Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -16,443. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 241,337–262,712 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 11:56
243,803
-1,084
17 Sept 2026, 02:58
244,887
-624
15 Sept 2026, 04:18
245,511
-519
13 Sept 2026, 12:40
246,030
-1,117
11 Sept 2026, 15:58
247,147
-1,480
8 Sept 2026, 23:21
248,627
-913
5 Sept 2026, 17:38
249,540
-541
3 Sept 2026, 14:19
250,081
-284
2 Sept 2026, 09:58
250,365
-296
1 Sept 2026, 07:06
250,661
-162
31 Aug 2026, 06:25
250,823
-139
30 Aug 2026, 07:06
250,962
-385
29 Aug 2026, 06:55
251,347
-460
28 Aug 2026, 04:04
251,807
-361
27 Aug 2026, 04:33
252,168
-255
26 Aug 2026, 02:36
252,423
-491
25 Aug 2026, 02:12
252,914
-716
23 Aug 2026, 14:44
253,630
-622
22 Aug 2026, 00:57
254,252
-551
20 Aug 2026, 22:12
254,803
first reading
Engagement
976 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.879%
avg views ÷ 243,803 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,140
585 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
585
of 976 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 584 of 585 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
976 (5 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
1,254,124
Reactions total
49,681
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈52,000
Videos
≈24,000
Links
≈92,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6h 06m
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 414 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
77,329 reactions across 956 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
29,899
38.7%
❤
18,939
24.5%
👏
8,012
10.4%
😡
6,195
8.01%
😁
4,370
5.65%
💔
3,089
3.99%
😭
1,901
2.46%
😢
1,602
2.07%
🤮
1,374
1.78%
😍
1,064
1.38%
👎
619
0.8%
😱
213
0.275%
🙏
52
0.067%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 975 of the 976 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78,525 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 976 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حروم زاده اعظم :
خانمها و آقایان،آیا میدانید فقط یک موشک بالستیک یک تنی میتواند سالنی که در آن نشستید را کاملا نابود کند؟
در واقع، دو موشک از این نوع، سازمان ملل را نابود میکنند. اما ایران هزاران موشک بالستیک بزرگ روی سر شهروندان ما در اسرائیل ریخت!
مگه آبگرمکن نبود حمال😂
🗣 Nazi
@twtenghelabi
همین که نماینده استرالیا با ادبیات طلبکارانه از واژه «رژیم» برای جمهوری اسلامی ایران استفاده کرد، نماینده ایران همونجا طرفو نشوند سرجاش
شیرزن ایرانی جلوی لفاظی یه دگوری نبایدم سکوت میکرد
🗣 ندا یزدانی
@twtenghelabi
⭕ واکنش حافظ حکمی، معاون بینالملل وزارت ارتباطات به سخنرانی نتانیاهو در سازمان ملل متحد:
🔸 استفاده تسلیحاتی از تکنولوژی به رکورد جدیدی دست یافت! قصاب غزه به تبلیغ استارلینک رو آورده!
🔸 این وظیفه اتحادیه بینالمللی مخابرات است که تکنولوژیهای ارتباطی را به نحو شایسته تنظیمگری کند!
🔸 استارلینک با مهمترین چالش اعتباری خود روبهروست؛ اینکه مرد پشت فاجعه غزه به تبلیغ و ترویجش بپردازد!
🔸 شبکههای مخابراتی باید خنثی و…
نتانیاهو امروز با بردن یک پیجر به مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل و نشان دادن آن به سالن خالی، داستان انفجار پیجرهای حزب الله را از کارهای خود اعلام کرد.
انفجار پیجرهای در سپتامبر ٢٠٢۴ یا شهریور١۴٠٣ اتفاق افتاد و بعد از آن دو بار در این تریبون صحبت کرده است، چرا اکنون به آن پرداخت؟
راز همه مواضع و گفتمان وی در راستای انتخابات آبان ماه است.در سرزمین های اشغالی هر کس اثبات کند بیشتر آدم کشته یا ترور کرده است به پیروزی نزدیک تر…
اعتراف کارشناس آمریکایی:
ما برای متحدان خودمان فرش قرمز پهن نمیکنیم؛
اما برای چین و روسیه نه تنها فرش قرمز پهن کردیم بلکه افسران ما برای مرتب کردنش زانو میزنند!
چون در این دنیا، حرف اول را قدرت نظامی میزند
🗣 عبـدالمـجید خرقـانی
@twtenghelabi
غم میناب و غم لامِرد توی تاریخ ایران ثبت شده ... این دسته گلایی که پَرپَر شدن توی ذهن هر ایرانی جاودان شدن ...
هلما احمدیزاده فقط داشت توی ورزشگاه ورزش میکرد که با موشک خاص آمریکایی آسمونی شد!
🗣 🎒صَمصام | samsam
@twtenghelabi
شما وقتی سلاح دستت گرفتی و اومدی تو خیابون تبدیل به یک هدف متحرک برای نیروهای مسلح میشی. هر قدر هم به کارکرد سلاح مسلط باشی، اندازهی یک نیروی نظامی ماهر نیستی. ایدهی مسلح کردن معترضین یک ایدهی کثیف برای راه انداختن حمام خون در ایرانه. رضا پهلوی مرزهای وطنفروشی رو جابهجا کرد.
🗣 پشه خسته
@twtenghelabi
هشت نظامی ناو هواپیمابر آبراهام لینکن در جنگ علیه ایران قصد خودکشی داشتهاند.
بارها گفتهام که تاکنون نوک کوه یخ خفت و رسوایی آمریکا بیرون زده است.
داستانهای خشم حماسی ادامه دارد!
🗣️ محمد صرفی
@twtenghelabi
😁51👍5❤3👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 976 posts we hold for @twtenghelabi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
توییتر مقاومت @twitter_Quds · 46,477 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
خیبرشکن @kheybarshekan · 203,657 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
رادار انقلاب @radar_enghelab · 31,222 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
افسران جوان جنگ نرم @afsaran_ir · 255,479 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
ضد اسلام آمریکایی و تشیع انگلیسی @americanislam · 25,387 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
حسین دارابی @hosein_darabi · 28,703 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
محمدرضا حدادپور جهرمی @mohamadrezahadadpour · 26,496 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Roshangari.ir | روشنگری @roshangari_ir · 36,952 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 September 2026
بیداری ملت @bidariimelat · 161,167 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
کانال خبری تحلیلی فتن @fetan · 25,842 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
علیرضا زادبر @mobahelegharne21 · 37,088 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
سِدخارجی @sedkhareji · 21,750 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
فارس پلاس @fars_plus · 33,447 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
ایران تایمز @irantimes_com · 908,215 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
انقلابی نیوز @enghllabi · 24,066 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
فصل بیداری @fasle_bidarii · 25,490 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
وحید یامین پور @yaminpour · 25,931 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
حمید رسایی @rasaee · 22,666 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
انقلابی - لشکر قدس @enghlabi_ir · 70,002 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
چریکهای جنگ نرم @chrik_ir · 29,222 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 September 2026
سيدنا | seyedoona @seyyedoona · 63,838 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
طنز سیاسی دکترسلام @drsalaam · 34,031 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
بیداری ملت @bidari_com · 76,068 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
فرزند ایران @farzandeiran_ir · 26,090 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 70 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“توییتر انقلابی - ایکس” (@twtenghelabi), 243,803 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twtenghelabi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.