Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,929–22,183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:19
21,958
-10
15 Sept 2026, 13:39
21,968
-13
13 Sept 2026, 18:40
21,981
-3
12 Sept 2026, 00:19
21,984
-8
9 Sept 2026, 14:59
21,992
-42
6 Sept 2026, 09:37
22,034
-7
4 Sept 2026, 03:41
22,041
-12
2 Sept 2026, 20:35
22,053
+15
1 Sept 2026, 18:55
22,038
-5
31 Aug 2026, 17:38
22,043
-9
30 Aug 2026, 18:02
22,052
-5
28 Aug 2026, 16:42
22,057
-1
27 Aug 2026, 18:57
22,058
-7
26 Aug 2026, 19:53
22,065
-8
25 Aug 2026, 16:26
22,073
-2
24 Aug 2026, 17:58
22,075
-5
23 Aug 2026, 02:36
22,080
-11
21 Aug 2026, 13:17
22,091
-9
20 Aug 2026, 13:58
22,100
+1
19 Aug 2026, 15:42
22,099
first reading
Engagement
68 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.5%
avg views ÷ 21,958 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,510
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.989%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 68 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
68 (21 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
139,683
Reactions total
1,382
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 12:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
51m 23s
Average length
2m 42s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,435 reactions across 67 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,567
74.7%
👍
577
16.8%
👎
164
4.77%
💯
63
1.83%
💔
29
0.844%
👏
20
0.582%
🔥
7
0.204%
😡
6
0.175%
🥰
2
0.058%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,435 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭕️ مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِینَ رِجالٌ صَدَقُوا ما عاهَدُوا اللّهَ عَلَیْهِ فَمِنْهُمْ مَنْ قَضى نَحْبَهُ وَ مِنْهُمْ مَنْ یَنْتَظِرُ وَ ما بَدَّلُوا تَبْدِیلاً
🔹با نهایت تاثر و تالم، حیات طیبه درگذشت ناگهانی برادر مجاهد، از فعالان برجسته فرهنگی استان سمنان، مرحوم مغفور آقا مصطفی واحدی را محضر رهبر معظم انقلاب، جبهه فرهنگی انقلاب اسلامی و خانواده محترم ایشان تسلیت عرض میکند.
🔸این بسیجی بیادعا که عمر با برکت خود را صرف انق…
⭕️ #خبر| پشیمانی در سرکشی از خیرخواهی رهبر
💢ملأ مستکبر نصیحت دوست ندارد
🔹این حق کارگزار است که نصیحت بشود، چه از سمت مردم، چه از سمت ولی جامعه؛ هرچند که ملأ، نصحیتکنندگان را هر قدر هم دلسوز و خیرخواه باشند دوست ندارند. اینگونه، با سرپیچی از نصحیت خیرخواه، افسوس و پشیمانی به ارث میبرند؛ مثل عبرت حکمیت، عبرت برجام، عبرتهای دیگر... این سخن جلیلی در جلسۀ 152 حکمت سیاسی بود، جلسۀ دوم حکمت نصیحت.
🔸جلیلی در این جلسه نی…
⭕️ #کلیپ| پیروزی در میدان جنگ، آغاز یک میدان بزرگتر است
🔹پس از شکست عملیات نظامی دشمن، حالا صحبت از طرد اقتصادی ایران میکنند این یعنی دشمنِ مستاصل، آخرین تلاشهای خود پس از شکست را انجام میدهد. البته این تهدیدات درحالی مطرح میشود که سال ۹۷ نیز رئیس فعلی حاکم بر رژیم آمریکا با شعار فشار حداکثری به دنبال صفر کردن فروش نفت ایران بود و حتی در دولت بایدن امتداد پیدا کرد اما به شکست انجامید.
🔸کشوری با ۱۵ همسایه، مناب…
⭕️ #نسخه_کامل| ارائه محمد مهدی عباسی پژوهشگر مسائل آمریکا، با موضوع "انتخابات میان دوره آمریکا و تاثیر آن بر جنگ ایران" در صد و پنجاه و دومین جلسه حکمت سیاسی اسلام در قرآن:
https://www.aparat.com/v/fvei9n8
✅ @jalili_saeed
⭕️ #اطلاع_رسانی| بررسی تأثیر انتخابات میاندورهای آمریکا و تاثیر آن بر جنگ ایران در حکمت ۱۵۲
🔹محمدمهدی عباسی، پژوهشگر مسائل آمریکا، در صد و پنجاه و دومین جلسه «حکمت سیاسی اسلام در قرآن»، به بررسی ابعاد انتخابات میان دوره آمریکا به عنوان پنجره فرصت برای ایران خواهد پرداخت.
🔸صد و پنجاه و دومین جلسه «حکمت سیاسی اسلام در قرآن» با موضوع «نصیحت و وحدت ۲»، سهشنبه ۱۰ شهریورماه، ساعت ۱۷ در حوزه هنری انقلاب اسلامی، سالن مه…
⭕️ #فیلم| کودتای دیماه مقدمه جنگ بود
🔹آتش زدن همزمان صدها مسجد و قرآن، صرفاً یک اقدام پراکنده نیست؛ نشانهای از یک طراحی بزرگتر برای ضربه زدن به پشتوانه اجتماعی و اعتقادی مردم است.
🔸اگر دشمن در حال چیدن مقدمات درگیری و ایجاد فضای آشوب و جنگ است، پاسخ آن عقبنشینی به بهانه دوری از تله تنش نیست بلکه پاسخ، حفظ آمادگی، هوشیاری و حضور مردم در صحنه است.
▫️بخشی از سخنرانی دکتر سعید جلیلی در جمع دانشجویان حاضر در طرح و…
⭕️ #فیلم| بزرگترین فرصت یک نسل
🔹امروز شما دانشجویان در یک «نقطه بزنگاه» تاریخی ایستادهاید؛ نقطهای که میتواند فرصت نقشآفرینی در سطح ملی، منطقهای و حتی جهانی را برایتان فراهم کند.
🔸مسیرتان را متناسب با این شرایط تعریف کنید؛ چه در عرصه فردی و جمعی، چه در رشته تخصصی و چه در مسائل عمومی. تجربه حیات رهبر انقلاب نشان میدهد که حرکت برای خدا، با امید و نگاه به آینده، میتواند یک نقطه محدود را به عرصهای گسترده برای ا…
⭕️ #کلیپ| نصیحت؛ حق مردم در برابر مسئولان
🔹نصیحت در اندیشه سیاسی اسلام، امری یکطرفه نیست؛ همانطور که مسئولان وظیفه دارند خیرخواه مردم باشند، مردم نیز حق و وظیفه دارند کارگزاران حکومت را نصیحت کنند.
🔸این از تمایزهای مهم اندیشه سیاسی اسلام است؛ بنابراین حکومت باید بستری فراهم کند که مردم بتوانند با دلسوزی و خیرخواهی، مسئولان را نقد و نصیحت کنند، نه اینکه اصلِ نصیحت به حاشیه رانده شود.
✅ @jalili_saeed
❤51👍10👎5
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @jalili_saeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
وحید یامین پور @yaminpour · 25,931 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
حمید رسایی @rasaee · 22,666 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
علیرضا پناهیان @Panahian_ir · 64,914 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
عمار مدیا | اخبار انتخابات @entekhabat_akhbar · 25,190 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
امیرحسین ثابتی @sabety_ir · 58,948 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
حامد کاشانى @kashani1395 · 40,771 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
حسین دارابی @hosein_darabi · 28,703 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
استاد محمد شجاعی @Ostad_Shojae · 90,390 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
محمدباقر قالیباف @ghalibaf · 53,345 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
جدال- علی عليزاده @jedaal · 57,028 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
خط انرژی @khate_energy · 38,374 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
کانال رسمی میثم مطیعی @MeysamMotiee · 33,149 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
طب سنتی سورنا @sorenanews · 22,181 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
مسلمان تی وی | Mosalman Tv @mosalman_tv · 22,425 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 September 2026
هُما (واحد خانواده مؤسسه مصاف) @Homa_masaf · 21,832 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
محمدرضا حدادپور جهرمی @mohamadrezahadadpour · 26,496 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Aminikhaah_Media🇵🇸 @Aminikhaah_Media · 26,620 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
RaefipourFans @raefipourfans · 64,483 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
آیت الله بهجت (ره) @bahjat313_ir · 23,443 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
سيدنا | seyedoona @seyyedoona · 63,838 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
اخبار مجلس 🇮🇷 @AkhbarMajles_ir · 73,354 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
Masaf | مؤسسه مصاف @masaf · 188,915 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
کانال خبری رجانیوز @rajanews_com · 49,678 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
حاج مهدی رسولی @mahdirasuli_ir · 69,931 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار دکتر سعید جلیلی” (@jalili_saeed), 21,958 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jalili_saeed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.