Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
💲شاهین آسمایی💲
@ShaheenAsmaye
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,508subscribers
+841 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001357787988 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShaheenAsmaye |
| Description | ﷽ اعلام سریع ترین مظنه لحظهاى دلار جهت تبلیغات خود به آیدی زیر در ارتباط باشید ادمین شاهین @Mehdi15199 جهت تبلیغات فقط @tablighcryptto ادمین تبادل با پنج سال سابقه کاری👇🏻 @maryam_admin83🌹 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 51 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShaheenAsmaye |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:15 | 26,508 | +3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:01 | 26,505 | +7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:15 | 26,498 | -18 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:48 | 26,516 | +1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 26,515 | +27 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:08 | 26,488 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:31 | 26,492 | +12 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 26,480 | +21 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 26,459 | -1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 26,460 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:27 | 26,466 | +5 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 08:55 | 26,461 | +8 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:17 | 26,453 | +30 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 26,423 | +15 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 15:22 | 26,408 | +115 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 05:18 | 26,293 | +73 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 26,220 | +67 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 26,153 | +9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 26,144 | +22 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 26,122 | first reading |
Engagement
2,217 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.99%
- avg views ÷ 26,508 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 792
- 1,055 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1,077
- of 2,217 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,217 (6 August 2026 – 26 October 2026) |
| Views total | 835,112 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Oct 2026, 04:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 223
- Links
- 282
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
💲شاهین آسمایی💲 pinned «پایان معاملات، خسته نباشید🌹 🗓 دوشنبه 1405.08.04 ✅ 269,500 شروع معاملات 🔺️ 271,200 سقف معاملات 🔻 268,500 کـــف معاملات 📌 269,400 آخـرین معامله»
پایان معاملات، خسته نباشید🌹 🗓 دوشنبه 1405.08.04 ✅ 269,500 شروع معاملات 🔺️ 271,200 سقف معاملات 🔻 268,500 کـــف معاملات 📌 269,400 آخـرین معامله
هرات فردایی ⏳ 269,500 خــرید🔵
هرات فردایی ⏳ 269,600 فروش🔴
هرات فردایی ⏳ 269,400 خــرید🔵
هرات فردایی ⏳ 269,400 خــرید🔵
269,400 معامله ⏳ فردایی ✔️ 8 میلیارد
هرات فردایی ⏳ 269,500 فروش🔴
هرات فردایی ⏳ 269,400 خــرید🔵
269,500 معامله ⏳ فردایی ✔️ 4 میلیارد
هرات فردایی ⏳ 269,500 فروش🔴
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,217 posts we hold for @ShaheenAsmaye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
«دوستان بخاطر شرایط اقتصادی کشور، متاسفانه ضرر اعضا اونقدر زیاد شده که تصمیم گرفتیم لینک Vip رو به مدت ۱ روز آزاد کنیم. موافقید؟»
- بله حتما بزارید خیلی ضررم99%
- موافق نیستم1%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
موافق هستین برای دقایقی لینک vip رو بذارم کانال؟
- خیر عضو هستم0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 29 September 2026 to 26 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@dolarr2020 · 25,483#1
@goldonline2016 · 67,345#2
@Thalildolar2015 · 14,493#3
@NabTwitt24 · 10,097#4
@marajeharat · 6,929#5
@hratyifkb · 14,223#6
@HaratMarket · 15,662#7
@vipherat · 20,475#8
@signal_bartar20 · 13,676#9
@wallstreet202 · 13,720#10
@sekesabze · 8,598#11
@Herat_Tomen · 166,281#12
@fhhjkngfdsajkkg · 25,938#13
@Afhhhhhadfhhh · 23,606#14
@mazene · 58,029#15
@abshdanaghdy · 178,061#16
@fhjllg · 33,347#17
@NaghdP · 71,601#18
@KEBRIAGOLD · 6,709#19
@soltan_navasan · 38,449#20
@dolar402rate · 18,215#21
@abshde · 13,923#22
@tgtala1 · 17,964#23
@tahlelteknekal · 3,359#24
@Hareta_Dollar_Bloe · 51,107#25
@noghtezan2 · 1,607#26
@wallstrong_arst · 3,380#27
@mirhamsterkom · 4,747#28
@vandarpay · 1,308#29
@AGHOHMPEQ1400 · 4,587#30
@ontimeounce · 53,359#31
@narhkdoolar · 19,241#32
@wgsh0044 · 5,993#33
@makos_herat · 2,399#34
@dolarmashad · 85,929#35
@dollar_sulaymaniyah · 122,440#36
@tahlil_arzzzz · 3,831#37
@flashjadoee · 3,923#38
@DHSGROUPDUBAI · 42,695#39
@Dollar_sedaghat · 15,133#40
@HeratDollarafg · 2,143#41
@mazane2000 · 2,221#42
@Doollar_Sully · 907#43
@ForexTR · 12,385#44
@daqiq_sari · 12,041#45
@dolareseleimani · 17,855#46
@ttprice · 15,339#47
@PishbiniTalaa · 124,836#48
@jaguar_sig · 17,996#49
@pposhte_pardee · 14,393#50
@twiier_news · 51,132#51
@TetherLand · 71,578#52
@khabar_fouri · 1,253,660#53
@RaetUAEonline2023 · 4,406#54
@mrgold995 · 29,331#55
@snaptal1399pik · 8,845#56
@XAUUSD_i · 14,067#57
@JIBit · 1,473#58
@NerkhDollarIRT · 90,324#59
@nerkharzazad · 63,760#60
@tahlilbazar · 26,909#61
@entekhab_ir · 205,195#62
@Jahan_Fouri · 80,420#63
@news2 · 14,121#64
@DailyGoldAnalysis2000 · 5,318#65
@CentralBankof_Iran · 13,565#66
@IR_Breakingnews · 32,209#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dolarr2020 · 25,483
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
@Toman_to_Afghani · 29,891
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
@NaghdP · 71,601
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
@vipherat · 20,475
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 September 2026
@USDT_RLS · 26,264
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 September 2026
@gold_center_channel · 19,574
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 30 September 2026
@narhkdoolar · 19,241
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 3 October 2026
@Hareta_Dollar_Bloe · 51,107
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 25 August 2026
@Herat_Tomen · 166,281
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 12 August 2026
@NerkhDollarIRT · 90,324
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
@dollarferdowsii · 23,009
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 19 September 2026
@fhjllg · 33,347
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
@soltan_navasan · 38,449
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
@fhhjkngfdsajkkg · 25,938
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 September 2026
@abshdanaghdy · 178,061
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
@ontimeounce · 53,359
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@World_Eagle1 · 28,638
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 9 September 2026
@exchange_rate · 70,534
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
@goldonline2016 · 67,345
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 21 August 2026
@Afghanerkh · 57,292
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
@kabuldollor · 54,266
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
@kabulvip · 43,729
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@mzar_dalar · 47,565
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 26 August 2026
@kabul_dollar_12 · 44,647
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💲شاهین آسمایی💲” (@ShaheenAsmaye), 26,508 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShaheenAsmaye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.