Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sport Bad Tweet

Channel

Sport Bad Tweet

@SportBadTweet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

137,791subscribers

-14,441 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001561222645
TypeChannel
Username@SportBadTweet
Descriptionارسال توییت‌هاتون: @SBadN_Bot We respect and comply with copyright laws. صحت تبلیغات به هیچ وجه تایید نمی شود
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/SportBadTweet

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

137,791152,232145,011.57 August 2026 — 152,232 subscribers7 August 2026 — 152,232 subscribers8 August 2026 — 152,006 subscribers9 August 2026 — 151,612 subscribers10 August 2026 — 151,351 subscribers11 August 2026 — 150,967 subscribers12 August 2026 — 150,612 subscribers12 August 2026 — 150,380 subscribers14 August 2026 — 149,967 subscribers15 August 2026 — 149,611 subscribers17 August 2026 — 149,182 subscribers18 August 2026 — 148,871 subscribers19 August 2026 — 148,603 subscribers20 August 2026 — 148,352 subscribers21 August 2026 — 148,036 subscribers22 August 2026 — 147,736 subscribers24 August 2026 — 148,259 subscribers25 August 2026 — 147,926 subscribers26 August 2026 — 147,619 subscribers27 August 2026 — 147,399 subscribers28 August 2026 — 147,214 subscribers29 August 2026 — 146,999 subscribers30 August 2026 — 146,786 subscribers31 August 2026 — 146,578 subscribers1 September 2026 — 146,285 subscribers2 September 2026 — 146,055 subscribers3 September 2026 — 145,731 subscribers5 September 2026 — 145,426 subscribers8 September 2026 — 144,656 subscribers11 September 2026 — 144,455 subscribers13 September 2026 — 144,225 subscribers14 September 2026 — 143,993 subscribers16 September 2026 — 143,927 subscribers18 September 2026 — 143,517 subscribers25 September 2026 — 142,520 subscribers3 October 2026 — 141,295 subscribers8 October 2026 — 140,476 subscribers12 October 2026 — 140,123 subscribers14 October 2026 — 139,986 subscribers15 October 2026 — 139,846 subscribers16 October 2026 — 139,706 subscribers17 October 2026 — 139,625 subscribers18 October 2026 — 139,559 subscribers19 October 2026 — 139,425 subscribers20 October 2026 — 139,463 subscribers21 October 2026 — 139,357 subscribers22 October 2026 — 139,178 subscribers23 October 2026 — 139,157 subscribers24 October 2026 — 139,057 subscribers25 October 2026 — 138,922 subscribers26 October 2026 — 138,673 subscribers27 October 2026 — 138,738 subscribers28 October 2026 — 138,570 subscribers29 October 2026 — 138,346 subscribers30 October 2026 — 138,184 subscribers31 October 2026 — 138,044 subscribers1 November 2026 — 137,949 subscribers2 November 2026 — 137,791 subscribers7 August 20262 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 87 days, net -14,441. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 135,625–154,398 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 17:56137,791-158
1 Nov 2026, 16:26137,949-95
31 Oct 2026, 17:38138,044-140
30 Oct 2026, 18:10138,184-162
29 Oct 2026, 15:36138,346-224
28 Oct 2026, 11:35138,570-168
27 Oct 2026, 11:28138,738+65
26 Oct 2026, 10:06138,673-249
25 Oct 2026, 06:50138,922-135
24 Oct 2026, 07:36139,057-100
23 Oct 2026, 10:30139,157-21
22 Oct 2026, 12:20139,178-179
21 Oct 2026, 07:39139,357-106
20 Oct 2026, 07:56139,463+38
19 Oct 2026, 06:11139,425-134
18 Oct 2026, 08:00139,559-66
17 Oct 2026, 10:37139,625-81
16 Oct 2026, 10:56139,706-140
15 Oct 2026, 13:37139,846-140
14 Oct 2026, 11:44139,986first reading

Engagement

3,126 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 184 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.50%
avg views ÷ 137,791 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,300
1,059 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,059
of 3,126 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1,057 of 1,059 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held3,126 (6 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total10,937,004
Reactions total1,027,553
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 08:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈37,300
Videos
≈9,180
Links
≈428

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
30m 35s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 91 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

960,329 reactions across 998 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣465,51448.5%
👍170,74017.8%
🤡143,42814.9%
❤71,6107.46%
🔥51,3075.34%
👎28,2242.94%
💔27,1982.83%
😍8500.089%
🤬7470.078%
👌3440.036%
😭1890.02%
👏830.009%
🤝520.005%
😢430.004%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 998 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 960,329 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 October 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
31
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SportBadTweet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 October 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,780 views209 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

در کیفیت دیومانده شکی نیست سوزوکی هم دروازه بان خیلی خوبیه ولی نکته دیوانه وار اینه که جفتشون تقریبا نزدیک بود بیفتن دست PSG پاریس همین الانش چندین سر و گردن بالاتر از بقیه تیما قرار داره و اگه این دوتا هم به جمعشون اضافه میشدن.... عملا چمپیونزلیگو تبدیل میکردن به بوندسلیگا @SportBadTweet | هررا

🤣178👍25👎4❤2

3 Nov 2026, 07:31 UTC≈3,620 views527 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

انجلوتی لاشیم فقط تیم نوب کشی میکرد @SportBadTweet | Ar

🤣373🤡146🔥6❤2

3 Nov 2026, 06:34 UTC≈5,480 views355 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

چه بازی داریم امشب تو چمپیونزلیگ🫪🔥🔥 @SportBadTweet | رفتگر برنابئو

🤣343🔥8🤡3❤1

3 Nov 2026, 06:10 UTC≈6,250 views414 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

مکن ای صبح طلوع @SportBadTweet | مهزد

🤣392❤14👍3💔3🔥2

3 Nov 2026, 06:01 UTC≈6,550 views905 reactionsread 3 November 2026

ببخشیدا ولی این جود بلینگهامی که میگید تو الکلاسیکو هایی که چهار تا پنج تا می‌خورید کجا بود؟ یدونه برد ۲-۱ داشتید حالا هوا برتون نداره که خبریه، همین شما اگه احیانا بارسا تو سوپرکاپ بخوره به رئال و بتونه رئال رو ببره میایید ناله میکنید که وای نمی‌دونم هافبک نداشتیم ولی بارسا رودری و پدری داره در رابطه با فرمین هم همینو بدون که بلینگهام که سهله کل پست ۱۰ های حال حاضر هم نمیتونن با تعداد دقایقی که فرمین بازی کرده اون…

👍576🤡277🤣35❤17

3 Nov 2026, 05:32 UTC≈6,680 views342 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

همینطور یهویی یادآوری کنیم... @SportBadTweet | 008

🤣304🤡38

2 Nov 2026, 22:12 UTC≈9,170 views9 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

⚽️ شبی پر از تقابل‌های بزرگ؛ از نبردهای اروپایی تا جدال غول‌های آسیا! 💥⚡️ ⚽️ کنداکتور فردا با مجموعه‌ای از جدال‌های جذاب و سرنوشت‌ساز همراه شده؛ از آزمون استقلال و الهلال در آسیا تا رویارویی قدرت‌های بزرگ فوتبال اروپا. جایی که منچستریونایتد و رم، پاری‌سن‌ژرمن و ویارئال و اتلتیکومادرید و بایرن برای برتری مقابل یکدیگر قرار می‌گیرند. در ادامه، اینتر در خانه فاینورد به دنبال یک نمایش قدرتمند است و بارسلونا نیز مقابل …

❤7👎1🔥1

2 Nov 2026, 22:08 UTC≈9,230 views1,264 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

من به ضعیف کش بودن فلیک اعتراض دارم @SportBadTweet | King

🤣870🤡348🔥41👍4❤1

2 Nov 2026, 21:58 UTC≈9,580 views882 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

یادش بخیر اخرین برد منچستر یونایتد چه دورانی بود حاجی @SportBadTweet | Reby

🤣845🤡20💔13❤3😍1

2 Nov 2026, 21:49 UTC≈9,680 views827 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

از نظر من کوناته توو رئال مادرید نه تنها جواب داده بلکه از حد انتظار هم فراتر رفته. جذب کردن رایگانش بازهم از هوش سرشار پرز بود ولی من در بهترین حالتش هم فکر نمیکردم اینقدر خوب بتونه باشه. من شخصاً عیار کوناته رو از ال کلاسیکو سنجیدم. بنظرم مهم ترین خرید فصل بعد از دیوماندس... @SportBadTweet | «Kroosowski»

❤573🤣193👍52👎6👌3

2 Nov 2026, 21:37 UTC≈9,860 views592 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

اقا باورت نَمیشه ولی یه چهار هفته‌ای که وینیسیوس محروم بود مارو نجات داد @SportBadTweet | «DrSocrates»

🤣567👍17❤8

2 Nov 2026, 21:30 UTC≈9,950 views1,586 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

افسانه ها میگن حداقل ۱۰۰۰ تا ❤️ رو شاخشه برا فردا شب @SportBadTweet | RXB

❤1,290🤣288👎5👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 3,126 posts we hold for @SportBadTweet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Oct 2026, 17:50 UTCAnonymous Poll51,000 voters approx.

کی کی رو؟

  1. بارسا پاریس رو59%
  2. پاریس بارسا رو41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 October 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

⚽ Sport Bad News
@SportBaadNews · 850,488
#1
Futball Bad Tv ⚫
@futballbadtv · 318,827
#2
Fantasy Arena
@fantasiball · 6,682
#3
FutballBadBoys
@FutballBadBoys · 107,848
#4
Short sport
@Shortspor · 93,275
#5
⚽️ بیست و دو | Bistodo
@bistodo · 408,725
#6
بَنـــــگ‌ بــــال
@BANGGBALL · 19,551
#7
ورزش سه
@varzesh3 · 1,302,842
#8
فوتبال 3060
@Football3060 · 39,233
#9
BAD SS
@Badss_ir · 47,205
#10
بارسا | بارسلونا | Barca
@Barca_We · 278,673
#11
𝐃𝐫 𝐓𝐞𝐥
@drtel · 783,232
#12
¹⁵ 𝐓𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥 𝐌𝐚𝐝𝐫𝐢𝐝 ³⁶
@Troll_RMA · 12,028
#13
Varzesh+plus | ورزش پلاس
@vaarzesh_plus · 332,474
#14
توییت فوتبالی | بیست و دو
@bistodo_tweet · 29,389
#15
Footmation | فوتمیشن
@Footmation · 20,292
#16
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
@iMTProto · 7,686,939
#17
Sikimsportz ⚽️
@SikimSportz · 241,909
#18
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid
@Realmadrid_we · 294,204
#19
𝗙𝗨𝗧𝗕𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗜 𝟭𝟴+
@FUTBALLI18 · 482,471
#20
استقلال | Esteghlal
@EsteghlalFc_We · 350,891
#21
سرخ توتال
@SorkhTotal · 16,706
#22
Bad Soccer
@badsoccer · 117,259
#23
جیمی جامپ | Jimmy jump
@JiimmyJump · 24,150
#24
فوتبال ۳۶۰
@ft360_ir · 417,695
#25
توییتی
@TweetyChannel · 818,967
#26
فوتبال 180
@Futball180TV · 366,605
#27
ABiON | آبیون
@Abion · 15,528
#28
Futball Boys
@FutballBoys · 148,209
#29
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid C.F
@RealMadridTweet · 200,563
#30
Rap God News
@RapGodNews · 185,340
#31
فوتبال برتر | لیگ ایران | بیست و دو
@bistodo_ir · 138,166
#32
Futball Premium
@FutballPremium · 15,118
#33
توتال فوتبال
@total_fut · 144,607
#34
Dark News ⚽️
@darknews · 85,552
#35
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid
@RealMadridCFz · 310,223
#36
کانال هواداران بارسلونا ( بارسا )
@BarcelonaFCBw · 278,379
#37
⚽️ 𝐍𝐚𝐛 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐫 | ناب ساکر
@Nabsoccer · 37,789
#38
میم هاب | MemeHub
@MemeHubOriginal · 93,047
#39
یِ دانش آموز
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 1,027,774
#40
Bad Football | بد فوتبال
@BadFootball · 51,518
#41
پرشینز بارسا | Barcelona | بارسلونا
@persiansbarcaaa · 25,210
#42
اسپورتینو | SPORTINO
@SPORTinoTV · 55,891
#43
Futball Fuck News | FFN
@Futball_Fuckk · 671,231
#44
[ چه خبر؟ ]
@chekhabarre · 243,778
#45
رپ بد نیوز | RapBad Newz
@RapBad_Newz · 246,305
#46
➲PesPars
@PesPars · 71,545
#47
⚽️Dashagh News⚽️
@Dashaghnews · 111,864
#48
جواد خیابانی
@javad_khiabani · 12,914
#49
کریستیانو رونالدو | Ronaldo
@Ronaldo_Cristiano_R · 108,908
#50
Tweet+plus | توییت پلاس
@tweet_varzeshplus · 31,790
#51
Goal News
@GoalnewsTv · 13,107
#52
⚽ Green Soccer / گرین ساکر
@Green_Soccer · 45,215
#53
Feel
@akh_mam · 179,680
#54
جزیره فوتبالی
@Island120 · 48,116
#55
[ اخبار کوتاه ورزشی ]
@ShortSports · 205,134
#56
جوانان ایران
@ir_javan · 638,781
#57
بارسا توییتس ™ BarcaTweetsIR
@BarcaTweetsIR · 8,586
#58
بارسالند | بارسلونا | بارسا
@Barcaland_IR · 48,589
#59
HipSoccer | هیپ ساکر
@HipSoccer · 3,560
#60
FOOTBALL FAN TWEET
@Football_Fan_Tweet · 5,335
#61
Bad Futball News
@BadFotBallNews · 36,939
#62
هتریک | Hattric
@Hattric_Official · 138,842
#63
Premier League | لیگ برتر
@PL_IRANII · 5,459
#64
Dark Twitt
@Darktwitt1 · 22,712
#65
Futball Ultra Boys
@Footballultraboys · 21,041
#66
Rap King
@rapking · 314,213
#67
مووی کاتیج
@CottageOrg · 750,622
#68
HipHopTweety | هیپ هاپ توییتی
@HipHopTweety · 261,907
#69
همکلاسی
@hamclasixii · 101
#70
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
@iRoProxy · 7,975,947
#71
Hip X Hopi
@hip_hopi · 362,178
#72
[ Fun HipHop ]
@funhiphop · 285,699
#73
RapTV
@raptv · 392,924
#74
RegaPlus
@RegaPlus · 1,505,739
#75
Rap Plus News
@RapPlusNews · 86,094
#76
رسانه افشا | اخبار جنگ
@EfshaKhabar · 277,101
#77
MARIZ MEDI
@MARIZMEDIA · 54,805
#78
نتایج و سود سیگنال‌های VIP
@TvMali · 13,904
#79
Z RAP | زد رپ
@zZRap · 64,515
#80
اخبار جنگ الونیوز AloNews
@alonews · 1,007,670
#81
پروکسی Proxy
@proxy_qavi · 3,270,143
#82
جمهوری میم الاسکی
@meme_ol_ski · 219,782
#83
رادیوکصشر
@Radiokocsher · 1,138,273
#84
Badgram | بدگرام
@badgram · 624,503
#85
دارک پروکسی | Proxy mtproto
@darkproxy · 4,591,585
#86
Proxy MTProto
@proxymtproto · 11,865,133
#87

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

⚽ Sport Bad News
@SportBaadNews · 850,488
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
بَنـــــگ‌ بــــال
@BANGGBALL · 19,551
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
Footmation | فوتمیشن
@Footmation · 20,292
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 September 2026
فوتبال 3060
@Football3060 · 39,233
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
Short sport
@Shortspor · 93,275
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
خبرستان فارسی
@khabarestan_farsii · 149,051
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
[ اخبار کوتاه ورزشی ]
@iShortSports · 97,391
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Barca Home | بارسلونا
@HomeFCB · 37,184
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
بد سیتی | CITY BAD
@CITY_BAD · 103,865
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
لاشیای فوتبال
@lashiya_football · 20,895
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 September 2026
- 𝐅𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐃𝐚𝐫𝐤 🖤
@FootballDark · 32,184
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
شوتیفای | اخبار فوتبال
@Shootify · 85,539
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
Futball Premium
@FutballPremium · 15,118
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 September 2026
[ گزارش و فیلم گل ]
@Livooli · 33,040
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
⚽️ فوتبال برتر | فوتبال اروپا
@FootballEvan · 40,613
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 30 August 2026
فان فوتی
@FunFooti · 19,865
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 24 September 2026
Foot Palang
@Foot_palang · 21,762
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
فوتبالیسم
@Footballism1 · 23,210
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 September 2026
ساکر بد | Soccer Bad
@Soccer_bad · 28,747
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
فوتبال نیوز
@footbaallnewz · 29,442
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
فوت‌نیوز | FutNews
@FutNewsCH · 32,471
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 September 2026
توییتر
@Tweeter9 · 39,283
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
Football fuck news
@Football_fucknews · 44,569
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 September 2026
FootSam | فوتسم
@Foot_sam · 31,642
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 638 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sport Bad Tweet” (@SportBadTweet), 137,791 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SportBadTweet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.