Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 42 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,360–2,385 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 21:20
2,380
-2
13 Sept 2026, 09:17
2,382
+4
9 Sept 2026, 07:39
2,378
+3
4 Sept 2026, 03:21
2,375
+1
31 Aug 2026, 21:44
2,374
+2
29 Aug 2026, 06:34
2,372
-1
23 Aug 2026, 13:23
2,373
+5
19 Aug 2026, 23:56
2,368
+2
16 Aug 2026, 21:56
2,366
+1
13 Aug 2026, 08:26
2,365
+2
6 Aug 2026, 23:47
2,363
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:32
2,363
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 58s
Average length
1m 45s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
610 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
336
55.1%
👍
188
30.8%
👎
78
12.8%
👏
8
1.31%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 610 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ایران در دوران هوش مصنوعی / قسمت اول
#ایران_هوش_مصنوعی
اگر فرض کنیم که صد هزار نفر نیروی کاری ایران در شغلهای ادمین، ساپورت، و خدمات فروش به واسطهی AI تا پنج سال آینده از کار بیکار شوند، دقیقا چه اتفاقی میافتد؟
(برای من هنوز بدیهی نیست که این فرض اتفاق میافتد)
1️⃣ صد هزار نفر از کار بیکار شدهاند که به خودی خود فاجعه است. در جامعهای که سالهاست با شرایط جنگی دست و پنجه نرم میکند، نرخ بیکاری سالهاست روند صعود…
لینک زیر یکی از تستهایی که توسط ری دالیو طراحی شده. به نظرم این تست برای تیملیدها، مدیرها، فاندرها و بهطور کلی هر کسی که درگیر ساختن و توسعهی یک تیم است، میتواند بسیار مفید باشد.
https://principlesyou.com/assessment?utm_source=peyman
من در سالهای گذشته تستهای شخصیتشناسی و روانشناسی مختلفی رو امتحان کردهام و راستش، به نظرم اکثرشان ارزش عملی چندانی ندارند. اما این تست یکی از بهترین نمونههایی بوده که دیده…
دوست گرامی وحید فخر متن جالبی دربارهی اکوسیستم استارتاپی (تکنولوژی) ایران نوشته است که من چند نکته بهش اضافه کنم:
1️⃣ «اکوسیستمی که فقط چند بازیگر بزرگ باقیمانده از نسل قبل را حفظ کرده، اما توان ساختن نسل بعد را نداره، یک اکوسیستم زنده نیست»
در همین پنج سال گذشته هزاران استارتاپ جدید در ایران شکل گرفتهاند؛ در شرایط سختی که وضعیت اقتصادی منفی است و وضعیت کشور جنگی. نسل بعدی هم همچنان در ایران در حال ساخته شدن است…
کیمی کا۳
مقدمه — کیمی کا۳ (Kimi K3) یک مدل زبانی بزرگ چینی است که کیفیتی تقریبا یکسان با بهترین مدلهای منتشر شدهی آمریکایی مثل gpt5.6 یا fable دارد. نکتهی جالب (و البته قابل پیشبینی) ماجرا این است که این مدل برخلاف مدلهای آمریکایی با وزن باز منتشر شده است و هر کسی که دسترسی به سختافزار دارد میتواند آن را ران کند.
داستان — رییس واحد استراتژیک OpenAI (شرکتی که خودش را تهدید شده میبیند) پس از بارها ابرازکردن …
کانال لیکفا (@leakfarsi) یکی از کانالهای جالبی است که بررسی لیکهای ایران رو انجام میدهد و معمولا پروسهی وریفای کردن خوبی دارد. با نگاهی به کانال میبینیم که
از زمانی که پست بالا دربارهی هک اتاقک نوشته شده است تا الان صدها سهلانگاری دیگر در شرکتهای بزرگ و کوچک اتفاق افتاده است و کمتر کسی به این موضوع میپردازد.
نداشتن امنیت داده در کشور ما جوری پذیرفته شده است که انگار نه انگار نگهداشت دادهها وظیفه و مسئول…
سلام
حدود چهار سال پیش تصمیم گرفتم که این کانال را برای مهندسی نرمافزار، دنیای تک، ساخت محصول و محتواهای این شکلی نگه دارم. و توی این مدت سعیم این بود راجع به چیزی که در تخصصم نیست چیزی منتشر نکنم.
امروز فکر کردم که شاید بد نباشه نوشتهها و دغدغههای غیر تکنولوژی رو هم جایی منتشر کنم ولی برای اینکه مزاحم دوستانی که اینجا رو برای تکنولوژی دنبال میکنند نباشه
یه کانال جدید درست کردم
خوشحال میشم دوست داشتین دنبال کنی…
مسئولیت مردم / قسمت اول
اگر توماس هابز مینوشت:
«هنگام بررسی اخبار جنگ و رسانههای پیرامون آن، هوشیار باشیم که هیچ گزارشی بیطرفانه نیست. در وضعیت جنگی، اطلاعات صرفاً ابزاری برای کسب قدرت و تضعیف رقیب است. هر خبری که میشنویم، در واقع بخشی از عملیات روانی برای صیانت از منافع یک طرف درگیری است.
در این میان، بزرگترین خطر این نیست که دشمن به ما دروغ بگوید، بلکه این است که ما داوطلبانه در اتاقهای پژواک خود محبوس شویم…
آتشبس
جنگ ایران و آمریکا هرچند که بر روی زمین ۴۰ روز پرتنش و اضطراب را به خود دیده، در عمل جنگی اقتصادی، فرهنگی، سیاسی، اجتماعی و نظامی در ۴۷ سال گذشته بوده است. دولتهای مختلف آمریکا -و غرب- با همکاری خواسته یا ناخواستهی مافیای ثروت و با اتکا بر پروپاگاندای بلاهت در ایران اوضاع را به نحوی رقم زدهاند که ایران عزیز به این نقطهی غمگین رسیده باشد.
اکنون، در این لحظه که همین آتشبس موقت و شکننده با ایستادگی جانانه…
انتقام، عشق و امید
چند روز مانده به نوروز ۱۴۰۵
ادموند دانتس، دریانوردی جوان، مهربان و پر از آرزو که به فکر ساختن زندگیاش است، با خیانت اطرافیانش به زندان میافتد. ۱۴ سال حبس به ناحق، در انفرادی، بابت گناهی که مرتکب نشده بود... ادموند در نهایت از زندان فرار و اسمش را عوض میکند و خود را «کُنت مونتکریستو» مینامد. ادموندِ دریانورد را فراموش میکند تا «کنت» انتقامجو را شکل دهد. هدف «کنت» میشود انتقام از آنهایی که …
❤32
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @peymanfakharian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Arman Garshasbi @Armangarshasbiofficial · 45,678 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
اکوتوپیا @pouriabakhtiari · 23,739 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Kooshiar @kooshiar3 · 25,895 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پیمان فخاریان | Peyman Fakharian” (@peymanfakharian), 2,380 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peymanfakharian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.