Channel
@Entekhab_Jahan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,524subscribers
-522 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002181153155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Entekhab_Jahan |
| Description | اخبار سرویس سیاست خارجی و بین الملل «انتخاب» www.Entekhab.ir ارسال پیام، انتقاد و پیشنهاد به آیدی زیر @Alo_Entekhab تبلیغات در کانال: 09126196407 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Entekhab_Jahan |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 34,524 | -31 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 34,555 | -25 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 34,580 | -14 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:14 | 34,594 | -12 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 34,606 | -34 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:15 | 34,640 | -25 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 34,665 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 34,679 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:34 | 34,689 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 34,707 | +19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 34,688 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 34,704 | -20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 34,724 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 34,732 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 34,747 | -15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 34,762 | -16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 34,778 | -27 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 34,805 | -19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 34,824 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 34,837 | first reading |
1,211 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 590 of 637 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,211 (6 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,860,983 |
| Reactions total | 8,733 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 05:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,882 reactions across 913 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5,078 | 39.4% | |
| 👎 | 4,493 | 34.9% | |
| 🤬 | 2,768 | 21.5% | |
| 🤔 | 147 | 1.14% | |
| 🤯 | 132 | 1.02% | |
| 😢 | 110 | 0.854% | |
| 💔 | 103 | 0.8% | |
| 😱 | 51 | 0.396% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 916 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,882 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پزشکیان در گفتوگو با فاکسنیوز: انصارالله یمن مسئول اقدامات خودشان هستند و از ما دستور نمیگیرند. ما بهعنوان کسانی که در منطقه در برابر شرایطی که بر آنها تحمیل شده مقاومت میکنیم، با آنها در ارتباط هستیم. / انتخاب
👍2
برت بایر، مجری شبکه فاکس: آیا غنیسازی اورانیوم ۶۰ درصدی را کنار خواهید گذاشت؟ مسعود پزشکیان، رئیسجمهور ایران: در چارچوب قوانین بینالمللی و بر اساس معاهده منع گسترش سلاحهای هستهای (NPT). هر چیزی را که موظف به رعایت آن باشیم، رعایت خواهیم کرد. / انتخاب
👍1
پزشکیان در گفتوگو با فاکسنیوز درمورد حوادث دیماه: «خودِ ترامپ اعلام کرد که ایالات متحده این افراد را برای سرنگونی دولت ایران تجهیز و مسلح کرده بود. اطرافیان نتانیاهو اعلام کردند که نیروهایی قرار است از استانهای کردستان و بلوچستان به کلانشهرهای اصلی نفوذ کنند تا حکومت را ساقط سازند. آنها گمان میکردند این ماجرا ۳ روزه تمام میشود و حکومت فرو خواهد پاشید؛ اما دولت و نظام استوار باقی ماند، منسجمتر شد و به اتحا…
👎5👍2
پزشکیان در گفتوگو با فاکسنیوز: «رئیسجمهور آمریکا اعلام کرد که ما تروریست هستیم. اما در واقعیت، هر کسی به سادگی میتواند تشخیص دهد که این ما بودهایم که قربانی و هدف تروریسم قرار گرفتهایم؛ و آنوقت آنها میگویند: "نه، ما این کار را نکردیم." آنها حقیقت آشکار را انکار میکنند، با این حال همچنان ما را به چنین اقداماتی متهم مینمایند. ما خواهان زندگی در صلح و آرامش در این منطقه هستیم.» / انتخاب
👍2👎2
پزشکیان در گفتوگو با فاکسنیوز: «ما تا آخرین لحظه به مقاومت ادامه خواهیم داد. بله، قطعاً مشکلات اقتصادی داریم، اما برای بقا و ماندن، هر سختی را پشت سر خواهیم گذاشت و پایداری خواهیم کرد.» / انتخاب
👍6👎3
پزشکیان در گفتوگو با فاکسنیوز: ترامپ مدام میگفت: «میخواهم برای مردم ایران هدیه بیاورم»، اما هدیهای که آنها برای ما آوردند، موشکهای هدایتشونده، تسلیحات سنگین و ویرانی بود. آنها در واقع میخواهند در داخل کشور حوادث و اتفاقاتی ایجاد کنند که زمینه را برای فروپاشی نظام، جامعه و دولت فراهم کند. / انتخاب
👍3
پزشکیان در گفتوگو با فاکسنیوز: اگر دولت کنونی آمریکا بخواهد در چارچوب قوانین بینالمللی به توافقی دست پیدا کند، خوب است اگر نه، چه پیش از انتخابات و چه پس از انتخابات، چه تفاوتی برای ما دارد؟ / انتخاب
👍3
پزشکیان در گفتوگو با فاکسنیوز: «ما هرگز به دنبال جنگ نبودهایم و نیستیم. من عمیقاً معتقدم که انسان نباید باعث مرگ انسان دیگری شود. ما قرار است برگزیدگان خلقت باشیم. وقتی میتوانیم مسائل را از طریق گفتوگو حلوفصل کنیم، نباید به کشتن یکدیگر متوسل شویم. اما با تحریکات و اقداماتی که اسرائیل انجام داد، این جنگ را بر ما تحمیل کردند. با این حال، ما نمیخواهیم این وضعیت ادامه پیدا کند. این آمریکا است که باید انتخاب کن…
👍6🤬1
پزشکیان در گفتوگو با فاکسنیوز: «هر کسی که بخواهد اعتراض کند، کاملاً حق دارد این کار را انجام دهد. ما با بسیاری از همین معترضان نشستیم و گفتوگو کردیم. اما مسلحکردن اعتراضات و استفاده ابزاری از آنها، موضوعی کاملاً متفاوت است.» / انتخاب
👍4👎3
پزشکیان در گفتوگو با فاکسنیوز: «یکی از مشکلاتی که با آن مواجه هستیم این است که پول ما در چین بلوکه شده است. ما حتی نمیتوانیم پول خودمان را از کشوری که به آن کالا صادر کردهایم، خارج کنیم؛ چه رسد به اینکه بتوانیم از این منابع برای پرداخت پول به شخص دیگری در گوشه دیگری از جهان استفاده کنیم.» / انتخاب
👍3
پزشکیان در گفتوگو با فاکسنیوز: «ما با ترامپ به توافق رسیده بودیم. آن توافق به امضا رسید و بر اساس آن، ما آماده و همچنان خواهان ادامه مسیر هستیم و چارچوب نیز مورد توافق قرار گرفته بود. ما تنگه هرمز را نبسته بودیم؛ تنگه باز بود. آنها بدون هیچ توجیه یا چارچوب قانونی به ما حمله کردند.» / انتخاب
👍4
پزشکیان در گفتوگو با فاکسنیوز : «ما جنگ را انتخاب نکردیم؛ جنگ به ما تحمیل شد. ما به دنبال جنگ نیستیم؛ بلکه هر زمان که به ما حمله شود، مجبور به دفاع از خود هستیم. ما هرگز آغازگر جنگ نبودهایم، اما اگر آنها بخواهند به جنگ با ما ادامه دهند، ما نیز با قدرت پاسخ خواهیم داد.» / انتخاب
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,211 posts we hold for @Entekhab_Jahan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Entekhab_Jahan edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار فوری جهان (انتخاب)” (@Entekhab_Jahan), 34,524 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Entekhab_Jahan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.