Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کپی رایتینگ با محتوازیست

Channel

کپی رایتینگ با محتوازیست

@content_life

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,804subscribers

+111 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001733917878
TypeChannel
Username@content_life
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/content_life

Growth

7,6937,8047,748.56 August 2026 — 7,693 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,697 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,716 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,725 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,726 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,740 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,742 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,748 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,762 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,775 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,796 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,804 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 34 days, net +111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,676–7,821 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 00:177,804+8
3 Sept 2026, 13:567,796+21
31 Aug 2026, 00:487,775+13
28 Aug 2026, 00:027,762+14
24 Aug 2026, 21:547,748+6
21 Aug 2026, 10:287,742+2
18 Aug 2026, 07:337,740+14
15 Aug 2026, 16:077,726+1
12 Aug 2026, 11:297,725+9
9 Aug 2026, 16:047,716+19
6 Aug 2026, 12:207,697+4
6 Aug 2026, 03:227,693first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 7,804 subscribers
Avg views / post
872
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.862%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held73 (28 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total32,253
Reactions total278
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54m 04s
Average length
27m 02s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

579 reactions across 59 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍23740.9%
15827.3%
👏6110.5%
🔥5910.2%
🤔244.15%
💔203.45%
😍122.07%
😢61.04%
🙏20.345%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 603 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC149 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🗂️ پوشهٔ کانال‌های اهالی فعال گروه خلاقیت کلامی نیمکت 🤝 👇👇👇 https://t.me/addlist/AGQImaIlTxc3YzVk به‌روزرسانی: شهریور ۱۴۰۵ #معرفی 🌱@Content_Life | محتوازیست

4

28 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC310 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @heydarisani_ir

🔻جادوی استایل یک نکتهٔ کوچک دربارۀ Word که در فایل‌های طولانی اهمیت زیادی پیدا می‌کند: Style فقط برای زیباتر کردن تیترها نیست. اگر عنوان‌های یک سند را اصولی با استایل تعریف کنیم، ورد ساختار عنوان‌ها را می‌شناسد. همین موضوع بعدها در این‌طور کارهایی به کمکمان می‌آید: • ساخت فهرست مطالب • مدیریت سلسله‌مراتب عنوان‌ها • تغییر یکپارچۀ قالب تیترها • سرصفحۀ خودکار • ارجاع داخلی • و... بنابراین اگر تا امروز استایل را بیشت

2👍2

28 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC352 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🐮 نبرد گاوها! انقدر لبنیات توی ایران گرون شده که رقابت بر سر فروش شیر و ماست توی بیلبوردها داره غوغا می‌کنه. اکثراً هم دارن از گاو مایه می‌ذارن و جالب اینکه گاو نر و ماده هم قاطی شده‌ن. مگه گاو ماده شیر نمی‌ده؟ پس چرا تصویر گاو نر می بینیم بعضی جاها؟! زبانم قاصره! خودتون اینجا ببینید. #نمونه_کاوی #تبلیغات 🌱@Content_Life | محتوازیست

👍51

27 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC522 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

بسازه یا بسازه؟! پارسا کاکوئی، دوست خوبم این کارشون رو توی لینکدین به بوتهٔ نقد گذاشته. اول بابت شجاعتش تبریک می‌گم و تحسینش می‌کنم و دوم چند نکتهٔ کوتاه دارم. نقاط قوت: 🔸کپی‌ها خیلی کوتاهن و بدون حرف اضافه 🔸وزن و واج‌آرایی داریم 🔸ایهام داریم توی واژه‌های بسازه و می‌سازه اما نقاط ضعف زبانی این کار رو دوست دارم شما بگین توی نظرها🙏 #تبلیغات #نمونه_کاوی #کپی_رایتینگ 🌱@Content_Life | محتوازیست

👍9

27 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,420 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📚 مترجم هوشمند EPUB از انگلیسی به فارسی این یه ابزاره که کتاب‌های EPUB انگلیسی رو با هوش مصنوعی به فارسی روان ترجمه می‌کنه، بدون به‌هم‌ریختن سروشکل کتاب. فهرست، تصاویر و ساختار اصلی دست‌نخورده می‌مونه و خروجی هم راست‌چین و با فونت فارسی آماده‌ می‌شه! اگه دوست دارید یه کتاب انگلیسی رو به فارسی داشته باشید، امتحانش کنید👇 http://github.com/Retro-Zero/epub-ai-translator منبع: @RepoFA #ابزار #تولید_محتوا #هوش_مصنوعی

🔥3👍2

26 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC517 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

بدون شرح! #تبلیغات 🌱@Content_Life | محتوازیست

👍5💔2🔥2🤔2

24 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC699 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📊 نیم‌نگاهی به بازار نویسندگی تجاری نمودار قرمز که نشون‌دهندهٔ رشد جستجوی گوگلی عبارت «کپی رایتینگ» در ۵ سال گذشته و در ایرانه، می‌تونه امیدوارمون‌ کنه که نسبت به «تبلیغ نویسی» داره بیشتر استفاده و شناخته می‌شه، اما شکی نیست که هوش مصنوعی با جهش عجیبش داره بازار کار ما رو کوچیک می‌کنه. یه نکتهٔ دیگه اینکه بعد از جنگ و قطعی طولانی اینترنت، جستجوی کپی‌رایتینگ و تبلیغ‌تویسی به وضعیت قبل برنگشته اما هوش مصنوعی برگشته.

👍91

23 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC769 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @maktabkhoonehPhoto

🔥 ۵۰۰ دوره آموزشی مکتب‌خونه رایگان شد! در طرح «ایرانِ ‌ماهر»، مکتب‌خونه با همراهی جمعی از محبوب‌ترین مدرسان، این دوره‌ها رو رایگان کرده تا افراد بیشتری بتونن بدون دغدغه مالی، مهارت‌های موردنیازشون رو برای ورود به بازار کار، پیشرفت شغلی یا توسعه فردی یاد بگیرن. دوره‌های رایگان، موضوعات متنوعی رو پوشش میدن: 💻 برنامه‌نویسی، هوش مصنوعی و فناوری اطلاعات 💼 مدیریت، بازاریابی، مالی و مهارت‌های شغلی 🌍 زبان، توسعه فردی، هنر

👍61

23 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC722 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @iranadsclubPhoto

شفافیت همیشه بدون هزینه نیست. 🔵پژوهشی از دانشگاه NYU نشان می‌دهد اضافه‌شدن برچسب «ساخته‌شده با هوش مصنوعی» می‌تواند نرخ کلیک تبلیغات را تا ۳۱.۵ درصد کاهش دهد؛ آماری که اکنون به یکی از پایه‌های چارچوب تازه IAB برای افشای استفاده از هوش مصنوعی تبدیل شده است. 🔵به باور پژوهشگران، همه کاربردهای هوش مصنوعی به برچسب نیاز ندارند. اگر محتوای تولیدشده احتمال فریب مخاطب، جعل هویت یا تغییر درک او از واقعیت را افزایش دهد، افشای

👍2

22 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC710 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📊 اینفوگرافی پیام‌آوای تحلیل گفتمان 🌱 @Content_Life | محتوازیست

👍32👏2

22 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC≈1,140 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

کشف آن‌سوی واژه‌ها با تحلیل گفتمان 🎙مهسا رودحِله، محتواگر و دانشجوی ارشد زبان‌شناسی از تعریف موضوع جذاب تحلیل گفتمان تا کاربردش در طراحی پیام‌های تبلیغاتی و مسیر گفتمان می‌گه. اینو بااطمینان عرض می‌کنم که کپی‌رایتر و محتوانویس اگر این‌دست از آموزه‌های زبان‌شناسی رو بدونه خیلی پیشرفت می‌کنه! توی این پیام‌آوا چیا می‌شنویم؟ 00:51 چیستی تحلیل گفتمان 01:30 تعریف متن و اهمیت بافتار (Context) 03:33 فاکتور اول تحلیل گفتما

9👍6👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @content_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@content_life edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTCAnonymous Poll314 voters

برای تولید محتوای متنی فارسی، بیشتر از کدوم استفاده می‌کنید؟

  1. chatGPT62%
  2. Gemini23%
  3. Claude11%
  4. DeepSeek7%
  5. Gapgpt4%
  6. Perplexity2%
  7. Grok4%
  8. سایر چت‌بات‌ها4%
  9. اصلاً از هوشواره کمک نمی‌گیرم13%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ایده‌های جدید و خلاقانه محتوا - محمد مهدی میرزایی
@contentideass · 30,896
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
دانشگاه بازاریابی
@iranmarketinguniversity · 95,997
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Mehrsasharoleslam
@mehrsasharoleslam · 36,424
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Directam | دایرکتم
@directam_ir · 51,794
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026
NovinHub | نوین هاب
@novinhub · 53,636
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
ترجمان علوم انسانى
@tarjomaanweb · 42,861
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
مجله | خلاقیت، بدون مرز
@AR_NOSRATI · 49,054
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
هوش مصنوعی | Ehsaneshooon
@EhsaneshooonTG · 33,714
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
مدیران ایران | آموزش مدیریت کسب وکار |modiriran 🕊
@modiriran · 35,079
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
بیشتر‌ از‌ یک‌ نفر | پیام بهرام پور
@bishtarazyek · 44,945
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
علی ميرصادقی
@ali_mirsadeghi · 46,839
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
انجمن مدیران
@managersclub · 171,399
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
RADΙO PLAN
@radioplan · 28,118
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 September 2026
آموزش سئو SEO | محسن حبیبی راد
@mohsenhabibi_seo · 36,762
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
کانال دورکاری
@doorkaari · 29,080
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کپی رایتینگ با محتوازیست” (@content_life), 7,804 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/content_life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.