سابقا «مدرسه آزادفکری»
⭕️ برای مشاهده گفتگوها به سایت و یوتوب آزاد مراجعه کنید:
https://zil.ink/azad.im
⭕️ارتباط با ما:
@AzadSocialAdmin
حمایت ارزی از طریق:
https://www.patreon.com/azad579
حمایت ریالی از طریق:
https://donito.me/azadsocial
Created
24 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 30% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,466–38,897 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:20
38,516
-37
15 Sept 2026, 12:16
38,553
-21
13 Sept 2026, 21:57
38,574
-36
12 Sept 2026, 02:56
38,610
-32
9 Sept 2026, 16:55
38,642
-53
6 Sept 2026, 06:15
38,695
-33
4 Sept 2026, 00:35
38,728
-15
2 Sept 2026, 18:18
38,743
-33
1 Sept 2026, 14:36
38,776
-23
31 Aug 2026, 17:07
38,799
-8
30 Aug 2026, 17:46
38,807
-8
29 Aug 2026, 18:52
38,815
-9
28 Aug 2026, 16:38
38,824
-15
27 Aug 2026, 14:13
38,839
-5
26 Aug 2026, 15:13
38,844
-3
25 Aug 2026, 15:34
38,847
+4
24 Aug 2026, 16:42
38,843
-3
22 Aug 2026, 23:06
38,846
+19
21 Aug 2026, 13:28
38,827
+5
20 Aug 2026, 10:53
38,822
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 49 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,140
Videos
≈860
Links
≈1,910
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 05m
Average length
1m 52s
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,855 reactions across 45 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,028
26.7%
💔
912
23.7%
❤
886
23.0%
👎
402
10.4%
😁
204
5.29%
👌
163
4.23%
🔥
48
1.25%
😢
42
1.09%
👏
30
0.778%
🤨
22
0.571%
😭
21
0.545%
🤯
19
0.493%
❤🔥
18
0.467%
😐
17
0.441%
😱
17
0.441%
💯
16
0.415%
🎉
4
0.104%
🤓
2
0.052%
🤔
2
0.052%
🏆
1
0.026%
1 further kind
1
0.026%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,098 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
217
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 48 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
210
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @azadsocial. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
مخاطبان عزیز و گرامی آزاد،
من، مهدی احمدی مدیر و میزبان گفتوگوهای «آزاد»، پیرو ابلاغیه با اتهام «نشر اکاذیب» دیروز و امروز جهت تفهیم اتهام به دادسرا مراجعه کردم.
مطابق دستور مقام قضایی، من با قرار کفالت آزاد شدم، اما رسانه «آزاد» تا اطلاع ثانوی از انتشار هر گفتوگویی منع شده است.
اگر درد دلهای فراوان درباره مشکلات متنوع را به زمانی دیگر بسپاریم، شما مخاطبان عزیز آزاد به خوبی میدانید که تامین هزینههای جاری این…
🎥 آمریکا و ایران: گذشته، حال و آینده
🔶 گفتوگوی فواد ایزدی و ری تکیه
ری تکیه، پژوهشگر ارشد شورای روابط خارجی آمریکاست. او همچنین متخصص تاریخ روابط ایران و آمریکا و سیاست ایالات متحده در قبال ایران است.
فؤاد ایزدی، استاد مطالعات آمریکا در دانشگاه تهران است و حوزه فعالیت او بر روابط ایران و آمریکا و سیاست خارجی آمریکا متمرکز است.
ری تکیه: رهبران جمهوری اسلامی از ابتدای انقلاب ۱۹۷۹ بهدنبال روابط عادی با آمریکا نب…
🎥 ایران و آمریکا؛ در آستانه جنگ جدید؟
🔶 گفتوگوی ناصر هادیان و گری سیمور
گری سیمور، استاد علوم سیاسی در دانشگاه برندایس، از کارشناسان برجسته امنیت ملی ایالات متحده است. او در دولتهای مختلف آمریکا بهعنوان هماهنگکننده کاخ سفید در امور کنترل تسلیحات و سلاحهای کشتار جمعی فعالیت کرده است. او همچنین پیشتر ریاست سازمان «اتحاد علیه ایران هستهای» را بر عهده داشته است.
ناصر هادیان، استاد علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران است. …
🎥 رویای تصمیمگیرنده ایرانی چیست؟
🔶 بخشی از گفتوگوی مسعود نیلی، جواد صالحی اصفهانی و امیر کرمانی
🎞 فیلم کامل این گفتوگو در یوتوب آزاد:
https://youtu.be/CS0-pSn29_o
✅ حمایت «ارزی» و «ریالی» از آزاد
🆔@AzadSocial
🎥 آمار اشتغال در دوران تحریم
🔶 بخشی از گفتوگوی مسعود نیلی، جواد صالحی اصفهانی و امیر کرمانی
🎞 فیلم کامل این گفتوگو در یوتوب آزاد:
https://youtu.be/CS0-pSn29_o
✅ حمایت «ارزی» و «ریالی» از آزاد
🆔@AzadSocial
🎥 راهحل بحران بنزین
🔶 بخشی از گفتوگوی مسعود نیلی، جواد صالحی اصفهانی و امیر کرمانی
🎞 فیلم کامل این گفتوگو در یوتوب آزاد:
https://youtu.be/CS0-pSn29_o
✅ حمایت «ارزی» و «ریالی» از آزاد
🆔@AzadSocial
Azad’s international debates are returning.
In the weeks ahead, we’ll publish conversations with distinguished Iranian and international scholars, policymakers, and leading voices on Iran, the region, and the wider world.
Serious questions, different perspectives, and conversations worth hearing.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel and stay tuned for new episodes:
YouTube.com/@AzadInst
🆔 @Azad_Inst
🎥 اول سرمایه اجتماعی، بعد اصلاح اقتصادی
🔶 بخشی از گفتوگوی مسعود نیلی، جواد صالحی اصفهانی و امیر کرمانی
🎞 فیلم کامل این گفتوگو در یوتوب آزاد:
https://youtu.be/CS0-pSn29_o
✅ حمایت «ارزی» و «ریالی» از آزاد
🆔@AzadSocial
🎥 سال ۸۶؛ شوک چینی به اقتصاد ایران
🔶 بخشی از گفتوگوی مسعود نیلی، جواد صالحی اصفهانی و امیر کرمانی
🎞 فیلم کامل این گفتوگو در یوتوب آزاد:
https://youtu.be/CS0-pSn29_o
✅ حمایت «ارزی» و «ریالی» از آزاد
🆔@AzadSocial
🎥 دهه ۸۰ نقطه عطفی در اقتصاد ایران بود
🔶 بخشی از گفتوگوی مسعود نیلی، جواد صالحی اصفهانی و امیر کرمانی
🎞 فیلم کامل این گفتوگو در یوتوب آزاد:
https://youtu.be/CS0-pSn29_o
✅ حمایت «ارزی» و «ریالی» از آزاد
🆔@AzadSocial
🎥 سال سخت اقتصاد ایران
🔶 بخشی از گفتوگوی مسعود نیلی، جواد صالحی اصفهانی و امیر کرمانی
🎞 فیلم کامل این گفتوگو در یوتوب آزاد:
https://youtu.be/CS0-pSn29_o
✅ حمایت «ارزی» و «ریالی» از آزاد
🆔@AzadSocial
👍22😭6🤨3❤2😁2👎1😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @azadsocial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
آثاروما | تحلیل و نقد هنر و فرهنگ @asaroma · 2,555#93
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
صادق زیباکلام - Sadegh Zibakalam @sadeghZibakalam · 53,720 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
دغدغه ایران @fazeli_mohammad · 56,445 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
آینده (عباس عبدی) @abdiabbas · 30,117 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
ایران آزاد و آباد (مهدی نصیری) @iranazadvaabad · 32,666 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Renani Mohsen / محسن رنانی @Renani_Mohsen · 68,374 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
پادکست رخ @rokhpodcast · 112,400 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
نگاه متفاوت (احمد زیدآبادی) @ahmadzeidabad · 74,821 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 August 2026
سخنرانیها @sokhanranihaa · 131,755 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
سایت خبری-تحلیلی کلمه @kaleme · 48,418 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
بهرام مشیری @bahrammoshri · 36,225 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
ایمان سلیمانی امیری- IMAN SOLEIMANI AMIRI @Imansoleymaniamiri · 25,565 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Aasoo - آسو @NashrAasoo · 29,328 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
مصطفی ملکیان @mostafamalekian · 65,709 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
علم سیاست @PoliticalScience_ir · 26,297 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
جدال- علی عليزاده @jedaal · 57,028 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
ترجمان علوم انسانى @tarjomaanweb · 42,992 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
شفیعی کدکنی @shafiei_kadkani · 44,420 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
انبارستان🎧 @anbar100 · 28,665 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
مدرسه علوم انسانی @zistboommedia · 32,178 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آزاد | Azad” (@azadsocial), 38,516 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/azadsocial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.