Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ANTI FACT | آنتی فکت

Channel

ANTI FACT | آنتی فکت

@anti_fact

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,996subscribers

-118 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001205121755
TypeChannel
Username@anti_fact
Description+ بررسی فکت های مطرح شده در فضای مجازی + اندراحوالات سواد رسانه و تفکر انتقادی 📕... و اما تاریخ تحریف نخواهد شد (دکتر محمد مصدق) ADMIN t.me/Antifact 🤖 ربات ارسال سوژه : t.me/Antifactbot آدرس سایت : https://anti-fact.com/
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held53
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/anti_fact

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,99610,14710,071.56 August 2026 — 10,114 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,121 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,132 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,147 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,144 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,146 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,142 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,146 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,137 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,134 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,132 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,130 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,128 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,129 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,122 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,120 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,126 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,123 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,122 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,114 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,113 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,108 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,106 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,102 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,098 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,104 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,101 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,097 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,096 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,094 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,075 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,056 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,047 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,041 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,040 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,038 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,032 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,028 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,027 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,019 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,016 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,018 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,019 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,016 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,017 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,018 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,017 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,015 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,013 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,005 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,003 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,001 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,996 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
53 measurements spanning 90 days, net -118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,973–10,170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 21:509,996-5
3 Nov 2026, 01:3110,001-2
2 Nov 2026, 02:4810,003-2
1 Nov 2026, 00:4610,005-8
31 Oct 2026, 01:0110,013-2
29 Oct 2026, 02:3710,015-2
28 Oct 2026, 01:3710,017-1
27 Oct 2026, 03:5710,018+1
26 Oct 2026, 02:0610,017+1
25 Oct 2026, 02:0810,016-3
24 Oct 2026, 01:0010,019+1
23 Oct 2026, 01:4610,018+2
21 Oct 2026, 21:1110,016-3
20 Oct 2026, 19:1610,019-8
19 Oct 2026, 15:0510,027-1
18 Oct 2026, 17:4610,028-4
17 Oct 2026, 16:1710,032-6
16 Oct 2026, 14:2010,038-2
14 Oct 2026, 14:3910,040-1
13 Oct 2026, 01:5010,041first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.9%
avg views ÷ 9,996 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,190
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held55 (19 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total25,520
Reactions total1,559
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 09:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,200
Videos
≈388
Links
≈238

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 59s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,360 reactions across 55 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,44744.1%
❤2,80622.7%
🤣1,76614.3%
😢1,0618.58%
👏4663.77%
😁3362.72%
👎2361.91%
❤‍🔥710.574%
🔥710.574%
🫡260.21%
🥰170.138%
😎150.121%
🗿140.113%
✍80.065%
🏆60.049%
🤔60.049%
🤬50.04%
🎉20.016%
💯10.008%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,360 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 55 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anti_fact. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (37.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 18:44 UTC≈1,510 views216 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

کارزار رضا پهلوی «هر دروغی رو میخواید باور کنید، ولی فریب این احمق رو نخورید»

👍177🤣29👎5❤4🔥1

Signed a

5 Nov 2026, 04:25 UTC≈2,050 views300 reactionsread 7 November 2026

انتخابات آمریکا برای ما خیر و برکاتی ندارد. نه باید بزرگنمایی نمود و نه کوچک‌انگاری؛ چالش‌های ترامپ بیشتر شده اما سیاست‌های آنان دستخوش تغییر، خیر. فشارها ادامه خواهد داشت و ایران برای تثبیت حقوق خود تمام قد دفاع خواهد کرد. آماده هر سناریو خواهیم بود و دشمن این را در جنگ بهتر از هرکسی درک کرده است. راهی جز پذیرش حقوق ملت ایران ندارد و فشارها اوضاع را برای جهان سخت‌تر می‌کند.

👍266❤24👎8🤣2

Signed Amu🇮🇷

5 Nov 2026, 04:19 UTC≈2,210 views255 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

گویا صدام از آن دنیا توئیت زده است... بله؛ این سطح صاف یکی از اهداف استراتژیک و مهم برای حمله زمینی است که دشمن در برنامه‌های ویژه خود؛ خصوصا در روز سوم جنگ رمضان قرار بود اجرایی کند. آنها قصد داشتند با محاصره این محدوده از سمت شمال توسط نیروهای نیابتی و پشتیبانی عملیات ویژه از جنوب اقدام به جداسازی این محدوده از ایران و سپس تصرف سرزمینی آن کنند که مورد بهره‌برداری برای عملیات‌های بعدی علیه ایران شود. اما ای کاش ص…

❤217👍23🔥12👎2😁1

Signed Amu🇮🇷

30 Oct 2026, 17:35 UTC≈3,690 views121 reactionsread 7 November 2026

چرا جریان سلطنت‌طلبی و جریان انقلابی نمی‌توانند حتی با رعایت اصول اولیه گفت‌وگو بحثی سالم را به پایان برسانند؟ من در این نوشته اساسا جانبداری خاصی از هیچ‌ یک از دو جریان سلطنت‌طلبی و انقلابی یا داوری درباره حقانیت سیاسی آن‌ها ندارم(زیرا موضوع متن نیست). صرفا از آنجا که تقابل میان این دو نمونه‌ای ملموس است از آن به‌عنوان مثال استفاده می‌کنم. تقریبا همه ما کم‌وبیش از اختلافات مبنایی میان این دو آگاهیم. این اختلافات صر…

❤‍🔥59👍30❤15👎13🔥2🤣1🤬1

Signed Amu🇮🇷

30 Oct 2026, 14:20 UTC≈3,160 views117 reactionsread 7 November 2026

کی این همه رو میخونه آخه؟ - #سخن_بزرگان - #انگشتان_ادمین

😁69👍22🤣18🥰5❤2🏆1

Signed Amu🇮🇷

30 Oct 2026, 14:15 UTC≈3,260 views53 reactionsread 7 November 2026

● چالش؛ فرصت یا مانع؟ ذهن را نباید مخزنی برای انباشت اطلاعات دانست بلکه مجموعه‌ توانایی‌های شناختی است که می‌توان با انجام تمرین، کسب تجربه و مواجهه درست با چالش‌ها این توانایی‌ها را نیز پرورش داد. می‌توان گفت یکی از چالش‌های مهم ذهن انسان مواجهه با حجم بسیار زیاد اطلاعات، پردازش هم‌زمان محرک‌ها و تشخیص اطلاعات مرتبط از میان انبوه داده‌های دریافتی است. بااین‌حال مسئله مقدار اطلاعات نیست بلکه به نحوه ارائه، سازمان‌د…

❤40👍8👏5

Signed Amu🇮🇷

26 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,870 views219 reactionsread 7 November 2026

همه فکر می‌کنند بر پیکر حقیقت فقط زخم‌هایی بجا مانده از دروغ وجود دارد اما من دیدم روی یکیشان نوشته بود: به گفته منابع آگاه!

👏152👍46🤣14❤3👎3😁1

Signed Amu🇮🇷

20 Oct 2026, 04:02 UTC≈5,770 views278 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

به ایران قسم که زانو نخواهم زد.

❤229🔥33🤣6🥰6❤‍🔥2🗿2

Signed Amu🇮🇷

8 Oct 2026, 07:56 UTC≈6,720 views135 reactionsread 7 November 2026

✍🏻 در عملیات روانی سازندگان پروپاگاندا پاسخ را به مخاطب نمی‌دهند بلکه فقط قطعاتی از پازل را می‌چینند تا مخاطب خودش ناخواسته همان تصویری را بسازد که طراح می‌خواهد. [ مطالعه کنید ]

👍120❤11👏2🤣2

Signed Amu🇮🇷

6 Oct 2026, 18:07 UTC≈7,260 views247 reactionsread 7 November 2026

می‌گویند که گاهی چشمان خود را بر روی زمان حال ببندید؛ نفس عمیق بکشید و چند سالی را به گذشته بروید. سعی کنید خاطرات خوب را لمس کنید و این آرامش قبل از شروع یک خواب کامل است. بهمن ۱۳۹۸: میکروچیپ داخل واکسن‌ها قرار است با استفاده از اینترنت فایوجی شمارا زامبی کنند و بعد از واکسن تا دو سال دیگر خواهید مُرد 

🤣223❤16👎5🥰3

Signed Amu🇮🇷

6 Oct 2026, 17:39 UTC≈7,340 views197 reactionsread 7 November 2026

امان از طاعون و مردک کله کلاغ! جالب است... از خبر شیوع طاعون ریوی در شهر شلخوف استان ایرکوتسک روسیه که شیوع آن هنوز تایید نگردیده چنان می‌ترسیم که از بیماری‌های اطراف خود که جان‌ها گرفته و خواهد گرفت غافل شده‌ایم. حتی با فرض صحت اخبار مبنی بر شیوع طاعون مذکور و لحاظ نمودن مخفی‌کاری دولت روسیه درحال حاضر چیزی برای ترس و نگرانی وجود ندارد مگر آن که عضو افرادی باشید که در محل مذکور و قرنطینه شده باید ماجرا را پایش کن…

👍162❤29👎3🤣3

Signed Amu🇮🇷

3 Oct 2026, 06:17 UTC≈5,730 views74 reactionsread 7 November 2026

● ذهن ما پیش از نقد به فهم نیاز دارد! تجربه‌ی اول‌شخص از یک موضوع و مشاهده‌ی بیرونی همان تجربه اساسا دو سطح متفاوت از مفهوم کلی "شناخت‌" هستند. آنچه یک انسان در درون خود تجربه می‌کند؛ متاثر از متغیرهای ریز و درشتی مانند حافظه، هیجان، سابقه، توجه، انتظار و معانی است که به هر رویداد نسبت می‌دهد. بنابراین ممکن است تجربه‌ی واقعی او با تصویری که ما از بیرون نسبت به آن تجربه می‌بینیم تفاوت قابل‌توجهی داشته باشد. توماس نیگ…

❤54👍9👏8👎2🤣1

Signed Amu🇮🇷

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @anti_fact. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @anti_fact as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

آموزش سواد سایبری
@Cyber_Literacy · 27,899
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
دروغ ها و خرافات ملحدین
@Zandiq_IQ7 · 19,338
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 October 2026
علویات
@alaviaat · 45,332
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
حامین مدیا | صفرتاصد ازدواج
@hamin_media · 19,800
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 October 2026
علیرضا زادبر
@mobahelegharne21 · 37,064
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
آکادمی سربازی‌آسان | دکتر سلجر
@soldier_dr · 38,239
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
استاد علی صفایی حائری (عین صاد)
@einsad · 24,407
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
کتابهای ممنوعه
@ketab_mamnue · 31,287
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 9 September 2026
‌‌ساندیس میم | Sandis Meme
@SANDIS_MEME · 20,859
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 September 2026
مهدیاران | mahdiaran
@Mahdiaran · 37,180
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
جواد موگویی|حرف بی‌حساب
@javadmogoei · 36,442
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
توابین | سيد مصطفی موسوی
@ir_tavabin · 19,873
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 September 2026
اخبار دکتر سعید جلیلی
@jalili_saeed · 21,755
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
وحید یامین پور
@yaminpour · 25,757
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Military Fact | میلیتاری فکت
@military_factt · 22,565
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 September 2026
آ سِد مهدی
@A_seyed_mahdi · 32,452
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
خط انرژی
@khate_energy · 33,308
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
آزاد | Azad
@azadsocial · 38,026
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
سِدخارجی
@sedkhareji · 21,601
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
🌐مطالب تاریخی
@matalebtarikhim · 30,418
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
جدال- علی عليزاده
@jedaal · 57,685
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
مُحَلِّل
@Mohallell · 25,309
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
بنیاد شهید مطهری
@motahari_ir · 20,489
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 September 2026
حسین دارابی
@hosein_darabi · 28,193
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ANTI FACT | آنتی فکت” (@anti_fact), 9,996 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anti_fact.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.