National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 12 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 464 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 46 of the 3,003 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 6,830 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 April 2025 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 464, the earliest publisher we hold is @akharinkhabar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 463 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
413 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
126 measurements spanning 94 days, net -175,124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,466,941–1,694,603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 126
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 09:46
1,493,210
-518
7 Nov 2026, 07:26
1,493,728
-25
7 Nov 2026, 05:10
1,493,753
-406
6 Nov 2026, 06:11
1,494,159
-52
6 Nov 2026, 04:19
1,494,211
-303
5 Nov 2026, 06:54
1,494,514
-85
5 Nov 2026, 00:34
1,494,599
-326
4 Nov 2026, 09:06
1,494,925
-83
3 Nov 2026, 23:00
1,495,008
-165
3 Nov 2026, 10:10
1,495,173
-127
2 Nov 2026, 21:06
1,495,300
-133
2 Nov 2026, 11:31
1,495,433
-168
1 Nov 2026, 19:19
1,495,601
-168
1 Nov 2026, 13:16
1,495,769
-1,483
31 Oct 2026, 20:20
1,497,252
-250
31 Oct 2026, 12:37
1,497,502
-316
30 Oct 2026, 19:57
1,497,818
-145
30 Oct 2026, 11:56
1,497,963
-998
29 Oct 2026, 16:54
1,498,961
-91
29 Oct 2026, 10:55
1,499,052
first reading
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 09m
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 237 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 6,983 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (277 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 2,683 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 59 minutes of being posted; a typical post has already reached 50.5% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 98.9% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 22,400 views — 1.50% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 27,457).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
16 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
1,414 reactions across 574 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
749
53.0%
😁
264
18.7%
👍
101
7.14%
👎
101
7.14%
🤬
58
4.10%
🔥
54
3.82%
💔
51
3.61%
😭
11
0.778%
🤝
11
0.778%
🤗
6
0.424%
😱
3
0.212%
🎅
2
0.141%
😘
2
0.141%
❤🔥
1
0.071%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 640 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,414 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 3 November 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴احتمال افت فشار و قطعی آب در آبادان، خرمشهر و شادگان به مدت ۳ روز
آبفای خوزستان:
🔹در پی اجرای عملیات فنی و اصلاحی در تاسیسات و خطوط انتقال آب طرح غدیر از سوی سازمان آب و برق خوزستان، تامین آب ورودی به شهرهای آبادان، خرمشهر و شادگان به مدت سه روز با محدودیت مواجه خواهد شد.
🔹این عملیات از ساعت ۱۳ روز یکشنبه ۱۷ آبانماه آغاز شده و تا ساعت ۲۰ روز چهارشنبه ۲۰ آبانماه ۱۴۰۵ ادامه خواهد داشت.
@newsfori
🔴خط و نشان سخنگوی سپاه: مینها منتظراند
🔹تنگه هرمز تماماً تحت کنترل نیروی دریایی سپاه است و هر شناور متخلف سرنوشتی جز برخورد با مینهای سرگردان در محدوده پرخطر تنگه هرمز ندارد.
@newsfori
🔴واشنگتن پست: وزیر خزانهداری ترامپ از چین خواسته است از نفوذ خود بر ایران برای پایان دادن به جنگ استفاده کند
واشنگتن پست نوشت:
🔹اسکات بسنت، وزیر خزانهداری آمریکا، با حمایت ترامپ با چین تماس گرفته و از پکن خواسته است از نفوذ خود بر ایران برای پایان دادن به جنگ استفاده کند.
🔹چین این پیام را به تهران منتقل کرده
🔹دیپلمات صاحبنفوذ قطری: سران ایران منتظرند ببینند آیا انتخابات واقعاً رفتار آمریکا را تغییر داده یا نه
…
🔴ادعای اسرائیل کاتس، وزیر جنگ اسرائیل:
🔹«ایران در تلاش است تلاشهای خود را برای دستیابی به سلاح هستهای از سر بگیرد؛ آن هم در کنار اقدامات خطرناک دیگری که اسرائیل را در معرض تهدیدی واقعی قرار میدهند. ما نمیتوانیم چنین تهدیدهایی را بپذیریم.»
@newsfori
🔴انفجار سومین نفتکش در تنگه هرمز
🔹روابط عمومی نیروی دریایی سپاه: از ساعات ابتدایی بامداد امروز تا کنون سه فروند نفتکش متخلف در مسیر غیر مجاز تنگه هرمز دچار انفجار و آتش سوزی شدید شده و دود حاصل از آتش سوزی این نفتکش ها آسمان تنگه هرمز را فرا گرفته است.
🔹این نفتکش ها بدلیل خاموش نمودن سامانه های ناوبری و شناسایی خود و شرارت ارتش قاچاقچی و متجاوز آمریکا در آتش در حال سوختن هستند.
@newsfori
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @newsfori. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@newsfori edited 25 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @newsfori as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
2 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
4.7 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
5
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@newsfori named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@madarekemotabar named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026 · confirmed gone 4 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@akhbaretehran_ir named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@akhbaforitehran named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@green_energies1 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@iranpl named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Domains linked from posts
68 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال اخبارفوری ࡆ خبرفوری” (@newsfori), 1,493,210 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/newsfori.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
