Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for یادداشت‌های محمد ناطقی

Channel

یادداشت‌های محمد ناطقی

@Nateghi_Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,327subscribers

+723 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001264389871
TypeChannel
Username@Nateghi_Telegram
Descriptionنوشته‌های محمد ناطقی @mohammadnateghi1 اینستاگرام: Instagram.com/mohammadnateghi
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Nateghi_Telegram

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,5688,3277,947.56 August 2026 — 7,604 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,604 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,601 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,590 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,586 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,583 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,581 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,575 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,570 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,568 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,575 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,574 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,573 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,809 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,839 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,945 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,978 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,985 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,984 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,989 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,164 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,201 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,202 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,323 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,327 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net +723. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,454–8,441 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 16:178,327+4
1 Nov 2026, 19:088,323+121
29 Oct 2026, 22:408,202+1
27 Oct 2026, 00:488,201+37
23 Oct 2026, 17:568,164+175
21 Oct 2026, 02:467,989+5
18 Oct 2026, 03:377,984-1
15 Oct 2026, 09:187,985+7
12 Oct 2026, 19:407,978+33
6 Oct 2026, 00:567,945+106
28 Sept 2026, 09:167,839+30
19 Sept 2026, 02:397,809+236
14 Sept 2026, 11:397,573-1
10 Sept 2026, 18:567,574-1
1 Sept 2026, 22:267,575+7
29 Aug 2026, 21:147,568-2
27 Aug 2026, 02:567,570-5
24 Aug 2026, 03:037,575-6
20 Aug 2026, 04:387,581-2
17 Aug 2026, 11:067,583first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
68.8%
avg views ÷ 8,327 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,730
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held37 (19 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total114,510
Reactions total1,935
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 23:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
352
Videos
49
Links
63

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 41s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,766 reactions across 37 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,88950.2%
❤1,37436.5%
👎2907.70%
👏1413.74%
🔥691.83%
👌30.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,766 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 37 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Nateghi_Telegram. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (70.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC≈3,590 views146 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

به نظرم توییت ونس خیلی مهمه و باید بیشتر بهش پرداخته بشه! معاون رئیس‌جمهور آمریکا صریح نوشته دلیل شکست ما جنگ بود؛ حتی گفته اگر فکر می‌کنید این جنگ ارزش از دست دادن سنا برای شش سال آینده رو داشته، بیایید صادقانه از همین هزینه دفاع کنید! حالا واکنش ترامپ رو در این فیلم ببینید. وقتی درباره حرف ونس ازش می‌پرسند، می‌گه: «فکر می‌کنم تا حد زیادی درسته» و به افزایش قیمت بنزین اشاره می‌کنه. یعنی معاون رئیس‌جمهور، یکی از مهم‌…

❤75👍56👏6👎4🔥3👌2

Signed Mohammad Nateghi

4 Nov 2026, 18:11 UTC≈4,020 views95 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

ترجمه توییت ونس رو می‌ذارم چون به نظرم به شدت مهم و جریان سازه! یکی از چیزهایی که تحلیلگران دادهٔ ما با وسواس دنبال می‌کردند، «ترکیب رأی‌دهندگان» بود؛ اینکه آیا ترکیب کسانی که پای صندوق می‌آیند، آن‌قدر به سال ۲۰۲۴ شباهت دارد که جمهوری‌خواهان بتوانند پیروز شوند یا نه. با وجود نظرسنجی‌هایی که از پیروزی قاطع دموکرات‌ها خبر می‌دادند، داده‌ها مدام یک چیز را به ما می‌گفتند: در بعضی ایالت‌ها میزان مشارکت صرفاً قابل‌قبول بو…

👍60❤28👏3🔥3👌1

Signed Mohammad Nateghi

3 Nov 2026, 05:06 UTC≈4,010 views131 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

کسانی که معتقدند جمهوری‌خواه‌ها کنترل سنای آمریکا رو حفظ می‌کنند، با chance of a lifetime خودشون رو به رو شدند چون با قیمت ۲۴ سنتیِ این تصویر، اگر پیش‌بینی‌شون درست باشه، می‌تونند پولشون رو بیش از ۴ برابر کنند! بازار پیش‌بینی فعلاً شانس پیروزی جمهوری‌خواه‌ها رو حدود ۲۴ درصد می‌دونه. فکر نمی‌کنم در خیلی از جاهای دنیا، به‌اندازه قشر خاصی در ایران، نسبت به جمهوری‌خواه‌ها خوش‌بینی وجود داشته باشه! کاش بین چیزی که دو…

❤62👍44👎13👏10🔥2

Signed Mohammad Nateghi

1 Nov 2026, 19:37 UTC≈4,760 views86 reactionsread 5 November 2026

برای بعضی‌ها سؤال بود که چرا این خبر رو گذاشتم و چرا اینقدر مهمه! من معمولا کم پست می‌ذارم‌، پس حتما علتی داشته. دلیلش خودِ عبدل السیده؛ نامزد سنایی که صریحاً مقابل ایپک، لابی حامی اسرائیل ایستاده و خواستار توقف ارسال سلاح به اسرائیله. تقابل او با این لابی، یکی از موضوعات مهم کارزار انتخاباتی‌اش بوده. حالا برخی از رسانه‌ها حدس می‌زنند که اختلاف بر سر اسرائیل به جایی رسیده که هیلی استیونز، نماینده دموکرات و رقیب سا…

👍62❤16👏5🔥3

Signed Mohammad Nateghi

1 Nov 2026, 19:14 UTC≈4,670 views37 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

هیلی استیونز، نماینده دموکراتی که در رقابت درون‌حزبی برای نامزدی سنای میشیگان از عبدل السید شکست خورده بود، حالا رسماً از مایک راجرز، رقیب جمهوری‌خواه او، حمایت کرده! این چرخش فقط دو روز مانده به انتخابات رخ داده؛ آن هم در حالی که استیونز قبلاً از السید حمایت کرده بود. اختلاف‌ها بر سر اسرائیل و یک تبلیغ جنجالی بالا گرفت و در نهایت، برنامه حضور مشترک این دو در یک مراسم انتخاباتی هم لغو شد. تبلیغ مورد اختلاف، هزینه ک…

👍23❤9🔥3👎2

Signed Mohammad Nateghi

31 Oct 2026, 18:43 UTC≈5,090 views83 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

با اینکه اغلب پیش‌بینی‌ها دموکرات‌ها رو شانس اول پیروزی در سنا می‌دونند، CNN هشدار می‌ده اگر خطای نظرسنجی‌های ۲۰۱۸ تا ۲۰۲۴ در رقابت‌های سنای ایالت‌های ترامپی تکرار بشه، جمهوری‌خواه‌ها می‌تونن با ۵۲ کرسی در برابر ۴۸ کرسی کنترل سنا رو حفظ کنند! این با پیش‌بینی پیروزی دموکرات‌ها تناقضی نداره؛ شانس بیشترِ برد، هنوز به معنی برد قطعی نیست. اما به نظرم این جنس هشدارها یک اثر احتمالی دیگه هم دارند: نمی‌ذارند هوادارها قبل از…

👏33👍26❤21🔥3

Signed Mohammad Nateghi

30 Oct 2026, 22:08 UTC≈4,530 views63 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🛑 هوش مصنوعی (قسمت چهارم) قبلاً درباره احتمال حباب در «هوش مصنوعی» نوشته بودم. حالا ریزش سهام فناوری جدی‌تر شده؛ نزدک ۱۰۰ در جریان معاملات ۳۰ اکتبر ۲۰۲۶، نسبت به سقف ۶ اکتبر به محدوده افت ۱۰ درصدی رسید! به نظرم هنوز زوده بگیم حبابی ترکیده؛ حتی زوده با قطعیت بگیم حبابی وجود داشته! صرف پایین اومدن قیمت‌ها، وجود حباب رو ثابت نمی‌کنه. ولی داده‌های جدید دارن نگرانی‌هایی رو که قبلاً مطرح کرده بودم جدی‌تر می‌کنند. برداشت م…

❤38👍21👎2🔥2

Signed Mohammad Nateghi

30 Oct 2026, 15:53 UTC≈4,870 views104 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

طلا به زیر ۳۹۰۰ دلار هم رسید! نقره حتی به زیر ۵۰ دلار! چقدر در مورد ریزش طلا صحبت کردیم و البته همچنان معتقدم این «آخرین» ریزش هست و بعد از اون باید شاهد ادامه روند صعودی بازار طلا باشیم! علت‌های بنیادینش رو توی همین کانال تلگرام نوشتم @nateghi_telegram

👍68❤19👎7👏6🔥4

Signed Mohammad Nateghi

28 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC≈6,340 views60 reactionsread 5 November 2026

نتانیاهو باز هم نخست‌وزیر اسرائیل می‌شود؟ با شمارش نزدیک به 90 درصد آرای انتخابات اسرائیل، نتایج اولیه نشان می‌دهد: 🔹 ائتلاف حامی نتانیاهو: ۵۳ کرسی 🔹 احزاب حامی آیزنکوت: ۴۸ کرسی 🔹 احزاب عرب: ۱۹ کرسی احزاب عرب توانسته‌اند با کسب ۱۹ کرسی، رکورد قابل‌توجهی در این انتخابات ثبت کنند! نکته مهم این بود که مطابق پیشبینی ها هیچ گروهی نتوانست به 61 کرسی برسد! با چنین ترکیبی، هیچ‌کدام از دو بلوک اصلی به اکثریت ۶۱ کرسی موردنیا…

❤35👍20👎3👏2

Signed Mohammad Nateghi

26 Oct 2026, 04:47 UTC≈6,160 views95 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

حدود ۴۸ ساعت تا انتخابات اسراییل مانده و با توجه به اینکه به نظر می‌رسید نتانیاهو خواستار حمله یا افزایش تنش با ایران هست، جنگی رخ نداد. ایال زمیر رییس ستاد ارتش اسراییل هم به نوعی مخالفت تقریبا علنی خودش نسبت به حمله به ایران در شرایط کنونی رو رسانه‌ای کرد! این نکات اگر بازی رسانه‌ای نباشه، نشون می‌ده حدس اولیه ارکان قدرت و مردم حذف نتانیاهو از قدرته! هرچند در مورد انتخابات اسراییل باید بگیم که پیشبینیش کار سختی …

👍71❤15🔥4👎3👏2

Signed Mohammad Nateghi

25 Oct 2026, 08:34 UTC≈6,280 views109 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026
Photo

بازار سرمایه جای عجیبیه؛ جایی که بعضی وقت‌ها می‌شه ترس و طمع رو خیلی واضح روی تابلوی معاملات دید! یکی از نمونه‌های جالب این روزها، سهام فولاد مبارکه اصفهانه! شرکتی که امروز سهامش در محدوده ۴۰۰ تومان معامله می‌شه، در حالی که ممکنه سود تلفیقی اون در سال ۱۴۰۵ به حدود ۱۴۰ تومان به ازای هر سهم برسه! یعنی اگر این سود محقق بشه، نسبت قیمت به درآمد آتی (Forward P/E) با مبنا قرار دادن سود تلفیقی به کمتر از ۳ واحد می‌رسه! من د…

👍76❤21👎4👏4🔥4

Signed Mohammad Nateghi

24 Oct 2026, 18:43 UTC≈6,600 views59 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🛑 بازار بدهی دارد درباره غول‌های هوش مصنوعی هشدار می‌دهد؟ (قسمت سوم) وقتی صحبت از ترکیدن حباب می‌شه همه یاد CDs می‌افتند! چون دقیقا در سال ۲۰۰۸ هم همین اتفاق افتاد! این نمودار بهانه خوبی هست که این موضوع رو هم یاد بگیریم! ساده اش این هست که CDs یا همون هزینه پوشش ریسک نکول بدهی انویدیا، برادکام و اوراکل بالا رفته؛ در اوراکل، این افزایش شدیدتر هم بوده! این نمودار «CDS پنج‌ساله» را نشان می‌دهد؛ قراردادی که به زبان سا…

👏29👍15❤13👎1🔥1

Signed Mohammad Nateghi

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @Nateghi_Telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2026, 15:40 UTCAnonymous Poll1,840 voters approx.

به نظر شما دور جدید درگیری همه جانبه بین ایران و آمریکا شروع می‌شود؟

  1. بله74%
  2. خیر26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

اکوتوپیا
@pouriabakhtiari · 23,447
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Dmsadeqi️️
@dmsadeqi · 19,203
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 September 2026
دور امیر | دورامیر | بفرمایید جام | بفرماییدجام |نیمه شب امیرحسین قیاسی | برنامه پامپ | Backstream Boys | بک استریم بویز
@NimehShaab · 22,571
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 September 2026
علی اوشانی | alioshani
@alioshani · 35,345
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
پادکست دغدغه ایران - کانال رسمی
@dirancast_official · 20,579
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
کانال صادق الحسینی
@Sadegh_Alhosseini · 56,249
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
جواد نصر | سلام بورس
@salam_bourse · 36,531
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
قطب نما(افزایش سواد مالی)
@iranian_economic · 41,302
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 31 August 2026
🌏 پویش ملي صادرات
@Exportcampaign · 22,338
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
تاریخ‌اندیشی ــ مهدی تدینی
@tarikhandishi · 111,338
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“یادداشت‌های محمد ناطقی” (@Nateghi_Telegram), 8,327 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Nateghi_Telegram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.