Channel
@melodio
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
2,193,389subscribers
-52,358 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001139311078 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @melodio |
| Created | 11 August 2017 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/melodio |
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 2,193,389 | -796 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 2,194,185 | -788 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 2,194,973 | -1,003 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 2,195,976 | -774 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:38 | 2,196,750 | -650 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:54 | 2,197,400 | -939 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:55 | 2,198,339 | -697 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:44 | 2,199,036 | -705 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 2,199,741 | -683 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 15:22 | 2,200,424 | -991 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 2,201,415 | -3,163 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 00:41 | 2,204,578 | -2,870 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 12:38 | 2,207,448 | -6,402 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 2,213,850 | -4,444 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 2,218,294 | -1,304 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 2,219,598 | -1,342 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 2,220,940 | -1,044 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 2,221,984 | -1,153 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 2,223,137 | -1,541 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 2,224,678 | first reading |
23,987 posts held, back to 11 August 2017 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 5,219 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23,987 (11 August 2017 – 23 October 2026) |
| Views total | 19,988,710 |
| Reactions total | 30,635 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Oct 2026, 17:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 430 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 410 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 5.6 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 24.7% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 68.9% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 34,800 views — 1.59% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 38,800).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /3058823 Oct 2026, 16:25 UTC | 220 minutes – 75 minutes old | 9,610 views ~11 reactions | 60 minutes: 8,070 interp. | not yet at 24h | 27 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3058723 Oct 2026, 14:31 UTC | 514 minutes – 3.1 hours old | 18,800 views ~20 reactions | 60 minutes: 8,147 interp. → 3.0 hours: 18,800still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 72 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3058623 Oct 2026, 14:31 UTC | 514 minutes – 3.1 hours old | 18,500 views ~23 reactions | 60 minutes: 8,334 interp. → 3.0 hours: 18,500still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 68 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3058523 Oct 2026, 12:30 UTC | 1010 minutes – 5.2 hours old | 23,300 views ~23 reactions | 60 minutes: 7,983 interp. → 3.0 hours: 17,326 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3058423 Oct 2026, 12:30 UTC | 1010 minutes – 5.2 hours old | 23,100 views ~25 reactions | 60 minutes: 8,153 interp. → 3.0 hours: 17,198 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3058323 Oct 2026, 10:29 UTC | 1310 minutes – 7.2 hours old | 27,300 views ~14 reactions | 60 minutes: 8,150 → 3.0 hours: 17,056 interp. → 6.0 hours: 25,800still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3058223 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC | 1625 minutes – 9.2 hours old | 32,000 views ~55 reactions | 60 minutes: 8,490 → 3.0 hours: 18,500 → 6.0 hours: 26,500still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /3058123 Oct 2026, 04:03 UTC | 2412 minutes – 14 hours old | 36,500 views ~29 reactions | 60 minutes: 3,382 interp. → 3.0 hours: 10,300 → 6.0 hours: 23,500 → 12 hours: 35,100still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 4.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
55,229 reactions across 999 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55,229 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 999 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55,229 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 August 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @melodio. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 16 August 2026 to 23 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📲 نسخهی جدید اپ اندروید ملوبیت قبل از نصب اپ از طریق لینک زیر میتونید شمارهتون رو در ربات به اشتراک بذارید تا اشتراک پرمیومتون همزمان روی ربات و اپ فعال باشه و همچنین آرشیو دانلود ربات رو هم روی اپ داشته باشید 👇 🔗 https://t.me/melobot?start=ctc همچنین با نصب اپ و اشتراک گذاری شماره و همسانسازی ملوبات با اپ. ⭕️با اپلیکیشن ملوبیت، حتی در شرایط نت ملی راحت و بیدردسر به موسیقی گوش بده⭕️
❤11
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤20
🗣 Ehsan Daryadel 🎵 Baba Maman #EhsanDaryadel صفحهی آهنگ 🔤 @melodio
❤23
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤23
🗣 Zedbazi 🎵 Bara Hamishe #Zedbazi صفحهی آهنگ 🔤 @melodio
❤25
اسپاتیفای؟ 🧐 نه مرسی تو تلگرام مینیاپ ملوبات رو دارم 😎 👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/melobot/app
❤14
#Eshagh_Anvar موج دریا زده را تنگهی ساحل قفس است
❤55
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤29
#پلی_لیست #گلچین_پاپ مجموعهای از بهترین و تازهترین آهنگهای منتشر شده اخیر🎧 🔤 @melodio
❤19
📲 نسخهی جدید اپ اندروید ملوبیت قبل از نصب اپ از طریق لینک زیر میتونید شمارهتون رو در ربات به اشتراک بذارید تا اشتراک پرمیومتون همزمان روی ربات و اپ فعال باشه و همچنین آرشیو دانلود ربات رو هم روی اپ داشته باشید 👇 🔗 https://t.me/melobot?start=ctc همچنین با نصب اپ و اشتراک گذاری شماره و همسانسازی ملوبات با اپ. ⭕️با اپلیکیشن ملوبیت، حتی در شرایط نت ملی راحت و بیدردسر به موسیقی گوش بده⭕️
❤22
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤20
🗣 Saaren 🎵 Ki Arezo Kard 2 #Saaren صفحهی آهنگ 🔤 @melodio
❤23
Showing the 12 most recent of 23,987 posts we hold for @melodio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@melodio edited 50 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@melodio named 30 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 333 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“melobit | ملوبیت” (@melodio), 2,193,389 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/melodio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.