Channel
@azarijahromi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,470subscribers
-638 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001101759541 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @azarijahromi |
| Description | وقایع |
| Created | 29 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/azarijahromi |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:38 | 40,470 | -33 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 40,503 | -25 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 40,528 | -21 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 40,549 | -28 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 40,577 | -44 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 40,621 | -75 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 40,696 | -25 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:03 | 40,721 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:05 | 40,732 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:45 | 40,747 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 40,765 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 40,776 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 40,783 | -17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 40,800 | -20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 40,820 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 40,828 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 40,839 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 40,851 | -17 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 40,868 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 40,884 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 28 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (28 December 2025 – 20 September 2026) |
| Views total | 62,800 |
| Reactions total | 2,182 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 11:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
34,433 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13,664 | 39.7% | |
| 👎 | 9,454 | 27.5% | |
| ❤ | 8,347 | 24.2% | |
| 😁 | 1,486 | 4.32% | |
| 🤬 | 1,262 | 3.67% | |
| 😢 | 168 | 0.488% | |
| 🔥 | 52 | 0.151% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,433 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2025 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
کارکرد دیپلماسی گاه اقتضا میکند که در برخی اجلاسها و مجامع حضور نیافت؛ چهبسا در شرایطی خاص، منفعت و دستاوردِ عدم حضور در سطح رئیسجمهور در نیویورک، بیش از حضور در چنین سطحی باشد. @azarijahromi
👍593👎431😁41❤28🤬19😢3🔥2
سالنی کنار مجلس عروسی به خاک و خون کشیده شدهی سیریک فراهم کنید، از میانجیهای بین المللی آنجا پذیرایی کنید؛ اسم محل هم بگذارید Trump Dreams! ✨ @azarijahromi
👍749👎209❤55😢28😁19🤬5
برای جنوب، سرزمین مادری... جنوب فقط یک جغرافیا نیست؛ بوی دریاست، عطر نخل است، گرمای دستهای پینهبستهی مردمانی است که همیشه با صبوری، زندگی را از دل آفتاب بیرون کشیدهاند. امروز اما، آسمان جنوب، به جای آواز مرغان دریایی، صدای انفجار را در خود پیچانده است. خانههایی که باید مأمن آرامش باشند، با اضطراب چشم به افق دوختهاند؛ مادرانی که باید قصهی خواب بخوانند، دلنگران فردای فرزندانشان شدهاند. در روزهایی که آتش جنگ…
❤626👎118👍51🤬21😢9😁6🔥2
این روزها، بدرقه بزرگمردی است که با فدای جان خود و خانوادهاش پای اعتلای ایران تا قطرهی آخر خونش ایستاد. تشییع او نماد برخاستن مجدد ملتی بزرگ خواهد شد که پس از ایستادگی جانانه دست بر زانو خواهد زد، قامت راست کرده و دنیا را شگفت زده خواهد کرد، به فضل الهی... همه خواهیم آمد... 🏴 @azarijahromi
❤991🤬870👎256😁68👍48😢11🔥5
جوونم فدای جوونت حسین 🏴 @azarijahromi
❤535👎202👍18😁15🤬8😢3
تنگه باز بود، نفت ایران تحریم بود. تنگه بسته و مجدد باز شد، تحریم نفت ایران معلق شد. البته که ترامپ پیروز جنگ شده است، نکشیمون پیروز! ✨ @azarijahromi
👎806❤650😁183👍95🤬9
از خون جوانان وطن لاله دمیده... ✨ @azarijahromi
❤954😁148👍70👎56😢26🤬22🔥3
تفاهم صورت گرفته، تثبیت کنندهی دستاوردهای مقاومت و ایستادگی ملت ایران و نیروهای مسلح و از جان گذشتهی آن است. دشمن ستمگر هر چند عزیزان ارزشمندی را از ما گرفت، اما هرگز نتوانست «نور» ایران را خاموش کند؛ ایران درخشانتر از همیشه بر تارک دنیا خواهد درخشید! @azarijahromi
❤644😁181👍145👎64🤬12
دغدغهی کسانی که در مخالفت با توافق پیش رو با آمریکا، با همهی وجود فریاد میزنند؛ قابل درک است. آنها معتقدند که ترامپ به یک فرصت تنفس نیاز دارد و این توافق، پنجره فرصتی مناسبی به او خواهد داد و او پس از این تنفس و تجدید قوا، اینبار پر قدرتتر به سراغ ایران خواهد آمد. این را تجربه دو جنگ اخیر به ما اثبات کرده است. اما یک جای پای استدلال آنها میلنگد، اینکه تصور میکنند، تیم سیاسی ایران، از این موضوع ناآگاه است؛ حتما…
❤675👍393😁69👎59🤬10😢1
انتقام گرفتن، صرفا جنگیدن نیست؛ بعضی وقتها تجدید بنا و بازسازی و توسعهی ایران، ضربهی بزرگتری به دشمنی است که خواهان نابودی ایران است. دیدگاه ارزشمندی است آقای رئیس جمهور؛ انشالله شما و همکارانتان در انتقام گیری خون شهدای ایران، سربلند و موفق باشید. ✨ @azarijahromi
❤683👎343👍295😁54🤬23🔥2😢2
مشکل، انتقاد صداوسیما از دولت نیست! مشکل بزرگ، سکوت اعضای محترم دولت در مواجهه با مردم و رسانههاست. با مردم حرف بزنید؛ حتی از همان تریبون صداوسیما؛ مردم را توانمند در قضاوت بدانید! ✨ @azarijahromi
👍595❤94👎57😁30
بمب بعدی ترامپ و نتانیاهو شاید از جنس باروت نباشد؛ از جنس «تورم» باشد! میدان نبرد، سفرهی مردم، اجاره بهای مسکن و ... است! پدافند اقتصادی کشور آماده است، یا خدایناکرده مجددا غافلگیر میشویم؟ ✨ @azarijahromi
👍687😁88🤬54❤44👎39😢13🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @azarijahromi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 79 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“وقایع :: آذریجهرمی” (@azarijahromi), 40,470 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/azarijahromi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.