Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 34 days, net -129. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,210–27,379 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 00:22
27,229
-12
5 Sept 2026, 16:18
27,241
-13
3 Sept 2026, 13:38
27,254
-3
2 Sept 2026, 09:54
27,257
-3
1 Sept 2026, 11:04
27,260
-8
31 Aug 2026, 11:04
27,268
-5
30 Aug 2026, 07:48
27,273
-5
29 Aug 2026, 04:17
27,278
-3
28 Aug 2026, 07:34
27,281
-5
27 Aug 2026, 09:43
27,286
-1
26 Aug 2026, 09:25
27,287
-2
25 Aug 2026, 12:45
27,289
-3
24 Aug 2026, 14:58
27,292
-8
22 Aug 2026, 21:44
27,300
-7
21 Aug 2026, 08:43
27,307
-2
19 Aug 2026, 12:02
27,309
-8
18 Aug 2026, 15:34
27,317
-6
17 Aug 2026, 16:54
27,323
-3
16 Aug 2026, 08:12
27,326
-4
14 Aug 2026, 18:07
27,330
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 27,229 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,230
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
28 (15 June 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
29,580
Reactions total
366
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 36s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,982 reactions across 28 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
990
49.9%
👍
369
18.6%
😁
169
8.53%
😢
130
6.56%
😱
68
3.43%
🤔
61
3.08%
😍
50
2.52%
🤮
45
2.27%
🥰
29
1.46%
👎
21
1.06%
🗿
20
1.01%
👏
10
0.505%
🔥
7
0.353%
🤪
4
0.202%
💯
3
0.151%
🤷♂
3
0.151%
🕊
2
0.101%
🤬
1
0.05%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,982 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
واقعا مسخرهست! از صدا سیما گرفته تا گردهماییهای مهم همه تولیدات تصویریشون شده هوش مصنوعی. اونم نه اینکه مثلا کمک گرفته باشنا، نه؛ کلش رو دادن هوش مصنوعی ساخته. از سناریو بگیر تا خود ویدیو. مثلا در الکامپ که یکی از نمایشگاههای مهم فناوریه در ایرانه، وقتی وزیر ارتباطات رفته روی سن همچین ویدیوی مضحکی رو پخش میکنن که در حد کلیپ خانم پَیازه! بعد انگار جومونگ داره خوش آمد میگه. حتی تلاش نکردن مثلا یه نسخهی ایرانی درس…
موشک هدایتشونده اوایل دهه ۱۹۶۰. ببینید وقتی هیچ ریزپردازندهای وجود نداشته، چه مقدار قطعات الکترونیکی نیاز است!!
(کاش هیچ وقت موشکی نبود ، کاش انسانها همو درک میکردن)
کوه صفه اصفهان یه جایی که خیلیها برای تفریح اونجا میرن، بعضیا هم مدیتیشن و یوگا و از این کارا میکنن اونجا. جالبه که این کوه بسیاری از گونههای عقرب و عنکبوتیان زهر دار رو تو خودش داره! همین ماری که میبینید افعی شاخداره و تو همین کوه صفه این عکس گرفته شده! خلاصه که حواستون باشه که خیلی هم امن نیست این کوه برای هرکاری... حتی با اینکه چسبیده به شهر اصفهان
موچی گربهای است که ظاهرش بیشتر شبیه یک اثر هنری است تا یک ، لگوی طبیعی! 🐱✨
ترکیب خیرهکنندهی لکهی سفید روی صورت با خطوط و نشانههای تیرهی خز، ظاهری به او داده که بهسادگی از یاد نمیرود. انگار این طرح با دقت و ظرافت روی بدنش نقاشی شده و همین ظاهر خاص باعث شده موچی خیلی زود توجه کاربران فضای مجازی را به خودش جلب کند.
یه پژوهشی روی ۹ میلیون نفر در آمریکا انجام دادن و فهمیدن رانندگان تاکسی و آمبولانس کمتر از کارکنان در هر شغل دیگری دچار آلزایمر میشن!! علتش مسیربایهای متعددی هست که در روز تو ذهنشون انجام میدن! از اونجایی که ابتلا به آلزایمر هر روز داره بیشتر میشه، توصیه میکنند که سعی کنید گاهی خودتون مسیریابی کنید یا حداقل ابتدای سفر مسیر رو حفظ کنید و از ذهنتون کمک بگیرید تا از این بیماری دورتر بمونید
✍️ مجید میرزایی
این اسب در حالی که صاحبش مشغول پلاککوبی گوساله تازه متولدشده بود، از او در برابر هجوم گاو ماده محافظت کرد! اسبها تقریباً دید ۳۶۰ درجه دارند هیچ شانسی برای رد کردن مخفیانه اسب وجود ندارد!
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @ajiib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دانستنیهای عجیب @Amazingss · 32,758 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 5 September 2026
شگفتیها و عجایب دنیا @ajaiebdonia · 35,889 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
National Geographic farsi @nationalgeographicfarsi · 35,704 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
📚 عجایب جهان 📚 @factpedia · 35,122 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
اطلاعات عمومی @etelaate_omoomi · 95,799 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
عجیب ولی واقعی @ajibvalivaghaei · 493,422 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 August 2026
عجیب ترین ها @irwonders · 443,811 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 August 2026
عکس و کلیپ بازیگران @artist_scoop · 50,377 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 August 2026
آچار فرانسه @wrenchf · 32,001 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
SUPERNOOVA™ @SuperNoova · 43,769 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
😜 جَـفَـرآبـاد 😜 @jafarabad · 53,630 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
🐓 خروس جنگی🎃 @khooroosjangi · 32,847 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026
اطلاعات عمومی ❀ @newmatter · 48,025 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
دنياى گمشده @lostworldss · 33,166 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
کافه روانشناسی @caferavanshenasi · 40,726 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
Civil & Architecture @civil_arch · 74,122 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
😜 خمپاره 😜 @khompare · 43,282 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
دنیای علم و تکنولوژی @Tech_Sci · 36,004 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
🍃طبِ معجزهگرِ سنتی🍂 @samenteb · 81,920 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
خندوانه😄 @khandaavanehh · 30,477 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
پارازیت @Parazit · 248,680 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
جهانهای موازی™ @Parallel_WORLDS · 31,296 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
تـاریخ ایـران بـا نـادر شـاه @naader_shah · 50,102 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عجیب اما واقعی” (@ajiib), 27,229 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ajiib.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.