😴 کسی حتی تو خواب هم 218000رو نمیدید… ولی ما با تحلیل دقیق هدف 218000رو اعلام کردیم دقیق خورد به هدف ✅💪💪 دقت و قدرت سیگنالهامون دوباره ثابت شد؛ هدف بهطور کامل رویت شد ✅ 💎 اینه تفاوت ویآیپی ما با بقیه

Channel
پشت خطی دلار هرات
@dolarr2020
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,415subscribers
+317 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001676537700 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dolarr2020 |
| Description | تحلیل تخصصی و لحظهای دلار هرات با بیش از 8 سال سابقه در کانال VIP دقت بالای 90٪ در تحلیلها تحلیلها ابتدا در VIP منتشر میشن، بعد از رویت اسکرین شات از نمونهها اینجا قرار میگیرن برای عضویت در VIP، پیام بده✅👇 @Dr_Mirzai420 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dolarr2020 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:44 | 24,415 | +27 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 24,388 | +20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 24,368 | +9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 24,359 | +49 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 24,310 | +48 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 24,262 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 24,264 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 24,274 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 24,276 | +25 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 24,251 | +68 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:39 | 24,183 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 24,193 | +15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 24,178 | +13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 24,165 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 24,166 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 24,163 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 24,164 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 24,170 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 24,166 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 24,160 | first reading |
Engagement
309 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.8%
- avg views ÷ 24,415 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,620
- 309 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 309
- of 309 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 309 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,118,847 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 13:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 840
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 13
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
از سیگنالهای بعدی جانمونید ✅👆
با تحلیلهای حرفهای و سیگنالهای مطمئن همیشه چند قدم جلوتر از بازار باشید 💪 📩 جهت عضویت در کانال VIP پیام بدید ✅ @Dr_Mirzai420 @Dr_Mirzai420
هدف بعدی 218600✅✅✅✅
جو هرات همچنان بشدت خریدار هست 🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵
216,700 معامله ⏳ فردایی ✔️ 9 میلیارد کامل رویت شد ✅💪💪💪
216,700 معامله ⏳ فردایی ✔️ 20 میلیارد رویت کامل ✅✅✅✅💪💪💪💪
فروش مطلقا ممنوع ❌❌❌❌
هدف بعدی هرات 216500✅✅✅✅
همچنان جو هرات بشدت خریدار هست 🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵🔵
ما چارهای جز حرکت همراه با روند بازار نداریم چون تنها راه سود کردن همینه. در بازار نزولی فروش میدیم و در بازار صعودی خرید میکنیم. حرکت خلاف روند یعنی ریسک بیدلیل و ضرر دوستان و ما هرگز چنین کاری نمیکنیم. تحلیل ما تابع واقعیت بازاره نه احساس و حدس هدف فقط یک چیزه حفظ سرمایه و سود مستمر.
سقفهای بازار این روزها مثل آب خوردن شکسته میشن بدون مکث بدون اصلاح جدی بدون ترس… وقتی کنترل مدیریت و تصمیمگیری درست تو بازار وجود نداشته باشه نتیجهاش میشه همین وضعیتی که میبینید هر روز سقف جدید هر روز قیمتهای عجیبتر نه نظارتی هست نه فکری به حال سرمایهی مردم میشه. تو همچین بازاری فقط تحلیل مدیریت ریسک و تجربه میتونه نجاتدهنده باشه. وگرنه بازار با احساسات شوخی نداره یا درست سوار موج میشی یا زیر موج له می…
Showing the 12 most recent of 309 posts we hold for @dolarr2020. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 693,474 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@soltan_navasan · 40,083
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
@Hareta_Dollar_Bloe · 49,768
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 25 August 2026
@NerkhYab_Khorasan · 161,425
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
@king_powr · 48,019
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
@PMCgroup · 128,887
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 9 here — alongside 8 others — read 14 August 2026
@kabuldollor · 55,475
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
@Herat_Tomen · 157,620
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 12 August 2026
@NerkhDollarIRT · 85,548
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
@kabulvip · 43,885
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@sekkedollarrate · 47,800
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 26 August 2026
@das_cash · 38,373
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 31 August 2026
@nerkhzani · 46,930
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 27 August 2026
@goldonline2016 · 64,789
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 21 August 2026
@Newsof_Herat · 117,301
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 29 August 2026
@Afghanerkh · 58,688
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
@PishbiniTalaa · 124,926
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 13 August 2026
@mazene · 56,145
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@NaghdP · 67,269
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
@exchange_rate · 70,510
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
@mzar_dalar · 47,636
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 26 August 2026
@Secret_Arzi · 65,878
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
@DollarKabul · 117,060
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
@tehranpelle · 55,577
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
@Mazaneeposhtkhati · 35,652
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پشت خطی دلار هرات” (@dolarr2020), 24,415 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dolarr2020.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.