Channel
@rahkar_com
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,218subscribers
+1,206 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001541458360 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rahkar_com |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rahkar_com |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 23,218 | -32 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 23,250 | -18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 23,268 | +411 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 22,857 | +391 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 22,466 | -37 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 22,503 | +68 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 22,435 | +46 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:34 | 22,389 | +48 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:27 | 22,341 | +64 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 22,277 | -37 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 22,314 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 22,325 | -21 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 22,346 | -20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 22,366 | -31 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 22,397 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 22,417 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 22,428 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 22,431 | +15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 22,416 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 22,423 | first reading |
168 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 77 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 168 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 34,469 |
| Reactions total | 147 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 12:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
536 reactions across 80 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 318 | 59.3% | |
| 👍 | 147 | 27.4% | |
| 👏 | 27 | 5.04% | |
| 🙏 | 23 | 4.29% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 2.99% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 0.933% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 168 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 536 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 168 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
. تا حالا شده توی یک جمع چند نفر شروع کنن و بهت تیکه بندازن یا مسخرت کنن؟ به نظرت بهترین واکنش چیه؟ ۱) باهاشون همراهی کنی و تو هم شروع به شوخی کنی ۲) صبانی بشی و با پرخاشگری باهاشون برخورد کنی ۳) سکوت کنی و چیزی نگی ۴) سریع موضوع رو عوض کنی تا بحث تموم بشه عددش رو برام کامنت کن
. 🔺سؤال درباره علایق موضوعی را پیدا کن که طرف مقابل واقعا دوست دارد دربارهاش حرف بزند. این روزها چه فیلم یا سریالی دیدی که واقعاً خوشت اومده باشه؟ هنوز ورزش میکنی؟ این روزها چه ورزشی؟ این روزها چه آهنگهایی گوش میدی؟ اگه همین الان بخوای یه سفر بری، کجا رو انتخاب میکنی؟ آخرین کتابی که خوندی چی بود؟ ارزش خوندن داشت؟
. 🔺 خاطره مشترک از یک خاطره، آدم یا اتفاق مشترک شروع کن. یادتونه اون سال که همه رفتیم شمال چه اتفاقی افتاد؟ فلانی یادتونه اون موقع چه کاری میکرد؟ آخرین باری که همه با هم جمع شدیم کی بود؟ یادتونه بچه که بودیم سر چی همیشه دعوامون میشد؟
. 🔺سؤال تجربهای بهجای اینکه از طرف مقابل اطلاعات خشک و معمولی بپرسی، درباره تجربه، نظر یا انتخاب شخصی خودش سوال کن. این مدل سؤال معمولا خیلی راحتتر گفتگو را باز میکند. مثالها: اگه قرار باشه فقط یک شهر رو برای زندگی انتخاب کنید، کجا رو انتخاب میکنید؟ چرا؟ شما وقتی میخواید از فشار کاری فاصله بگیرید، معمولاً چه کاری انجام میدید؟
. 🔺 قالب مشاهده + سؤال باز اول یک چیزی را که در جمع میبینی یا میشنوی مطرح کن، بعد با یک سوال باز طرف مقابل را وارد گفتگو کن. این روش طبیعیترین راه برای شروع مکالمه است. مثالها: دیدم درباره سفر شمال صحبت میکردید، شما بیشتر اهل سفرهای طبیعتگردی هستید یا شهرگردی؟ این غذایی که سفارش دادید خیلی خوب به نظر میاد، قبلا اینجا امتحانش کردید؟ به نظرم بحث خیلی جالبی شد، شما خودتون توی این مورد چه تجربهای داشتید؟
. خیلی از دوستان گِله دارن که چرا من نمیتونم تو جمع سر صحبت رو باز کنم و حرف بزنم میخوام بهتون چند تا قالب برای شروع صحبت در جمع رو بگم
❤1👍1
معمولا تو جمعهای فامیلی، دوستانه و کاری جزو کدوم دستهای؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
. قیمت اصلی دوره ۷ میلیون تومنه اما برای اولین بار و فقط برای ۱۰۰ نفر تصمیم گرفتم این دوره رو با ۵۰ درصد تخفیف ارائه کنم 🔺قیمت ویژه ثبت نام ۳ میلیون و ۴۹۰ هزار تومان🔺 ۴ هدیه به ارزش بیش از ۸ میلیون تومان هم همراه دوره دریافت میکنید ثبت نام از ۴ روز دیگه شروع میشه ظرفیت دوره فقط و فقط ۱۰۰ نفر
❤6
. 🔥برای کسانی که در جادوی کلام شرکت میکنن ۸ میلیون هدیه در نظر گرفتم ✅دوره ابر انسان به ارزش ۵ میلیون تومان ✅تکنیک های تقویت حافظه به ارزش ۲ میلیون تومان ✅لیست کلمات و جملات شیک و قدرتمند به ارزش ۱ میلیون تومان ✅کتاب اسطوره حاضرجوابی به ارزش ۹۶۰ هزار تومان ارزش مجموع این هدایا بیش از ۸ میلیون تومان میشه😍
Sticker, posted without a caption
. 🛑 هدف دوره "جادوی کلام" اینه که بتونی از این مهارت ها در زندگی واقعیت استفاده کنی ✅ بتونی راحت تر وارد گفتگو بشی ✅ در لحظه جواب پیدا کنی ✅ خاطراتت رو جذاب تعریف کنی ✅ در جمع حرفی برای گفتن داشته باشی ✅ از شخصیت خودت دفاع کنی ✅ وقتی صحبت میکنی آدمها واقعا به حرفات توجه کنن
❤4
. 🔴 جادوی کلام دقیقا چیه؟ دوره جادوی کلام یک دوره جامع برای تقویت مهارت های کلامیه که از ۷ مهارت بسیار مهم تشکیل شده است 1⃣ هوش کلامی کمکت میکنه سریع تر فکر کنی کلمات مناسب رو پیدا کنی و منظور خودت رو واضح تر و جذاب تر بیان کنی 2⃣ حاضرجوابی کمکت میکنه وقتی کسی سوالی میپرسه یا کنایه ای میزنه ذهنت قفل نکنه و بتونی همون لحظه جواب مناسب پیدا کنی 3⃣ شوخ طبعی کمکت میکنه گفتگوهای معمولی رو جذاب تر کنی و کاری کن…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 168 posts we hold for @rahkar_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
معمولا تو جمعهای فامیلی، دوستانه و کاری جزو کدوم دستهای؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
اگر یک نفر توی جمع بهت تیکه بندازه عکس العملت چیه؟
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
چرا نمیتونی تو جمع با دیگران ارتباط بگیری و صمیمی باشی؟
The shares total 209%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
تاحالا شده ببینی یک نفر تخصص و مهارت و مدرک تحصیلیش از تو پایین تره ولی درآمدش از تو بیشتره؟
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
تاحالا برات اتفاق افتاده یک حرف یا نظری رو بگی و همه مخالفت کنن ولی یک نفر دیگ همون حرف رو بگه و همه موافقت کنن؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
فکر میکنی چقدر محتوایی که تولید میکنیم به مشکلات تو مربوطه ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 168 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vip rahkar” (@rahkar_com), 23,218 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rahkar_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.