کانال رسمی پادکست دغدغه ایران
مدیر پادکست: محمد فاضلی
حمایت از پادکست
Https://hamibash.com/dirancast
شماره کارت
6362-1411-1942-3466
شماره حساب
0302819106008
بانک آینده
Created
Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 93 days, net -295. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,533–20,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 13:55
20,577
-2
5 Nov 2026, 10:27
20,579
-1
3 Nov 2026, 12:39
20,580
+1
2 Nov 2026, 10:46
20,579
-3
31 Oct 2026, 08:46
20,582
-2
30 Oct 2026, 08:05
20,584
-3
29 Oct 2026, 08:06
20,587
-4
27 Oct 2026, 03:40
20,591
-2
26 Oct 2026, 00:39
20,593
-4
24 Oct 2026, 21:19
20,597
-4
23 Oct 2026, 19:08
20,601
-1
22 Oct 2026, 16:50
20,602
-3
21 Oct 2026, 09:35
20,605
-16
20 Oct 2026, 10:39
20,621
-11
19 Oct 2026, 12:30
20,632
-4
18 Oct 2026, 09:50
20,636
-3
17 Oct 2026, 09:51
20,639
-9
16 Oct 2026, 12:04
20,648
-8
15 Oct 2026, 13:45
20,656
-2
14 Oct 2026, 14:36
20,658
first reading
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 14 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.0%
avg views ÷ 20,577 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,750
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.319%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
33 (14 December 2025 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
46,020
Reactions total
147
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
241
Videos
36
Links
574
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 21s
Average length
1m 20s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
727 reactions across 33 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
661
90.9%
👎
66
9.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 727 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2025 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (87.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
قصه هواوی: از تولد تا بلوغ
مدل رشد در اقتصاد چینی چه ویژگیهایی دارد؟ نقش دولت چین در توسعه صنایع چیست؟ برای پاسخ به این پرسشهای به سراغ کتاب «خانه هواوی» میرویم تا با مطالعه چگونگی تاسیس و توسعه شرکت #هواوی شناختی از مدل توسعه در کشور چین داشته باشیم.
دیدن ویدیو
https://youtu.be/LtDRAkRA9dY
رشد بیسابقه چین در دو دهه اخیر پدیدهای جالب است که مطالعه در مورد آن برای هر کشور درحال توسعهای ضروری است، به خصوص در ا…
قسمت صدوشصتوهشت پادکست دغدغه ایران
آمریکا و ایران: سیاست مهار دوجانبه (رفتن به شورای امنیت)
این آخرین قسمت از شرح کتاب «ایران و آمریکا: تحریمها، جنگها و سیاست مهار دوجانبه» نوشته ساسان فیاضمنش است. او روند قطعنامههای شورای امنیت علیه ایران و پرونده هستهای را پیگیری کرده و سیاست آمریکا و اسرائیل علیه ایران را بررسی میکند. آخرین بخش از این قسمت، به شرح نتیجهگیری فیاضمنش درباره آینده ایران و آمریکا؛ و همچنی…
قسمت صدوشصتوهفت پادکست دغدغه ایران
آمریکا و ایران: سیاست مهار دوجانبه (دولت جرج بوش و پرونده هستهای)
ساسان فیاضمنش در کتاب «ایران و آمریکا: تحریمها، جنگها و سیاست مهار دوجانبه» نشان میدهد که آمریکا و اسرائیل از لحظه اول پیدایش انقلاب ایران درباره این انقلاب و چگونه مواجه شدن با ایران چگونه اندیشیده و عمل کردهاند. بخش سوم شرح این کتاب بر شرح رابطه ایران و آمریکا در دوران جرج بوش پسر و پیدایش پرونده هستهای ا…
قسمت صدوشصتوشش پادکست دغدغه ایران
آمریکا و ایران: سیاست مهار دوجانبه (اسرائیل و مهار دوجانبه)
ساسان فیاضمنش در کتاب «ایران و آمریکا: تحریمها، جنگها و سیاست مهار دوجانبه» نشان میدهد که آمریکا و اسرائیل از لحظه اول پیدایش انقلاب ایران درباره این انقلاب و چگونه مواجه شدن با ایران چگونه اندیشیده و عمل کردهاند. این بخش دوم از شرح این کتاب است که به سیاستهای اسرائیل در قبال ایران و همچنین سیاست تحریمها و اقدام …
قسمت صدوشصتوپنج پادکست دغدغه ایران
آمریکا و ایران: سیاست مهار دوجانبه (سالهای انقلاب و جنگ)
ولی نصر در کتاب «بر لبه تنهایی: روایت کلانراهبرد امنیت ملی ایران» نشان میدهد که رهبران ایران چگونه درباره امنیت ملی میاندیشیدهاند و راهبرد امنیت ملی چگونه توسعه یافته است. اما ساسان فیاضمنش در کتاب «ایران و آمریکا: تحریمها، جنگها و سیاست مهار دوجانبه» نشان میدهد که آمریکا و اسرائیل از لحظه اول پیدایش انقلاب ایران …
از توسعه تا مردمسالاری
آیا توسعه اقتصادی الزاماً به دموکراسی منتهی میشود؟ آیا برای رسیدن به دموکراسی، یک حکومت باید ابتدا ضعیف شود و در آستانه فروپاشی قرار بگیرد؟
دیدن ویدیو
https://youtu.be/dmwLB5lDfnY
کتاب «از توسعه تا مردمسالاری» نوشته دن اسلیتر و جوزف ونگ، با بررسی تجربه ۱۲ کشور آسیایی، پاسخهایی متفاوت برای این پرسشها ارائه میکند؛ پاسخهایی که میتوانند به فهم بهتر مسئله توسعه و آینده سیاسی ایران کمک کنن…
تحریمها به دلیل نابود کردن زیرساخت زیست مدنی، تضعیف طبقه متوسط و تولید خشم اجتماعی و کاستن از ظرفیت زیرساختی حکومت و ناتوان کردن جامعه، ضدجامعه هستند. مطالبه تحریم کردن. ضداخلاقی و خلاف ایراندوستی است.
https://youtu.be/jQCr9hnLW38
@dirancast_official
تحریمها چگونه کار میکنند؟ (قسمت دوم)
تحریمها چگونه کار میکنند؟ آیا تحریم اقتصادی میتواند یک حکومت را وادار به تغییر رفتار کند، یا در کنار آسیب زدن به اقتصاد، پیامدهایی میسازد که حتی به زیان تحریمکننده تمام میشوند؟
دیدن ویدیو
https://youtu.be/jQCr9hnLW38
در بخش دوم و پایانی روایت کتاب «تحریمها چگونه کار میکند؟ ایران و تأثیر جنگ اقتصادی» در ویدیوکست دغدغه ایران، به تجربه ایران میپردازیم: از کاهش درآمد نفت…
آمریکا و ایران: سیاست مهار دوجانبه (دولت جرج بوش و پرونده هستهای)
ساسان فیاضمنش در کتاب «ایران و آمریکا: تحریمها، جنگها و سیاست مهار دوجانبه» نشان میدهد که آمریکا و اسرائیل از لحظه اول پیدایش انقلاب ایران درباره این انقلاب و چگونه مواجه شدن با ایران چگونه اندیشیده و عمل کردهاند. بخش سوم شرح این کتاب بر شرح رابطه ایران و آمریکا در دوران جرج بوش پسر و پیدایش پرونده هستهای ایران و تلاش برای ارجاع پرونده به شورا…
تحریمها چگونه کار میکند؟
آیا تحریم یک کشور صرفا یک ابزار اقتصادی است که خرید و فروش کالا را محدود میکند؟ آیا آمریکا در این سالها با تحریم ایران توانست به خواستههای خود دست یابد؟ تحریمها در چند دهه اخیر چگونه آرایش نیروهای سیاسی را تغییر دادند؟
دیدن ویدیو
https://youtu.be/qmADkPiPaW4
در این قسمت به سراغ کتاب «تحریمها چگونه کار میکند» میرویم که با مطالعه جامعه ایران به عنوان کشوری که دههها تحت #تحریم بوده،…
راهبرد کلان امنیت ملی ایران: پرونده هستهای و هزینهها
این آخرین بخش از شرح کتاب «بر لبه تنهایی: روایت کلانراهبرد امنیت ملی ایران» نوشته ولی نصر است. نویسنده از سه فصل پایانی کتابش، هزینههای موفقیت محور مقاومت، روند و عواقب پرونده هستهای، وقایع بعد از هفت اکتبر ۲۰۲۳ و معماهایی را تحلیل میکند که پیش روی امنیت ملی ایران قرار دارد.
دیدن ویدئو
https://youtu.be/2H6wBFhKQvE
این سه فصل انتقادیترین بخشهای کتاب نسبت…
👍18👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @dirancast_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Renani Mohsen / محسن رنانی @Renani_Mohsen · 67,641 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
دغدغه ایران @fazeli_mohammad · 55,831 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پادکست دغدغه ایران - کانال رسمی” (@dirancast_official), 20,577 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dirancast_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.