Channel
@alijahsh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,725subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001003146401 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alijahsh |
| Created | 24 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alijahsh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 6,725 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 6,719 | +12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 6,707 | +6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 6,701 | +13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 6,688 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 6,697 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 6,707 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 6,718 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 6,726 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 6,728 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 6,728 | first reading |
47 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (20 July 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,725 |
| Reactions total | 186 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
326 reactions across 39 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 93 | 28.5% | |
| ❤ | 88 | 27.0% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 7.98% | |
| 👎 | 23 | 7.06% | |
| 👌 | 18 | 5.52% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 4.91% | |
| 🍌 | 11 | 3.37% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 3.07% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 2.76% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 2.76% | |
| 🤮 | 6 | 1.84% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 1.23% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.92% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 0.92% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 0.92% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.307% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.307% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.307% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.307% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 360 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔻 ۵ نشانه که مشکل شما تبلیغات نیست | وقتی کمپین برای داشبورد ساخته میشود در قسمت قبلی درباره «حل مسئله اشتباه» صحبت کردم. اینکه گاهی از تبلیغات انتظار داریم مشکلی را حل کند که اساسا ریشهاش جای دیگری در کسبوکار است. اما یک مسئله ظریفتر هم وجود دارد: گاهی مشکل، خود تبلیغات نیست. معیاری است که با آن تبلیغات را قضاوت میکنیم. فرض کنید کمپین شما CTR خوبی دارد، CPA پایین آمده، Conversion قابل قبول است و ROAS هم در گز…
👌2❤1
دارم فکر میکنم اونجایی که ترامپ جزو آمریکا اعلام کرده، دلار چنده؟ 😄 اما خارج از شوخی زیاد در سوشال بودن اعتبار هر برندی را کم میکنه. یک روز کل جهان جزو آمریکا بود به جز ایران. یک روز دیگه کل ایران جزو آمریکا بود ... امروز هم تنگه هرمز و عمان مرد رها کن اون سوشالتو ... 🇮🇱 〰️ علیجاه شهربانویی - مشاور بازاریابی و تبلیغات یوتوب | وبسایت | اینستاگرام 🌐 @alijahsh
👍4😁2👎1😢1
RADIO | علیجاه شهربانویی pinned a photo
🌐 چند نقد و نکته درباره Ozone و مدل O2O گروه گلرنگ دارم که در این پست نوشتهام. در کنارش، ایدههایی دارد که به نظر من قابل توجه است. اگر مایل بودید، متن کاملش را در لینکدین بخوانید 🔗 لینک پست من 〰️ علیجاه شهربانویی - مشاور بازاریابی و تبلیغات یوتوب | وبسایت | اینستاگرام 🌐 @alijahsh
❤3👍2
Posted without readable text
📱اصول بازاریابی در یوتیوب بالاخره ۱۳ قسمت «اصول بازاریابی» را در یوتیوب منتشر کردم و خوشحالم که این مجموعه به پایان رسید. این دوره را با این هدف تهیه کردم که برای چند گروه قابل استفاده باشد: - کسانی که می خواهند تازه بازاریابی را شروع کنند - کسانی که می خواهند یک دید کلی و منسجم از بازاریابی داشته باشند - مدیران بخش های منابع انسانی، تِک، عملیات و ... که می خواهند با فضای بازاریابی آشنا شوند و بتوانند با تیم های با…
❤9👍6
سخنی با سخنگوی دولت فخیمه آقای پزشکیان چند وقتی است که یک آقا با زبان طنز و با تقلید از صحبتهای خانم مهاجرانی، سخنگوی محترم دولت، دردهای مردم را مطرح میکند؛ دردهایی که به نظر من، در بسیاری از موارد، پاسخهای مسئولان به آنها نه راهی باز کرده و نه پاسخگوی مردم بوده است. این جوان، با طنز خودش، هم پاسخهای کماثر خانم مهاجرانی را به ایشان یادآوری میکند و هم صدای بخشی از مردم را به گوش میرساند. حالا موضوع خبرساز شده…
👍11❤4👏4
RADIO | علیجاه شهربانویی pinned a video
پاسخ آژانس محترم زیگما ۸ (Zigma 8) به پست من: آقای علیجاه شهربانویی عزیز، آنچه در نقدهای شما برای ما در زیگما۸ ارزشمند است، نگاه شماست؛ نگاهی که «بودجه، زمان، شرایط بازار یا محدودیتهای ایران» را بهانهای برای پایین آوردن استاندارد نمیداند. چون اگر همهچیز را با محدودیتها توجیه کنیم، کمکم هر چیزی قابل قبول میشود؛ و شاید اصلیترین درد صنعت ما همین باشد. ما هم سالهاست تلاش کردهایم پروژههایمان را با همین نگاه …
👏9👌4❤3🔥1
💭 فصل سوم نقد تبلیغات، این بار با حضور آژانس و مشتری همانطور که احتمالا میدانید، دو فصل از برنامه «نقد تبلیغات» را منتشر کردم و برای فصل سوم تصمیم گرفتم با یک رویکرد متفاوت جلو بروم. این ایده از یک فیدبک مهم از طرف آژانسهای تبلیغاتی شکل گرفت. چند آژانس به من گفتند: «علیجاه، وقتی شما تبلیغات را نقد میکنی، خیلی از مسائلی که باعث میشود یک تبلیغ کم اثر شود یا خروجی نهایی ضعیف باشد، لزوما مربوط به خود تبلیغ یا تیم آژانس…
👏7❤4
🔻چرا CRM در بسیاری از سازمان ها شکست می خورد؟ این بار از یک زاویه دیگر: وقتی CRM را قبل از شناخت فرآیندهای سازمان تهیه می کنیم در قسمت های قبلی این موضوع، درباره شفافیت سازمانی، انتخاب زیرساخت مناسب و نقش کارکنان در موفقیت CRM صحبت کردم. اما یک مشکل مهم دیگر هم وجود دارد. گاهی سازمان قبل از اینکه مشخص کند فرآیندهایش چگونه باید کار کنند، سراغ خرید CRM می رود. در حالی که قبل از انتخاب نرم افزار باید فرآیندهای کلی سا…
👍3❤1
❗️لطفاً روی لینک عضویت کلیک نکنید. احتمال دارد این لینک حاوی بدافزار باشد و از طریق حساب تلگرام شما برای دیگران نیز ارسال شود و حتی باعث سرقت اطلاعاتتان شود. لطفا این پست را برای دوستان و آشنایانتان هم بفرستید تا دیگران هم آگاه باشند. 🙏 یادمون باشه: پنیر مجانی فقط توی تلهٔ موشه! 〰️ علیجاه شهربانویی - مشاور بازاریابی و تبلیغات یوتوب | وبسایت | اینستاگرام 🌐 @alijahsh
👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @alijahsh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@alijahsh edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RADIO | علیجاه شهربانویی” (@alijahsh), 6,725 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alijahsh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.