National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “manoto من و تو” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net -19,110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 370,645–395,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 18:17
373,511
-100
5 Nov 2026, 20:56
373,611
-185
4 Nov 2026, 17:31
373,796
-119
3 Nov 2026, 15:27
373,915
-71
2 Nov 2026, 17:34
373,986
-177
1 Nov 2026, 15:26
374,163
-201
31 Oct 2026, 14:46
374,364
-119
30 Oct 2026, 16:17
374,483
-185
29 Oct 2026, 17:56
374,668
-163
28 Oct 2026, 14:26
374,831
-64
27 Oct 2026, 12:37
374,895
-207
26 Oct 2026, 12:16
375,102
-245
25 Oct 2026, 12:08
375,347
-146
24 Oct 2026, 10:06
375,493
-160
23 Oct 2026, 09:07
375,653
-128
22 Oct 2026, 12:29
375,781
-268
21 Oct 2026, 03:26
376,049
-223
19 Oct 2026, 22:39
376,272
-284
18 Oct 2026, 19:26
376,556
-194
17 Oct 2026, 22:56
376,750
first reading
Engagement
782 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.23%
avg views ÷ 373,511 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,340
342 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
342
of 782 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
782 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
2,851,266
Reactions total
52,096
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14h 50m
Average length
1m 16s
Measured directly from 703 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
136,571 reactions across 777 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
46,144
33.8%
💔
33,740
24.7%
👍
14,056
10.3%
🤬
7,629
5.59%
❤🔥
4,900
3.59%
😢
3,915
2.87%
😭
3,742
2.74%
🤮
3,656
2.68%
🕊
2,410
1.76%
🔥
2,074
1.52%
👎
2,054
1.50%
💩
1,800
1.32%
👏
1,681
1.23%
🤣
1,433
1.05%
😡
1,329
0.973%
😁
747
0.547%
🤔
718
0.526%
🤯
565
0.414%
🖕
479
0.351%
😨
479
0.351%
31 further kinds
3,020
2.21%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 782 of the 782 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137,469 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 782 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 342 posts held from the last 30 days (2.34%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
رویترز گزارش داده جمهوری اسلامی پیشنهادی هستهای را از طریق قطر به واشنگتن فرستاده که بررسی آن به اجرای هفت شرط تهران گره خورده است. همزمان با رایزنیها برای کاهش تنش، ترامپ مدعی کنترل آمریکا بر ایران شد و درباره احتمال ادامه حملات و تخریب بیشتر کشور هشدار داد.
گزارش حملات تازه به نفتکشها در تنگه هرمز، نگرانیها درباره امنیت کشتیرانی و افزایش قیمت جهانی نفت را تشدید کرده است.
روزانه حدود ۲۰ میلیون بشکه نفت خام و فرآوردههای نفتی از این آبراه عبور میکند، مسیری که نزدیک به یکچهارم تجارت دریایی نفت جهان به آن وابسته است.
در پی حوادث اخیر، قیمت نفت برنت با افزایش نزدیک به ۴ درصدی به بیش از ۹۸ دلار رسید. کارشناسان هشدار میدهند که تشدید حملات و اختلال گسترده در صادرات نفت می…
انتخابات آمریکا و اسرائیل پایان یافت، اما پرسش اصلی همچنان پابرجاست: آیا سرنوشت ایران باید به تصمیم قدرتهای خارجی گره بخورد؟ سیاست واشنگتن و تلآویو میتواند بر آینده ایران تأثیر بگذارد، اما تغییر پایدار نه از صندوق رأی دیگران، بلکه از سازماندهی سیاسی و حق تعیین سرنوشت مردم ایران میگذرد.
ولادیمیر پوتین، رئیسجمهور روسیه، روز پنجشنبه ۱۴ آبان در مسکو با محسن رضایی، دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی جمهوری اسلامی، دیدار و درباره روابط دوجانبه و تحولات منطقهای گفتوگو کرد.
در این دیدار، رئیس اطلاعات نظامی روسیه و شماری از مقامهای ارشد دو کشور نیز حضور داشتند. رسانههای حکومتی ایران گزارش دادند که رضایی پیامی از مجتبی خامنهای را به پوتین تحویل داده است.
این دیدار در شرایطی انجام شد که جنگ با آمریکا و اسرائیل ا…
عبدل السید با کسب نزدیک به ۲.۵ میلیون رأی در میشیگان، به نخستین مسلمان منتخب سنای آمریکا تبدیل شد؛ ایالتی که تنها یک درصد از جمعیت بزرگسال آن مسلماناند. پیروزی او با وجود اختلافهای مذهبی و سیاسی، بار دیگر نقش رأی مردم و اهمیت پاسخگویی در دموکراسی را برجسته کرد.
شکست جمهوریخواهان در انتخابات میاندورهای آمریکا با استقبال مقامهای جمهوری اسلامی روبهرو شد. آنها نتیجه انتخابات را پیامد جنگ با ایران دانستند و آن را شکست سیاسی دونالد ترامپ معرفی کردند. با این حال، برخی مقامهای تهران هشدار دادند که پیروزی دموکراتها به معنای تغییر سیاست آمریکا در قبال جمهوری اسلامی نخواهد بود.
همزمانی انتخابات میاندورهای آمریکا با سالگرد اشغال سفارت این کشور در تهران، به مراسم حکومتی ۱۳ آبا…
آیا جنگ ایران باعث شکست جمهوریخواهان در انتخابات آمریکا شد؟
جیدی ونس جنگ را عامل شکست میداند، اما نظرسنجیهای ایبیسی نیوز و آسوشیتدپرس نشان میدهند گرانی، فساد دولتی و نارضایتی از عملکرد ترامپ نیز در تصمیم رأیدهندگان نقش مهمی داشتهاند. آیا جنگ عامل تعیینکننده بود یا تنها بخشی از نارضایتی گستردهتر آمریکاییها؟
از احضار و تهدید به اخراج تا فشار برای اعتراف؛ آسوشیتدپرس در گزارشی تازه از برخورد با دانشجویان معترض به اعتراضات دیماه ۱۴۰۴ پرده برداشته است. این خبرگزاری با شش دانشجوی تحت پیگرد گفتوگو کرده و از بررسی پرونده حدود ۲۵۰ دانشجو در دانشگاه شریف و گزارشهایی از اخراج دانشجویان در چند دانشگاه ایران خبر داده است.
حمله دوباره، توافق یا ادامه محاصره؟ اکسیوس در گزارشی تازه از سه گزینه دشوار ترامپ برای آینده جنگ ایران پس از شکست انتخاباتی جمهوریخواهان پرده برداشته است؛ از اختلاف در کاخ سفید و فشار نتانیاهو برای حمله تا ادامه آمادهسازی ارتش آمریکا. آیا شکست انتخاباتی ترامپ به توافق منجر میشود یا تشدید جنگ؟
ونس: جنگ با ایران عامل شکست جمهوریخواهان بود
جیدی ونس، معاون دونالد ترامپ، پس از شکست جمهوریخواهان در انتخابات میاندورهای آمریکا، جنگ با ایران را عامل اصلی این شکست معرفی کرد.
او با اشاره به یافتههای یک نظرسنجی گفت پایان جنگ، مهار تورم و هزینههای زندگی، اولویت دادن به منافع آمریکا و تغییر روابط واشنگتن با اسرائیل، چهار خواسته اصلی رایدهندگانی بود که در سال ۲۰۲۴ از ترامپ حمایت کرده بودند، اما این بار به دموکرا…
سفر اروپایی شاهزاده رضا پهلوی از بروکسل آغاز شد، سفری که با دیدار با مقامهای ارشد پارلمان اروپا و پیامی روشن درباره آینده ایران همراه بود.
همزمان با انتشار خبر اعدام دو جوان بازداشتشده در اعتراضات دیماه، شاهزاده رضا پهلوی خواستار پایان سیاست مماشات اروپا با جمهوری اسلامی و حمایت عملی از مبارزات مردم ایران شد.
او در نخستین روز سفر خود با شماری از چهرههای سیاسی و مقامهای ارشد پارلمان اروپا درباره تحولات ایران گفت…
❤232😁9
Showing the 12 most recent of 782 posts we hold for @manototv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@manototv edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 September 2026
Most recent edit
26 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @manototv as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
4 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@manototv named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@manotoofficial named in 1 post, 24 October 2026 – 24 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Iran International ایران اینترنشنال @iranintltv · 1,379,356#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Timetunnel / تونل زمان @tzaman · 20,419 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 September 2026
Farah Pahlavi - فرح پهلوی @farahdibapahlavi · 39,230 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
Reza Pahlavi | رضا پهلوی @OfficialRezaPahlavi · 364,965 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
صدای امریکا | Farsi VOA @FarsiVOA_tv · 74,651 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
مسیح علینژاد @masih_alinejad · 54,650 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
همگام با رضاشاه دوم @siasattalkh · 62,477 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
Farsi VOA @farsivoa · 134,902 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
Iran International ایران اینترنشنال @iranintltv · 1,379,356 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
Radio Farda @radiofarda_official · 21,806 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 October 2026
Toomaj | توماج @ToomajSalehi · 31,194 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Iranwire @Farsi_Iranwire · 47,378 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
آموزشکده توانا @Tavaana_TavaanaTech · 47,556 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
من و تو Manoto Tv @Mnototv · 70,702 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
BBC News فارسی @news_bbc_persian · 50,284 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 October 2026
ﻣﺎﻧﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲ Mana Neyestani @mananey · 20,337 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
ایران بیدار @IRanBidar · 27,068 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 September 2026
رضا شاه یادت جاویدان. اینجا که آمدی بخند .کمی هم فکر کن😉 @komediannfarshad · 50,456 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
اسرائیل به فارسی @IsraelinFarsi · 118,285 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
ایرانفوری ࡆ کانال اخبار جنگ امریکا @ir_km · 338,320 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 August 2026
🚨خبر فوری 🥷🏿مرد مشکی پوش @radoclub · 19,262 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 September 2026
مجتبا پورمحسن/ Mojtaba Pourmohsen @mojtabapourmohsen · 23,823 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
ایراننویس/ مرتضی اسماعیلپور @MEsmailpour · 44,456 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 September 2026
شبكه رسانهاى بیان @BayanMediaNetwork · 24,137 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
اخبار فوری ایران و جهان @Fori_Akhbar · 47,595 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 183 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تلویزیون منوتو” (@manototv), 373,511 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/manototv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.