National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 12 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 464 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 648 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11,837 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 464, the earliest publisher we hold is @akharinkhabar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 463 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
413 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 45 days, net -881. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117,704–118,849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 13:59
117,836
-80
17 Sept 2026, 04:15
117,916
-34
15 Sept 2026, 07:16
117,950
-45
13 Sept 2026, 15:01
117,995
-31
11 Sept 2026, 19:56
118,026
-57
9 Sept 2026, 08:16
118,083
-60
5 Sept 2026, 22:01
118,143
-31
3 Sept 2026, 16:20
118,174
+9
2 Sept 2026, 10:05
118,165
+12
1 Sept 2026, 11:47
118,153
-31
31 Aug 2026, 11:57
118,184
+21
30 Aug 2026, 11:45
118,163
-46
29 Aug 2026, 09:43
118,209
-31
28 Aug 2026, 13:03
118,240
-14
27 Aug 2026, 11:04
118,254
-31
26 Aug 2026, 09:11
118,285
-21
25 Aug 2026, 09:33
118,306
-14
24 Aug 2026, 09:04
118,320
-36
22 Aug 2026, 20:17
118,356
-37
21 Aug 2026, 10:45
118,393
first reading
Engagement
18,330 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1,020 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.28%
avg views ÷ 117,836 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,870
1,117 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1,124
of 18,330 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
18,330 (23 May 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
4,317,426
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 21:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈436,000
Videos
≈72,900
Links
≈518,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 50m
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 107 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
یکی از تکان دهندهترین سکانسهای نمایش گرسنگی در قرن حاضر (تماشا کنید)
✍️ عصر ایران
🔹سکانس «بانک غذا» از فیلم لحظهای است که کتی از شدت گرسنگی، غرور و کرامتش را کنار میگذارد و در برابر دوربین بیطرف کن لوچ فرو میریزد.
👇👇👇
asriran.com/0050UT
@MyAsriran
حملات موشکی عربستان به شمال یمن
منابع یمنی گزارش دادند عربستان در این حملات، مناطق «مران وحیدان» و «الظاهر» در غرب استان صعده را هدف قرار داد.
Asriran.com
@MyAsriran
حمله هوایی روسیه به مراکز کنترل پهپادهای اوکراین
🔹نیروی هوایی روسیه مراکز کنترل پهپادهای اوکراینی را با بمبهای FAB-1500 بهشدت هدف قرار داد.
🔹وزارت دفاع روسیه اعلام کرد که این اهداف نزدیک خوتن در منطقه سومی و دروژکوفکا در جمهوری دونتسک مورد اصابت قرار گرفتند.
Asriran.com
@MyAsriran
همسویی 5 کشور با تروئیکای اروپایی علیه ایران: اختلال در تنگه هرمز و باب المندب غیرقابل قبول است
🔹انگلیس، فرانسه و آلمان به همراه استرالیا، ژاپن، نیوزیلند، لهستان و کره جنوبی روز سهشنبه در بیانیهای مشترک مدعی شدند هرگونه اختلال در مسیرهای دریایی از جمله تنگه هرمز و بابالمندب، غیرقابل قبول است.
👇👇👇
asriran.com/0050UP
@MyAsriran
ترامپ در جلسه با سران منطقه در نیویورک:
استیو و جرد امروز جلسه بسیار پرباری با میانجیهای ایران داشتند. باید دید چه پیش میآید.
به نظرم انگیزه و شتاب زیادی برای دستیابی آنها به توافق وجود دارد؛ این چیزی است که از همه میشنویم.
امیدوارم پیش از آنکه خیلی دیر شود، هرچه سریعتر کار درست را انجام دهند.
میدانید، زمانی فرا میرسد که دیگر خیلی دیر شده است و ما فرصتی برای اینکه اجازه دهیم آنها به عنوان یک ملت باقی بمان…
تهدید دوباره ترامپ برای حمله به کوه کلنگ
🔹رئیسجمهور آمریکا در جلسه با سران کشورهای منطقه گفت که ایالات متحده آمریکا ممکن است مجبور شود «کوه کلنگ را منفجر کند».
Asriran.com
@MyAsriran
ادعای ترامپ درباره ایران:
«استیو ویتکاف و جرد کوشنر امروز دیدار بسیار پرباری با میانجیهای ایران داشتند. خواهیم دید که از این دیدار چه نتیجهای حاصل میشود.
🔹مدتی است که آنها در حال میانجیگری هستند، اما فکر میکنم برای رسیدن آنها به یک توافق، شتاب و تحرک زیادی ایجاد شده است. این چیزی است که از همه میشنویم.» / انتخاب
Asriran.com
@MyAsriran
ادعای العربیه درباره دیدار نمایندگان ایران و آمریکا در نیویورک
منبعی بلندپایه به «العربیه»:
نشست نیویورک میان هیئتهای آمریکایی و ایرانی، مذاکرات را از حالت بنبست خارج کرده و موجب تحرک در روند مذاکرات شده است.
🔹هیئت ایرانی که با استیو ویتکاف و جرد کوشنر دیدار کرد، تأکید کرده است که اختیارات کامل برای مذاکره دارد.
🔹رایزنی میان آمریکا و ایران بر اساس بازگشایی تنگه هرمز و کاهش تحریمها و محاصره انجام میشود.
Asrira…
بلومبرگ: سنتکام پس از حمله به میناب، روند استفاده از هوش مصنوعی را تغییر داد
🔹مجموعه تغییرات اعمالشده در فرماندهی مرکزی آمریکا، بر ضرورت کاهش خطر خطاها در عملیاتهای رزمی گسترده و پرسرعت تاکید دارد. برخی مقامهای دفاعی و کارشناسان بهطور خصوصی هشدار دادهاند که احتمال تکرار جنایت میناب همچنان بیش از حد بالاست.
👇👇👇
asriran.com/0050UG
@MyAsriran
دیدار عراقچی - ویتکاف
صداوسیما:
🔹عراقچی و ویتکاف (نماینده ترامپ) در نیویورک باهم دیدار کردند.
🔹با اصرار نماینده آمریکا دیدار عراقچی با ویتکاف در حاشیه مجمع عمومی برگزار شد
🔹 ابلاغ شروط ایران برای بازگشایی تنگه هرمز دلیل پذیرش درخواست ویتکاف برای این دیدار بوده است.
🔹مواضع قاطع ایران در این دیدار به نماینده آمریکا ابلاغ شده است.
🔹رفع فوری محاصره دریایی، پرداخت فوری همه اموال مسدود شده ایران و پایان جنگ در همه …
ویتکاف در گفتوگو با سیبیاس: دیدار با ایرانیها خوب پیش رفت و در حال حاضر احساس بسیار خوبی دارم
Asriran.com
@MyAsriran
Signed N
Showing the 12 most recent of 18,330 posts we hold for @MyAsriran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 135 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 152 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
10
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
10
vacant every time we have ever looked
@MyAsriran named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@myasrirsn named in 297 posts, 8 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
@bank_mehreiran named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@healthsea_admin named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@irancelnews1 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@myasiran named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@myasrian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@myasrkahabr named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@nyasriran named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@sepahnewsiradmin named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ertebatino_admin named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
خبرگزاری خبرآنلاین @khabaronline_ir · 115,958 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
چندثانیه آنلاین @chandsanieh_news · 140,784 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
فرارو @fararunews · 129,458 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 11 August 2026
سهند ایرانمهر @sahandiranmehr · 38,294 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
شرق @SharghDaily · 29,986 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
پایگاه خبری الف @alef_news · 38,057 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 31 August 2026
اطلاعات آنلاین @ettelaatonline · 46,395 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
خبر۲۴ @bisto4news · 56,318 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 August 2026
کانال سلام @salamonlline · 48,929 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 19 August 2026
Tabnak | تابناک @TeleTabnak · 207,443 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
🌻🌾ایران تایمز🌽🌻 @iran_times · 27,397 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
اعتمادآنلاین @EtemadOnline · 37,961 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
رسانه خبری بامدادنو @baamdadeno · 105,133 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
اصلاحات نیوز - رسانه @Eslahatnews · 138,528 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
اخبار فوری جهان (انتخاب) @Entekhab_Jahan · 34,524 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
تجارت نیوز @tejaratnews · 46,179 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
جماران @jamarannews · 68,028 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 August 2026
دیده بان ایران @didebaniran · 172,384 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 12 August 2026
پایگاه خبری انتخاب @entekhab_ir · 205,576 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
هممیهن @hammihanonline · 39,276 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 30 August 2026
قیمت سکه،طلا،ارز،بورس @gheymateseketala · 55,736 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 23 August 2026
شبکه راوی @raavionline1 · 101,501 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 16 August 2026
تلویزیون روایت فردا | RFT @revayatfarda · 188,604 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
خبرگزاری مهر @mehrnews · 341,936 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 248 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
4 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عصر ایران” (@MyAsriran), 117,836 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MyAsriran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.