بیتکوین ۷۵ هزار دلار رو هم رد کرد: @whatsmusicbot
❤194💔103👍12🤔11⚡9🤣4

Channel
@whatsmusic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
2,066,128subscribers
+44,304 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001870662237 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whatsmusic |
| Created | 13 August 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whatsmusic |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 2,066,128 | +2,152 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 2,063,976 | +1,482 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 2,062,494 | +1,241 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 2,061,253 | +2,386 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 2,058,867 | +4,580 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:02 | 2,054,287 | +4,120 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 2,050,167 | +4,081 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 2,046,086 | +1,577 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 2,044,509 | +796 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:33 | 2,043,713 | +555 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 2,043,158 | +1,198 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 2,041,960 | +1,884 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 2,040,076 | +1,545 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 2,038,531 | +1,764 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 2,036,767 | +1,218 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 2,035,549 | +1,585 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 2,033,964 | +490 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 2,033,474 | +962 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 2,032,512 | +211 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 2,032,301 | first reading |
196 posts held, back to 13 August 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 196 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /2038113 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC | 1under a minute – under a minute old | 8 views1 reaction | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /2038013 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC | 15 minutes – 5 minutes old | 3,890 views ~139 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /2037913 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC | 211 minutes – 42 minutes old | 12,200 views ~117 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 17 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2037713 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC | 828 minutes – 3.7 hours old | 34,600 views ~732 reactions | 60 minutes: 15,300 → 3.0 hours: 30,700still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 76 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2037613 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC | 963 seconds – 3.7 hours old | 33,000 views ~282 reactions | 60 minutes: 15,455 interp. → 3.0 hours: 28,503 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 68 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2037513 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC | 105 minutes – 4.3 hours old | 33,900 views ~443 reactions | 60 minutes: 15,035 interp. → 3.0 hours: 27,141 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 70 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2037413 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC | 2715 minutes – 14 hours old | 55,300 views ~1,749 reactions | 60 minutes: 8,870 interp. → 3.0 hours: 19,047 interp. → 6.0 hours: 30,500 → 12 hours: 50,900still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 5.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /2037313 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC | 118 minutes – 18 minutes old | 3,930 views ~37 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
107,356 reactions across 137 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 40,311 | 37.5% | |
| ❤ | 31,178 | 29.0% | |
| 💔 | 17,304 | 16.1% | |
| 👍 | 6,890 | 6.42% | |
| 🖕 | 3,079 | 2.87% | |
| 👎 | 1,930 | 1.80% | |
| 🔥 | 1,706 | 1.59% | |
| 👌 | 1,280 | 1.19% | |
| 🤯 | 867 | 0.808% | |
| 💯 | 579 | 0.539% | |
| 😨 | 573 | 0.534% | |
| 🤬 | 571 | 0.532% | |
| 🤔 | 259 | 0.241% | |
| ⚡ | 225 | 0.21% | |
| 🍓 | 182 | 0.17% | |
| 😭 | 146 | 0.136% | |
| 👀 | 129 | 0.12% | |
| 😁 | 50 | 0.047% | |
| 👏 | 31 | 0.029% | |
| 🥰 | 23 | 0.021% | |
| 2 further kinds | 43 | 0.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 195 of the 196 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180,109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 196 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2023 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بیتکوین ۷۵ هزار دلار رو هم رد کرد: @whatsmusicbot
❤194💔103👍12🤔11⚡9🤣4
دلار ۱۹۳ هزار تومان 😱 @whatsmusicbot
💔907🖕147❤40👍14👌13🤔7🥰7💯5
بابک زنجانی کافه افتتاح کرده و آقازادهها هم رفتن اونجا عشق و حال: @whatsmusicbot
🖕1,240❤89💔37👍10👌1🤣1🥰1
پس از ازدواج کریستیانو رونالدو، روبرتو کارلوس اسطوره فوتبال برزیل نیز با زن مراکشیتبار که مسلمان هم هست ازدواج کرد. شایعاتی نیز وجود دارد که خود روبرتو کارلوس نیز مسلمان شده است @whatsmusicbot
👍511❤228🤔73👌15🥰13⚡7💯5
📱📱📱📱📱📱 ربات واتسموزیک اکنون یک دانلودر تمام عیار است با ربات واتسموزیک، میتوانید موزیکهای روی ویدیوها در اینستاگرام, تیکتاک, فیسبوک, پینترس, یوتیوب و اسنپچت و کلیه پستها و ویدیوهاشون حتی اونایی که موسیقی ندارند را هم دانلود کنید. اگر ویدیویی دیدید که نیاز به ویدیو یا آهنگ پسزمینه اون پُست داشتید کافیه لینک پست رو به ربات بفرستید 🔸 همچنین اگر اسم آهنگی که مدنظر دارید رو برای ربات بفرستید هم خود آهنگ هم آرشیو …
❤417💯77👍30⚡20👌20🤔5🥰2
مامانت میدونه تو ۱۰ سالگی با این دختره تو رابطه بودی؟ پن امروز ۱۸ آگوست, روز زوجهاست @whatsmusicbot
🤣1,380❤95💔40👍15🔥10👎8⚡4👏2
فقط تو دو سال... @whatsmusicbot
💔40🤣1
این پسربچه ایرانی که یکی از آهنگهای ترکی رو کاور کرده بود حالا تو اکسپلور خارجیا میم شده @whatsmusicbot
🤣1,190💔81❤39👎23👍7👏5
چند وقت پیش یه فرد ناشناس آیدی bank@ رو به قیمت ۵ میلیون دلار از تو حراجی تلگرام خرید با توجه به قیمت فعلی گرام (تون) پولش شده ۱ میلیون دلار 😂 @whatsmusicbot
🤣868💔57❤30🔥17👎6
این گربه کم بود. این یکی هم اضافه شد بهش. کل اکسپلور و فید رو گرفتن @whatsmusicbot
🤣875❤60👍13👎11👏5
این چه سمیه 😂😂 - تو یه بازیش باید بری به شبکههای خبری حمله کنی. اون یکی هم اسمش وحشتناکه @whatsmusicbot
🤣497❤13👏1
از لحظاتی که بعد ازدواج تجربه میکنید و هیچ حق اعتراضی هم بهش ندارید: @whatsmusicbot
🤣881❤46👎4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 196 posts we hold for @whatsmusic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@whatsmusic edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 207 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“whatschannel” (@whatsmusic), 2,066,128 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whatsmusic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.