International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
57 measurements spanning 89 days, net -755. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,686–40,667 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 17:56
39,799
-6
2 Nov 2026, 15:05
39,805
-13
1 Nov 2026, 11:56
39,818
-20
31 Oct 2026, 11:46
39,838
+4
30 Oct 2026, 08:56
39,834
-10
29 Oct 2026, 09:19
39,844
-13
28 Oct 2026, 06:00
39,857
-37
27 Oct 2026, 02:26
39,894
-16
26 Oct 2026, 01:17
39,910
-18
24 Oct 2026, 23:45
39,928
+24
23 Oct 2026, 20:27
39,904
+7
22 Oct 2026, 23:36
39,897
+1
21 Oct 2026, 21:16
39,896
-11
20 Oct 2026, 19:48
39,907
-8
19 Oct 2026, 21:39
39,915
+25
18 Oct 2026, 21:10
39,890
-3
17 Oct 2026, 23:28
39,893
-10
17 Oct 2026, 02:19
39,903
-13
16 Oct 2026, 05:19
39,916
-6
15 Oct 2026, 07:41
39,922
first reading
Engagement
1,597 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 170 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.27%
avg views ÷ 39,799 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,100
750 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
754
of 1,597 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 747 of 750 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
1,597 (6 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
1,571,886
Reactions total
26,412
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 21:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈20,000
Videos
≈14,300
Links
≈2,270
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4h 08m
Average length
1m 08s
Measured directly from 221 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38,434 reactions across 989 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
11,218
29.2%
🤬
7,472
19.4%
👏
5,812
15.1%
👍
4,491
11.7%
🔥
3,405
8.86%
😁
2,715
7.06%
👎
1,079
2.81%
👌
604
1.57%
💔
596
1.55%
🤔
429
1.12%
😱
324
0.843%
😢
289
0.752%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 989 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38,434 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 12 September 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴 این گزارش واقعاً در وبسایت رسمی «مؤسسه بینالمللی مطالعات راهبردی» (IISS) مستقر در لندن منتشر شده است.
۱. منبع اصلی: مؤسسه IISS
عنوان گزارش:
The US, the Gulf States and the Making of a Post-American Gulf
🔻 ترجمه: «آمریکا، کشورهای خلیج فارس و شکلگیری خلیج فارسِ پساآمریکایی»
تاریخ انتشار: ۳۰ اکتبر ۲۰۲۶ (۸ آبان ۱۴۰۵)
🔻 مطالعه گزارش اصلی در وبسایت رسمی IISS
🔻 این گزارش بخشی از مجموعه پژوهشی بزرگتر با عنوان T…
🔴 «ایالت آیووا موظف شد به شعبه محلی معبد شیطان (The Satanic Temple) اجازه دهد
🔻 مراسم تعطیلات دسامبر ۲۰۲۶ خود را برگزار کند.»
زیرعنوان:
🔻 «این یک پیروزی برای آزادی مذهبی در ایالت آیووا است.»
توضیح: معبد شیطان (The Satanic Temple) یک سازمان مذهبی و مدنی در آمریکاست که بر جدایی دین از حکومت و برابری حقوق مذهبی تأکید دارد.
🔻 عبارت Ordered to Allow نشان میدهد که طبق ادعای تیتر، مرجع صلاحیتداری ایالت آیووا را ملزم ک…
رسانههای آمریکایی:
اسرائیل به ایالات متحده اطلاع داده است که ایران در حال بررسی استفاده از سلاحهای شیمیایی است. بر اساس این گزارشها، تلآویو اطلاعات جاسوسی ادعایی را با واشنگتن به اشتراک گذاشته که نشان میدهد ایران به استفاده از سلاحهای شیمیایی علیه دشمنانش فکر میکند؛ اطلاعاتی که با ابراز نگرانی برخی از مقامات آمریکایی و تردید شدید برخی دیگر مواجه شده است
🖼سرلشکر رضایی: پاسخ آمریکا به حقوق و مطالبات ایران قانعکننده نبود و آنها باید کامل و صریح ۷ شرط ایران را پاسخ داده و به آن عمل کنند؛ تنها در این صورت تنگهٔ هرمز باز خواهد شد.
👏47❤4🤔2😁2
Signed Yamahdi
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,597 posts we hold for @worldwar3ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
محمد مهدی بابایی - اخبار جنگ @m_Mahdibaba · 138,648#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
انصارالمهدے(عج) @alavion313 · 18,584 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
فاتحین نیوز-اخبارجنگ @fateheinn_news · 92,161 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
مطالعات رژیم صهیونیستی @Israel_Studies · 29,349 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
آنتی ایلومیناتی @antiluminati · 33,355 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
🔸صائب بن مالک🔸"باید برخاست" @mahdaviatakhbar · 59,508 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
🔸کیسان ابوعمره🔸 @mahdaviatsiasi · 167,749 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
ظهور نزدیک است ... @Zohour_I12 · 31,499 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
مهدویت استاد رائفی پور @raefipoor_Mahdaviat · 27,131 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
امپراتوری مقاومت @mojahedin_iran · 28,395 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
ناب جهادی @nabjahadiii · 52,239 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
دیدگاه نو @didgah257 · 75,010 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
تحولات جهان @tahavolatworld · 56,792 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
محمد مهدی بابایی - اخبار جنگ @m_Mahdibaba · 138,648 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
🇮🇷(ن.م.) نیروهای مسلح جمهوری اسلامی ایران،Iranian Armed Forces 🇮🇷👮♂🇮🇷 @Nirouhaye_mosallah312 · 50,401 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
رسانه خبری فتح @news_fath · 19,668 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
ضد اسلام آمریکایی و تشیع انگلیسی @americanislam · 25,014 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
اخبار بدون تعارف✔ @bedun_taarof · 40,241 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 27 August 2026
🚩سپاه سایبری ایران 🇮🇷 @sepah_cyberi_iran · 53,461 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
RaefipourFans @raefipourfans · 64,246 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
🇮🇷چریک مدیا🏴 @charik_media · 65,371 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
نظامی ترین @nezamitarin · 85,389 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
مقاومت تا ظهور @moghavemattazohur · 22,035 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
امام مهدی عج @emammahdi · 32,656 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
سپاه پاسداران @sepahp_ir · 35,727 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 96 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جنگ جهانی سوم WW3” (@worldwar3ir), 39,799 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/worldwar3ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.