Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 93 days, net -377. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,764–21,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 21:54
20,821
-6
5 Nov 2026, 20:45
20,827
-10
4 Nov 2026, 20:49
20,837
-6
3 Nov 2026, 01:24
20,843
-4
1 Nov 2026, 23:00
20,847
+10
31 Oct 2026, 22:36
20,837
-5
30 Oct 2026, 21:26
20,842
+1
29 Oct 2026, 19:46
20,841
-4
27 Oct 2026, 21:19
20,845
+4
26 Oct 2026, 20:54
20,841
-7
25 Oct 2026, 23:46
20,848
-4
24 Oct 2026, 21:16
20,852
-9
23 Oct 2026, 20:48
20,861
-2
22 Oct 2026, 21:49
20,863
-4
21 Oct 2026, 17:58
20,867
-5
20 Oct 2026, 17:30
20,872
-4
19 Oct 2026, 15:36
20,876
+3
18 Oct 2026, 15:16
20,873
-7
17 Oct 2026, 14:07
20,880
-4
15 Oct 2026, 15:28
20,884
first reading
Engagement
66 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.54%
avg views ÷ 20,821 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,990
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 66 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
66 (16 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
27,800
Reactions total
384
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 15:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
26m 18s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,219 reactions across 65 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,712
77.2%
👍
165
7.44%
🙏
74
3.33%
👏
46
2.07%
🔥
45
2.03%
🥰
36
1.62%
👌
32
1.44%
😍
26
1.17%
💯
24
1.08%
⚡
22
0.991%
🎉
18
0.811%
🏆
14
0.631%
✍
5
0.225%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚀 کسبوکار خود را در یک دقیقه معرفی کنید!
آیا صاحب کسبوکاری هستید یا کسبوکار ارزشمندی را میشناسید که شایسته معرفی و دیدهشدن بیشتر باشد؟
در چالش رایگان «یک دقیقه، یک کسبوکار» از شما دعوت میکنیم کسبوکار خود یا کسبوکاری را که با رضایت صاحب آن معرفی میکنید، در قالب یک ویدئوی حداکثر یکدقیقهای به ما معرفی کنید.
🎯 هدف این چالش چیست؟
فراهمکردن فرصتی برای معرفی کسبوکارهای مختلف و کمک به افزایش دیدهشدن آنها در …
🌱 همراه مکتب کمال در سایر شبکههای اجتماعی باشید
برای دسترسی آسانتر به آموزشها، ویدئوها و مطالب منتشرشده در مکتب کمال، از شما دعوت میکنیم صفحات رسمی ما را در پلتفرمهای دیگر نیز دنبال کنید.
📌 صفحات رسمی مکتب کمال:
🔹 بله: https://ble.ir/maktabekamal
🔹 ایتا: https://eitaa.com/maktabekamal
🔹 آپارات: https://www.aparat.com/maktabekamal
🔹 تلگرام: https://t.me/moazamica
🔹 یوتیوب: https://www.youtube.com/c/MoazamiCa/vid…
💡 چرا بعضی برندها را دوست داریم و به بعضیها بیاعتماد میشویم؟
رابطه ما با یک برند فقط به محصول یا خدماتش محدود نمیشود، احساسی که در طول تعامل با آن تجربه میکنیم، نقش مهمی در شکلگیری این رابطه دارد.
وقتی برندی به وعدههایش عمل میکند، به مشتری احترام میگذارد و به او احساس ارزشمندی میدهد، زمینه اعتماد و علاقه را فراهم میکند.
اما اگر وعدهها عملی نشوند یا مشتری احساس کند فریب خورده، حتی محصولی باکیفیت هم ممکن …
ریشه بعضی از رنجهای انسان را باید در ارتباطاتش جستوجو کرد.
بروس الکساندر، با آزمایش پارک موشها، این پرسش را مطرح کرد که آیا شرایط زندگی و محیط اجتماعی میتوانند بر مصرف مواد مخدر تاثیر بگذارند؟
در این آزمایش، موشهایی که در محیطی غنیتر و همراه با امکان تعامل و بازی زندگی میکردند، در مقایسه با موشهای تنها، الگوی مصرف متفاوتی نشان دادند. این پژوهش به اهمیت محیط و ارتباطات اشاره میکند، هرچند اعتیاد پدیدهای پیچید…
🌱 پذیرش خود؛ قدم اول برای داشتن رابطهای بهتر با خودمان
«کمال سر محبت ببین، نه نقص و گناه
که هرکه بیهنر افتد، نظر به عیب کند»
گاهی آنقدر خودمان را با دیگران مقایسه میکنیم که فراموش میکنیم برای ارزشمند بودن، لازم نیست شبیه شخص دیگری باشیم.
💚 پذیرش خود یعنی تواناییها و ضعفهایمان را ببینیم، برای خودمان ارزش و احترام قائل باشیم و در عین حال، برای رشد و بهتر شدن تلاش کنیم.
قرار نیست فرد دیگری باشیم تا شایسته دوس…
آیا واقعاً خودت رو دوست داری؟
گاهی چیزی که به زبان میآریم، با چیزی که در عمق وجودمون باور داریم، متفاوته.
در این تمرین، با یک روش ساده به رابطهمون با خودمون توجه میکنیم. رابطهای که میتونه روی ارتباط ما با دیگران، کار و طبیعت هم اثر بذاره.
البته نتیجه این تمرین بهتنهایی معیار قطعیِ خوددوستی نیست؛ مهم اینه که به احساسات و باورهای خودمون آگاهتر بشیم.
اگر قرار باشه رابطهات با یک نفر رو بهتر کنی، چرا اون یک نف…
چهار ارتباطی که به زندگی ما معنا میدهند
ما انسانها در ارتباطهایمان رشد میکنیم، خودمان را میشناسیم و به زندگی معنا میدهیم. اما ارتباط، فقط به رابطه ما با دیگران محدود نمیشود.
چهار نوع مهم ارتباط:
۱. ارتباط با خودمان
شناخت احساسات، نیازها، تواناییها و تصویری که از خودمان داریم.
۲. ارتباط با دیگران
رابطههایی که به ما احساس تعلق میدهند و بخشی از هویت ما را شکل میدهند.
۳. ارتباط با کارمان
کاری که فقط منبع درآمد…
🍃 چرا هنوز به حافظ نیاز داریم؟
در دنیایی پر از نگرانی، دلتنگی و دشواری، حافظ چه چیزی برای آموختن به ما دارد؟
📖 او یادآوری میکند که در رنجهایمان تنها نیستیم؛ پیش از ما نیز انسانهایی با همین دردها و تردیدها زندگی کردهاند.
✨ زندگی همیشه مطابق خواستههای ما پیش نمیرود؛ اما میتوانیم در دل سختیها، معنایی برای ادامه دادن پیدا کنیم، از ترس قضاوت دیگران رها شویم و با خودمان مهربانتر باشیم.
شاید نیاز ما به حافظ، بیش از…
❤31👏4🏆3😍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @moazamica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دکتر علیرضا آزمندیان @dralirezaazmandian · 39,600 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
کتابخانه دانشگاهی @Academic_Library · 144,495 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال رسمی محمود معظمی” (@moazamica), 20,821 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moazamica.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.