Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for راهبرد

Channel

راهبرد

@RahbordChannel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

12,155subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001000075602
TypeChannel
Username@RahbordChannel
Created6 November 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RahbordChannel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,15512,21312,1845 August 2026 — 12,207 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,206 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,208 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,209 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,205 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,211 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,212 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,213 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,211 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,207 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,209 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,198 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,191 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,186 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,185 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,186 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,190 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,192 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,190 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,193 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,192 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,189 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,185 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,182 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,166 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,158 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,156 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,155 subscribers5 August 202617 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 43 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,146–12,222 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 11:5612,155-1
15 Sept 2026, 12:5912,156-2
13 Sept 2026, 21:3812,158-8
12 Sept 2026, 02:5912,166-16
9 Sept 2026, 16:2112,182-3
6 Sept 2026, 05:3712,185-4
3 Sept 2026, 21:2012,189-3
2 Sept 2026, 15:5712,192-1
1 Sept 2026, 16:1412,193+3
31 Aug 2026, 18:5412,190-2
30 Aug 2026, 17:2212,192+2
29 Aug 2026, 16:1812,190+4
28 Aug 2026, 18:1512,186+1
27 Aug 2026, 20:0712,185-1
24 Aug 2026, 21:2912,186-5
23 Aug 2026, 07:4612,191-7
20 Aug 2026, 18:0712,198-11
19 Aug 2026, 16:5512,209+2
18 Aug 2026, 20:2712,207-4
17 Aug 2026, 21:3712,211first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 8 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41m 06s
Average length
4m 34s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,831 reactions across 21 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
98553.8%
👍68837.6%
👎683.71%
😁341.86%
😢331.80%
🔥201.09%
🤩30.164%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,831 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
162
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 21 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
110
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RahbordChannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 December 2025 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC≈2,910 views90 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

نفت نجاست شیطان است و ما در این نجاست غرق خواهیم شد! مصاحبه بنده مخلص با اقتصادنیوز: وقتی حرف از نفت می‌شود، یاد گفته الفونسو، وزیر اسبق نفت ونزوئلا و پدر اوپک، می‌افتم که در اظهارنظری مشهور گفت: «نفت نجاست شیطان است و ما در این نجاست غرق خواهیم شد!» شاید نفت ضد آزادی نباشد، ولی باید خیلی مراقب بود، زیرا اسلحه‌ای بی‌نظیر برای تمامیت‌خواهی و عوام‌فریبی است متأسفانه نفت فقط یک عامل در اقتصاد یا حتی سیاست نیست، نفتی

53👍33👎2😁2

Signed Amir Hossein KhaleQi

5 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈4,750 views63 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

قانون طلایی طلا! امیرحسین خالقی، پژوهشگر اقتصاد سیاسی، در برنامه «اکونومی پلیطیک» می گوید برای پیش‌بینی روند طلا، قبل از هر تحلیل باید به یک سؤال پاسخ داد: اعتماد در حال افزایش است یا کاهش؟ به گفته او، هر زمان اعتماد مردم به نظام مالی، دولت و اقتصاد تضعیف شود، تمایل به دارایی‌هایی که ارزش خود را در بلندمدت حفظ می‌کنند افزایش می‌یابد و طلا مهم‌ترین پناهگاه سرمایه در چنین شرایطی است. خالقی توضیح می‌دهد که انسان‌ها برا

46👍17

Signed Amir Hossein KhaleQi

31 Jul 2026, 06:48 UTC≈5,970 views43 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

در باب چین چین چگونه از یکی از فقیرترین کشورهای جهان به بزرگ‌ترین قدرت تولیدی دنیا تبدیل شد؟ و چرا امروز رشد اقتصادی این کشور دیگر مانند گذشته نیست؟ در این قسمت از اکونومی پلیطیک از «قرن تحقیر» و اصلاحات اقتصادی چین آغاز می‌کنیم و سپس به مهم‌ترین چالش‌های امروز این کشور می‌پردازیم؛ از مصرف پایین خانوار، وابستگی به سرمایه‌گذاری و صادرات، تا جنگ تجاری با آمریکا، تعرفه‌ها، عناصر کمیاب، هوش مصنوعی، کریدورهای اقتصادی و

28👍9🔥4🤩2

Signed Amir Hossein KhaleQi

16 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC≈7,410 views41 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

اقتصاد سیاسیِ طلا آیا طلا صرفاً یک دارایی سرمایه‌گذاری است یا آینه‌ای از تحولات ژئوپلیتیک و تغییرات نظم جهانی؟ در این قسمت از «اکونومی پلیطیک» به این سؤال اساسی پاسخ می‌دهیم. بسیاری از فعالان بازار تصور می‌کنند که طلا صرفاً تابع تورم یا نرخ بهره است. اما واقعیت پیچیده‌تر از این است. اگر چنین بود، توضیح بسیاری از جهش‌ها و ریزش‌های بزرگ طلا در دهه‌های اخیر دشوار می‌شد. در این برنامه بررسی می‌کنیم که چه عواملی در پش

30👍10👎1

Signed Amir Hossein KhaleQi

12 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC≈7,300 views125 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

در باب تنگه و باقی ماجرا خوبیت ندارد آدم وارد بیزینس متخصصان فال قهوه شود ولی گاهی گریزی نیست و البته ما همواره محکوم به غافلگیری در برابر آینده ایم. نگارنده این سطور معتقد است که ما روزگار خوشی پیش رو نداریم، جنگی ویرانگر در پیش است که دیر و زود دارد ولی سوخت و سوز ندارد، در کشور ساختارهای موازی برای تصمیم گیری (چه «بدیم بره» و چه جنگ!) بعید است اجماعی شکل گیرد و در نهایت وقتی تصمیم گرفته می شود که دیگر گزینه زیا

82👍32😢6👎4🔥1

Signed Amir Hossein KhaleQi

26 Jun 2026, 17:45 UTC≈7,700 views60 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

دلار و جنگ های نفتی آیا قذافی و صدام به خاطر این کشته شدند که می خواستند نفت کشورشان را با ارز دیگری جز دلار قیمت گذاری کنند؟ آیا هژمونی دلار به دلیل قیمت گذاری کامودیتی ها و به ویژه نفت با دلار است؟ پاسخ یک کلمه ای: خیر! در نخستین قسمت از «اکونومی پلیطیک» درباره «توهم افول دلار» از جنگ های پترودلار گفتیم و بعد عاملی مهمتر را معرفی کردیم: یورودلار. لینک تماشا کانال راهبرد/امیرحسین خالقی @RahbordChannel حمایت ا

👍3617😁4👎3

Signed Amir Hossein KhaleQi

24 Jun 2026, 17:00 UTC≈6,850 views43 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

دلاری که همچنان با ما خواهد بود! بسیاری از تحلیلگران از پایان هژمونی دلار و ظهور نظم پولی جدید سخن گفته‌اند. اما اگر پروژه «دلارزدایی» آن‌گونه که آنها انتظار دارند پیش نرود چه پیامدهایی برای سرمایه‌گذاران خواهد داشت؟ در نخستین قسمت از «اکونومی پلیطیک» درباره «توهم افول دلار» از آینده دلار و هژمونی آن در اقتصاد جهان گفته ایم و اینکه دلار همچنان سهم بزرگی از در اقتصاد جهانی خواهد داشت؛ بعضی پیشنهادها را هم برای سرمای

34👍5🔥2😢2

Signed Amir Hossein KhaleQi

23 Jun 2026, 16:37 UTC≈10,800 views61 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

در باب ترامپیسم ترامپیسم شاید مهم‌ترین چالش نظم اقتصادی جهانی در دهه اخیر است. طرفداران آن معتقدند تعرفه‌ ها و حمایت از تولید داخلی و بازگرداندن صنایع به آمریکا می‌تواند به بهبود اشتغال، امنیت و قدرت صنعتی امریکا کمک کند. اما منتقدان هشدار می‌دهند که این سیاست‌ها شاید در کوتاه مدت بهبود بعضی از شاخص های اقتصادی را به همراه داشته باشند ولی در نهایت به کاهش رفاه مصرف کنندگان، نزول رقابت‌پذیری و کند شدن رشد اقتصاد امری

👍3816👎4😁3

Signed Amir Hossein KhaleQi

22 Jun 2026, 16:45 UTC≈7,650 views63 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

توهم افول دلار آیا دلار باید تاج‌و‌تخت خود را به یُوان واگذار کند!؟ یا داستان هژمونی دلار بسیار پیچیده‌تر از این هاست؟ در نخستین قسمت «اکونومی پلیطیک» به سراغ یکی از مهم‌ترین موضوعات اقتصاد سیاسی جهان رفته‌ایم: هژمونی دلار! در این برنامه بررسی می‌کنیم: • چگونه دلار به ارز مسلط جهان تبدیل شد؟ • بازار یورودلار چیست و چرا بسیاری آن را ستون اصلی نظام مالی جهانی می‌دانند؟ • آیا سلطه دلار در حال افول است یا همچنان آقای

38👍18👎3😁2🔥1🤩1

Signed Amir Hossein KhaleQi

15 Jun 2026, 13:06 UTC≈9,940 views149 reactionsread 2 September 2026

چه می شود؟ صرف تفاهم (اگر امضا شود) یک سیگنال به یانکی ها بود تا آن تصویر اولیه جنگ مبنی بر غیرعقلایی رفتار کردن طرف ایرانی را تعدیل کنند و معامله را جدیتر بگیرند. همین طور یک مانور قدرتمند برای شخص قالیباف که نشان می دهد وی نفوذ لازم را برای پیشبرد اراده اش دارد؛ به هر حال کسی هست که بتوان با او دیل کرد! اگر بتواند قدرتش را تحکیم کند و در صحنه داخلی مخالفان را کنار بگذارد، احتمال توافق بیشتر می شود. اما چنان تح

👍10233👎9😢3😁2

Signed Amir Hossein KhaleQi

14 May 2026, 12:36 UTC≈8,760 views77 reactionsread 2 September 2026

در باب عوامفریبی سیاسیون عوامفریب عالم از اصول مشخصی استفاده می کنند که پیدا کردن مصداق هایش کار سختی نیست: ۱. زیر سوال بردن انگیزه‌ی گوینده وقتی کسی یک استدلال محکم و مستند ارائه می‌دهد، عوام‌فریب نمی‌گوید «این استدلال غلط است.» بلکه می‌گوید: «این آدم چرا این حرف را می‌زند؟ چه کسی پشتش هست؟ چه منفعتی دارد؟» ۲. ایجاد بدبینی نسبت به زمین و زمان عوام‌فریب یک قدم فراتر می‌رود و می‌گوید: همه دروغ می‌گویند، رسانه‌ها ف

👍4233👎2

Signed Amir Hossein KhaleQi

7 May 2026, 11:17 UTC≈9,450 views52 reactions51 Starsread 2 September 2026
Video

در باب روزهای اخیر و املاکی شیردل دوستان مقیم وطن می‌توانند این را در آپارات هم ببینند ویدئو کامل کانال راهبرد/امیرحسین خالقی @RahbordChannel حمایت از راهبرد: https://bit.ly/2Hja5HY

36👎6👍4🔥3😁3

Signed Amir Hossein KhaleQi

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @RahbordChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

خاطرات و خطرات
@khateraaat · 22,210
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
اندیشه
@andiiishe · 33,516
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
Renani Mohsen / محسن رنانی
@Renani_Mohsen · 68,374
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
شبکه توسعه
@I_D_Network · 38,829
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
تاریخ‌اندیشی ــ مهدی تدینی
@tarikhandishi · 111,604
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
اكونوميست فارسی
@economistfarsi · 22,690
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
Classical Music
@classicmusic3 · 40,693
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
اقتصاد به زبان ساده
@eghtesaderooz · 55,846
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
خوانش کتاب برای انسان خردمند
@homosapiensfa · 43,914
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
ترفند مدیریت
@tarfandemodiriat · 103,553
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
اکوتوپیا
@pouriabakhtiari · 23,739
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q140263654 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelAmir Hossein KhaleQi
Descriptioneconomist
X / Twitter@AmirKhaleqi
Official sitehttp://khaleqi.com/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“راهبرد” (@RahbordChannel), 12,155 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RahbordChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.