریه میکرد که بگه «فرزند رسانه ملی هستم»
فردوسی پور، هرچی داره، بند بند وجودش، از برکاتی بوده که جمهوری اسلامی بهش داده.
هیچ وقت درباره چیزهایی که به «حق پخش تلویزیونی باشگاه ها از صداوسیما بود» هم مثل بقیه چیزها نپرداخت! همیشه نقدهای سرکاری و بیخطر!
تریبون، محبوبیت، پول، شهرت، همه چی.
متاسفانه مردم گاهی فریب میخورند.
اپ و سایت فردوسیپور رو از دسترس خارج کردند.
همون موقعها که ما رو فیلتر میکردند یا وقتی خودش سایت بالا آورد و توی صداوسیما پروموتش میکرد و توی صداوسیما جلوی تبلیغ ما رو گرفت و نیروهای من رو بر میزد، بهش گفته بودم عاقبت خوشرقصی برای قدرت، جمال خاشقجیه.
عادل دیدی؟ دیدی آسیاب به نوبته؟
جوانان امروزی، از انیشتین به مراتب «اطلاعات بیشتری» دارند و متعاقب اون «خلاقیت مثبت و مخرب همزمان» بیشتری هم دارند
اما از شاگر مغازههای زمان انیشیتین «فهم» کمتری دارند.
البته مقصر نیستند، دلیل اصلیش، انحصارات دولتی از جمله سیگنال روانی شتابدار مخربی به نام تورم و مالیاته.
چون تورم پولی، مثل چاقی در بدن، هزاران مرض نامشخص میاره. مثل چربی که میزنه از شکم بیرون. اطلاعات فست فودی زیاد هم از شکم جامعه میزنه بیرون.
وق…
مذاکره کلا با یه تلفن هم میتونه انجام بشه، حتی به شکل توییتری هم مذاکره میشه میکرد.
بنابراین اگه فکر میکنید همزمان با بمبباران و موشکباران، مذاکرات قطع میشن، اشتباه میکنید.
مذاکره همیشه هست. موضوع اینه که سر چی چه کسی وسط جنگ حاضره چقدر کوتاه بیاد.
سه سال پیش، دو راهی پیش رو رو نوشته بودم.
با حمله به پلهای آق قلا، امریکا نشون داد از شمال و جنوب خفگی رو کامل میکنه.
چی میشه که انسان به «نفرین کاساندرا» دچار میشه؟
توییت سه سال پیش، بذارید کنار برنامههای صداوسیما و حرفهای محسن رضایی!
ایمان نمیآورید؟
وای جنت خواه تو کی بودی وقتی «همه» مسخرهات میکردند؟
جنت خواه تو کی هستی که کتابی که نوشتی هم همینقدر بعد از چند سال بدیهی میشه و هنوز به حرف حق تسلیم نمیشن؟
این سه صفحه از رساله رستگاری که سال ۱۴۰۱ منتشر کردم رو بخوونید.
⛔ به تمسخر به من میگن حرف از دین میزنه و میخواد اعلام پیامبری کنه.
🟢 من اگه میخواستم اعلام پیامبری کنم نیاز به دین نداشتم، همین تحلیل های من از جزایر سه گانه در سالیان گذشته براش کافی بود!
متن های توی تصاویر، در رساله رستگاری در سال ۱۴۰۱ نوشته شده.
واقعاً چنین تحلیلهایی از «حتی یک نفر» در اون سالها از کسی بر نمیآمد!
زمانی که تاجزاده و حجاریان در اوین مشغول شکنجه و اعتراف گرفتن از زندانیها بودند، جلیلی رفته جبهه و یک پاش رو هم از دست داده ولی الان کمپین درست کردن فرستادن جلیلی به جبهه!
مادرقحبهتر از اصلاحطلب تاریخ بشریت به خودش ندیده!
توییت پرایوت یه دوستی بود واقعاً حیف بود پابلیک نشه
👍3,240❤252🔥202👌99
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @jannatkhah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Vahid Online وحید آنلاین @vahidonline · 1,402,047#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تاریخاندیشی ــ مهدی تدینی @tarikhandishi · 111,604 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
با من باشین تا گم نشین @moji_anti_left · 44,039 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
حافظه تاریخی @hafezeye_tarikhi · 142,125 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Anarconomy @anarconomy · 46,570 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
اقوال الانعام @aqvalanam · 39,803 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
پروژه تاریخ شفاهی ایران در دانشگاه هاروارد @tarikh_shafahi_iran_project · 57,441 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
کانال صادق الحسینی @Sadegh_Alhosseini · 56,598 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
Dr.Mohamad.Heshmati @heshmati_finance · 25,451 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
اتاق آینده / شیرعلینیا @jafarshiralinia · 44,849 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
ایراننویس/ مرتضی اسماعیلپور @MEsmailpour · 46,108 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 September 2026
پادکست رخ @rokhpodcast · 112,400 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
پادکست سکه @Sekke_Podcast · 33,142 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
Bplus @podcastbplus · 97,331 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
یدالله کریمی پور @Karimipour_K · 21,390 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
Vahid Online وحید آنلاین @vahidonline · 1,402,047 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
دغدغه ایران @fazeli_mohammad · 56,371 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
آزاد | Azad @azadsocial · 38,516 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
کلینیک سلامت ژالیا @healthclinic_ir · 22,810 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 September 2026
Share the Joy @sharethejoy · 30,831 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
دانشگاه صوتی چکیده ماندگار | خلاصه کتاب تاریخی، سیاسی @EsfandiarKhodaee · 23,193 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
ایران آزاد و آباد (مهدی نصیری) @iranazadvaabad · 32,666 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
مجتبا پورمحسن/ Mojtaba Pourmohsen @mojtabapourmohsen · 23,692 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Mypersia | ايران من @mypersia24 · 34,904 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
نگاه متفاوت (احمد زیدآبادی) @ahmadzeidabad · 74,793 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 62 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محمدعلی جنت خواه” (@jannatkhah), 106,864 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jannatkhah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.