" اِلیزایُم "
انجامِ وظیفهیِ اجتماعی از طریق ارتقای سطح دانش جامعه در حوزه هوش مصنوعی
جهت تهیه انواعِ سرویسهایِ هوش مصنوعی میتونید با
@ElizaiumHelp
در ارتباط باشید.
Created
Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
57,800 average views per post against 32,960 subscribers — an engagement rate of 175.2%. Across the 3,428 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,635–99,960 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.07% and 10.9%, with a median of 5.08%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
17 of 17 published in the window (0 exact, 17 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
981,900
Mature posts only
175.2% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 94 days, net -13,293. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,226–48,683 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 10:08
32,356
-264
6 Nov 2026, 10:49
32,620
-147
5 Nov 2026, 12:40
32,767
-193
4 Nov 2026, 10:14
32,960
-257
3 Nov 2026, 09:02
33,217
-9
2 Nov 2026, 10:49
33,226
-124
1 Nov 2026, 08:15
33,350
-160
31 Oct 2026, 10:18
33,510
-154
30 Oct 2026, 07:31
33,664
-818
29 Oct 2026, 04:20
34,482
-731
28 Oct 2026, 00:30
35,213
-127
27 Oct 2026, 01:20
35,340
-178
26 Oct 2026, 02:45
35,518
-148
25 Oct 2026, 00:27
35,666
-201
23 Oct 2026, 21:30
35,867
-640
22 Oct 2026, 23:59
36,507
-888
22 Oct 2026, 01:27
37,395
-261
20 Oct 2026, 16:59
37,656
-202
19 Oct 2026, 17:06
37,858
-4,669
18 Oct 2026, 17:45
42,527
first reading
Engagement
123 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 179 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
187.5%
avg views ÷ 32,356 subscribers
Avg views / post
60,700
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.289%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 123 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
123 (24 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
910,000
Reactions total
2,629
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 18:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
144
Videos
100
Links
194
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
49m 35s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 64 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
31,140 reactions across 121 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
29,650
95.2%
👍
1,203
3.86%
💔
242
0.777%
👎
45
0.145%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 123 of the 123 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31,666 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 123 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
متیو شوارتز این بار در حدود سه ماه با Claude Fable 5 و BootLoops تونسته ۳۰ انتگرال فاینمن رو حل کنه که ۱۵ تاش قبلاً هیچوقت محاسبه نشده بود.
چند نتیجهٔ از این پروژه:
• که Claude نتایج یکی از مقالههای قبلی شوارتز رو در حدود ۲۰ دقیقه بازتولید کرد.
• کدی که خود شوارتز برای همین کار نوشته بود، چند هفته وقت گرفته بود.
• شوارتز از اشتباههای Claude هم نوشته. Claude بارها کاری رو تمومشده اعلام کرده که تموم نشده بود.
• …
از امروز با Gemini هم میتونید از عکس اسکچ یک اپ یا ابزار تعاملی واقعی بسازید.
روند کار اینطوریه:
۱. از اسکچتون عکس بگیرید و در Gemini آپلود کنید.
۲. ابزار Canvas رو انتخاب کنید و بنویسید:
که Can you code this app و Gemini طرح رو میخونه و کدش رو مینویسه.
۳. اپ رو در پنجرهٔ پیشنمایش امتحان کنید و تغییرهایی مثل رنگ، فونت یا قابلیت جدید رو همونجا با پیام بخواید.
لازم نیست کدنویسی بلد باشید. اگه خواستید کد رو بب…
اَنتروپیک حدود ۲۰۷ هزار گفتگو رو بررسی کرده تا ببینه دانشمندها از Claude برای چی استفاده میکنن.
تحلیل داده پرکاربردترین کاره، ۳۴٪ گفتگوها در Claude و ۴۸٪ در Claude Code.
نوشتن حدود ۳۲٪ استفاده از Claude رو تشکیل میده.
نوشتن پیشنویس مقاله بهتنهایی بزرگترین سهم (۱۸٫۶٪) رو بین همهٔ کارها داره.
ایدهپردازی و فرضیهسازی فقط ۴٪ استفادهست، در حالی که دانشمندهایی که در نظرسنجی شرکت کردن، اون رو مهمترین بخش کارشون …
گوگل، اسکنر داخلی Google Drive رو در اندروید ارتقا داده تا برای اسکن اسناد چندصفحهای کمتر به اپلیکیشنهای جانبی نیاز داشته باشید.
میتونید چند صفحه رو در یک مرحله اسکن کنید.
حتی وقتی چند صفحهٔ کتاب یا چند رسید کنار هم در کادر دوربین باشن، اسکنر هر صفحه رو جدا تشخیص میده و ثبت میکنه.
صفحههای تکراری هم خودکار شناسایی میشن تا یک صفحه رو اشتباهی دو بار اسکن نکنید.
برای اسکن، در اپ Google Drive دکمهٔ Camera پایین ص…
پلتفرم Gemini هم قابلیت Skills رو داره؛ و لازم نیست هر بار برای انجام کارهای تکراری، پرامپتهای طولانی بنویسید.
دستورالعملهای قابلاستفادهٔ مجدد که یکبار تنظیمشون میکنید و بعد هر زمان لازم باشه دوباره ازشون استفاده میکنید.
میتونید روش کاری، لحن نوشتن، قالبهای موردنظرتون و قواعد تیم رو به شکل یک Skill تعریف کنید؛ از نوشتن ایمیل و گزارش گرفته تا استانداردسازی اسناد. فایل مرجع، مثل متن، PDF یا تصویر، هم میتونید…
اگه یک کسبوکار کوچک دارید و برندینگ، تبلیغات و حسابوکتابش رو خودتون انجام میدید، Gemini حالا یک صفحهٔ مخصوص کسبوکار داره.
از همین صفحه میتونید هویت بصری برندتون رو بسازید، وضعیت مالیتون رو بررسی کنید و مشتریهاتون رو بهتر بشناسید.
چند قابلیت کاربردی رو یکجا داره:
تصویرهای هماهنگ با برند: وبسایت، کیت برند، فونتها یا پالت رنگیتون رو آپلود کنید. Gemini این سبک رو نگه میداره و با مدل Nano Banana 2.1 تصویرهای…
قابلیت Artifacts در Claude میتونه برای کارهای پژوهشی فراتر از نوشتن متن استفاده بشه.
کافیه ایدهتون رو توضیح بدید تا Claude یک ابزار تعاملی بسازه و کنار همون گفتگو نشونش بده، بدون اینکه لازم باشه از صفر کدنویسی کنید.
روند کار اینطوریه:
با یک پرامپت شروع کنید و ایده، داده یا فایلتون رو به Claude بدید.
خروجی رو مرحلهبهمرحله با درخواستهای بعدی در همون گفتگو اصلاح کنید.
کار نهایی رو با لینک به اشتراک بذارید. همهٔ …
اگه میخواید ویدیو، صدا، عکس یا GIF یک پست رو از سایتهایِ مختلف ذخیره کنید، Cobalt این کار رو بدون تبلیغ و بدون نصب برنامه انجام میده.
کافیه لینک پست رو در سایت Cobalt وارد کنید و دانلود رو بزنید.
سه حالت دارید: auto برای دانلود معمولی، audio برای گرفتن فقط صدا و mute برای گرفتن ویدیو بدون صدا.
فعلا از ۲۰ سرویس پشتیبانی میکنه.
ورود به Cobalt
@Elizaium
💬 اگه گفتگوهایی در ChatGPT دارید که نمیخواید وقتی کسی صفحهتون رو میبینه یا از دستگاهتون استفاده میکنه جلوی چشم باشن، حالا میتونید قفلشون کنید.
چت قفلشده از تاریخچه، چتهای پینشده و جستجو حذف میشه و فقط با یک PIN چهاررقمی باز میشه. (روی موبایل با اثر انگشت یا Face ID هم)
برای قفل کردن یک چت، از منوی سهنقطه (•••) گزینهٔ Lock chat رو بزنید. اگه اولین باره، یک PIN چهاررقمی هم میسازید. چتهای قفلشده به بخش P…
اگر در Gemini Notebook (NotebookLM) گزینهٔ Review برایِ پنلِ Studio رو روشن کنید، قبل از ساختن اسلاید یا ویدیو، اول طرح کلیاش رو نشون میده.
میتونید ترتیب صحنهها رو عوض کنید، خلاصه اضافه کنید یا سبک رو تغییر بدید و بعد Proceed رو بزنید.
برای خروجی سریع هم میتونید Review رو خاموش کنید و مثل قبل مستقیم بسازید.
تهیه سریع و راحتِ انواعِ سرویسهای هوشمصنوعی
@Elizaium
💬 از امروز در اَپِ دسکتاپِ ChatGPT میتونید پیامهای قبلی یک گفتوگو رو ویرایش کنید، نه فقط آخرین پیام رو.
این قابلیت وقتی به درد میخوره که بعد از چند مرحله کار متوجه بشید یکی از درخواستهای اولتون ناقص یا اشتباه بوده.
قبلاً فقط آخرین پیام قابل ویرایش بود و برای بقیه باید گفتوگو رو شاخهدار میکردید. حالا خود همون پیام رو اصلاح میکنید.
هنوز توضیح رسمی منتشر نشده که بعد از ویرایش، پیامهای بعدی و یا تغییرهایی که…
🤖🔍 با مدلِ جدیدِ گوگل میتونید مقالهٔ علمی سنگین رو به کتاب مصور متحرک تبدیل کنید.
به این صورت که Gemini 4 Argon مقاله رو میخونه، مفهوم اصلیاش رو میفهمه و اون رو به یک روایت قابلفهم تبدیل میکنه؛ Nano Banana برای هر بخش از این روایت تصویر میسازه و Veo تصویرها رو متحرک میکنه.
یک راه تازه برای فهمیدنِ بهترِ پژوهشها.
تهیه Google AI Pro برای دسترسی به Gemini 4 Argon
✦ ابزارهای AI زیادن؛ در @Elizaium
دقیق بررسی …
❤462👍15
Showing the 12 most recent of 123 posts we hold for @NewElizaium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@NewElizaium edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @NewElizaium as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
1 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
25 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Domains linked from posts
12 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elizaium” (@NewElizaium), 32,356 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NewElizaium.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.