Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 89 days, net -1,221. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,035–20,622 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 20:08
19,218
-4
3 Nov 2026, 17:18
19,222
+4
2 Nov 2026, 19:27
19,218
-14
1 Nov 2026, 22:06
19,232
-17
31 Oct 2026, 19:11
19,249
-11
30 Oct 2026, 17:29
19,260
-9
29 Oct 2026, 17:31
19,269
-9
28 Oct 2026, 17:47
19,278
-21
27 Oct 2026, 15:09
19,299
-9
26 Oct 2026, 16:11
19,308
-8
25 Oct 2026, 18:25
19,316
-6
24 Oct 2026, 21:10
19,322
-7
23 Oct 2026, 21:25
19,329
-9
22 Oct 2026, 21:58
19,338
-13
21 Oct 2026, 18:18
19,351
-12
20 Oct 2026, 13:00
19,363
-10
19 Oct 2026, 13:09
19,373
-6
18 Oct 2026, 16:28
19,379
-9
17 Oct 2026, 15:39
19,388
-3
16 Oct 2026, 14:21
19,391
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 11 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.2%
avg views ÷ 19,218 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,140
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
35 (11 November 2024 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
49,980
Reactions total
1,131
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
5,939 reactions across 34 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,839
64.6%
👍
2,100
35.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,939 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2024 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
50
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 34 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
18
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dmsadeqi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 November 2024 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🌎 دوره کامل تحلیل اقتصادسیاسی کاربردی
مخاطب عام ، از صفر بدون پیش نیاز
۱ جلسه مفاهیم پایه
۸ جلسه اموزش اقتصادسیاسی ، ابزار ها و روش ها
۱ جلسه اضافه تحلیل بازار ها
همراه با پرسش و پاسخ
برگزاری در کانال تلگرام خصوصی
شروع ۲۵ آبان
پایان ۲۵ آذر
در صورت قطعی نت در اپلیکیشن اختصاصی بنده دوره ادامه پیدا می کنه.
قیمت دوره یک میلیون و هشتصد
ظرفیت دوره ۱۰۰ نفر
برای ثبت نام به شماره
۰۹۳۷۶۲۱۸۹۷۱
در تلگرام پیام بدهید
تحلیل ساده و کاربردی طلا
مدل ارزش سنجی طلا نشان می دهد که قیمت تعادلی مبتنی بر مدل در ابتدای 3 ماهه پایانی سال 1405 ، برابر با 29 تا 30 میلیون تومان برای هر گرم است که بازار در شرایط فعلی ان را با حدود 25 میلیون تومان قیمت گذاری می کند . نکته اینجاست که قیمت تعادلی یک شاخص محاسباتی است و حکم الزامی بازار برای دیدن این عدد نیست . با این حال طبق ازمون های اماری احتمال دیدن قیمت تعادلی در 4 ماه اتی بیش از 80 درصد است .
تحلیل کوتاه بازار سهام | ۲ آبان ۱۴۰۵
امروز شاخص کل با افت حدود ۱٫۶ درصد روی ۸ میلیون و ۴۴ هزار واحد بسته شد. ارزش معاملات خرد (سهام و صندوقهای سهامی) حدود ۴۶ همت بود و بیش از ۸ همت پول حقیقی از بازار خارج شد.
چه میبینیم؟
از خرداد تا مهر، حجم معاملات خرد تقریباً دو برابر شده بود و چند بار رکورد تاریخی زد (حتی بالای ۷۰ همت). اما از اواخر مهر شتاب حجم کم شده. میانگینهای ۵، ۱۰ و ۱۵ روزه همه حول ۴۶–۴۷ همت نشستهاند و…
قول داده بودم بعد از اینکه بهره کافی از مدل ها بردم انها رو به صورت مقاله منتشر کنم تا دوستان و علاقه مندان بتوانند برای مصارف تجاری و اموزشی از ان استفاده کنند . انشالله که روند انتشار مقاله ها بتواند کمکی در راستای پیوند دانش اقتصاد با بازارهای مدرن برای شما عزیزان بکند
مخلصم میلاد صادقی
میانگین سالانه بیتکوین و پول چاپشده
قیمت روزانه بیتکوین پرنوسان است. برای دیدن روند، میانگین ۲۵۵روزه را گرفتیم؛ تقریباً یک سال.
بعد پرسیدیم این میانگین چقدر با حجم پول همحرکت میکند. دو سنجه را مقایسه کردیم:
۱. پول گسترده آمریکا (ام۲)
سری رسمی و زنده. چون ام۳ آمریکا از ۲۰۰۶ قطع شده، از همین استفاده شد.
۲. نقدینگی چهاربلوک دنیا
جمع دلاری آمریکا + چین + حوزه یورو + ژاپن. حدود ۱۰۵ تریلیون دلار. این سری بخشی بازسا…
💰 طلا به کجا می رود ؟
طلا نسبت به دیروز در یک نرخ حدود ۴۴ هزار تومان پایین آمده و در نرخ ظهر کمی برگشته. سکه امامی ۲۶۸٫۵ تا ۲۶۸٫۹ میلیون، بهار حدود ۲۵۹ میلیون، نیمسکه حدود ۱۴۲ میلیون و ربع حدود ۷۶ تا ۷۷ میلیون. اونس جهانی حدود ۴۱۲۳ تا ۴۱۲۶ دلار است، فقط حدود ۱۴ دلار بالاتر از دیروز.
📊تحلیل. طلای داخل امروز دنبال دلار نرفت. دلار بالا آمد، گرم طلا کمی ارزان شد. یعنی حباب یا موجودی بازار پر بوده، نه اینکه روند طلا ش…
🛠بهترین استراتژی فرد، پیشبینی سقف دلار نیست. زنده ماندن قدرت خرید است.
امروز دلار ۲۶۵ تا ۲۶۸ هزار تومان شد، طلا از ۲۶ میلیون گذشت، بورس تا ۷٫۹۱ میلیون رفت و برگشت، و پول حقیقی از سهم به صندوق طلا رفت. کسی که همهچیز را در یک بازار گذاشته، هر روز باید قهرمان همان بازار باشد.
چهار لایه کافی است:
۱. خرج سه تا شش ماه را جدا نگه دارید. این پول سود نمیسازد؛ جلوی فروش اضطراری را میگیرد.
۲. هسته پسانداز را به دارایی …
📊بورس سقف را نگه نداشت
بازار با حدود ۹۸ هزار واحد رشد باز شد و شاخص تا نزدیک ۷٫۹۱ میلیون رفت. تا ظهر برگشت و حوالی ۷٫۷۸۸ میلیون بود؛ فقط حدود ۲۲ هزار واحد بالاتر از چهارشنبه، معادل ۰٫۲۸ درصد. هموزن تقریباً صفر ماند. ارزش معاملات خرد حدود ۶۵ همت بود، ولی حدود ۴٫۱ همت پول حقیقی از سهام خارج شد. ۳۴۱ نماد از مثبت به منفی چرخیدند و بیش از نیمی از نمادها قرمز بودند. بیشترین ورود حقیقی به صندوق طلا رفت.
📊تحلیل: این تأیید…
🛢قیمت نفت الان مثل فنری است که به خاطر ترس از قطع شدن بخشی از نفت خاورمیانه کشیده شده. بازار هر خبر درباره تنگه هرمز، ناوهای آمریکایی یا محدودیت صادرات را سریع در قیمت میگذارد؛ به همین دلیل در چند ماه گذشته از حدود ۶۰–۷۰ دلار به بالای ۱۰۰ دلار جهش کرد و هنوز نوسان شدید دارد.
اگر این ترس کم شود و نفت بیشتری از منطقه خارج شود، عرضه از تقاضا جلو میزند، موجودیها پر میشوند و قیمت معمولاً به سمت محدوده ۷۰–۸۰ دلار برمی…
⚪️سه مسیر قیمت نقره
خط نارنجی سناریوی پایه است: اول افت ملایم به محدوده ۵۸–۶۰، بعد برگشت تدریجی به سمت ۶۵ تا حدود ۹۰ روز بعد.
سبز یعنی نرخ بهره عقب بنشیند؛ قرمز یعنی بهره بالا بماند و کف ۵۵ تست شود. نوار نارنجی کمرنگ همان محدوده محتمل مدل ماست .
@capit_news
بازار کار:
بحران، اشتغال نیست، بحران مزد واقعی است
حداقلبگیر مجرد حدود ۲۲ میلیون میگیرد. سبد ادعایی ۸۰ تا ۹۰ میلیون است. حتی اگر سبد اغراق داشته باشد، شکاف آنقدر بزرگ است که بحث بر سر ۲ یا ۳ میلیون تومان ترمیم دیگر ماهیت اقتصادی ندارد؛ ماهیت سیاسی دارد.
ترمیم مزد در این نقطه دو اثر متضاد دارد:
اگر نیاید، تقاضا برای کالاهای داخلی و خدمات شهری ضعیف میماند. رکود مصرفی زیر تورم پنهان میشود.
اگر بیاید، بنگاه هزین…
❤95👍44
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @dmsadeqi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @dmsadeqi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
IELTSFamily | بيان برتر @ieltsfamily · 21,341 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dmsadeqi️️” (@dmsadeqi), 19,218 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmsadeqi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.