Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for منچستر ایران️

Channel

منچستر ایران️

@Manchesteriran

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,846subscribers

-386 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001006055730
TypeChannel
Username@Manchesteriran
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Manchesteriran

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “منچستر ایران — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

12,84613,23213,0396 August 2026 — 13,232 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,231 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,226 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,219 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,215 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,218 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,217 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,207 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,203 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,201 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,205 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,204 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,198 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,190 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,189 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,204 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,207 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,211 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,223 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,199 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,189 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,148 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,084 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,909 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,846 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 36 days, net -386. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,788–13,290 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 06:5812,846-63
8 Sept 2026, 08:5612,909-175
5 Sept 2026, 03:5513,084-64
3 Sept 2026, 05:5813,148-41
2 Sept 2026, 01:5213,189-10
1 Sept 2026, 03:4813,199-24
31 Aug 2026, 01:4513,223+12
29 Aug 2026, 23:5813,211+4
29 Aug 2026, 00:3513,207+3
27 Aug 2026, 21:4213,204+15
25 Aug 2026, 15:3613,189-1
24 Aug 2026, 17:0613,190-8
23 Aug 2026, 04:1613,198-6
21 Aug 2026, 13:2313,204-1
20 Aug 2026, 13:4313,205+4
19 Aug 2026, 16:5513,201-2
18 Aug 2026, 16:1813,203-4
17 Aug 2026, 16:0713,207-10
16 Aug 2026, 07:1713,217-1
14 Aug 2026, 15:0513,218first reading

Engagement

571 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.3%
avg views ÷ 12,846 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
430 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
434
of 571 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 413 of 430 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held571 (5 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total1,066,677
Reactions total32,882
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
39m 23s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 52 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

44,900 reactions across 547 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14,99733.4%
👍8,81819.6%
🤣8,04317.9%
🔥2,4835.53%
🖕1,8084.03%
👎1,5743.51%
💔1,5723.50%
🤮1,2502.78%
😡6961.55%
🤯6341.41%
😐3510.782%
🍌2800.624%
🗿2640.588%
🤡2630.586%
😭2590.577%
❤‍🔥2330.519%
😍1860.414%
🤔1820.405%
🥴1750.39%
😢1440.321%
18 further kinds6881.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 550 of the 571 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44,900 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 571 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 567 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Manchesteriran. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 571 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,160 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

بيشترين هزینه‌ نقل‌وانتقالاتی باشگاه‌های اروپایی ، بدون در نظر گرفتن فروش بازیکن📉 @Manchesteriran

🤣15🤯7

Signed Mehran

2 Sept 2026, 15:15 UTC≈2,390 views246 reactionsread 2 September 2026

دربيه؟ بتخمم🫡 @Manchesteriran

👍215👎8🤣8🫡84💯3

Signed Mehran

2 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC≈2,770 views85 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

چيدو اوبي به ويليام دوم هير وي گو🔴🤭 @Manchesteriran

👍49😐22🗿6🤣43💔1

Signed Mehran

2 Sept 2026, 13:42 UTC≈2,780 views89 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔴منچستریونایتد؛ خریدهای عجیب ‌و غریب! 📣 آندری سانتوس با ۵۰ میلیون پوند؟ واقعاً؟ شواهد چندانی وجود ندارد که نشان دهد یونایتد این فصل تفاوت زیادی با فصل گذشته خواهد داشت؛ تیمی که همچنان به‌شدت به برونو فرناندز وابسته است تا در لحظات سخت، آن‌ها را از مخمصه نجات دهد. 🔴 در مورد تیم‌های بازنده در پنجره نقل‌وانتقالات: قطعا منچستریونایتد. 📣 عملکردشان واقعاً عجیب بوده است. آن‌ها در این تابستان مثل یک باشگاه بزرگ رفتار ن

👍746👎5🤯3🤣1

Signed Hamidreza Bn

2 Sept 2026, 13:37 UTC≈2,670 views70 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📣 ویلم II با منچستریونایتد برای جذب چیدو اوبی به‌صورت قرضی به توافق رسیده است. تنها انجام تست‌های پزشکی و نهایی شدن مراحل اداری باقی مانده تا این انتقال رسمی شود. ✒️ Voetbal International ✍️ این چه تیمیه دیگه..... حداقل به یه تیم خوب قرض بدید!!! @Manchesteriran

👍52🥴115🤣2

Signed Hamidreza Bn

2 Sept 2026, 13:32 UTC≈2,610 views59 reactionsread 2 September 2026

📣 منچستریونایتد معتقد است برای پوشش پست لوک شاو، گزینه‌هایی مثل نصیر مزراوی و دیوگو دالو را در اختیار دارد و در شرایط اضطراری نیز می‌تواند روی لیساندرو مارتینز، کارلوس بالبا و پاتریک دورگو حساب کند. هری آمس نیز همچنان در تیم حضور دارد، اما دیگو لئون در حال حاضر جایی در این معادلات ندارد. برخی بازیکنان معتقد بودند که جذب یک مهاجم نوک جدید برای تقسیم بار گلزنی با بنجامین ششکو ضروری است. این اتفاق به ماتئوس کونیا و ب

🖕42👍83🗿3🤣3

Signed Hamidreza Bn

2 Sept 2026, 13:29 UTC≈2,380 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📸 تمرین امروز در کارینگتون @Manchesteriran

16

Signed Hamidreza Bn

2 Sept 2026, 13:24 UTC≈2,430 views170 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔴 رالف رانگنیک در سال ۲۰۲۰، یعنی ۶ سال پیش، به‌عنوان سرمربی موقت منچستریونایتد، معتقد بود این باشگاه باید در پست دفاع چپ تقویت شود. 🗣 رانگنیک: مطمئن نیستم لوک شاو در سطحی باشد که برای باشگاهی مثل منچستریونایتد لازم است. @Manchesteriran

👍1528🤣3🤯3🖕2👎1😡1

Signed Hamidreza Bn

2 Sept 2026, 12:08 UTC≈2,640 views202 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

بهترين بازيكن هفته دوم ليگ جزيره برونو فرناندز🎩🔥 @Manchesteriran

178🔥20👍4

Signed Mehran

2 Sept 2026, 11:26 UTC≈2,780 views47 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

مجموع خالص هزینه نقل و انتقالاتی تیم‌های لیگ جزیره💰 @Manchesteriran

🤣38😐81

Signed Mehran

2 Sept 2026, 10:47 UTC≈2,810 views40 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📊ليست پرهزينه ترين خريد هاي ليگ جزيره @Manchesteriran

🤣34😴32🤔1

Signed Mehran

2 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC≈2,920 views205 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📣 🚨 فاز دوم بازسازی منچستریونایتد به پایان رسید. ✅ فاز اول: بازسازی خط حمله ✅ فاز دوم: بازسازی خط میانی ➡️ فاز سوم: متحول کردن خط دفاعی 🎯 هدف یونایتد این است که تا سال ۲۰۲۸ قهرمان لیگ برتر انگلیس شود. 🏆 ✒️Daily Telegraph @Manchesteriran

105🤣96👍4

Signed Hamidreza Bn

Showing the 12 most recent of 571 posts we hold for @Manchesteriran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 20:00 UTCAnonymous Poll1,080 voters approx.

در صورت مصدوميت لوك شاو كدام بازيكن را در پستش مناسب ميدانيد؟

  1. ننه رتكليف80%
  2. ننه برادا27%
  3. ننه ويلكاكس28%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTCAnonymous Poll1,520 voters approx.

با توجه به 2 بازی گذشته کدام گزینه برای زوج تیلمانس عملکرد بهتری داشته؟

  1. مینو97%
  2. سانتوس4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTCAnonymous Poll1,870 voters approx.

نظرتون درباره قرعه كشي و بازيها؟

  1. راحت13%
  2. متوسط57%
  3. سخت33%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTCAnonymous Poll1,660 voters approx.

به کدوم مربی بیشتر امید داشتین و بیشتر از همه نا امیدتون کرد؟

  1. مویس2%
  2. فن خال7%
  3. مورینیو23%
  4. سولسشر16%
  5. تن هاخ25%
  6. خوبه آموریم41%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTCAnonymous Poll1,520 voters approx.

جلوی کدوم اتفاق رو میگرفتی؟

  1. آوردن سولسشر8%
  2. بازگشت رونالدو34%
  3. آوردن تن هاخ55%
  4. آوردن آموریم19%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTCAnonymous Poll1,450 voters approx.

كدام از كيت ها مورد پسندتون هست؟

  1. كيت اول🔴31%
  2. كيت دوم🔵20%
  3. كيت سوم⚪️42%
  4. به من نايكي بدهيد23%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 571 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

منچستریونایتد | منچستر یونایتد
@manchesternews_ir · 32,061
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026
منچستریونایتد | منچستر یونایتد
@UnitedArea · 74,321
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
طرفداری
@tarafdari · 102,371
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
⚽️Dashagh News⚽️
@Dashaghnews · 112,296
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
FootFun | فوتفان
@FootFun2020 · 83,488
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“منچستر ایران️” (@Manchesteriran), 12,846 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Manchesteriran.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.