⚡️ تجربه ی پیشبینی فوتبال رو تا حالا در یک پلتفرم 100% خارجی داشتی ⁉️ 🌍باواریایی ها یا شاگردان سیمئونه ⁉️ نبرد بایرن مونیخ و اتلتیکو مادرید را در ریتزوبت پیش بینی کنید ✔️ 100% بونوس اولین واریز ✔️ 100% بونوس ورزشی یکشنبه ها 💳 همراه با درگاه فعال کارت به کارت برای مخاطبین ایرانی ⚠️ از همه مهم تر پروموکد هفتگی از 200 هزار تومان تا 200 ملیون تومان 🚀همین حالا ثبتنام کن و و درآمد دلاری کسب کن 👇 📲اپلیکیشن موبایل ر…

Channel
فوتبالیسم
@Footballism1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,210subscribers
+2,306 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001248476302 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Footballism1 |
| Description | فوتبالیسم ✓ فوتبال با حواشی جذاب ✓ همه چی از خبر و گل و... تا دافهای فوتبالی ✓ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Footballism1 |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:28 | 23,210 | -11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:55 | 23,221 | -17 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 23,238 | -8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:46 | 23,246 | -13 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:15 | 23,259 | -11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 23,270 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:15 | 23,279 | -10 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:48 | 23,289 | -10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:05 | 23,299 | -12 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 23,311 | -15 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 23,326 | -9 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:26 | 23,335 | -17 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 23,352 | -14 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 23,366 | -9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 23,375 | -6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 23,381 | -16 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 23,397 | -13 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:37 | 23,410 | -17 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 23,427 | -18 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:08 | 23,445 | first reading |
Engagement
1,704 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.21%
- avg views ÷ 23,210 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 282
- 507 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.44%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 507
- of 1,704 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 410 of 507 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,704 (6 August 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 142,914 |
| Reactions total | 2,933 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 02:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈54,000
- Videos
- ≈18,400
- Links
- ≈475
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 24m
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 242 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,459 reactions across 809 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,324 | 24.3% | |
| 🤣 | 1,263 | 23.1% | |
| 😁 | 717 | 13.1% | |
| 👍 | 675 | 12.4% | |
| 🔥 | 657 | 12.0% | |
| 😐 | 189 | 3.46% | |
| 💔 | 169 | 3.10% | |
| 💩 | 129 | 2.36% | |
| 🖕 | 79 | 1.45% | |
| 👎 | 55 | 1.01% | |
| 🤮 | 35 | 0.641% | |
| 👏 | 33 | 0.605% | |
| 🍌 | 27 | 0.495% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 0.385% | |
| 🤡 | 18 | 0.33% | |
| 🤯 | 16 | 0.293% | |
| 💋 | 12 | 0.22% | |
| 🤬 | 11 | 0.202% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 0.165% | |
| 🌭 | 7 | 0.128% | |
| 8 further kinds | 13 | 0.238% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 812 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,459 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 August 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📲 اپلیکیشن اندروید سایت ریتزوبت 🔥 🚀 وقتی شرط هاتون رو توی ریتزوبت ثبت کنین ، علاوه بر ضرایب بالا ، هفتگی با کد های هدیه کسب درآمد میکنید 🤑 #شرطبندی ♦️ آموزش شارژ حساب با کریپتو ♦️ آموزش شارژ حساب ریالی در ریتزوبت
لامبورگینی جدید اکیتیکه بدجوری خفنه از این مدل فقط یکی تو دنیا وجود داره، این ماشین شخصی سازی شده و به سفارش خودش ساخته شده🔥 @Footballism1
💔4🔥3
عملکرد نیکولاس جکسون توی 7 بازی اخیرش، فردا شب میاد بالا سر بارسا... @Footballism1
🤣2👍1
این واکنش و عصبانیت شدید هالند تو بازی با برایتون که انقدر هافبکای سیتی بد بازی کردن و توپ نرسوندن بهش که اولین شوت تو چارچوبشو تازه دقیقه 62 تونست بزنه و در نهایت 1-0 باختن خیلی وایرال شده؛ بچه غول چه تعصبی داره رو سیتی❤️ @Footballism1
❤3😁1
🔴 مایکل کریک: من بیصبرانه منتظر بازی فردا هستم. شاید با توجه به نتایج و شرایطی که تا الان داشتیم، فکر کنید دیوونهام، اما واقعا برای این بازی لحظه شماری میکنم. @Footballism1
🤣3
کامنت کروس زیر پست بلینگهام😂😂 @Footballism1
😁6
ژائو فلیکس که تو برد 6-2 امشب النصر تو زمین پاختاکور 2 گل و 2 پاس گل ثبت کرد، تو دو بازی آخرش برای النصر، آمار پشم ریزون 6 پاس گل و 2 گل رو ثبت کرده💀🔥 @Footballism1
❤6
بلینگهامم یه دقیقه دخترای جهانو راحت نمیذاره @Footballism1
🤣8💩1
👏یک بار شارژ کن ، دوبار شارژشو این طرح اختصاصی ریتزوبت برای کاربرای فارسی زبان خودش رو از دست نده 🔵اولین پلتفرم جهانی و اسپانسر لیگ هلند محیط امن و حرفه ای برای عاشقان شرط بندی فوتبال ⚡️ واریز آنی با کریپتو ⚡️ تسویهحساب سریع و مطمئن ⚡️ دسترسی آسان و بدون دردسر ⚡️ محیط حرفهای برای شرطبندی و کازینو 🚀 همین حالا ثبتنام کن و تجربهای متفاوت از شرطبندی آنلاین رو شروع کن. 📲اپلیکیشن موبایل برای اندروید 🌐 https://R…
📲 اپلیکیشن اندروید سایت ریتزوبت 🔥 🚀 وقتی شرط هاتون رو توی ریتزوبت ثبت کنین ، علاوه بر ضرایب بالا ، هفتگی با کد های هدیه کسب درآمد میکنید 🤑 #شرطبندی ♦️ آموزش شارژ حساب با کریپتو ♦️ آموزش شارژ حساب ریالی در ریتزوبت
یادش بخیر یه زمانی رودیگر کابوس اسپانیا رو میذاشت زیر سرش و با خیال راحت میخوابید @Footballism1
❤6🤣3💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,704 posts we hold for @Footballism1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دارین دربی میبینین؟
- نه باو کیر تو دربی و لیگ ایران و هرچی که هست69%
- آره میبینم32%
- اوبی میباشم3%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Ritzobet_ir · 39,61869 postsBerryBet IR Official
@BerryBetOfficial · 21,70826 postsمل بت
@melbet_chaneel · 36,0319 postsBetForward بت فوروارد
@betforward · 856,4308 postsربات بت فوروارد
@betforward_bot · 18,7768 posts𝗧𝗮𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗶 | 𝗠𝗮𝗳𝗶𝗮
@tabani_mafia · 33,4976 postsکانال رسمی دربی بت
@DerbyBet_official · 112,3765 postsBetgo
@Betgoir · 46,6123 postsکانال شرطبندی دربی کلاب
@derbybetm · 157,1963 postsAmitisbet | آمیتیس بت
@amitisbet · 4,8832 postsوان ایکس بت | وانيكس بت | 1XBET
@one_Mn85m_xbet · 28,7842 postsAron_Tip
@aron_tip · 31,1971 post𝙈𝙄𝙓_𝙑𝙄𝙋 🍀
@Miix_Viip · 20,7371 post🔰𝙎𝘼𝙁𝙀_𝘽𝙀𝙏🔰
@Mix_Safe · 23,9531 postBet Blinders | بت بلایندرز
@PeakyBetBlinders · 7,8201 postYEKBET - یکبت
@yekbet · 41,4031 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@futballbadtv · 318,827#1
@varzesh3 · 1,302,842#2
@SportBaadNews · 850,345#3
@FutballBadBoys · 107,848#4
@bistodo · 408,725#5
@Barca_We · 278,673#6
@SportBadTweet · 137,791#7
@IR_Times7 · 25,944#8
@Fucks_Newz1 · 4,034#9
@top_footballi · 4,028#10
@Futball180TV · 366,605#11
@FUTBALLI18 · 482,471#12
@bistodo_tweet · 29,389#13
@ft360_ir · 417,695#14
@JiimmyJump · 24,150#15
@EsteghlalFc_We · 350,891#16
@ir_javan · 638,781#17
@TweetyChannel · 819,079#18
@trollfootball_persian · 95,274#19
@Green_Soccer · 45,215#20
@PesPars · 71,545#21
@PL_IRANII · 5,459#22
@fantasiball · 6,682#23
@total_fut · 144,607#24
@FutballPremium · 15,118#25
@irShort · 75,321#26
@EfshaKhabar · 277,101#27
@Shortspor · 93,275#28
@Football_Fan_Tweet · 5,335#29
@Island120 · 48,116#30
@persiansbarcaaa · 25,210#31
@SorkhTotal · 16,706#32
@footballvision2 · 70,782#33
@darknews · 85,552#34
@TrollJavan_Persian · 6,517#35
@FC_Nixon · 12,182#36
@bistodo_ir · 138,166#37
@khabarforieh · 194,939#38
@persianoffline · 731#39
@hamidsaharicartooon · 26,888#40
@SourceShit · 79,573#41
@Hattric_Official · 138,842#42
@HipSoccer · 3,560#43
@Green_Twett · 6,819#44
@SPORTinoTV · 55,891#45
@BarcelonaFCBw · 278,379#46
@KiriFutballl · 104,279#47
@RZAsport · 16,821#48
@OnSoccer · 180,751#49
@Darktwitt1 · 22,712#50
@Football3060 · 39,233#51
@javad_khiabani · 12,914#52
@AfshaHot · 341,803#53
@lashiya_football · 20,895#54
@offside85 · 1,818#55
@RMbadtweet · 978#56
@BarcelonaTweetir · 91,145#57
@Kylian_Mbappe_Iran · 954#58
@Inter_Milan_Iran · 8,003#59
@AloSportNews · 75,986#60
@ParalSport · 18,501#61
@BANGGBALL · 19,551#62
@Nike_twitt · 3,274#63
@amarezaa · 855#64
@rapking · 314,213#65
@drtel · 783,232#66
@alonews · 1,007,670#67
@chekhabarre · 243,778#68
@meme_ol_ski · 219,782#69
@RapGodNews · 185,340#70
@iran_efsha_news · 1,456,330#71
@news_hut · 103,049#72
@EAFC_PRIME · 1,845,037#73
@hey_broz · 10,998#74
@scary_strange · 186,934#75
@Hiphop_Reaal · 104,786#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@IR_Times7 · 25,944
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فوتبالیسم” (@Footballism1), 23,210 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Footballism1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.