Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,093–7,146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:57
7,099
-6
13 Sept 2026, 19:42
7,105
+5
9 Sept 2026, 15:19
7,100
-3
4 Sept 2026, 16:57
7,103
-11
1 Sept 2026, 10:13
7,114
-16
29 Aug 2026, 04:11
7,130
-5
25 Aug 2026, 23:33
7,135
-5
22 Aug 2026, 19:48
7,140
+7
19 Aug 2026, 11:18
7,133
+5
16 Aug 2026, 04:27
7,128
-12
12 Aug 2026, 16:53
7,140
+9
9 Aug 2026, 20:12
7,131
-2
7 Aug 2026, 04:50
7,133
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:32
7,133
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19m 55s
Average length
2m 51s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,791 reactions across 24 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,065
59.5%
❤
292
16.3%
👎
176
9.83%
😁
98
5.47%
👏
88
4.91%
🤔
45
2.51%
🤬
9
0.503%
🔥
5
0.279%
😱
5
0.279%
🤯
5
0.279%
🎉
1
0.056%
😢
1
0.056%
🥰
1
0.056%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,791 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
♦️کارخانهی تولید مجری-بازیگرانِ مطیع و مخلص؛ «کودکنماینده» فقط شروع کار بود/خواب پریشان جلیلی برای «رییسجمهوری تابع» و نفوذ دائمی حتی پس از رفتن جبلی
◾️مصطفی فقیهی
🔹از ابتدای دورهی «جبلی_جلیلی» یک استراتژی رسانهای مبتنی بر ۳ اصل به دستور «سعید جلیلی» اجرا شد:
▪️ اعتبارزدایی از سلبریتی-اینفلوئنسر و هر شخصیت محبوب و نیمهمحبوبِ غیرتابع
▪️ تولید انبوهی کارمند-سلبریتیهای معتمد و در مُشت
▪️ برونسپاری مواضع سی…
♦️طاعونِ اعتمادبهنفسِ جاهلانه؛ از متخصصین دیپلماسیِ «تحریم کاغذپاره» و «دشمن حمله نمیکند» تا عبدالملکیِ لامبورگینیساز
▪️مصطفی فقیهی
🔹لاینقطع اظهارفضل میکند، آنهم با تنها سابقهی دیپلماتیکِ عمرش که «دادزنی» در دیدار رییس دولت ۱۳ از سازمان ملل بود و بابتِ افاضات و افاداتش در همین سالیان، نقل محافل نیز است؛ از پیشبینیهایش از سرنوشتِ سوریه و ونزوئلا تا تحلیل تصویر جعلی هوشمصنوعی از سفر ترامپ به چین!
🔹این قم…
♦️تمدید یکسالهی حکم «جبلی» در صداوسیما؟
▪️مصطفی فقیهی
🔹حتی اگر این شایعه صحت داشته باشد، نشانی قابلتامل است؛ چندانکه انتظار نمیرود در این اوضاع، تغییری محسوس اتفاق افتد و جریانی با دو دهه قدمت و ریشه دواندن در جایجای پیکرهی سیاسی کشور، در دل جنگ و یکشبه به حاشیه رانده شود.
@mostafafaghihi
♦️باز هم علمالهدی!
▪️مصطفی فقیهی
🔹اگر «دامادِ علمالهدی» زنده بود و رییس شورای امنیت، باز هم علمالهدی زبان به خصم و عتاب میگشود؟
پس چرا در دوران مذاکرات دولت رییسی با بایدن، جز به تمجید و تحسین از دیپلماسی هیچ نگفت؟
🔹برای فرد سالخوردهای چون او بد نیست که رویکردش را از «برادرِ داماد داماد» وام بگیرد؟ بازی قدرتخواهی حضرات، زیاد از حد، روراست و انگشتنما نیست؟
@mostafafaghihi
♦️تکرار تاریخ؟
▪️مصطفی فقیهی
🔹«شیخ علی تهرانی» شوهر خواهر رییسجمهورِ وقت و رهبر دومِ جمهوریاسلامی، در اوج جنگ با عراق، به دامان صدام رفت!
🔹آیا «باقر خرازی» برادر عروس رهبر دوم و برادر همسر برادرِ رهبر سوم، به سرنوشت او دچار خواهد شد؟
🔹نقطهی اشتراک شیخ علی و باقر، عدم اعتنای عمومی به آنها و البته عدم تعادل در گفتار و روحیات است، اما اختلاف اصلی آنجاست که شیخ علی رزومهی واقعی داشت؛ مجتهد بود و «از شاگردان…
لطف بیمنت به کودتاچیان
مصطفی فقیهی
جریانِ کودتاچی، سرگردان و دربهدر، در پی تداوم پروژهی تقابل بود و پردهدَر، و اتهاماتی تازهتَر، اما بیم و هراس در دل داشت که ناگاه سر و کلهی یکی پیدا شد از تبار غلامِ بَدر! از مشتاقانِ نشستن بر هر سیخ و صدر! که بخش اول نامش «خر» و پیشهاش، زعامت دستهای تکنفر! و با دستاری بزرگ بر سر، بدل شد به نوکری بیزَر و بیقَدر!
حقیقتاً چه لذتی دارد که یکی از تیرهی «خ.ر»، ناگه سربرآ…
🔹گروهکِ «برادر داماد یکی از رؤسای سابق دولت» که در سالیان گذشته، نسبتِ نزدیکِ فامیلی با رئیسِ سابقِ حجتیه را انکار میکرد، همزمان برنامههای گسترده و کودتاگونهای برای جانشینیِ رهبری در سر میپروراند.
🔹این نگونبختان که خود را آمادهی فتحِ رهبری میدیدند و حتی مناصب را پشتِ درهای بستهی فامیلی تقسیم کرده بودند، پس از رخدادهایی که به پایانِ دولتِ فامیلیشان انجامید، آرزوهای خود را بر باد رفته و بر گور خوابیده دید…
♦️ببینید یکی از مهمترین «حفرههای امنیتی» را
▪️مصطفی فقیهی
🔹یادتان هست که عراقچی پیرامون «وجود حفرههای امنیتی و عوامل نفوذی در بالاترین سطح نظام» چه گفت؟ او تاکید کرد «نفوذ در تصمیمسازی هم هست، در جهتدهی به فضای روانی.این حفره هنوز وجود دارد»
🔹و حالا فیلم زیر را ببینید که مربوط به پلمب یک مجموعه در باغ کتابِ شهرداری تهران است. در اوج تنش و آتش، همزمان دست بر نقطهی حساس ملت و عامل تولید ناآرامیهای ۱۴۰۱ گذاش…
از تعبیر غیرمنصفانهی غنینژاد تا پاسخ گزندهی سروش/ شریعتی و سایهی مارکسیسم
مصطفی فقیهی
دکتر شریعتی همچون بسیاری از روشنفکران دورهی خود، ناخودآگاه و تحت غلبهی پارادایم مارکسیستی زمانه، عناصری چون عدالتخواهی و ضدامپریالیستی را وام گرفت و با ادبیات دینی درآمیخت؛ که این آمیزش عوامل ناهمگون و لایتچسبک و فاقد ربط منطقی، به یک جریان التقاطی منتج به سادهسازی تاریخ و تضعیف انسجام نظری در مکاتب مورد استفاده انجامید.
…
♦️در شرح احوالِ آن شیخ که بگفت «به من که نمیتونید این خبرارو بگید…»
▪️مصطفی فقیهی
آن نامعلوم آمده از لُپلُپِ سیما
آن خوشترکیب و چشموچراغِ جمعِ جلیلیا
آن مُشرف به همه اخبار و خَفا
آن خوشمعامله که آمد همهجا
آن چشمِبصیرتِ اهلِ رویا و صفا
آن خوشخدمت و چَشمِ مُدامِ رُئسا
آن چشمدوخته به دستخوشِ رفقا
آن نو کارشناسِ خوشاطوار و ادا
آن آنالیزور و مُحللِ خوشاشتها
آن تنگچشمِ غیر و خوشندا بر آشنا
آن …
😁51❤11👍3👎3😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @mostafafaghihi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mostafafaghihi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ویرایش ذهن | شهابالدین حائری شیرازی @virayeshe_zehn · 31,149 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
اخبار فوری جهان (انتخاب) @Entekhab_Jahan · 34,524 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
ایران آزاد و آباد (مهدی نصیری) @iranazadvaabad · 32,666 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
آینده (عباس عبدی) @abdiabbas · 30,117 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
نگاه متفاوت (احمد زیدآبادی) @ahmadzeidabad · 74,821 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 August 2026
قیمت لیر تهران @lear_ir · 45,978 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 31 August 2026
کانال کارانیوز @karazinews · 79,364 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
فردای بهتر (مصطفی تاجزاده) @MostafaTajzadeh · 42,926 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
صادق زیباکلام - Sadegh Zibakalam @sadeghZibakalam · 53,720 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
پایگاه خبری انتخاب @entekhab_ir · 205,576 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
تهرانآنلاین ࡆ اخبارفوری جنگ ࡆ خبرفوری کرج @te_h6 · 322,227 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
اسکان نیوز @eskannews_com · 108,888 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
تحلیل زمانه @TahlilZamane · 72,005 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
تَلخندسیاسی اجتماعی @Talkhand_Siyasi2 · 87,543 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
سینا کمالخانی(fa.wikipedia.org) “…سینا کمالخانی منتشر کرد.{{یادکرد وب|عنوان=مصطفی فقیهی|نشانی=https://t.me/mostafafaghihi/6600|وبگاه=Telegram|بازبینی=2020-04-27}} وی معتقد است…” read 13 September 2026
مصطفی فقیهی(fa.wikipedia.org) “…[[سینا کمالخانی]] منتشر کرد.{{یادکرد وب|عنوان=مصطفی فقیهی|نشانی=https://t.me/mostafafaghihi/6600|وبگاه=Telegram|بازبینی=2020-04-27}} وی معتقد است…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مصطفی فقیهی” (@mostafafaghihi), 7,099 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mostafafaghihi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.