Posted without readable text

Channel
𝙈𝙄𝙓_𝙑𝙄𝙋 🍀
@miix_viip2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,533subscribers
+3,409 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001445011658 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miix_viip2 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miix_viip2 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 5,533 | +99 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 5,434 | +102 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:40 | 5,332 | +185 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 5,147 | +178 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 11:01 | 4,969 | +251 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 06:54 | 4,718 | -3,635 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 8,353 | +183 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 8,170 | +118 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 8,052 | -6,905 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 14,957 | +12,833 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:22 | 2,124 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:47 | 2,124 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
235 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 200 | 85.1% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 8.09% | |
| 🤪 | 9 | 3.83% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.28% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.851% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.426% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.426% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 235 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
❤15👍2
✅✅✅✅
❤18🤪3☃1
✅✅✅✅
❤15🤪4
✅✅✅✅
❤11🤪2
اسپانیا + آذربایجان برد بارسلونا + برد قره باغ بالای 1.5 🚩 کد وانیکس: KU13C ✅سایت های مورد تایید: 🤩 دانلود اپلیکیشن وانیکس 🤩 ┅━━━━━━━━━━━━┅ 📶 Channel : @Miix_Viip2 ⚫️
❤16👍10
𝙈𝙄𝙓_𝙑𝙄𝙋 🍀 آلمان 🇩🇪 🚩حداقل یک تیم Over 1.5 گل🚩 😎کد #وانیکس : 5SATB آنالیز : 📈📉 🇩🇪 اوسنابروک - اینتراخت براونشوایگ 🎯 گزینه اصلی: حداقل یک تیم بیشتر از 1.5 گل بزند 💰 ضریب: 1.46 شروع فصل هر دو تیم بازیهای پرنوسانی داشته است. براونشوایگ در سه هفته 9 گل زده و 7 گل خورده و نتایجی مثل 6-1 و 3-5 ثبت کرده؛ اوسنابروک هم در دو هفته ابتدایی بازیهای 4-3 و 0-3 داشته است. اوسنابروک با وجود مالکیت پایین، بهطور میانگین حدود 15 ش…
❤12👍4
𝙈𝙄𝙓_𝙑𝙄𝙋 🍀 بلژیک 🇧🇪 🚩هر دو تیم گل میزنند بله 🚩 😎کد #وانیکس : G3LSB آنالیز : 📈📉 🇧🇪 اندرلخت - گنک 🎯 گزینه: هر دو تیم گل میزنند — بله گنک فصل را با ساختاری کاملاً هجومی شروع کرده؛ تیم Jess Thorup در ۴ هفته نخست لیگ 12 گل زده و 8 گل دریافت کرده و در تمام مسابقات موفق به گلزنی شده است. نتایج 2-1، 3-2، 4-4 و 4-0 نشان میدهد گنک توان هجومی بالایی دارد، اما خصوصاً در بازیهای خارج از خانه فضای زیادی هم به حریف میدهد. در دو …
❤12👍2
𝙈𝙄𝙓_𝙑𝙄𝙋 🍀 روسیه 🇷🇺 بالای 12.5 شوت ماخاچ قلعه 🚩 😎کد #وانیکس : GRJ6B آنالیز : 📈📉 🇷🇺 دینامو ماخاچقلعه - رودینا 🎯 گزینه: بیشتر از 12.5 شوت دینامو ماخاچقلعه رودینا یکی از ضعیفترین ساختارهای دفاعی شروع فصل را داشته و در ۶ بازی لیگ به حریفانش بهترتیب 25، 24، 22، 18، 22 و 16 شوت داده؛ یعنی تمام حریفان این تیم از خط 12.5 عبور کردهاند و میانگین شوت دریافتی رودینا بالای 21 شوت در هر مسابقه است. ماخاچقلعه ذاتاً تیم پرشوتی…
❤13🤗2👍1
سلام اساتید 🤨 @Miix_Viip2
❤24✍3
1.61✅✅✅✅✅⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️
❤11
✅✅✅✅✅1.75
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @miix_viip2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Transfeer_IR · 57,0569 posts𝙎𝘼𝙁𝙀_𝘽𝙀𝙏🔥2️⃣
@Mix_Safe2 · 22,8858 postsکام نیوز | CUM NEWS
@CUM_NEWS · 68,4747 postsگزارش ورزشی
@G_Varzeshii3 · 58,9477 posts🔞 Footy hub💦
@footy_hub · 105,1157 postsلیونل مسی | Leo Messi | آرژانتین
@BarcelonaCF10 · 68,8206 postsنقل و انتقالات فوتبال
@Footitransfers · 59,1066 postsاخبار کوتاه ورزشی
@NewShortSports · 583,9196 postsDaf Sport
@Dafsportt · 47,5765 postsلیگ برتر
@LigbartarTVir · 53,2375 posts⚪ Argentina Team | آرژانتین 🔵
@argentina_team · 19,5465 postsFotballbad
@FotballBad_Tv · 138,0174 postsحاجی فوتبالی
@Haji_fotbali · 48,2114 postsEsteghlalPage استقلال پیج
@Ultrataji · 62,8484 postsکشتی آزاد و فرنگی
@koshti_media · 48,4464 posts[ ترول اسپورت ]
@troll_sporrt · 50,9914 postsAlfa FootBall
@AlfaFootBall · 341,3193 posts#بدون_مخاطب
@BedonEMokhatab · 30,1923 postsLeo Messi | لیونل مسی
@Messi_Media · 63,0503 postsطهلیل پیکنیکی
@TahlilPikniki · 64,6713 postsفوتبال تایم | چمپیونزلیگ
@fotball_timee · 35,3843 postsFUNNY SOCCER | فانی ساکر
@funnysoccer · 37,5373 postsبیکینی باتم
@BIKINIBOTTOMHUB · 69,8902 postsBad Soccer
@Bad_Socer · 22,6372 postsبارسلونا 🔴🔵
@CatalanClub_ir · 31,6402 postsالکلاسیکو | 𝐅𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧
@Fotballion · 36,0522 posts🔰𝙎𝘼𝙁𝙀_𝘽𝙀𝙏🔰
@Mix_Safe · 19,1172 postsکانال تلگرام نود 90
@NewsNavadOfficial · 42,6342 postsکانال هواداران پرسپولیس
@Perspolisrfans · 26,0312 posts𝐓𝐞𝐥 𝐙𝐨𝐨𝐧
@V2RTOX · 792 postsورزش3/ورزش 3/ورزش۳/ورزش ۳/ورزش سه
@Varzesh3_onlinei · 53,7812 postsکانال ارتش سرخ پرسپولیس
@artshsorkh6 · 63,7992 postsDark News ⚽️
@darknews · 86,3182 postsورزش 18
@varzeshi_18 · 6,2512 postsکانال هواداری استقلال💙
@ABI_ESTEGHLAL44 · 4751 postبارسالند | بارسلونا | بارسا
@Barcaland_IR · 52,2741 postFootballFuckers
@FutballFuckers · 30,3261 postFutball Bad ultra 🖤| بد اولترا
@Futball_Bad_ultra · 217,0411 postفوتبال ۳۶۵ | Football365
@IRFootball365 · 36,9341 postفوتبال 365
@IR_football365 · 44,6161 postTasiyan | تاسیان
@Tasiyanc · 102,4001 postTouchline
@Touchlline · 56,2281 postپرشینز بارسا | Barcelona | بارسلونا
@persiansbarcaaa · 25,2341 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙈𝙄𝙓_𝙑𝙄𝙋 🍀” (@miix_viip2), 5,533 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miix_viip2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.