Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ️ Navvab

Channel

️ Navvab

@navab021

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,970subscribers

+1,668 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001086547166
TypeChannel
Username@navab021
DescriptionID : Telgram-instagram/nvborg
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/navab021

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

15,300 average views per post against 26,970 subscribers — an engagement rate of 56.6%. Across the 6,095 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.85% and 13.2%, with a median of 6.54%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (25 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Posts measured12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled183,160
Mature posts only60.2% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers26,970 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 6,095 channels · p10 1.18% · p25 2.85% · p50 6.54% · p75 13.2% · p90 21.9%
Position in cohort99.376th percentile · 8.6× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.047% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

25,13726,97026,053.56 August 2026 — 25,302 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,302 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,301 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,289 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,269 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,258 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,248 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,228 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,232 subscribers15 August 2026 — 25,205 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,193 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,189 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,182 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,179 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,185 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,181 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,177 subscribers24 August 2026 — 25,160 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,149 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,137 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,148 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,308 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,434 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,505 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,595 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,227 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,590 subscribers5 September 2026 — 26,723 subscribers8 September 2026 — 26,832 subscribers11 September 2026 — 26,853 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,872 subscribers14 September 2026 — 26,938 subscribers16 September 2026 — 26,946 subscribers18 September 2026 — 26,970 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,668. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,862–27,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:5926,970+24
16 Sept 2026, 14:1926,946+8
14 Sept 2026, 18:3826,938+66
13 Sept 2026, 02:5626,872+19
11 Sept 2026, 03:5726,853+21
8 Sept 2026, 05:5526,832+109
5 Sept 2026, 00:5926,723+133
3 Sept 2026, 06:2926,590+363
1 Sept 2026, 23:2626,227+632
1 Sept 2026, 00:2725,595+90
31 Aug 2026, 01:2225,505+71
30 Aug 2026, 01:3725,434+126
29 Aug 2026, 03:5725,308+160
28 Aug 2026, 02:2825,148+11
27 Aug 2026, 02:5325,137-12
26 Aug 2026, 00:3225,149-11
24 Aug 2026, 23:4825,160-17
23 Aug 2026, 08:4825,177-4
21 Aug 2026, 20:3725,181-4
20 Aug 2026, 15:2225,185first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 6 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.6%
avg views ÷ 26,970 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,300
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held38 (6 December 2025 – 21 September 2026)
Views total183,160
Reactions total2,706
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 06:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11
Videos
117
Links
46

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 18s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,793 reactions across 38 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,52740.1%
😍1,60818.3%
❤‍🔥1,20513.7%
🔥8659.84%
👍4735.38%
🤣3674.17%
🍾2653.01%
💔1902.16%
😢1751.99%
🥰280.318%
👌270.307%
🤯270.307%
👏220.25%
👎140.159%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,793 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 38 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @navab021. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 December 2025 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 16:37 UTC≈3,770 views218 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤168❤‍🔥30🍾7😍7🔥6

19 Sept 2026, 19:57 UTC≈5,900 views57 reactionsread 24 September 2026

ویدیو رو گذاشتم براتون 🤍🫶🏼

❤50🔥3❤‍🔥2👍2

19 Sept 2026, 19:30 UTC≈13,500 views99 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

با چشمای خوشگلتون میتونید این شکلی ویدیو بسازید 🤍 https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSq7tmuN9/

❤84🤣5🤯5❤‍🔥3👌2

7 Sept 2026, 19:09 UTC≈12,200 views223 reactions1 Starread 24 September 2026
Video

اگه چشمات مال من بود🤍 “یاد”

❤193❤‍🔥18🔥12

4 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC≈14,800 views83 reactionsread 24 September 2026

ویدیوهاتونو با تیک تاک بسازید از یاد🤍

❤73❤‍🔥10

4 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC≈13,900 views58 reactionsread 24 September 2026

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS9BoR1KqKR6p-HbToQ/

❤44❤‍🔥13👍1

2 Sept 2026, 13:27 UTC≈14,800 views121 reactionsread 24 September 2026

https://open.spotify.com/album/2gk1NRrks1aavQbTCmTezi?si=crwX_A2ATbW-hshHU4al3Q&utm_source=copy-link از اسپاتیفای میتونید گوش بدید🤍

😍77❤35❤‍🔥7🍾1👌1

1 Sept 2026, 17:11 UTC≈4,490 views97 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://soundcloud.com/nvborg/yaad?ref=clipboard&p=i&c=1&si=349AB560BD604522B6AEE6CDC7C15A99&utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing

❤93❤‍🔥4

1 Sept 2026, 15:57 UTC≈48,600 views734 reactionsread 24 September 2026
File

از تو هر چی یاد من هست از همه ی قشنگیای این زمین قشنگتره🤍

❤624❤‍🔥70🔥13😍13💔6🍾4🤯3👍1

1 Sept 2026, 15:34 UTC≈17,400 views342 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

“یاد” تقدیم دلاتون 🤍

❤296❤‍🔥36🔥3💔2🤯2🥰2😢1

31 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC≈16,800 views362 reactions1 Starread 24 September 2026
Photo

فردا 🙇🏻‍♂️🤍

❤312🍾17😍14❤‍🔥9🔥9😢1

28 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC≈17,000 views312 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

اگه چشمات مال من بود… نزدیک🤍

😍202❤67❤‍🔥19🔥19👍3💔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @navab021. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

melobit | ملوبیت
@melodio · 2,218,294
#1
Miladbabaei1
@milad_babaei1 · 11,101
#2
علی نـواب| nvborg|آهنگ های آذربایجان ،ترکیه،ایران|دی جی موریکس |هکنا|نواب|الیاس|تورک|morix|Türk |علی |یالچینتاش |دابسمش |مسبب
@ali_navab1399 · 789 (as read 11 September 2026)
#3
𝑷𝒓𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒄𝒚 𝒊𝒔 𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓
@privacynarges · 383
#4
Mordad
@mordwd · 5,642
#5
AlirezaRiazi Official
@AlirezaRiazi · 3,306
#6
ARDALAN
@Ardalanofficial · 26,308
#7
Shayan Eshraghi
@ShayanEshraghi · 22,902
#8
🖤🕷
@txxeror · 2,383
#9
Fedi
@fedimusic · 5,943
#10
عرفان طهماسبی
@Erfancnl · 108,985
#11
ittahas
@ittahass · 110,749
#12
HB MEDIA
@hbrecords · 2,577
#13
Nivad | نیواد
@nivadmusic · 25,974
#14
Mani | مانی
@manny_original · 16,469
#15
Pishi Mood😎
@pishiiplaylist · 141 (as read 11 September 2026)
#16
Ahmad Solo
@ahmadsoloorginall · 22,075
#17
🎼𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐇𝐀 𝐁𝐀 𝐓𝐎 🎼
@tanhabattoo · 110 (as read 11 September 2026)
#18
iliyar
@iliyarofficial · 17,142
#19
♡آیدا.شاملو♡
@iydashamlo · 2,767
#20
Cₕᵤₘ BᵤCₕₑₜ🪣🫧
@Onlyoucansaveyourself · 76 (as read 11 September 2026)
#21
aliha
@alihamusic · 11,156
#22
𝙎𝙤𝙝𝙚𝙡(canapus)
@soheltunes · 16,032
#23
MahdiForoughi
@mahdiforoughiii · 15,096
#24
مسخ | سروش رجبی
@maskh_ir · 1,166
#25
Sami sharif
@samisharif · 5,548
#26
Matyar | متیار
@matyar · 22,464
#27
2yarmusic
@official_2yar · 23,100
#28
عليرضا پوراستاد Alireza Pourostad
@alirezapourostad · 8,355
#29
Vantewave 🎧
@vantewave · 1,213 (as read 11 September 2026)
#30
fazelderiss
@fazelderiss · 14,159
#31
Morteza Shokri
@MortezaShokriChannel · 25,295
#32
Ali Lohrasbi
@alilohrasbioriginal · 6,793
#33
لشیا
@mobhama · 13,091
#34
Narimor Music
@NarimorMusic · 6,905
#35
PMC Music | پی ام سی موزیک
@pmc_org · 24,987
#36
بیرموزیک - BirMusic
@birmusicOfficial · 47,462
#37
𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒐𝒏✨
@shinnmonn90 · 34
#38
REBEL
@Bardia_shamsii · 3,590
#39
تهران سانگ | Tehsong | دانلود آهنگ جدید
@tehsong · 9,600
#40
[ ستاره لارا ]
@saghiiii_118 · 1,314
#41
پَری‌‌وار
@parivaarr · 1,463
#42
Reza Shiri
@rezashiriichannel · 33,324
#43
@Remix Tarkibi Rap #Remix_Tarkibi_Rap RemixTarkibiRap ریمیکس ترکیبی پاپ و آهنگ فول همه رپرا رپ میکس Remix Rapi رپ
@RemixTarkibiRapHipHop · 2,768
#44
کانال رسمی رز موزیک
@rozmusict · 87,308
#45
Mehdi Yaghmaei | مهدی یغمایی
@Mehdiyaghmaii · 5,066
#46
نیو آهنگ , دانلود آهنگ جدید
@NewAhang_Com · 91,042
#47
Haamim | حامیم
@haamimtunes · 113,054
#48
Shadow
@sainaamii · 716
#49
Kiyarash
@Kiyarashmusic1 · 36,057
#50
vahidmohammadpourr
@vahid_video · 5,550
#51
. شَر تِکست گرافی .
@shar_text_graphy · 505 (as read 11 September 2026)
#52
Younes Bayat
@younesbayat · 32,675
#53
Mermaids land🧜🏻‍♀️
@mermaidsland · 882 (as read 11 September 2026)
#54
alihosseini | علی حسینی
@alihosswinii · 10,011
#55
NAVAR maghz.
@depworld1 · 421 (as read 11 September 2026)
#56
Arshin
@arshin_org · 6,623
#57
Puzzle
@puzzleBandTelegram · 14,962
#58
[ تیم علمی سکسولوژی ]
@zano_shohary · 46,482
#59
اَخبار محمودآباد
@akhbarmahmudabad · 1,935
#60
Sara&Nika Forghani Asl
@Sara_Forghani · 2,605
#61
موزيك ٣
@alikashani03 · 1,274 (as read 11 September 2026)
#62
Majidrazavi
@Majidrazavioriginal · 71,356
#63
Zabangostar
@ZabangostarAcademy · 877
#64
| آسـمـانـِ دلـ |
@asman_del · 3,493
#65
AvayeHonar Music Institute
@avayehonarofficial · 1,669 (as read 11 September 2026)
#66
کوراوغلی آهنگ خارجی جدید Ahang Khareji New Music Song Songs رپ آمریکایی برزیلی کره ای هندی اروپایی لاتین لاتینی ژاپنی آسیایی
@KUROGHLUU · 1,348 (as read 11 September 2026)
#67
کانال آموزشگاه تُرنگ Torang
@torangartati · 121
#68
انجمن ورزشی ولسوالی های جغتو وقره باغ
@Jeghatogarabagh · 106
#69
Power Man
@psapeg · 482
#70
Joyner Lucas
@RealJoynerLucas · 5,458
#71
Dizi Haberler
@Dizi_Haberlerr · 32,601
#72
نمونه سوال
@exam14002 · 1,437 (as read 11 September 2026)
#73
انجمن علمی چشم‌پزشکی
@Ophthalmology_Association · 1,987
#74

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ARDALAN
@Ardalanofficial · 26,308
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 September 2026
عرفان طهماسبی
@Erfancnl · 108,985
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Kiyarash
@Kiyarashmusic1 · 36,057
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
Nivad | نیواد
@nivadmusic · 25,974
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Ahmad Solo
@ahmadsoloorginall · 22,075
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
Reza Shiri
@rezashiriichannel · 33,324
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 September 2026
کانال رسمی رز موزیک
@rozmusict · 87,308
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Haamim | حامیم
@haamimtunes · 113,054
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
Majidrazavi
@Majidrazavioriginal · 71,356
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“️ Navvab” (@navab021), 26,970 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/navab021.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.