16 measurements spanning 16 days, net -639. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,451–42,282 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 06:39
41,547
-73
20 Aug 2026, 20:33
41,620
-78
19 Aug 2026, 19:41
41,698
-66
18 Aug 2026, 16:15
41,764
-40
17 Aug 2026, 18:12
41,804
-37
16 Aug 2026, 15:57
41,841
-85
14 Aug 2026, 20:45
41,926
-55
13 Aug 2026, 11:35
41,981
-38
12 Aug 2026, 11:33
42,019
-49
11 Aug 2026, 13:15
42,068
+11
10 Aug 2026, 13:33
42,057
-33
9 Aug 2026, 11:51
42,090
+12
8 Aug 2026, 10:07
42,078
-50
7 Aug 2026, 13:15
42,128
-57
6 Aug 2026, 11:20
42,185
-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:16
42,186
first reading
Engagement
517 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.48%
avg views ÷ 41,547 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,690
517 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
517
of 517 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 460 of 517 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held
517 (5 August 2026 – 21 August 2026)
Views total
1,391,322
Reactions total
14,948
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 10m
Average length
1m 15s
Measured directly from 104 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,575 reactions across 442 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
4,057
27.8%
❤🔥
3,817
26.2%
👍
2,306
15.8%
👎
1,703
11.7%
💔
548
3.76%
🤬
513
3.52%
😐
499
3.42%
🏆
414
2.84%
👌
285
1.96%
👏
216
1.48%
😱
96
0.659%
😍
65
0.446%
😭
56
0.384%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 460 of the 517 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,948reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 517 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
7️⃣وقت چرخشه! | SCARABTEMPLE
🎰 همین حالا با هر بار شارژ حداقل ۱ میلیون تومان، اسپین رایگان متناسب با مبلغ شارژ دریافت کن!
💰شارژ بیشتر؟ اسپین بیشتر!
🎁 هر چرخش، شانس دریافت جوایز نقدی
⚡️ اسپینهای بیشتر، فرصتهای بیشتر برای کشف جوایز بازی 😳
👾اسکربتمپل، با یک سیستم اسپین پرهیجان و جوایز متنوع: 👇
🔵 نسخه جدید سایت: Sportn5b2.com
🔵 نسخه قدیمی سایت: Sport90.bet
🔗کانال رسمی اسپورت نود:👇
✉️ @Sportnavad
🚨🚨سردار زاهدی بار دیگر در ارتباط با ما اعلام کرد علیرضا بیرانوند سرباز شده و از مهر ماه ( یکماه دیگر ) باید به خدمت مقدس سربازی اعزام شود
🤩@Football3060
🇮🇷کنایه باشگاه چادرملو به داوری بازی با آلومینیوم
⚪️باشگاه چادرملو با انتشار این تصویر نوشت: "جایگاه حفظ سلامت بازیکنان در استانداردهای داوری کجاست؟ بدون شرح، قضاوت با شما!"
🤩@Football3060
🚨🚨عضو کمیته استیناف فدراسیون فوتبال: کمیته استیناف بهعنوان مرجع نهایی صدور رأی در ارکان قضایی فدراسیون، حکم کمیته انضباطی مبنی بر برگزاری دیدار تراکتور و پرسپولیس بدون حضور هواداران در دو فصل متوالی لیگ برتر را تأیید کرده است.
🔴بر اساس این حکم، دیدار پیشرو و بازی برگشت ۲ تیم بدون حضور تماشاگران برگزار خواهد شد و اجرای این حکم نیز بر عهده سازمان لیگ است.
🤩@Football3060
🚨🟡مهدی طارمی با پاسخ مثبت به پیشنهاد الوصل، رسماً راهی لیگ امارات شد و دوران حضورش در فوتبال اروپا به پایان رسید. او حالا بعد از مظلومی، مجیدی، نیکبخت، کاویانپور، مبعلی و خلعتبری، هفتمین ایرانی تاریخ الوصل است و باید خودش را برای تقابل با استقلال و تراکتور در آسیا آماده کند.
🤩@Football3060
😐18😁5❤🔥4🏆1
Signed ⁰⁵ᴀᴅᴅɪᴛɪᴏɴ³⁹
Showing the 12 most recent of 517 posts we hold for @Football3060. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 339,003 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Short sport @Shortspor · 103,810 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Sport Bad Tweet @SportBadTweet · 148,036 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
⚽ Sport Bad News @SportBaadNews · 975,564 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
کانال رسمی باشگاه پرسپولیس @fcpersepolis_club · 205,542 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
کانال هواداران استقلال @es_qb · 4,035,982 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 August 2026
کانال فوتبال برتر️ @Football1bartar · 307,452 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
كانال رسمى باشگاه استقلال @EsteghlalfcTelegram · 238,934 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
Alo Sport الو اسپورت @AloSportNews · 81,964 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Bistodo IR | بیست و دو ⚽️ @bistodo_ir · 136,272 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026
کانال هواداران ارتش آبی استقلال @ss_2e · 1,927,451 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 August 2026
Sikim twiit @SikimTwiit · 78,284 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
هتریک | Hattric @Hattric_Official · 149,139 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
فوتبال برتر ࡆ لیگ 360 ࡆ ورزشی @F0_TB · 992,609 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
اخبار و خبر ورزشی فوتبال سه @varzesh_3i · 172,966 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
فوتبالی| اخبار و خبر ورزشی سه @varzesh3_3o · 287,669 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
بارسا | بارسلونا | Barca @Barca_We · 165,921 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Sikimsportz ⚽️ @SikimSportz · 263,023 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
ورزش سه - جدید @varzesh3_site · 108,374 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
کانال رسمی نود @Navadnewstelegram · 63,360 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
بارسالند | بارسلونا | بارسا @Barcaland_IR · 66,180 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
فوتبال 180 @Futball180TV · 450,661 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 August 2026
کانال اصلی بارسلونا ( بارسا ) @BarcelonaTweetir · 64,904 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
کانال هواداران استقلال @Esteghlallinews · 1,388,688 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid @Realmadrid_we · 134,929 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 60 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فوتبال 3060” (@Football3060), 41,547 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Football3060.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.