جدیدترین و داغ ترین اخبار دنیای تکنولوژی، علم و خودرو را با دیجیاتو دنبال کنید
💻 وبسایت:
www.Digiato.com
🔥 اینستاگرام:
https://www.instagram.com/digiato.online
💡تبلیغات در شبکه دیجیاتو:
@DigiatoAds
Created
25 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Digiato” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
42 measurements spanning 71 days, net +3,058. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110,783–114,759 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Oct 2026, 20:20
114,300
+60
14 Oct 2026, 20:44
114,240
+94
13 Oct 2026, 10:27
114,146
+82
9 Oct 2026, 04:37
114,064
+133
4 Oct 2026, 18:58
113,931
+205
27 Sept 2026, 00:39
113,726
+219
19 Sept 2026, 17:40
113,507
+86
17 Sept 2026, 06:20
113,421
+82
15 Sept 2026, 04:22
113,339
+53
13 Sept 2026, 13:15
113,286
+93
11 Sept 2026, 14:21
113,193
+731
8 Sept 2026, 21:18
112,462
+96
5 Sept 2026, 14:21
112,366
+20
3 Sept 2026, 18:20
112,346
+70
2 Sept 2026, 11:14
112,276
-44
1 Sept 2026, 09:33
112,320
+16
31 Aug 2026, 06:42
112,304
-26
30 Aug 2026, 10:12
112,330
+9
29 Aug 2026, 13:03
112,321
+31
28 Aug 2026, 09:24
112,290
first reading
Engagement
1,864 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 144 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.23%
avg views ÷ 114,300 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,980
828 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
829
of 1,864 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026
Posts held
1,864 (5 August 2026 – 15 October 2026)
Views total
4,947,727
Reactions total
63,857
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Oct 2026, 01:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈82,700
Videos
≈11,900
Links
≈50,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 51m
Average length
1m 28s
Measured directly from 158 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
78,786 reactions across 999 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
22,599
28.7%
❤
16,420
20.8%
👍
13,533
17.2%
🤬
6,568
8.34%
🔥
6,065
7.70%
👎
4,314
5.48%
🤯
3,415
4.33%
😐
2,373
3.01%
😢
1,527
1.94%
🤔
815
1.03%
😱
736
0.934%
👌
421
0.534%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 999 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78,786 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 September 2026 to 15 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 999 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Digiato. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 September 2026 to 15 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🟠دانشمندان سازوکار جالب تزریق زهر توسط نیش زنبور عسل را نشان دادند
🔹نیش زنبور عسل فقط به دلیل ورود زهر دردناک نیست؛ سازوکار تزریق زهر نیز در ماندگاری درد نقش دارد. زنبور عسل هنگام نیشزدن، معمولاً نیش خود را در پوست قربانی جا میگذارد و در این فرایند آسیب میبیند. زنبور پس از جداشدن نیش از بدنش میمیرد، اما نیش همچنان به پمپاژ زهر ادامه میدهد.
🔹پژوهشگران سازوکار نیش زنبور عسل را نوعی «میکروپمپ با پیستون دوگانه» تو…
🔄مطالعه جدید: گوشتخواران بیشتر از گیاهخواران شانس رسیدن به ۱۰۰ سالگی دارند
🔸پژوهشی جدید در چین نشان میدهد خوردن گوشت میتواند با طول عمر بیشتر و افزایش احتمال ۱۰۰ سالهشدن در برخی سالمندان ارتباط داشته باشد؛ البته نباید در نتیجهگیری نهایی عجله کنیم و این ارتباط به معنای اثبات حتمی تأثیر گوشت بر افزایش طول عمر نیست.
🔸نتایج نشان داد زنان گوشتخوار بیشتر از زنان گیاهخوار به ۱۰۰ سالگی میرسیدند. اما بررسی دقیقتر …
🐖دانشمندان کلیههای منجمد خوک را بعد از یک سال احیا کردند
🔸پژوهشگران موفق شدند برای اولینبار چند کلیه منجمد خوک را دوباره گرم و نشانههایی از فعالیت را در آنها مشاهده کنند. این کلیهها در دمای منفی ۱۵۰ نگهداری میشدند و یکی از آنها بیش از یک سال منجمد بود. کلیهها پس از گرمشدن رنگ طبیعی خود را بازیافتند و ادرار تولید کردند.
🔸دانشمندان برای نگهداری اندامها از فرایندی به نام «شیشهایشدن» استفاده کردند. در این ر…
⏺پروژه جدید ناسا: توسعه باتریهایی که سرمای منفی ۱۷۰ درجه ماه را تحمل میکنند
🔸ناسا درحال توسعه باتریهای جدیدی است که بتوانند سرمای شدید قطب جنوب ماه را تحمل کنند. قرار است برق موردنیاز فضانوردان، خودروهای ماهنورد و تجهیزات علمی با این باتریها تأمین شوند.
🔸ناسا در این باتریها از الکترولیت جامد سرامیکی یا پلیمری استفاده میکنند. این طراحی امکان تحمل شرایط دمایی سختتر را فراهم میکند. آزمایشها نشان دادند باتری…
🔄دانشمندان با فرمولی ریاضی زمان سرکشی هوش مصنوعی را پیشبینی کردند
🔹پژوهشگران دانشگاه جورج واشنگتن میگویند یک فرمول ساده ریاضی میتواند احتمال سرکشی هوش مصنوعی و تولید پاسخهای نامطلوب را پیش از وقوع پیشبینی کند. این روش بر سازوکاری درونی در شبکه عصبی مدل تکیه دارد و برای توسعه سامانههای ایمنتر کاربرد خواهد داشت.
🔹پژوهشگران سازوکار مورد بررسی را به سوزن قطبنما تشبیه میکنند. این سازوکار درواقع بردار باقیمانده…
🗣چین از ربات انساننمای غولپیکر Neo1 با توان حمل ۵۰۰ کیلوگرم بار رونمایی کرد
🔹این ربات انساننمای ۴ متری با عملگرهای هیدرولیکی و موتورهای برقی میتواند بارهای بسیار سنگین را در شرایط پرخطر حمل کند. ۳۹ مفصل این ربات مجهز به پمپهای هیدرولیکی مینیاتوری هستند و توان جابهجایی بارهای ۵۰۰ کیلوگرمی را با دو دست دارند.
🔹شرکت سازنده این ربات صنعتی علاوهبر توان بالا، به دقت حرکتهای آن نیز توجه داشته است. این ربات غول…
🔄ایلان ماسک: اسپیسایکس خسارت خریدهای اشتباه ایجنت Grok را پرداخت میکند
🔸ایلان ماسک اعلام کرد اگر ایجنت هوش مصنوعی Grok حین خرید دچار اشتباه شود یا اطلاعات کارت بانکی کاربران را لو دهد، اسپیسایکس تمام خسارت را جبران خواهد کرد.
🔸البته هنوز جزئیات دقیقی درباره نحوه پوشش این خسارتها توسط اسپیسایکس منتشر نشده است. قوانین فعلی اکثر پلتفرمها مانند OpenAI، متا و حتی خود گراک، مسئولیت اقدامات مالی را متوجه خود کاربران…
🟢اوپنایآی کارمند سابق خود را به انتقال ۱۰۰ فایل محرمانه به مدیران اپل متهم کرد
🔸شرکت OpenAI ادعا کرده یکی از کارمندان سابقش بیش از ۱۰۰ فایل محرمانه حاوی اطلاعات طراحی دستگاههای جدید را به مدیران اپل نشان داده است. به گفته این شرکت، اپل با استفاده از همین اسناد اقدام به معرفی محصولات جدید مجهز به هوش مصنوعی از جمله Homeview کرده است.
🔸اوپنایآی میگوید نگران است که اطلاعاتش درون اپل دستبهدست شود و مهندسان این …
🟢قابلیت جدید واتساپ: با افرادی که حساب کاربری ندارند تماس بگیرید
🔸واتساپ ویژگی جدیدی را معرفی کرد که به کاربران اجازه میدهد افراد بدونِ حساب کاربری یا اپلیکیشن را تنها با ارسال یک لینک به تماسهای خود دعوت کنند.
🔸این مهمانان به امکاناتی مانند اشتراکگذاری صفحه و واکنشهای ایموجی با رمزگذاری سرتاسری دسترسی دارند، اما ورود آنها نیازمند تأیید میزبان است. در این تماسها، شماره سایر افراد به مهمانان نمایش داده نمیش…
🔄ناتینگ ظاهراً روی دو مدل عینک هوشمند با قابلیتهای هوش مصنوعی کار میکند
🔸شرکت ناتینگ احتمالاً درحال توسعه دو مدل عینک هوشمند مختلف است که یک مدل بهصورت صوتی عمل میکند و مدل دیگر به دوربین و قابلیتهای هوش مصنوعی مجهز خواهد بود.
🔸این گجتها به لنزهای فتوکرومیک خودکار مجهز خواهند بود و مدل پیشرفته آن از ChatGPT و سیستم ترجمه لحظهای پشتیبانی میکند. تاکنون هیچ تصویر رسمی، لیست قیمت یا تاریخ عرضه دقیقی از سوی شرکت…
🗣اوپنایآی با شکایت ۸ ایالت آمریکا درباره خطرات ChatGPT برای کودکان مواجه شد
🔹دادستانهای کل ۸ ایالت آمریکا در شکایتهایی جداگانه، OpenAI را به فریب کاربران درباره ایمنی چتبات خود متهم کردند. به ادعای آنها، این برنامه با طراحی اعتیادآور و جلب اعتماد کاذب، اطلاعات نوجوانان و کودکان را جمعآوری و برخی را به سمت خودآزاری هدایت کرده است.
🔹این ایالتها اکنون خواستار جریمههای سنگین تا ۵۰ هزار دلار برای هر تخلف، حذف دا…
🍏هزینه تعمیر گوشی تاشو اپل میتواند حتی از قیمت آیفون ۱۸ پرو مکس نیز بیشتر شود
🔸براساس تعرفههای اپل که برای کاربران بدون پوشش بیمهای +AppleCare اعلام شده، هزینه تعمیر آیفون دوئو میتواند حتی به رقم سنگین ۱۴۹۹ دلار نیز برسد؛ یعنی گرانتر از قیمت پایه آیفون ۱۸ پرو مکس. برای تعویض نمایشگر داخلی نیز باید ۹۹۹ دلار خرج کنید.
🔸در مقابل، تهیه اشتراک ماهانه ۱۹.۹۹ دلاری یا سالانه ۱۹۹.۹۹ دلاری اپل هزینههای تعمیر را به شک…
🤣98👍7❤5🤯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,864 posts we hold for @Digiato. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 September 2026 to 15 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 82 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 99 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دنیای علم و تکنولوژی @Tech_Sci · 35,857 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
علم و فناوری | Dr IT @it_24 · 37,708 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
TechTube 𝕏 تک توب @TechTube · 75,352 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
Zoomit | زومیت @thezoomit · 132,087 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
GhachTech | قاچ تِک @ghachtech · 21,611 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 September 2026
شهر سخت افزار @shahrsakhtafzar · 30,840 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 7 September 2026
MoboNews | موبونیوز @mobo_channel · 35,360 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
اسب بخار @asbe_bokhar · 65,080 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Vigiato | ویجیاتو @vigiatonet · 83,480 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
ترنجی @toranji · 129,189 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
iClarified @iclarified · 48,620 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
فناوری فوری📡 @IT_Fouri · 52,967 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
هوش مصنوعی [ AI ] @iFutureAI · 42,992 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
ایرانیان امارات @iranian_uae · 48,296 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 27 August 2026
Virauniversity | ویرا @virauniversitycom · 375,619 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
Geph announcements | 迷雾通通知 @gephannounce · 21,657 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 September 2026
AvalAI | هوش مصنوعی @aval_ai · 25,088 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
SibApp | سیباپ @sibapp · 41,507 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 2 September 2026
جادی | Jadi @jadivarlog · 104,053 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
میلی تک | Militech @militech_ir · 94,302 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
فکتپرس @factpress_ir · 20,304 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 September 2026
تولید محتوا |هوش مصنوعی| زنگ دانش @zangedanesh · 59,149 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
تواناتک Tavaanatech @tavaanatech · 80,632 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
gemtv @gemtvhub · 28,644 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 540 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Digiato | دیجیاتو” (@Digiato), 114,300 subscribers as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Digiato.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.