National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 94 days, net -791. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,957–25,986 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 00:21
25,076
-11
7 Nov 2026, 16:05
25,087
-5
6 Nov 2026, 14:48
25,092
-13
5 Nov 2026, 11:36
25,105
-12
4 Nov 2026, 10:19
25,117
-5
3 Nov 2026, 13:19
25,122
-13
2 Nov 2026, 11:42
25,135
-10
1 Nov 2026, 12:05
25,145
-6
31 Oct 2026, 11:56
25,151
-10
30 Oct 2026, 09:28
25,161
-8
29 Oct 2026, 08:36
25,169
-11
28 Oct 2026, 08:28
25,180
-5
27 Oct 2026, 11:18
25,185
-3
26 Oct 2026, 10:49
25,188
-9
25 Oct 2026, 12:45
25,197
-4
24 Oct 2026, 16:00
25,201
-11
23 Oct 2026, 16:58
25,212
-6
22 Oct 2026, 14:05
25,218
-2
21 Oct 2026, 06:17
25,220
-2
20 Oct 2026, 01:48
25,222
first reading
Engagement
1,758 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.44%
avg views ÷ 25,076 subscribers
Avg views / post
863
646 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
646
of 1,758 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 635 of 646 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
1,758 (6 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
557,739
Reactions total
13,751
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 21:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14h 48m
Average length
1m 33s
Measured directly from 576 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
20,733 reactions across 986 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,237
30.1%
👍
4,945
23.9%
🤬
3,640
17.6%
😁
2,174
10.5%
👏
1,170
5.64%
😢
938
4.52%
👎
781
3.77%
🔥
485
2.34%
🥰
135
0.651%
🤔
63
0.304%
🤯
60
0.289%
🎉
55
0.265%
😱
27
0.13%
🤩
23
0.111%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 987 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,733 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 3 September 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 54 of 646 posts held from the last 30 days (8.36%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴 شنیدهشدن صدای انفجار در بندرعباس و قشم
▪️دقایقی پیش ساکنان مناطقی از قشم و بندرعباس صدای چند انفجار را شنیدند.
▪️برخی منابع محلی این صداها را ناشی از شلیک تیر اخطار به سمت کشتیهای متخلف در تنگه هرمز میدانند اما هنوز خبر رسمی دراینباره اعلام نشده است.
🔴 @fasle_bidarii | فصل بیداری
🔴 زیرنویس شبکهی خبر؛ ۹ اسفند ۱۴٠۴، ساعت ۹:۴٠ صبح، درخصوص تاکید وزیران امور خارجه ایران و قطر بر اهمیت مسیر دیپلماسی؛ دقایقی پس از اینکه قلب تهران هدف حملات دشمن قرار گرفت و در آن لحظه دیگر خامنه ایِ شهید در میان ما نبود!
🔴 @fasle_bidarii | فصل بیداری
🔴توییت علی قلهکی درباره رایزنیهای بیوقفهی دوحه با تهران؛
پیشنهادات جدید ایران با "عقبنشینی واضح " ترامپ همراه شده
▪️۷ شرط همچنان پابرجاست
▪️آخرین پیشنهادهای مطرح شده قطر؛
۱. #غنیسازیِ ۳.۶۷ ٪ ایران (که توسط عاصم منیر قول داده شد) پذیرفته شود
۲. ۴۰۰ کیلو اورانیومِ ۶۰٪ ایران در داخل رقیق شود
۳.محاصره دریایی ایران توسط آمریکا رفع شود
۴. بخشی از داراییهای ایران آزاد شود(رقمی بین ۶ تا ۱۰ میلیارد دلار)
🔴 @fasle_…
🎥 ️سندرز: آمریکا مایه ننگ است
▪️«برنی سندرز» سناتور منتقد ترامپ: آمریکا تنها کشور بزرگ روی زمین است که مراقبتهای بهداشتی را برای همه مردم تضمین نمیکند. این یک ننگ است.
🔴 @fasle_bidarii | فصل بیداری
🎥مادران مجردی که بچههای خود را به دنیا آوردهاند!!
▪️اگر خدای نکرده این بچهها حاصل رابطه نامشروع باشن، این همه شوق و ذوق داره؟
🔴 @fasle_bidarii | فصل بیداری
🔴ادعای سگ زرد کثیف: در صورت توافق هستهای و بازگشایی تنگه هرمز، حمله مجدد به ایران بسیار بعید است
دونالد سگ زرد، رئیسجمهور آمریکا، در گفتوگو با شبکه سیانان مدعی شد در صورت پیشرفت ایران به سمت توافق هستهای و بازگشایی تنگه هرمز، احتمال حملات مجدد آمریکا به ایران «بسیار بعید» خواهد بود.
▪️سگ زرد گفت: «این موضوع بستگی دارد به اینکه آیا آنها یک توافق بسیار قدرتمند را امضا میکنند یا نه.»
سگ مدعی شد: «در صورت ضرورت …
🔴عراقچی: «پیشنهاد دو روزه» ما روی میز است: آمریکا مطالبات آن، از جمله پایان جنگ در همه جبههها، را بپذیرید و نتایج آن را ببینید.
🔴 @fasle_bidarii | فصل بیداری
🔴کوروش زارعی درگذشت
▪️کوروش زارعی، بازیگر و کارگردان پیشکسوت تئاتر، سینما و تلویزیون درگذشت.
▪️او در سریال یوسف پیامبر(ع) در نقش «لاوی» بازی کرده بود.
🔴 @fasle_bidarii | فصل بیداری
🎥چه جریان و یا افرادی جریان ۹ اسفند را طراحی کردند؟
🔴 @fasle_bidarii | فصل بیداری
👍15❤4😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,758 posts we hold for @fasle_bidarii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fasle_bidarii edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 October 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظر شما، علی دایی و عادل فردوسی پور کجایی هستند که به سرود جمهوری اسلامی ایران احترام نذاشتند؟
افغانی21%
آفریقایی11%
نمیدونم کجایی هستن68%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 3 September 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ایران امروز @iran_emrooz · 19,122 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 October 2026
انقلابی نیوز @enghllabi · 23,697 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
تاریخ پهلوی @tarikhe_paahlavi · 37,432 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
کانال شهید سید ابراهیم رئیسی @raisii_fan · 46,644 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
🌸زندگی مومنانه🌸 @momenane_ir · 32,503 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 4 September 2026
مجلس نیوز @Majlles_News · 22,036 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 September 2026
استاد محمد شجاعی @Ostad_Shojae · 89,151 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 August 2026
Roshangari.ir | روشنگری @roshangari_ir · 36,317 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 September 2026
سپاه قدس🇮🇷 @sepah_qudse · 59,865 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
کانال فرزندان شاهد کشور @FARZANDANESHAHED · 92,873 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗰𝗵.𝗧𝘃 @whichTv · 12,397 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 27 September 2026
استاد عالی @Ostad_aali · 31,251 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
اخبار 20:30 🇮🇷 @akhbaar2030_ir · 61,076 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
خبر فوری @khabar_forl · 239,388 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
عمار مدیا | اخبار انتخابات @entekhabat_akhbar · 24,689 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
انقلابی - لشکر قدس @enghlabi_ir · 68,792 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
کانال آهنگ مازندرانی @ahangmazandaraanii · 46,510 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
آکادمی سربازیآسان | دکتر سلجر @soldier_dr · 37,677 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
RaefipourFans @raefipourfans · 64,277 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
رادار انقلاب @radar_enghelab · 29,065 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فصل بیداری” (@fasle_bidarii), 25,076 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fasle_bidarii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.