Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net +6,079. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,605–25,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 15:01
19,275
-93
16 Sept 2026, 06:38
19,368
-68
14 Sept 2026, 15:21
19,436
-46
13 Sept 2026, 03:16
19,482
-4,323
11 Sept 2026, 06:39
23,805
+9,655
8 Sept 2026, 13:16
14,150
+87
5 Sept 2026, 08:38
14,063
-113
3 Sept 2026, 14:37
14,176
+40
2 Sept 2026, 06:47
14,136
+33
1 Sept 2026, 04:14
14,103
+53
31 Aug 2026, 06:04
14,050
+30
30 Aug 2026, 04:52
14,020
+15
29 Aug 2026, 05:35
14,005
+48
28 Aug 2026, 05:47
13,957
+26
27 Aug 2026, 08:05
13,931
+30
26 Aug 2026, 05:53
13,901
+38
25 Aug 2026, 05:47
13,863
+3
24 Aug 2026, 06:56
13,860
+35
22 Aug 2026, 12:33
13,825
+36
21 Aug 2026, 03:18
13,789
first reading
Engagement
194 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.90%
avg views ÷ 19,275 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 194 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
194 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
121,840
Reactions total
2,328
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
4,333 reactions across 190 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,280
75.7%
👍
210
4.85%
😁
171
3.95%
💯
147
3.39%
🔥
113
2.61%
👌
90
2.08%
💔
90
2.08%
🙏
84
1.94%
😍
49
1.13%
🕊
37
0.854%
🤯
30
0.692%
🆒
29
0.669%
✍
3
0.069%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 190 of the 194 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,333 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 194 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
𝙈𝙄𝙓_𝙑𝙄𝙋 🍀
سوئیس 🇨🇭
هر دو تیم و بالای 2.5 گل 🚩
😎کد #وانیکس : 8PT97
آنالیز : 📈📉
تمام 5 بازی لیگ وادوز در این فصل همزمان BTTS و Over 2.5 شده؛ نتایج این تیم 2-1، 3-2، 3-2، 4-2 و 5-2 بوده و میانگین گل مسابقاتش به 4.4 گل در هر بازی رسیده است.
در طرف مقابل، لوزرن بعد از 5 هفته فقط 5 امتیاز دارد و با 5 گل زده و تفاضل -4، از نظر دفاعی تیم مطمئنی نشان نداده. اگر وادوز مثل بازیهای اخیرش باز هم به گل برسد، شانس عبور این مارکت ب…
𝙈𝙄𝙓_𝙑𝙄𝙋 🍀
اسکاتلند 🏴
برد سلتیک و بالای 2.5 گل 🚩
😎کد #وانیکس : JMHY7
آنالیز : 📈📉
سلتیک شروع بسیار قدرتمندی در لیگ داشته؛ هر 3 بازی ابتدایی را برده و با 8 گل زده و فقط 2 گل خورده بهترین خط حمله لیگ را در اختیار دارد. شاگردان مارتین اونیل در همین مقطع نتایج 5-1 مقابل کیلمارناک، 4-0 مقابل داندی یونایتد و 2-1 مقابل فالکرک را ثبت کردهاند؛ بنابراین توانایی سلتیک برای رساندن مسابقه به حداقل سه گل کاملاً مشخص است.
از ن…
𝙈𝙄𝙓_𝙑𝙄𝙋 🍀
اروپا 🌍
🇧🇪🇧🇪بالای 24.5 شوت بازی 🚩
😎کد #وانیکس : BAT87
آنالیز : 📈📉
⚽️ سنتترویدن – یونیون سنژیلواز
🎯 بیشتر از 24.5 شوت کل بازی
سنتترویدن در شروع فصل بازیهای بسیار پرحجمی از نظر شوت داشته؛ مجموع شوت مسابقات این تیم در 5 بازی رسمی اخیر به حدود 39، 39، 24، 35 و 37 شوت رسیده است. خود سنتترویدن نیز در این بازه مقابل لومل 32، سرکل بروژ 13، اومونیا 16 و 15 و آنتورپ 19 شوت ثبت کرده؛ بنابراین مشارکت این تیم در …
رودینا امروز بازی داره
ولی بازی حذفیه حریفش هم اسپارتاک که زیاد شوت زن نیست ولی تو بازی که داخل لیگ انجام دادن ۲۵ شوت زده اسپارتاک به رودینا
ولی این بازی احتمال استراحت به بازیکنای اصلی هست و عدد ۱۶.۵ هم بالاست خودم میزنم ولی نمیتونم بگم شما هم بزنید چون ریسک های اساسی داره
1️⃣کد وانیکس : SFC87
https://t.me/Miix_Viip
𝙈𝙄𝙓_𝙑𝙄𝙋 🍀
ایتالیا 🇮🇹
بالای 25.5 شوت بازی 🚩
😎کد #وانیکس : LUJV7
آنالیز : 📈📉
هر 3 مسابقه رسمی این فصل ساسولو حداقل 27 شوت مجموع داشته و بازیهای فروزینونه نیز به ترتیب به 39، 31 و 37 شوت رسیدهاند؛ یعنی هر 6 نمونه اخیر دو تیم از خط 25.5 عبور کرده است.
ساسولو با سیستم 4-3-3 آکوئیلانی تیمی شوتمحور بوده و در سه بازی اخیر خودش 18، 22 و 19 شوت ثبت کرده. در سمت مقابل فروزینونه نیز توانایی مشارکت جدی در تعداد شوتها را دارد…
این بازی آمارش فعلا معلوم نیست خلاصه بازی نگاه کردم فقط نیمه اول 5 شوت زده رستوف اونم تو خلاصه بازی دیدم ولی آمار سایت 2 داده نمیدونم قرار مثل سایت یوفا بگامون بدن یا نه
تیم بولو🇹🇷 این فصل مشکلات مالی داره شرایطشون خوب نیست
ولی هنوز ممکنه از طرف دولت یا پولدارای شهرشون حمایت بشن برای جون گرفتن
اگه اتفاق نیوفته از یه جایی به بعد بازیکنا فسخ میکنن میرن و تیم میره سمت بازیکنای جوون و u21 پس فعلا نمیشه مثل آدانای فصل قبل روش مطمئن بود ولی با زمان مشخص میشه خوبه که زیر نظر داشته باشید این تیمو ✅
#AR8
❤20🙏15👌3
Showing the 12 most recent of 194 posts we hold for @Miix_Viip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Miix_Viip edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 194 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 64 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 77 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
آنالیز | پیشبینی | شرطبندی @go_beting · 130,364 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 August 2026
فرم پیشبینی بت | فرم بت | کانال فرم شرطبندی @GapSports1 · 43,402 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
آنالیز شرطبندی Bet @Analizvtabani · 59,025 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
🤡پیشبینی و آنالیز شرطبندی فوتبال 🃏 @jokerbetvip · 126,552 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
شرطبندی | پیشبینی | جام جهانی @hj_rh · 43,120 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
𝗦𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧𝗦 | اسپورت @sports_Gap · 77,748 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
کانال شرط بندی 🔵 گروه شرطبندی تحلیل اموزش بت @help_For_Bet · 107,775 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 26 August 2026
آیسان اسلامی | aisan eslami @aisaneslamitel · 124,954 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
تبانی فوتبال فرم @FixMatchGold · 40,936 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
اعلام بازی های مهم | پیشبینی @pp_67y · 49,646 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
Fuck Bet @FutballFuckbet · 49,221 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
بت وینر 𝘽𝙀𝙏𝙒𝙄𝙉𝙉𝙀𝙍 @betwinner_orge · 131,528 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
کانال رسمی MelBet @meliranclub · 150,737 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
کانال رسمی Bet120x @club120xt · 46,163 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 August 2026
گل فوتبال | 𝗦𝗼𝗰𝗰𝗲𝗿 𝗚𝗼𝗮𝗹 @Soccer_Goalll · 71,844 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
🦅 𝐅𝐋𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐁𝐄𝐓 | فرم پیشبینی 🦅 @flight_bet · 35,311 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 31 August 2026
اخبار فوتبال اروپا | 𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼 𝗙𝗼𝗼𝘁𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗹 @Football_Europea · 108,285 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
EVENT CHECK @EventCheck · 129,510 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
کانال رسمی betfido @betfidomi · 38,514 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
تکبت | Takbet @takbetiran · 40,583 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 30 August 2026
فوتبال جهان | 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗙𝗼𝗼𝘁𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗹 @European_Fotball · 59,882 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026
BetForward بت فوروارد @betforward · 830,656 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
کانال سایت|بت فوروارد| بت فورد | بت فود @betfoods · 89,891 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 August 2026
Betgo @Betgoir · 39,481 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙈𝙄𝙓_𝙑𝙄𝙋 🍀” (@Miix_Viip), 19,275 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Miix_Viip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.