Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for گیمفا | Gamefa

Channel

گیمفا | Gamefa

@gamefa_official

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,129subscribers

+1,213 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001006427568
TypeChannel
Username@gamefa_official
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gamefa_official

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Gamefa.com — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

23,90725,14124,5245 August 2026 — 23,916 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,916 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,913 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,907 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,913 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,916 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,924 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,927 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,940 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,941 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,950 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,953 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,948 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,952 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,985 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,015 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,020 subscribers23 August 2026 — 24,024 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,046 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,060 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,068 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,702 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,936 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,000 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,036 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,067 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,087 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,114 subscribers5 September 2026 — 25,141 subscribers9 September 2026 — 25,125 subscribers11 September 2026 — 25,129 subscribers25,1295 August 202611 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 37 days, net +1,213. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,722–25,326 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 14:0125,129+4
9 Sept 2026, 00:1825,125-16
5 Sept 2026, 17:5525,141+27
3 Sept 2026, 15:0025,114+27
2 Sept 2026, 07:5925,087+20
1 Sept 2026, 06:5925,067+31
31 Aug 2026, 08:3625,036+36
30 Aug 2026, 11:4725,000+64
29 Aug 2026, 12:3824,936+234
28 Aug 2026, 11:0424,702+634
27 Aug 2026, 08:4224,068+8
26 Aug 2026, 05:2524,060+14
25 Aug 2026, 01:5624,046+22
23 Aug 2026, 14:4624,024+4
22 Aug 2026, 00:1324,020+5
20 Aug 2026, 19:2324,015+30
19 Aug 2026, 18:2823,985+33
18 Aug 2026, 15:5923,952+4
17 Aug 2026, 18:4623,948-5
16 Aug 2026, 14:3823,953first reading

Engagement

969 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.59%
avg views ÷ 25,129 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,150
734 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
736
of 969 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 710 of 734 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held969 (5 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total846,424
Reactions total10,631
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7h 11m
Average length
3m 34s

Measured directly from 121 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,189 reactions across 902 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,19231.8%
🔥2,39218.1%
👍2,18216.5%
👎1,83913.9%
🤣1,48811.3%
😁4993.78%
😢2321.76%
🤯1961.49%
😐1651.25%
💔40.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 925 of the 969 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,499 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 969 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 964 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gamefa_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 969 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,250 views31 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎮 در GTA 6 می‌توانید سگ‌ها را نوازش و حتی تنبیه کنید 🔻 بازی GTA 6 در نمایش جدید خود نشان داد بازیکنان می‌توانند با سگ‌ها تعامل داشته باشند؛ جیسون هنگام مواجهه با یک سگ، گزینه‌هایی مانند نوازش کردن، سرزنش کردن و بررسی آن را در اختیار دارد. 🔻 این سیستم احتمالاً به مکانیک‌های رفتاری سگ‌ها مرتبط است و گزینه بررسی نیز شباهت زیادی به قابلیت مشابه در Red Dead Redemption 2 دارد؛ با این حال عملکرد دقیق این تعاملات هنوز مشخص

23👎6🔥1🤣1

Signed 𝘌𝘛𝘙𝘒 ‌

3 Sept 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,240 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎮 ریمستر The Witcher 3 چه تغییراتی به همراه دارد؟ 🔻 ریمستر The Witcher 3 علاوه بر ارتقای گرافیکی، تغییرات مختلفی در مبارزات، جابه‌جایی، انیمیشن‌ها و رابط کاربری خواهد داشت. درخت مهارت‌ها نیز بازطراحی شده و افکت‌های صوتی جدیدی برای برخی قدرت‌ها اضافه می‌شود. 🔻 همچنین قابلیت Transmog امکان تغییر ظاهر زره بدون تغییر آمار آن را فراهم می‌کند و فینیشرهای جدیدی به مبارزات اضافه خواهند شد؛ سیستم ردیابی نیز برای تجربه‌ای رو

10👍1👎1

Signed 𝘌𝘛𝘙𝘒 ‌

3 Sept 2026, 09:34 UTC≈1,210 views37 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎮 بازی GTA 6 در کلیپ لو رفته به The Last of Us طعنه می‌زند 🔻 ویدیوی لو رفته GTA 6 نشان می‌دهد جیسون وارد فروشگاهی می‌شود که در ویترین آن بازی‌ای با نام We Came Together قرار دارد؛ عنوانی که ظاهراً اشاره‌ای مستقیم به The Last of Us است. 🔻 روی این بازی عبارت «ریمسترِ یک ریمیک» دیده می‌شود و حتی فونت و رنگ آن نیز به نمونه واقعی شباهت دارد؛ کنایه‌ای به انتشار چندین ریمیک و ریمستر از The Last of Us که با واکنش منفی برخی

😁30👎32🔥2

Signed 𝘌𝘛𝘙𝘒 ‌

3 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,170 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎮 بازگشت Gwent در بسته الحاقی جدید The Witcher 3 تأیید شد 🔻 بازی Gwent بار دیگر در بسته الحاقی Songs of the Past برای The Witcher 3 حضور خواهد داشت؛ این خبر پیش از نمایش تریلر DLC در رویداد Gamescom 2026 منتشر شده است. 🔻 این بسته الحاقی یکی از مهم‌ترین آثار حاضر در Gamescom امسال خواهد بود و بازدیدکنندگان نمایشگاه نیز می‌توانند Songs of the Past را تجربه کنند. 🆔 @Gamefa_official

5👎1

Signed 𝘌𝘛𝘙𝘒 ‌

3 Sept 2026, 09:24 UTC≈1,140 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎥 زک کرگر برای فیلم جدید Resident Evil از نسخه‌های ۴ و ۷ الهام گرفته است 🔻 زک کرگر اعلام کرده برای ساخت فیلم جدید Resident Evil از ریتم و مقیاس Resident Evil 4 و ویژگی‌های شخصیتی Resident Evil 7 الهام گرفته است؛ ترکیبی که قرار است هویت متفاوتی به فیلم بدهد. 🔻 فیلم در حاشیه اتفاقات Resident Evil 2 جریان دارد، اما تأثیر Resident Evil 7 نیز در آن دیده می‌شود؛ به‌خصوص در تمرکز روی شخصیتی معمولی که برخلاف قهرمانان حرفه‌

7👍1👎1

Signed 𝘌𝘛𝘙𝘒 ‌

3 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC952 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎥 دیوید زایاس برای فصل دوم Dexter: Resurrection بازمی‌گردد 🔻 دیوید زایاس بار دیگر در نقش انجل باتیستا برای فصل دوم Dexter: Resurrection جلوی دوربین رفته است؛ او اخیراً در میدان تایمز نیویورک در کنار مایکل سی. هال دیده شده است. 🔻 باتیستا با وجود مرگش در فصل اول همچنان مرده است و مشخص نیست سازندگان چگونه او را به داستان بازمی‌گردانند؛ احتمال حضور این شخصیت در قالب فلش‌بک یا روح مطرح شده، اما جزئیات هنوز فاش نشده است.

7👎1

Signed 𝘌𝘛𝘙𝘒 ‌

3 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC925 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎮 جزئیات ویژگی‌های نسخه PC بازی EA Sports FC 27 منتشر شد 🔻 نسخه PC بازی EA Sports FC 27 با بازنگری‌های فنی مختلف همراه خواهد بود تا بازیکنان بتوانند از حداکثر توان سخت‌افزاری سیستم خود استفاده کنند و عملکرد بهتری داشته باشند. 🔻 همچنین برای سیستم‌های رده‌بالا یک حالت گرافیکی جدید در نظر گرفته شده که با هدف ارائه بالاترین سطح واقع‌گرایی بصری، کیفیت گرافیکی بازی را افزایش می‌دهد. 🆔 @Gamefa_official

6👎3

Signed 𝘌𝘛𝘙𝘒 ‌

3 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC870 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎮 بیش از ۷۰۰ بازی در یک هفته روی استیم منتشر شد 🔻 آمارها نشان می‌دهند بین ۲۴ تا ۳۰ آگوست، تعداد ۷۲۰ بازی جدید روی Steam منتشر شده است؛ یعنی به‌طور میانگین روزانه ۱۰۲ بازی و تقریباً ۴ عنوان در هر ساعت. 🔻 این رقم یک رکورد جدید برای فروشگاه Valve محسوب می‌شود؛ جالب اینکه در کل سال ۲۰۱۳ تنها ۴۳۶ بازی روی استیم منتشر شده بود و تعداد عناوین یک هفته اخیر از آن بیشتر است. 🆔 @Gamefa_official

6👎1🤣1

Signed 𝘌𝘛𝘙𝘒 ‌

3 Sept 2026, 09:21 UTC828 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎮 سازنده The Witcher 3: در کوئست Bloody Baron اشتباهات زیادی کردم 🔻 پاول ساسکو، طراح سابق CD Projekt Red، درباره یکی از خاطره‌انگیزترین مأموریت‌های The Witcher 3 یعنی Bloody Baron گفت که هنگام طراحی آن اشتباهات زیادی مرتکب شده است. این مأموریت در نسخه فعلی حدود چهار ساعت طول می‌کشد. 🔻 ساسکو معتقد است داستان Bloody Baron کیفیت بالایی دارد، اما اگر امروز آن را طراحی می‌کرد، با ریتم و ضرباهنگ بهتری روایتش می‌کرد تا تج

9👍2👎1

Signed 𝘌𝘛𝘙𝘒 ‌

3 Sept 2026, 09:20 UTC801 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎮 ریمستر The Witcher 3 بیشتر شبیه نسخه ۲.۰ است 🔻 ریمستر The Witcher 3 تنها یک ارتقای گرافیکی نخواهد بود و بخش‌های مختلف بازی از سیستم اسب‌سواری تا حالت عکاسی دستخوش تغییر و بهینه‌سازی شده‌اند؛ همچنین ده‌ها ویژگی جدید به بازی اضافه می‌شود. 🔻 سازندگان برای نشان دادن گستردگی این تغییرات، پیشنهاد کرده‌اند به این نسخه مانند The Witcher 3 2.0 نگاه کنیم؛ چراکه طبق بازخوردها، گیم‌پلی یکی از بخش‌هایی بوده که بیشترین انتقاد

9👍1👎1

Signed 𝘌𝘛𝘙𝘒 ‌

3 Sept 2026, 09:14 UTC859 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎮 راکستار سرور رسمی نقش‌آفرینی GTA Online را معرفی کرد 🔻 راکستار از سرور رسمی نقش‌آفرینی GTA Online با نام nopixel V رونمایی کرده است؛ پروژه‌ای که با همکاری مستقیم این شرکت و تیم سازنده NoPixel توسعه پیدا می‌کند. 🔻 این همکاری پس از تصاحب پلتفرم FiveM توسط راکستار شکل گرفته و حالا تیم NoPixel خود را برای انتشار نسخه جدید سرور نقش‌آفرینی محبوبش آماده می‌کند. 🆔 @Gamefa_official

👎1

Signed 𝘌𝘛𝘙𝘒 ‌

3 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC824 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🎮 بازی Star Wars Zero Company ابتدا قرار بود بازی Titanfall باشد 🔻 بازی Star Wars Zero Company در مراحل اولیه به‌عنوان پروژه‌ای در جهان Titanfall به استودیوی Bit Reactor ارائه شده بود و قرار نبود بخشی از دنیای Star Wars باشد. 🔻 گزارش‌ها همچنین نشان می‌دهند بخش زیادی از کارکنان Bit Reactor تنها چند هفته پیش از عرضه به‌دلیل تمام شدن بودجه به مرخصی اجباری فرستاده شدند؛ با این حال موفقیت بازی می‌تواند زمینه بازگشت آن‌ه

1👎1🔥1

Signed 𝘌𝘛𝘙𝘒 ‌

Showing the 12 most recent of 969 posts we hold for @gamefa_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@gamefa_official edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTCAnonymous Poll626 voters

چند روزه گزارش‌هایی از اختلال و کندی اینترنت کاربران دریافت می‌شه. برای اینکه وضعیت رو بهتر بررسی کنیم، لطفاً بگید اینترنت شما در این چند روز چه وضعیتی داشته:

  1. بدون مشکل و عادی17%
  2. کمی کندتر از حالت معمول29%
  3. اختلال و قطعی‌های مکرر33%
  4. اینترنت به‌شدت مختل یا تقریباً غیرقابل استفاده21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 969 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Zoomg | زومجی
@myzoomg · 85,681
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 18 August 2026
Vigiato | ویجیاتو
@vigiatonet · 82,974
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
شهر سخت افزار
@shahrsakhtafzar · 30,634
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 7 September 2026
گیموشن آرت | GamotionArt
@gamotionart · 103,115
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
Zoomit | زومیت
@thezoomit · 131,126
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Game Bad News
@gamebadnews · 105,137
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 August 2026
Shelter DNS | شلتر
@sheltertm · 255,227
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 11 August 2026
30nama
@OfficialCinama · 57,529
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
پادکست، کتاب صوتی
@radioketabdoni · 33,799
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 September 2026
عجیب اما واقعی
@ajiib · 27,227
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
داتیس نتورک 🌏 شبکه - ارز دیجیتال
@datisnetwork · 27,880
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 September 2026
Digiato | دیجیاتو
@Digiato · 113,193
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
CinemaDaily | سینمادیلی
@Cinemadaily · 62,312
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“گیمفا | Gamefa” (@gamefa_official), 25,129 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gamefa_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.