26 measurements spanning 27 days, net +24,001. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,303–70,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 20:19
65,577
-301
2 Sept 2026, 11:37
65,878
-266
1 Sept 2026, 09:37
66,144
+9,858
31 Aug 2026, 06:37
56,286
-2,176
30 Aug 2026, 07:26
58,462
-249
29 Aug 2026, 09:35
58,711
-451
28 Aug 2026, 06:07
59,162
+1,094
27 Aug 2026, 04:35
58,068
+5,369
26 Aug 2026, 05:43
52,699
-185
25 Aug 2026, 05:47
52,884
-41
24 Aug 2026, 07:47
52,925
-93
22 Aug 2026, 16:04
53,018
-170
21 Aug 2026, 08:44
53,188
-53
20 Aug 2026, 12:03
53,241
-108
19 Aug 2026, 14:04
53,349
-258
18 Aug 2026, 11:32
53,607
-424
17 Aug 2026, 09:35
54,031
-517
15 Aug 2026, 19:03
54,548
+5,287
14 Aug 2026, 04:48
49,261
+9,066
12 Aug 2026, 19:04
40,195
first reading
Engagement
156 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.00%
avg views ÷ 65,577 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,590
138 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
138
of 156 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held
156 (2 August 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Views total
633,470
Reactions total
3,738
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Sept 2026, 06:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,440
Videos
≈1,270
Links
≈107
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 10m
Average length
1m 13s
Measured directly from 58 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,270 reactions across 156 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🍌
961
22.5%
🤣
848
19.9%
👍
767
18.0%
😡
474
11.1%
❤
350
8.20%
🤔
231
5.41%
👏
171
4.00%
💯
141
3.30%
🔥
128
3.00%
😢
122
2.86%
🤯
77
1.80%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 156 of the 156 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,270 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 156 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴 ترامپ: جایگزینهای زیادی برای تنگه هرمز در حال ارائه است/ تنگه هرمز دیگر آن چیزی نیست که قبلا بود!
در حال حاضر خطوط لوله در حال ساخت هستند. جادهای که از سوریه عبور میکند در حال ساخت است؛ در واقع باز است. مردم با کامیونها از سوریه عبور میکنند؛ کامیونهای عظیم با نفت.
🔹️ما ونزوئلا را تصرف کردیم و در واقع عملاً ایران را هم در اختیار گرفتهایم. چند روز است که هیچ تیراندازیای رخ نداده است.
به شی جینپینگ گفتم، «لط…
🔴 اسکات بسنت: یا رژیم تغییر میکند، یا مردم قیام میکنند؛ خواهیم دید چه میشود!
وزیر خزانهداری آمریکا:
🔹️آنها (ایران) نفت را به سمت چین فرستادند. منتظر اقدام در این باره در روز سه شنبه باشید.
من واقعاً فکر میکنم بعد از پایان این وضعیت، بازار نفت با مازاد عرضه بسیار زیادی روبهرو خواهد شد. حتی ممکن است قیمت نفت خام به محدوده ۴۰ تا ۵۰ دلار برای هر بشکه برسد.
مردم به من میگویند: «بازار سهام با اخبار بد بالا میرو…
🔴 همتی: تماشاگر افزایش نرخ بازار نخواهیم بود/ مداخله ارزی و فروش سکه میکنیم!
رئیس بانک مرکزی:
بانک مرکزی در برابر نوسانات غیرعادی بازار تماشاگر نخواهد بود، هر جا نرخها از واقعیتهای بنیادی اقتصاد فاصله بگیرند و نوسانات انتظاری تشدید شود، بانک مرکزی با استفاده از ظرفیت ارزی و ابزارهای در اختیار خود، بهموقع و با قدرت در بازار مداخله خواهد کرد.
🔹زمان، نحوه و حجم این مداخلات نیز متناسب با شرایط بازار تعیین خواهد شد …
🔴 ونس: تا زمانی که ایران از شلیک به کشتیها دست نکشد، مذاکره نخواهیم کرد!
دلیل افزایش قیمت سوخت در حال حاضر این است که ایرانیها به کشتیهای تجاری حمله میکنند.
🔹️اگر به توانایی ایران در مختل کردن زندگی عادی آمریکاییها نگاه کنید، فکر میکنم بسیار محدود است. صفر نیست، اما خیلی محدود است.
دیشب، ۱۵ میلیون بشکه از تنگه خارج شد. این به خاطر آمریکاست. اگر ما این کار را نکنیم، هیچکسی این کار را نخواهد کرد و اگر هیچ کسی ا…
🔴 ارتش ایران بامداد امروز به پایگاههای آمریکایی در کویت و امارات حمله کرد!
این حملات موشکی و پهپادی درحالی انجام شده است که شب گذشته آمریکا حملهای به شهرهای جنوبی ایران انجام نداد و صرفا به دو نفتکش در بنادر ایران حمله کرد.
@Secret_Arzi
🔴 تهدیدهای جدید وزیر خزانه داری آمریکا علیه ایران!
🔹ما به دوستان و دشمنان هشدار میدهیم: با این رژیم شیطانی معامله نکنید. ما میدانیم شما کی هستید. شما هم میدانید. اگر لازم باشد، ما شما را از فعالیت خارج خواهیم کرد.
چین در حال خرید نفت ایران است اما تنها حدود 30 میلیون بشکه نفت ایرانی در حال حاضر در حال حمل و نقل است. این میزان به زودی تمام خواهد شد.
@Secret_Arzi
🔴 طعنه خبرنگار والاستریت ژورنال به ترامپ: از کمک در راه است رسیدیم به چه زمانی مردم ایران قیام میکنند؟!
ترامپ: من قصد ندارم ایران را مجبور کنم پای میز مذاکره بیاید. من موقعیت فعلیمان را خیلی بیشتر میپسندم؛ با کنترل تقریباً کامل بر تنگه هرمز و اقتصادی که کاملاً در حال فروپاشی است. آنها فقط دارند روند اجتنابناپذیر را طی میکنند. مردم ایران چه زمانی قیام خواهند کرد و خواهند جنگید؟
@Secret_Arzi
🔴فیلم انتقال سربازان مجروح با هلیکوپترهای امدادی/ سپاه: به پایگاه تفنگداران آمریکایی حمله کردیم!
خبرگزاری تسنیم: در پاسخ به شرارتهای آمریکا، رزمندگان دلیر نیروی هوافضای سپاه در موج دوم عملیات تنبیه متجاوز، با حمله سنگین موشکهای بالستیک به پادگان تفنگداران آمریکایی در اردن موسوم به کمپ تیتین، تعداد زیادی از نیروهای آمریکایی را به درک واصل کرده و چند تاسیسات مهم و بالگردهای هجومی دشمن را منهدم نمودند.
@Secret_Arzi
🔴 ترامپ: ایران تلاش کرد رادارهای خود را دوباره بسازد، ما منتظر ماندیم تا ساخت آنها به پایان برسد و سپس آنها را بمباران کردیم!
@Secret_Arzi
😡17🍌10🤣6🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 156 posts we hold for @Secret_Arzi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Secret_Arzi edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Türkçe öğrenelim- ترکی یاد بگیریم @sulduzlular1 · 1,236#79
Derham&tooman @AEDTOMANDEIRA · 2,441 (as read 24 August 2026)#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اکونیوز | Econews @Econews_24 · 74,448 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
بانکی شو @Banki_show · 37,904 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
قیمت یوان تهران @yuan_ir · 46,934 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 27 August 2026
توئیت کده @tweet_cade · 62,987 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 27 August 2026
اقتصادمدیا ارزی @ecomedia_arzi · 43,828 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
خبرفوری ارز @khabar_fori_arz1 · 48,256 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 August 2026
اعضاء نظام مهندسی ساختمان @mihansazan · 34,499 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محرمانههای ارزی” (@Secret_Arzi), 65,577 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Secret_Arzi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.