Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💙 استقلال 💙

Channel

💙 استقلال 💙

@Esteghlalss

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,016subscribers

-299 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001002262658
TypeChannel
Username@Esteghlalss
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Esteghlalss

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 5 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Esteghlalss/280228 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC@mazdak_hattrick/1809707 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC0.99under a minute
@mazdak_hattrick/1809265 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC@Esteghlalss/280181 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC0.982.4 hours
@Esteghlalss/280191 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC@mazdak_hattrick/1809385 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC0.9742 minutes
@Esteghlalss/280206 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC@mazdak_hattrick/1809496 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC0.95under a minute
@mazdak_hattrick/1809667 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC@Esteghlalss/280224 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC0.95under a minute
@mazdak_hattrick/1809426 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC@Esteghlalss/280197 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC0.9556 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mazdak_hattrick9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.95under a minute@mazdak_hattrick (5–4)
@Futbal4fun6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.952 minutesthis entry (4–2)
@navad90com6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.96under a minuteeven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 40 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @navad90com. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,8499,4199,1346 August 2026 — 9,315 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,315 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,326 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,365 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,419 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,240 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,142 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,075 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,995 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,944 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,990 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,274 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,142 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,045 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,962 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,043 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,101 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,954 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,894 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,849 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,109 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,246 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,153 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,081 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,016 subscribers9,0166 August 20261 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 87 days, net -299. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,764–9,505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Nov 2026, 20:279,016-65
30 Oct 2026, 03:499,081-72
27 Oct 2026, 09:469,153-93
24 Oct 2026, 11:379,246+137
21 Oct 2026, 20:579,109+260
18 Oct 2026, 12:178,849-45
15 Oct 2026, 05:408,894-60
11 Oct 2026, 23:178,954-147
5 Oct 2026, 15:199,101+58
27 Sept 2026, 21:199,043+81
18 Sept 2026, 00:388,962-83
13 Sept 2026, 21:589,045-97
9 Sept 2026, 19:169,142-132
4 Sept 2026, 05:179,274+284
31 Aug 2026, 08:438,990+46
28 Aug 2026, 04:048,944-51
25 Aug 2026, 03:368,995-80
21 Aug 2026, 19:389,075-67
18 Aug 2026, 23:149,142-98
15 Aug 2026, 20:279,240first reading

Engagement

381 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 9,016 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
22
of 381 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held381 (5 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total36,410
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 09:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈127,000
Videos
≈22,400
Links
≈3,540

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
38m 47s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2026, 21:21 UTC23 viewsread 3 November 2026
Forwarded from @mazdak_hattrick

💬 ترکیب‌ها، آمار و فرم‌های پیشنهادی رو قبل بازی با هم بررسی می‌کنیم. برای همفکری و تبادل نظر، وارد گروه شو: 🔗 [ورود به گروه] https://t.me/+M_YAiGu22l05YzM0 برای دریافت فرم‌های روزانه، وارد کانال VIP شو.

3 Nov 2026, 21:21 UTC7 viewsread 3 November 2026
Photo

🔥 گزارش عملکرد فوق‌العاده‌ی امروز «تیپستر پرشین» 👑 رفقا سلام امروز بازار شرط‌بندی رو ترکوندیم 🚀 با مدیریت سرمایه دقیق و آنالیزهای تونستیم یک روز رویایی رو رقم بزنیم. 📊 آمار فرم‌های امروز: ▪️ تعداد کل فرم‌ها: ۷ فرم ▪️ فرم‌های برنده: ۶ برد طلایی ✅ ▪️ فرم‌های بازنده: ۱ باخت ❌ ▪️ مبلغ استیک (روی هر فرم): ۱۰,۰۰۰,۰۰۰ تومان 💰 سود خالص امروز: ✨ ۳۳,۶۱۰,۰۰۰ تومان پول تمیز به جیب رف تبریک به همه دوستانی که امروز پا به پای م…

1 Nov 2026, 19:11 UTC≈1,880 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔵👤 درخواست سرمربی استقلال از متدین: در نیم فصل قرارداد آسانی، فرعباسی، اقاسی و فلاح تمدید بشه. 💙 @Esteghlalss 💙

1 Nov 2026, 17:08 UTC≈1,920 viewsread 4 November 2026

🔵👤🇮🇷 حبیب فرعباسی پس از درخشش در بازی‌های اخیر استقلال‌ قرار است به اردوی بعدی تیم ملی دعوت شود. 💙 @Esteghlalss 💙

1 Nov 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,940 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔵میانگین تکل موفق در هر ۹۰ دقیقه؛رزاقی‌نیا در رتبه پنجم 💙 @Esteghlalss 💙

1 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC≈1,880 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔵برنامه سفر استقلال: ساعت 19 پرواز به بصره 🔵کاروان تیم استقلال امروز پس از اتمام آخرین تمرین خود در کمپ مرحوم زنده‌یاد حجازی، به صورت مستقیم راهی فرودگاه مهرآباد خواهند شد تا با پرواز مستقیمی که ساعت ۱۹ امشب انجام می‌شود، تهران را به مقصد بصره ترک کنند و اردوی پیش از بازی خود را در این شهر برپا کنند. 💙 @Esteghlalss 💙

1 Nov 2026, 13:53 UTC≈1,880 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🇶🇦🔵📊وضعیت الشمال رقیب بعدی استقلال در لیگ و نخبگان آسیا در شش دیدار اخیر: 💙 @Esteghlalss 💙

1 Nov 2026, 13:23 UTC≈1,850 viewsread 4 November 2026

🇮🇷🔻لیست جدید تیم ملی ۱۷ آبان رونمایی می‌شود ⚪️پس از پایان و بسته‌شدن پرونده هفته دوازدهم لیگ برتر، فهرست جدید تیم ملی شامگاه یکشنبه ۱۷ آبان اعلام خواهد شد؛ نفرات دعوت‌شده در فیفادی نوامبر راهی تورنمنت چهارجانبه بصره می‌شوند تا شاگردان امیر قلعه‌نویی برنامه آماده‌سازی خود را ادامه دهند. 💙 @Esteghlalss 💙

1 Nov 2026, 10:54 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

▶️ویدیویی کوتاه از مراسم تکریم و معارفه مدیرعامل باشگاه استقلال 💙 @Esteghlalss 💙

1 Nov 2026, 10:20 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 4 November 2026

⚽️غیبت ادامه‌دار میداوودی در سفرهای آسیایی 🔺میداوودی در سفر امروز استقلال به بصره هم حضور ندارد تا برای چهارمین بازی متوالی در لیگ نخبگان آسیا و این بار مقابل الشمال قطر غایب باشد. 🔺باشگاه استقلال از چند هفته پیش به دنبال حل مشکل خروج از کشور میلاد میداوودی بوده اما ظاهرا تلاش‌های باشگاه و شخص میداوودی فعلا نتیجه ‌بخش نبوده و غیبت مربی خوزستانی استقلال کماکان در سفرهای برون‌مرزی ادامه خواهد داشت. 💙 @Esteghlalss 💙

1 Nov 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 4 November 2026

⚽️👤پاداش درخشش در استقلال/ آسانی به آلبانی دعوت می‌شود 🔻با وجود عملکرد مطلوب آسانی در ترکیب استقلال، این بازیکن در فهرست آخرین اردوی آلبانی قرار نگرفت؛ موضوعی که با توجه به نمایش‌های او در رقابت‌های باشگاهی، تا حدودی دور از انتظار بود. با این حال، به نظر می‌رسد شرایط برای بازگشت این بازیکن به جمع ملی‌پوشان کشورش فراهم شده است. 🔻در همین رابطه، اروین باکو، روزنامه‌نگار و کارشناس ورزشی شبکه «Euronews Albania»، از احتم…

1 Nov 2026, 08:17 UTC≈1,730 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

ویدیویی کوتاه از مراسم تکریم و معارفه مدیرعامل باشگاه استقلال 💙 @Esteghlalss 💙

Showing the 12 most recent of 381 posts we hold for @Esteghlalss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @Esteghlalss as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
25 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
20 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

😄 خنده آباد 😄
@khandehabadd · 105,333
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💙 استقلال 💙” (@Esteghlalss), 9,016 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Esteghlalss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.